1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Advertisements

TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Whole Effluent Toxicity NPDES Program
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
1 National Hydrography Dataset Applications Overview Symposium on Terrain Analysis for Water Resources Applications Austin, Texas December 16, 2002.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Region 1 & 2 IR Workshop October 28,  The Water Quality Framework is a new way of thinking about how EPA’s data and information systems can be.
Georeferencing Water Quality Assessments to NHDPlus Catchments A New Approach to Evaluating and Measuring Progress in Surface Water Quality DWANE YOUNG,
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List and 305(b) Integrated Report 2008 Report and List Update Process and Schedule Bruce Gwynne Environmental Scientist.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research Douglas J. Norton USEPA Office of Water October 2005 Douglas J.
Module 1: Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Preparing for Regulatory Change WATER RESOURCES WORKSHOP February 20, 2004 Donald J. Brady, Ph.D.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Latest Developments - Effectiveness Assessment and Research Priorities Geoff Brosseau California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) December 4, 2007.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Expanding Water Quality Assessments beyond the Realm of 'Impairments' and into a Tool Useful to Watershed Managers at the Local Level Ken Edwardson Watershed.
MWCOG Water Resource Workshop “Preparing for Regulatory Change” February 20, 2004 Track 2: Panel #4 - Storm Water MS4 Regulation Paula Estornell, USEPA,
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
1 Water Quality Antidegradation: Guidance to Implement Tier II Summary of Discussion: Review the Tier II Rule requirements. Clarify what feedback we are.
Water Resources Workshop Standards, Use Attainability, Impairments and TMDLS Richard Eskin Maryland Department of the Environment February 20, 2004.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
1 Water Quality Standards - CWA and Porter-Cologne An Overview.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
U.S. Clean Water Act: Water Quality Standards Overview
303(d) List Methodology Jeff Manning
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Module 2 Overview of EPA, the Clean Water Act, and Water Quality Standards - What will we we learn in this Academy? - Who plays what roles in.
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender, USEPA’s Watershed Branch Dwane Young, USEPA’s Monitoring Branch Sarah Furtak, USEPA’s Watershed Branch

2 Introductions Shera Bender, Environmental Scientist, U.S. EPA Watershed Branch Dwane Young, IT Specialist, U.S. EPA Monitoring Branch Sarah Furtak, Environmental Protection Specialist, U.S. EPA Watershed Branch

3 This presentation will cover… Overview of water quality reporting under Clean Water Act sections 305(b) and 303(d) programs Overview of water quality reporting under Clean Water Act sections 305(b) and 303(d) programs Discussion of Integrated Reporting (IR) Discussion of Integrated Reporting (IR) Introduction to the ATTAINS database and Web site Introduction to the ATTAINS database and Web site

4 Adopt Water Quality Standards Monitor & Assess Waters List Impaired Waters Develop Pollutant Budget (e.g. Total Maximum Daily Load) Clean Water Act Framework for Restoring Polluted Waters Implement Controls (Point Source/Nonpoint Source) Clean Water Act section 303(c) 305(b) 303(d) 303(e) (b)

5 Clean Water Act Water Quality Reporting Section 305(b) Section 305(b) A biennial assessment of the quality of all navigable waters in each state A biennial assessment of the quality of all navigable waters in each state Assessment includes whether waters support their designated uses (e.g. swimming), and causes and sources of impairment in those waters that do not support uses Assessment includes whether waters support their designated uses (e.g. swimming), and causes and sources of impairment in those waters that do not support uses

6 Clean Water Act Reporting (cont’d) States report assessment information to EPA States report assessment information to EPA EPA summarizes state findings in a national report to Congress (section 305(b) report) EPA summarizes state findings in a national report to Congress (section 305(b) report)

7 Streamlined 305(b) Report to Congress Narrative report provides national summary of site- specific water quality assessment information provided in state 305(b) reports Narrative report provides national summary of site- specific water quality assessment information provided in state 305(b) reports Web site/database provides state summary and waterbody-specific assessment results Web site/database provides state summary and waterbody-specific assessment results Narrative report and Web site are dual components of Report to Congress Narrative report and Web site are dual components of Report to Congress Reflects transition between traditional 305(b) reporting and 303(d)/305(b) Integrated Reporting Reflects transition between traditional 305(b) reporting and 303(d)/305(b) Integrated Reporting

8 Clean Water Act Water Quality Reporting (continued) Section 303(d) Section 303(d) List of waters impaired or threatened by a pollutant, and needing a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) List of waters impaired or threatened by a pollutant, and needing a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Submitted biennially to EPA for approval Submitted biennially to EPA for approval

9 What is a TMDL? A calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards, and an allocation of that amount to the pollutant’s sources. A calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards, and an allocation of that amount to the pollutant’s sources. * The TMDL comes in the form of a technical document or plan. TMDL Definition

10 Regulations (40 CFR 130.7) Each state shall identify those water quality-limited segments still requiring TMDLs within its boundaries for which: Technology-based effluent limitations Technology-based effluent limitations More stringent effluent limitations More stringent effluent limitations Other pollution control requirements Other pollution control requirements Are not stringent enough to implement any water quality standards applicable to such waters Regulatory Requirements

