A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L U.S. EPA REGION SIX & OKLAHOMA & ARKANSAS DEPARTMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 24 th ANNUAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiochemical Methods and Data Evaluation
Advertisements

Why Lab. Certification? Laboratory certification tries to insure that the laboratory is qualified and capable of analyzing the sample and obtaining quality.
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
UNDERSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY/QC REPORTS Maya Murshak – Merit Laboratories, Inc.
Sampling: Your data is only as good as your field technicians.
Office of Water PittCon 2001 Status of EPA Method 1631 for the Determination of Low-Level Mercury Maria Gomez-Taylor Analytical Methods Staff U.S.
Module 6 Effluent Monitoring and Receiving Water Monitoring.
Mentoring Session Technical Assistance Committee Method Modifications.
Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.
Mercury Collection and Analysis in Ambient and Effluent Waters using EPA Method 1631 Overview of Sampling and Analysis William Telliard U.S. EPA Office.
Florida Pilot Initiative for the Performance Approach to Measurement Systems Stephen Arms Florida Department of Health.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Looking Ahead.
Hillcrest Community Environmental Investigation No Conflict of Interest Geo Strata is not affiliated with and does not hold contracts with the oil & gas.
Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850)
QA/QC Considerations for Sampling and Analysis Associated with EPA Method 1631 Chuck Wibby Wibby Environmental Seminar on Low Level Mercury Data and Analyses.
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
Detect Limits as Representation for a Standard VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi Risk Assessor, DERR, Central Office VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi.
EPA’s Revised Minimum Quantification Levels Scott Wilson.
Evaluation of Several Field Test Kits for Determining Concentrations of Arsenic in Drinking Water J. Mitchell Spear, You “Mark” Zhou Charles A. Cole and.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT
A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L U.S. EPA REGION SIX & OKLAHOMA & ARKANSAS DEPARTMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 24 th ANNUAL PRETREATMENT ASSOCIATION.
Field Analysis Quality Control
Understanding and Implementing SWAMP Comparability: Quality Assurance SWAMP Quality Assurance Help Desk Quality Assurance Research.
WWLC Standard Operating Procedures Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
Status of the WET Program William Telliard Director, Analytical Methods USEPA Office of Science & Technology Office of Water.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Daren Harmel, Rick Haney, Jeff Arnold – USDA-ARS, Temple, TX
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Present Development of a Regional Guidance Document for Dredged Material Evaluation Christopher McArthur, P.E. (US Environmental.
HD 2007 Rule Diesel Fuel Sulfur Testing and Sampling Methods and Requirements US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality November 20, 2002.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
QA/QC and QUALIFIERS LOU ANN FISHER CITY OF STILLWATER, OK
Introduction The past, the present and the future.
Annual Meeting, June , Split, Croatia WP3: QA/QC Validation – MSFD Interactions current status EMODnet Chemistry Partner contribution: ISPRA.
EPA REGION VI MINIMUM QUANTIFICATION LEVELS (MQLs) WHAT THE “L” IS GOING ON? 25 th EPA Annual Pretreatment Workshop Addison, TX 8/5/09 Allen Gilliam ADEQ.
Storm Water: Federal Enforcement and Compliance for Phase II MS4.
Representative Sampling. Samples vs. Populations The population is the total or all of the possible answers we might get by sampling. All of the individuals.
Laboratory Certification Update Part 2 Common Findings KWWOA Louisville April 15, 2015 Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
William Telliard U.S. EPA Office of Science and Technology
Emission source sampling and monitoring Topic 6 Ms Sherina Kamal May
Is Your Analytical Result Accurate? Presented By: James S. Smith, Ph.D. Trillium, Inc. GSA North-Central Section 39 th Annual Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Data Quality Assurance/ Quality Control. QA/QC Requirements for RECAP Submittals Data generated using rigorous analytical methods Data must be analyte.
Clean Sampling of Mercury
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
1 Ambient Monitoring Program PM 2.5 Data Lean 6 Sigma Air Director’s Meeting May 2015.
The Method Update Rule Does this affect me? HOW?
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Clean Water Act Methods Overview of EPA’s CWA Method Activities
The 2015/2016 TNI Standard and the EPA MDL Update
Status of EPA Method 1631 for the Determination of Low-Level Mercury
Overview of EPA Method 1631, Revision E By Roy W
The Nuts & Bolts of TBLL Development
EPA Method A Summary of the Changes in the Newly Promulgated GC/MS Method for Volatile Organics in Wastewater Harry McCarty and Kevin Roberts CSRA,
EPA Method Equivalency
The Analysis of Soils and Waters in Accordance with U. S
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Clean Water Act Methods Overview of EPA’s CWA Method Activities
EPA Method Equivalency
EPA Region 10 Alternate Test Procedures and Method Update Rule
What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply
Director of Quality Assurance
Spencer Bohaboy Policy Development Specialist Water Quality Policy
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
National Environmental Monitoring Conference
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
2019 AWOP National Meeting Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
Presentation transcript:

