Acoustic Tag Monitoring for Napa River Steelhead at the Napa Plant Site Year One Preliminary Results Presented to Napa Sonoma Marsh Restoration Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.
Advertisements

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
Funding Monitoring in 2006 – the Programs role in a West Coast Partnership November 16, 2005.
NOAA Restoration Center
Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction program 18 October, 2012 Portland, Oregon Howie Wright.
Using the Open Standards to Advance Puget Sound Recovery Kari Stiles, PhD Puget Sound Partnership Conservation Measures Partnership Oct 7-9, 2014.
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Generating New Value for Conservation.
Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.
Tagging  Fish are captured via angling & implanted with a VEMCO acoustic transmitter (V13, V9, or V7) – (Figure 4).  Specific age classes are targeted.
Management strategies for balancing hatchery functions with natural fish protections Brad Cavallo.
Elkhorn Slough Tidal Wetland Plan Barb Peichel October 13, 2004 Tidal Wetland Plan Coordinator Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve.
“BOOM OR BUST”: RESTORING BAY SCALLOP POPULATIONS THROUGH THE RELEASE OF COMPETENT LARVAE. ARE CONTAINMENT BOOMS NECESSARY? Jay R. Leverone Stephen P.
Habitat Restoration in the Commencement Bay Nearshore & Tidelands Area.
NOAA’s Habitat Blueprint- a multiagency approach to climate adaptation and increasing resiliency along the Sonoma coast Sonoma Adaptation Forum April 8,
Stock Status of Steelhead In California Katie Perry, California Department of Fish and Game.
Combining PIT Tags with Scale Reading to Better Understand the Life History of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Douglas Marsh and William Muir - NOAA Fisheries.
Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency.
Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center Presentation before Washington State House Committee on Technology, Energy, and Communications Northwest.
Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.
Documenting O. mykiss life histories in the White Salmon River prior to the reintroduction of anadromous fish above Condit Dam. Brady Allen and Patrick.
Periodic Review of the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary Comments of The Bay Institute on.
ESA-listed Snake River Salmon: What’s the link to Snake River dams? John G. Williams NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center Seattle
Report on BPC Special Project Peer Review and Future Study Recommendations of Salmonid Fish Tagging Study (Hearn, et al., 2012) presented by Josh Trotter.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
Sonoma Ecology Center TMDL Implementation Project Update November 4, 2011 Funded by EPA, Managed by SFEP, Administered by MMWD, and north bay partnership.
Ponds 6, 7 & 8 Permitting Update Napa Sonoma Marsh Restoration Group Meeting USGS San Pablo Field Station Office Mare Island November 17, 2010 April 17,
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
Growth Trajectories of Wild California Steelhead Parr David Swank 1,2, Will Satterthwaite 1, Michael Beakes 1, Susan Sogard 2, Marc Mangel 1, Rob Titus.
How healthy is your watershed? Indicators and Performance Measures for the North Bay Kat Ridolfi San Francisco Estuary Institute North Bay Watershed Council.
Study for Fish Screens at Existing Delta Facilities Dr. Leah Orloff Water Resources Manager CUWA Board MeetingJuly 24, 2009.
RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.
Ankle bracelets for fish.. knowing who is coming and going… Developing an acoustic fish “gate” for the Chester River. Hassan Moustahfid, PhD. U.S. IOOS.
Agency Coordination: Fraser River Estuary Management Program [FREMP] Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference 3 April 2003 Vancouver,
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Management & Recovery Implications Of Wild/Hatchery Steelhead Interactions Within A Large, Complex Watershed Research Partners: WDFW Skagit River System.
FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
PRINCIPLES OF THE CONSERVATION COMMONS Principle 1- Open Access: The Conservation Commons promotes free and open access to data, information and knowledge.
Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) Life History and Habitat Use in the Cache, Mississippi, and White Rivers, Arkansas.
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
Recovery Patterns of Coded-Wire Tagged Spring Chinook Salmon in the Upper Willamette River Basin David S. Hewlett Cameron S. Sharpe Oregon Department of.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
1 Poseidon Resources (Channelside), LLC Carlsbad Desalination Project Marine Life Mitigation Plan (MLMP) Marine Life Mitigation Site Selection and Preliminary.
Pacific Ocean Shelf Tracking (POST) Jonathan Thar POST Research Program Coordinator Vancouver Aquarium.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Survival and Behavior of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Lower Columbia River, Estuary, and Plume G. A. McMichael 1, R. L. McComas 2, J. A. Carter 1, G.
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) Life History and Habitat Use in the Cache, Mississippi, and White Rivers, Arkansas.
CVPIA §3406(b)(2) Water Operations on the Sacramento River Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum Technical Advisory Committee February 7, 2012.
Alsea Steelhead Acoustic Tagging Project. ODFW -Salmonid Life Cycle Monitoring Project Alsea Steelhead Acoustic Tagging Project EPA – Estuarine Habitat.
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
Sea Floor Maps - Why do we care? Fisheries management, especially marine protected areas Characterization of benthic habitats and ecosystems.
Hood Canal Steelhead Acoustic Telemetry Studies Barry Berejikian and Skip Tezak NOAA Fisheries Northwest Fisheries Science Center Manchester Research Station.
Implementing Hatchery Reform The Dawn of a New Beginning or more of the same old thing? Mike Delarm NOAA Fisheries.
Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.
Estimated survival of juvenile salmonids through the lower Columbia River and estuary, and estimated mortality from avian predation John Ferguson NOAA.
Janes Creek and McDaniel Slough Past, Present, and Future.
Alameda Creek Watershed San Francisco Public Utilities Commission October 27, 2009.
Limiting Factors in the Success of Habitat Restoration Sites for O. Conchaphila in San Francisco Bay For the: 9 th International Conference on Shellfish.
Initial Assessment of Habitat Use by Stocked Lake Sturgeon in the Genesee River D. E. DITTMAN 1 and E. C. ZOLLWEG 2 1 Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science,
Estuaries Portal DRAFT Mock-up of Fish Content (This is content developed by several CEMW group members and has not been approved)
The Oregon Watershed Council Model, USA
Thorp Mill Ditch Assessment ( )
The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 2 November 2018
Ducks Unlimited conserves, manages, and restores wetlands and associated habitats for North America’s waterfowl. These habitats also benefit other wildlife.
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman
Presentation transcript:

Acoustic Tag Monitoring for Napa River Steelhead at the Napa Plant Site Year One Preliminary Results Presented to Napa Sonoma Marsh Restoration Group November 17, 2010 Presented by Thomas Keegan, Principal Investigator ECORP Consulting, Inc. in association with Duck’s Unlimited NOAA

Study Partners Ducks Unlimited NOAA Fisheries UC Davis Biotelemetry Lab Napa County Resource Conservation District Brezina and Associates

Study Interests Contribute to the innovative collection of sound, scientifically based information NOAA Fisheries is a study participant and has indicated that fish distribution data are necessary for our understanding of how these fish species use restored tidal marsh habitat   Enable NOAA Fisheries and other regulatory agencies to make well-informed decisions regarding potential impacts that proposed restoration activities and other maritime construction activities, may or may not have on special-status species and habitats

Background Overarching LTMS and UC Davis/NOAA Study In 2007, focused on hatchery late fall run Chinook salmon and steelhead (Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Distribution Study Design for the San Francisco Estuary) In 2009, green sturgeon added as a target species Inception of the California Fish Tagging Consortium (CFTC) Extensive receiver array (VEMCO equipment) large influx of tagged fish through system Centralized database More recently, tagging of wild fish populations salmonids and green sturgeon

LTMS and UC Davis/NOAA Overarching Study: Initial Receiver Locations

Introduction A Story of Partnership NOAA, funding through ARRA, requires monitoring of special-status fish species in restored tidal marsh habitat Ducks Unlimited, as grantee, interested in innovative way to track wild Napa River steelhead, and determine use of habitats Wild Napa River Steelhead Available from Napa County Resource Conservation District

Study Objectives to assess the utilization of restored tidal marsh habitats by special-status salmonids and green sturgeon to determine the regional effectiveness of tidal restoration efforts on these species to partner with other study investigators (i.e., participate with the CFTC Central Database maintained by the NOAA Santa Cruz Laboratory)

Methods

VEMCO Receiver Deployment 10 VR2W receivers installed for NPS Project 2 in Napa River (gate) above NPS 1 Fagan Slough 1 North Unit Breach 1 Center Unit Breach (Barge Canal) 2 South Unit Breaches 1 Dutchman Slough 2 below Tennessee Bridge (gate) 4 VR2W receivers installed for USAR, Mare Island 2 at Mare Island piers 22 and 23 2 at San Pablo Dredge Disposal site (SF9)

Receiver Deployment on Piers Schedule 80 PVC deployment bracket Attached to pier pilings with large cable ties Safety lines through PVC and tied to pier pilings Study identification placard