11 Regulations (40 CFR 130.7) For waters identified in the 303(d) list: “TMDLs shall be established for all pollutants preventing or expected to prevent attainment of water quality standards…” “TMDLs shall be established for all pollutants preventing or expected to prevent attainment of water quality standards…” “TMDLs shall be established at levels necessary to attain and maintain the applicable narrative and numerical WQS…” “TMDLs shall be established at levels necessary to attain and maintain the applicable narrative and numerical WQS…” No statutory or regulatory timeframe for TMDL development EPA guidance establishes 8-13 year time frame from time of initial listing EPA guidance establishes 8-13 year time frame from time of initial listing Regulatory Requirements

12 Integrated Reporting Under the Clean Water Act Integrated Reporting (IR): Beginning with the 2002 reporting cycle, EPA has encouraged states to submit integrated reports that combine reporting under sections 305(b) and 303(d) Integrated Reporting (IR): Beginning with the 2002 reporting cycle, EPA has encouraged states to submit integrated reports that combine reporting under sections 305(b) and 303(d) Purpose of integrating reporting requirements: to increase data consistency, merge data from a variety of sources, provide a more informed summary of the quality of state waters Purpose of integrating reporting requirements: to increase data consistency, merge data from a variety of sources, provide a more informed summary of the quality of state waters

13 State Options for Reporting WQ Status Separate 305(b) & 303(d) Integrated Report The state’s section 303(d) list is comprised of waters impaired or threatened by a pollutant, and needing a TMDL States submit a separate 305(b) report on the conditions of all waters A single state-developed report that integrates the reporting requirements of CWA sections 303(d), 305(b) and 314 EPA’s Integrated Report Guidance (IRG) developed for 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008 reporting cycles ( Both are due to EPA on April 1 of every even year. EPA approves/disapproves 303(d) list, uses 305(b) information to prepare biennial report to Congress EPA approves/disapproves Category 5 of the Integrated Report, uses information to satisfy requirements of 305(b) Integrated Reporting Minimally Required by Regulations Recommended Reporting Format

14 Integrated Report Categories 1. Attaining standards 2. Attaining some designated uses, and insufficient or no data and information to determine if remaining uses are attained 3. Insufficient or no data and information to determine if the standard is attained 4. Impaired or threatened for one or more designated uses but not needing a TMDL a.TMDL has been completed b. Already required to meet standards c. Not impaired by a pollutant 5. Impaired or threatened by pollutant(s) for one or more designated uses and requiring a TMDL 305 (b) Report 303(d) List

15 Questions? Shera Bender, USEPA’s Watershed Branch Sarah Furtak, USEPA’s Watershed Branch

16 Waterbodies Criteria pH Copper Temperature Designated Uses Pri. Contact Rec. Aquatic Life Sec. Contact Rec. Drinking Water Basic concepts from a Water Quality Standards Perspective

17 These same concepts are incorporated into the Integrated Report Assessment Units Assessment Units relate to Water Quality Standards (WQS) Waterbodies

18 Designated Uses are assigned to Assessment Units Assessment Units Designated Uses Pri. Contact Rec. Aquatic Life Sec. Contact Rec. Drinking Water

19 Designated Uses Physical/Chemical Assessment Performed Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature do not meet the criteria specified in the Water Quality Standards (WQS) Assessment Conclusion : Segment is NOT SUPPORTING this designated use. Aquatic Life Designated Uses are assessed

20 When Uses are not supporting, Causes of Impairments are assigned Assessment Units Causes of Impairment Temperature Dissolved Oxygen Designated Uses Pri. Contact Rec. Aquatic Life Sec. Contact Rec. Drinking Water

21 For causes identified, sources are assigned Assessment Units Causes of Impairment Temperature Dissolved Oxygen Sources Municipal Point Source Discharges Designated Uses Pri. Contact Rec. Aquatic Life Sec. Contact Rec. Drinking Water Grazing in Riparian or Shoreline Zones

22 Approved TMDLs are assigned to Waterbody/Impairment combinations Assessment Units Causes of Impairment Temperature Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Completed!

23 ATTAINS Assessment TMDL Tracking And ImplementatioN System A national database that integrates the data from the 305(b) program and the 303(d) program The current State Assessment Databases (ADB) feed ATTAINS ATTAINS is the backbone of the National Water Quality Inventory Report to Congress

24 ATTAINS Provides: national summary information national summary information regional summary information regional summary information state summary information state summary information watershed information watershed information waterbody specific information waterbody specific information

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57 Questions? Dwane Young, USEPA’s Monitoring Branch

58 Join Us on July 16 th for: A Watershed Academy Webcast on: Clean Water Act State Revolving Fund Visit: epa.gov/watershedwebcasts

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75 Questions? Dwane Young, USEPA’s Monitoring Branch Shera Bender, USEPA’s Watershed Branch Sarah Furtak, USEPA’s Watershed Branch

76 Want to find out more? Check out our list of Additional Resources! Tell us what you thought of the Webcast! Fill out our Evaluation Form!

77 Resources ATTAINS Web site: epa.gov/waters/ir ATTAINS Web site: epa.gov/waters/ir 305(b) National Report web site: epa.gov/305b 305(b) National Report web site: epa.gov/305b 303(d) Web site: epa.gov/owow/tmdl 303(d) Web site: epa.gov/owow/tmdl 2006 Integrated Reporting Guidance: 2006 Integrated Reporting Guidance: epa.gov/owow/tmdl/2006IRG/#documents? epa.gov/owow/tmdl/2006IRG/#documents?