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L U.S. EPA REGION SIX & OKLAHOMA & ARKANSAS DEPARTMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 24 th ANNUAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM WORKSHOP EVERYTHING YOU WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT CLEAN MERCURY AND METALS SAMPLING BUT HOPED YOU’D NEVER HAVE TO ASK Dr. Paul N. Boothe Senior Scientist Albion Environmental College Station, TX 13 AUGUST 2008 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L PRESENTATION OUTLINE What do you need to know about mercury (Hg) & metals in your wastewaters and receiving waters? –How can clean sampling and analysis help you? Clean Hg & metals sampling & analysis techniques –Background Focus on low-level Hg sampling & analysis –Collecting mercury-free samples: Tiered approach DEMONSTRATION Paragould Arkansas –EPA low-level Hg methods: EPA 1631E & EPA Where do you go from here? –Implementation of a low-level Hg monitoring program Conclusions Q & A What do you need to know about mercury (Hg) & metals in your wastewaters and receiving waters? –How can clean sampling and analysis help you? Clean Hg & metals sampling & analysis techniques –Background Focus on low-level Hg sampling & analysis –Collecting mercury-free samples: Tiered approach DEMONSTRATION Paragould Arkansas –EPA low-level Hg methods: EPA 1631E & EPA Where do you go from here? –Implementation of a low-level Hg monitoring program Conclusions Q & A

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L What did you need to know about Hg & metals in your wastewaters & receiving waters? - “The Good Ole Days (2003)” Very little –Ignorance is bliss? –Non-detects are your friend. Still largely conventional sampling and analysis metals data –Relatively high detection limits- mostly ND’s –False positives due to contamination during sampling and analysis contamination and other anomalies Very little –Ignorance is bliss? –Non-detects are your friend. Still largely conventional sampling and analysis metals data –Relatively high detection limits- mostly ND’s –False positives due to contamination during sampling and analysis contamination and other anomalies

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L “THE HANLON MEMO” “… in the light of existing regulatory requirements for NPDES permitting, only the most sensitive methods such as Methods 1631E and are appropriate in most instances for use in deciding whether to set a permit limitation for mercury and for sampling and analysis of mercury pursuant to the monitoring requirements within a permit.” James A. Hanlon, Director EPA Office of Wastewater Management August 23,2007 “… in the light of existing regulatory requirements for NPDES permitting, only the most sensitive methods such as Methods 1631E and are appropriate in most instances for use in deciding whether to set a permit limitation for mercury and for sampling and analysis of mercury pursuant to the monitoring requirements within a permit.” James A. Hanlon, Director EPA Office of Wastewater Management August 23,2007

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L “THE HOSCH MEMO” EPA Region 6 has “… revised the MQL’s (Minimum Quantification Levels) which we will be accepting for EPA issued permits. … Region 6 expects that you (delegated States) will revise your procedures to incorporate these revised MQL’s” into your permitting procedures. Claudia V. Hosch, Chief EPA Region 6 NPDES Permits and TMDL’s Branch February 8, 2008 EPA Region 6 has “… revised the MQL’s (Minimum Quantification Levels) which we will be accepting for EPA issued permits. … Region 6 expects that you (delegated States) will revise your procedures to incorporate these revised MQL’s” into your permitting procedures. Claudia V. Hosch, Chief EPA Region 6 NPDES Permits and TMDL’s Branch February 8, 2008

