Grade-level Data Team Meetings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K-2 ELA Common Core State Standards Overview of Standards for Literature, Informational Text & Language Revised CCSS K-2 Report Card Job Alike #4 3:00.
Advertisements

What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
Using Data to Inform Instruction DIBELS, easyCBM, SRI.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
1 Module 2 Using DIBELS Next Data: Identifying and Validating Need for Support.
B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
1 Using Data to Plan Interventions: Determining Student Needs and Making Instructional Recommendations Kathryn Howe Trish Travers
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting December 10, 2009.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
1 Q2: How are we doing? Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Oregon Reading First (2007)1 Oregon Reading First Coaches’ Meeting Spring 2007 IBR Preparation April 25 and 26th, 2007.
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Math RtI Kickoff Meeting. Welcome/Introductions Mike Klavon K-12 Math Consultant Robyn Lucas K-5 Math Consultant Sara Gortsema Early Intervention Project.
School Improvement Specialist Meeting
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
(Teaching & Learning) RtI Fall RtI IS… IS NOT…
DATA BASED DECISION MAKING IN THE RTI PROCESS: WEBINAR #2 SETTING GOALS & INSTRUCTION FOR THE GRADE Edward S. Shapiro, Ph.D. Director, Center for Promoting.
100 % Data Meetings 100% Data Meetings turn data into ACTION FOR ALL students.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT SPECIALIST TRAINING SEPTEMBER 14, 2011.
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
B-ELL Leadership Session May 26, 2009 Jorge Preciado University of Oregon © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Spring Literacy Training Kindergarten Spring 2014.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Invitation to Begin… Rutgers Conference January 2015 Janet Higgins Reading Specialist East Amwell Township School Rutgers.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Presented by Dr. Jalilah Dukes and Bobbie Sievering Chicago Heights School District 170 October 2010.
 Response to Intervention A Good Fit for SAS Jan Cantrill (Pudong) Sarah Pearlz (Puxi)
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading Coaches Conference Orlando, Florida August, 2004.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Universal Screening Cadre 6 Training October 12, 2010.
The State of Our School Fall, Goals What do we want all children to know and be able to do with text in our school? K – 90% of students will reach.
Teacher Data Teams FOR RTI MODULE 5 ..
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
RTI Trends & Issues Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School District Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School.
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Data-Based Leadership
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Systems Problem Solving
Presentation transcript:

Grade-level Data Team Meetings

Role of School-wide Data Team Role of Grade-level Data Team Analyzes benchmark data from all grade levels – Fall, Winter and Spring Analyzes grade level data – benchmark and progress monitoring Identifies instructional needs from all grade levels Identifies student instructional needs at a grade level Prioritizes resources: Zone Schools: Tiers I, II, and III Oregon RtI Schools: Tiers I & II PPS Framework for Tiered Reading Support Analyzes Creates a grade-level tiered approach to reading aligned to school-wide plan Develops a School-wide Reading Action Plan Develops Action Plans Learner Centered Problem Problem of Practice Instructional Strategy Analyzes effectiveness of school-wide reading plan using PPS Healthy Systems Checklist Analyzes effectiveness of instruction identified in teacher Action Plans

Establishing Grade-level Data Team Meetings Basics of a Data Wall Teacher Action Plans Protocols

Introduction to Data Walls A Data Wall is… a planning tool that allows you to design and organize reading instruction a visual way to monitor student progress and instructional effectiveness Ask them to look around the room to see data walls, turn and talk about what you know about these data walls and how they are used. Acknowledge tiers, red yellow, green, each student is represented by a card, the card is determined by the fall screener (dibels, easyCBM), 8:50-9:05

PPS Framework Review Table Discussion Choose a grade level Use the Framework to identify the instructional materials and time recommended for each Tier 9:05-9:15

Data Cards Fall DIBELS Composite Score and easyCBM Risk Rating determines Tier (color of card) Color stays the same throughout year in order to give visual representation of student progress Triangulate data to fine tune instruction within Tier DIBELS individual measures (e.g., NWF, ORF) easyCBM individual measures (e.g., VOCAB, PRF) Progress Monitoring Phonics Survey Tasks In program assessments Oaks Prior knowledge activityAsk them to look around the room to see data walls, turn and talk about what you know about these data walls and how they are used. Acknowledge tiers, red yellow, green, each student is represented by a card, the card is determined by the fall screener (dibels, easyCBM), 8:50-9:05