Receiver Deployment Bracket

Acoustic Release Device and Setup for Open-water Receiver Deployment

Acoustic Tag for Testing Signal Reception

Collection of Juvenile Steelhead (actually by NCRCD staff Collection of Juvenile Steelhead (actually by NCRCD staff!) for Tag and release with VEMCO V7 Tags

Acoustic Tags in Antiseptic

Implantation of Acoustic Tag into Body Cavity of Juvenile Napa River Steelhead

After Recovery from Surgery, Fish is Released at Point of Capture

Napa River Steelhead collected from the RST and tagged Fish ID Weight (g) FL (mm) Release Time Release Date NWSTH_001 281.5 305 14:00:00 4/8/2010 NWSTH_002 99.2 212 NWSTH_003 68.3 190 14:25:00 NWSTH_004 46 164 NWSTH_005* 133.8 236 NWSTH_006 81.3 205 NWSTH_007 67.6 193 NWSTH_008 47.8 168 14:40:00 NWSTH_009 124 233 10:12:50 4/20/2010 NWSTH_010 65.6 197 NWSTH_011 89.8 204 NWSTH_012 53.5 173 NWSTH_013 59.2 179 10:42:00 NWSTH_014 62.6 182 NWSTH_015 103.6 213 NWSTH_016 203 NWSTH_017 79.8 200 11:10:00 NWSTH_018 86.8 206 NWSTH_019 54 NWSTH_020 67.5 184 NWSTH_021* 96.2 208 N/A 5/7/2010

Preliminary NPS Project Results Tracked 14 of 20 tagged fish through Napa River, into and through SF Bay Off-channel habitat usage documented Tracked 10 Napa River steelhead (50%) through GG Bridge array Tracked 6 of those fish on Pt. Reyes Array Numerous tag ID’s from Sac’to River/Delta release (CFTC) documented in vicinity of NPS; including CV steelhead, Chinook salmon, and green sturgeon

Napa Plant Site Project Receiver Locations

Mare Island and SF9 Locations Pier 22 & 23 SF9 Dredge Material Placement Area

Tracking of Napa River Steelhead through Project Area Fish ID Release Date Upper Napa 1 & 2 Fagan Slough 3 North Unit 4 Central Unit 5 South Unit 6 & 7 Dutchman Slough 8 Tennessee Bridge 9 & 10 Mare Island 22 & 23 San Pablo SF9 Golden Gate Array Pt. Reyes Array Small (<70g and 200mm) NWSTH_003 4/8/2010 4/12 4/13 4/14 NWSTH_004 4/27-28 4/28-29-30 4/29-30 5/26 NWSTH_012 4/20/2010 4/25 4/28 5/30 NWSTH_013 4/23 4/24 NWSTH_014 4/26 4/27 NWSTH_020 4/29 5/18 Large (>70g and 200mm) NWSTH_001 4/11-12 4/18 4/15-16 4/15-18 NWSTH_002 4/13-14 5/5 NWSTH_006 4/12-13 NWSTH_009 4/23-24 5/8 NWSTH_011 NWSTH_015 4/24-25 NWSTH_016 4/22-23 5/2 NWSTH_017 4/22-23-24 Add'tl Tagged Fish (LTMS) 10 2 9 20 na

Travel Days from Date of Release through Project Area Fish ID Release Date Upper Napa 1 & 2 Fagan Slough 3 North Unit 4 Central Unit 5 South Unit 6 & 7 Dutchman Slough 8 Tennessee Bridge 9 & 10 Mare Island 22 & 23 San Pablo SF9 Golden Gate Array Pt. Reyes Array Small (<70g and 200mm)   NWSTH_003 4/8/2010 6 NWSTH_004 19 20 21 48 NWSTH_012 4/20/2010 40 NWSTH_013 NWSTH_014 7 NWSTH_020 9 28 Large (>70g and 200mm) NWSTH_001 10 NWSTH_002 27 NWSTH_006 NWSTH_009 18 NWSTH_011 NWSTH_015 NWSTH_016 2 12 NWSTH_017

Emigration and Habitat Use Rate of Emigration can affect utilization of tidal marsh habitats by fish, and is largely affected by: Volume of Napa River outflow (storm events) Tidal regime (large vs. small fluctuations) Size at emigration Maturity of tidal marsh habitat To the extent possible, we will take into account the above factors in planning our tagging and release strategy during the next two years of the study.