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L HOW CAN CLEAN SAMPLING & ANALYSIS HELP YOU? Does your WWTP have metals limits? –Would you like to be able to accurately measure metals at the levels at which you are being regulated? Would you like to know how close you are to violating your permit limits? Would you like to avoid metal limits? Would you like to know how well your WWTP is operating in terms of metals removal? –Would you like higher, site specific technically based local limits? Would you like to know how much your effluent discharge is affecting metals levels in the receiving waters (i.e. reasonable potential dterminations)? Does your WWTP have metals limits? –Would you like to be able to accurately measure metals at the levels at which you are being regulated? Would you like to know how close you are to violating your permit limits? Would you like to avoid metal limits? Would you like to know how well your WWTP is operating in terms of metals removal? –Would you like higher, site specific technically based local limits? Would you like to know how much your effluent discharge is affecting metals levels in the receiving waters (i.e. reasonable potential dterminations)?

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L Pretreatment Local Limits

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L WHO IS ALBION ENVIRONMENTAL? One of the most experienced low-level mercury & metals laboratories in the U.S. –Helped the EPA “write the book” on clean sampling and analysis Acknowledged by name as significant contributor to EPA 1631E, 1638 (ICP-MS) and other “1600 series” clean methods Participated in validation studies for EPA & 1638 –“Re-writing the book” on dissolved Hg & metals filtration –One of the most inter-calibrated labs NELAC PT samples plus USGS, LAMPS, EPA split sample studies, etc. –AE frequently supplies clean Hg & metals sampling equipment to the U.S. EPA Office of Water in support of new national rulemaking initiatives One of the most experienced low-level mercury & metals laboratories in the U.S. –Helped the EPA “write the book” on clean sampling and analysis Acknowledged by name as significant contributor to EPA 1631E, 1638 (ICP-MS) and other “1600 series” clean methods Participated in validation studies for EPA & 1638 –“Re-writing the book” on dissolved Hg & metals filtration –One of the most inter-calibrated labs NELAC PT samples plus USGS, LAMPS, EPA split sample studies, etc. –AE frequently supplies clean Hg & metals sampling equipment to the U.S. EPA Office of Water in support of new national rulemaking initiatives

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L WHY CLEAN CHEMISTRY Greater Data Accuracy (no “false positives”) –Conventional data quality a continuing concern Enhanced Data Precision Lower Detection Limits –Minimize Number of “Non-Detects” –Minimize Use of Surrogate Data –Eliminate inaccurate receiving water data Accurate & Site Specific Removal Efficiencies and Background Loads Greater Data Accuracy (no “false positives”) –Conventional data quality a continuing concern Enhanced Data Precision Lower Detection Limits –Minimize Number of “Non-Detects” –Minimize Use of Surrogate Data –Eliminate inaccurate receiving water data Accurate & Site Specific Removal Efficiencies and Background Loads

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L CLEAN METALS CHEMISTRY Comprehensive field and laboratory quality assurance (QA)/ quality control (QC) procedures and samples –Clean sampling and storage procedures TIERED APPROACH- TAILOR EFFORT TO DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (USABILITY) –Clean, sensitive analytical methods Focuses on data accuracy Comprehensive field and laboratory quality assurance (QA)/ quality control (QC) procedures and samples –Clean sampling and storage procedures TIERED APPROACH- TAILOR EFFORT TO DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (USABILITY) –Clean, sensitive analytical methods Focuses on data accuracy

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L COMPREHENSIVE QA Cradle to grave EPA 1600 series methods: – Equipment blanks (sampler and bottle) – Field QA/QC: Blanks and duplicates – Lab QA/QC: Blanks, matrix spike/ matrix spike duplicate, blank spikes, reference materials, duplicates (optional) – Instrument calibration – Failsafe documentation – Stringent acceptance criteria Cradle to grave EPA 1600 series methods: – Equipment blanks (sampler and bottle) – Field QA/QC: Blanks and duplicates – Lab QA/QC: Blanks, matrix spike/ matrix spike duplicate, blank spikes, reference materials, duplicates (optional) – Instrument calibration – Failsafe documentation – Stringent acceptance criteria