Data Card Example

Instructional Focus Groups… allow teachers to differentiate instruction within a tier and to design targeted small group instruction that addresses identified gaps in learning. Ask them to look around the room to see data walls, turn and talk about what you know about these data walls and how they are used. Acknowledge tiers, red yellow, green, each student is represented by a card, the card is determined by the fall screener (dibels, easyCBM), 8:50-9:05

Understanding Instructional Focus Groups Table Activity 5-7 minutes: Divide your team into 3 groups (K, 1-3 & 4-8) Each group reads the Instructional Focus Group document for their assigned grade level group Highlight critical descriptors and recommended instructional focus Be prepared to teach your team what you learned 10 minutes: Use Go Around Protocol for each Instructional Focus Group Share key points of each, K, 1-3 and 4-8 Ask them to look around the room to see data walls, turn and talk about what you know about these data walls and how they are used. Acknowledge tiers, red yellow, green, each student is represented by a card, the card is determined by the fall screener (dibels, easyCBM), 8:50-9:05

Check for Understanding At your table, discuss the correct Instructional Focus Group Hold up card with the appropriate group number Ask them to look around the room to see data walls, turn and talk about what you know about these data walls and how they are used. Acknowledge tiers, red yellow, green, each student is represented by a card, the card is determined by the fall screener (dibels, easyCBM), 8:50-9:05

Application Activity Brianna –1st Grade Description: DIBELS Composite Score indicates Low Risk/Benchmark Status Passed all sections of the Phonics Survey Passed all Scott Foresman Unit Assessments (or SF Quick Check-outs) Using this assessment information, determine Brianna’s instructional focus group. 11 11

Application Activity David – 2nd Grade Description: DIBELS Composite Score indicates Some Risk/Strategic Did not pass 1 or more tasks on the Phonics Survey Using this assessment information, determine David’s instructional focus group. 12 12

Application Activity Sarah –Kindergarten Description: DIBELS Composite Score indicates High Risk/Intensive Using this assessment information, determine Sarah’s instructional focus group. 13 13

Application Activity Robert – 4th Grade Description: easyCBM Risk Rating indicates Some Risk/Strategic Passed Tasks 12 & 13 on 2nd Grade Phonics Survey Fluency score is below grade level percentile Inconsistent performance on SF Unit Assessments Using this assessment information, determine Robert’s instructional focus group. 14 14

Application Activity Trevor – 7th Grade Description: EasyCBM Risk Rating indicates Low Risk/Benchmark Passed all classroom assessments Met on OAKS Using this assessment information, determine Trevor’s instructional focus group. 15 15

Establishing Grade-level Team Meetings Basics of a Data Wall Teacher Action Plans Protocols

Teacher Action Plans Learner Centered Problem Instructional Strategy Plan to assess Samples and 1 page strategy page 10:05- 10:15

Establishing Grade-level Team Meetings Basics of a Data Wall Teacher Action Plans Protocols

Text-Based Discussion Protocol Table Group 10 minutes: Read the Fall Benchmark Data Analysis Protocol Take margin notes and/or highlight key ideas 15 minutes: Discuss Guiding Questions What role does the Data Wall play in the analysis of grade level data and the planning of instruction? How does the protocol guide teachers in evaluating their grade level tiered approach to reading? What are the key steps in the protocol? How does this protocol support teachers to have focused data conversations?

Protocol Shifts Fall Winter Spring Purposes: Reviewing Outcomes Fall to Winter Summary of Effectiveness Fall to Winter Reviewing Outcomes Winter to Spring Summary of Effectiveness Winter to Spring Create Data Wall with Instructional Focus Groups Update Data Wall and Instructional Focus Groups Update Data Wall Evaluate grade-level reading plan Revise grade-level reading plan Plan for Fall Develop Teacher Action Plan Develop/Refine Teacher Action Plan   10:45-10:50

K-8 Reading Team Daniel Cogan – dcogan@pps.net Cathy Cowherd – ccowherd@pps.net Sheila Hallinan – shallinan@pps.net Mindy Hawley – mhawley2@pps.net Maryanne Stalnaker – mstalnaker@pps.net