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L CLEAN SAMPLING METHODS EPA Method 1669 April 1995 –Written for Hg- worst case scenario –Onsite filtered dissolved measurements a driver Carefully cleaned plasticware Clean hands & dirty hands approach –Wear powder-free gloves –Adapt to or control airborne particulates On-site filtration for dissolved measurements Low detection limits require low blanks EPA Method 1669 April 1995 –Written for Hg- worst case scenario –Onsite filtered dissolved measurements a driver Carefully cleaned plasticware Clean hands & dirty hands approach –Wear powder-free gloves –Adapt to or control airborne particulates On-site filtration for dissolved measurements Low detection limits require low blanks

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L EPA DISSOLVED METALS & HG GUIDANCE New “15 Minute Rule” for dissolved trace metals (Footnote 7) –“For dissolved metals, filter grab samples within 15 minutes of collection and before adding preservatives. For a composite sample collected with an automated sampler … filter the sample within 15 minutes after completion of collection and before adding preservatives...” Exception for dissolved mercury (Footnote 17) –“A sample collected for dissolved trace level mercury (< 100 ng/L) should be filtered in the laboratory within 24 hours of the time of collection.” –“However, if circumstances preclude overnight shipment, the sample should be filtered in a designated clean area in the field in accordance with procedures given in Method 1669.” –“If sample integrity will not be maintained by shipment to and filtration in the laboratory, the sample must be filtered in a designated clean area in the field within the time period necessary to maintain sample integrity.” Information in TABLE II takes precedence over information in specific methods or elsewhere. Source: Method Update Final Rule, Part 136, Table II Required Containers, Preservation Techniques and Holding Times. Federal Register 72(47): Effective New “15 Minute Rule” for dissolved trace metals (Footnote 7) –“For dissolved metals, filter grab samples within 15 minutes of collection and before adding preservatives. For a composite sample collected with an automated sampler … filter the sample within 15 minutes after completion of collection and before adding preservatives...” Exception for dissolved mercury (Footnote 17) –“A sample collected for dissolved trace level mercury (< 100 ng/L) should be filtered in the laboratory within 24 hours of the time of collection.” –“However, if circumstances preclude overnight shipment, the sample should be filtered in a designated clean area in the field in accordance with procedures given in Method 1669.” –“If sample integrity will not be maintained by shipment to and filtration in the laboratory, the sample must be filtered in a designated clean area in the field within the time period necessary to maintain sample integrity.” Information in TABLE II takes precedence over information in specific methods or elsewhere. Source: Method Update Final Rule, Part 136, Table II Required Containers, Preservation Techniques and Holding Times. Federal Register 72(47): Effective

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L Side-by-side East Texas Sites (2-3 April 2008) Diss. Mercury vs Filter Type

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L CLEAN HG SAMPLING DEMO Paragould LW&C, Paragould Arkansas –Ms. Lisa Ellington –Ms. Ashley Barr “Ultra-clean” approach Manual grab sampling procedures –In-lab gravimetric flow-proportioned compositing Paragould LW&C, Paragould Arkansas –Ms. Lisa Ellington –Ms. Ashley Barr “Ultra-clean” approach Manual grab sampling procedures –In-lab gravimetric flow-proportioned compositing

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L

CLEAN COMPOSITE SAMPLING

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L EPA APPROVED DISSOLVED HG & METALS FIELD SAMPLING KIT

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L CLEAN ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY EPA series 1600 methods issued – ICP/MS, STGFAAS, CVAFS (Hg), Hydride AAS (As) Contamination always a concern Sample digestion a problem area Direct analysis (“clean”) vs extraction/preconcentration (“ultraclean”) Select analytical labs carefully EPA series 1600 methods issued – ICP/MS, STGFAAS, CVAFS (Hg), Hydride AAS (As) Contamination always a concern Sample digestion a problem area Direct analysis (“clean”) vs extraction/preconcentration (“ultraclean”) Select analytical labs carefully

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L CLEAN ANALYSIS METHODS Clean preservation & digestion (chemical & uv) EPA 1631e and EPA for low-level Hg EPA 1638/ ICP-MS –“Work Horse” method for remaining priority pollutant metals EPA 1632 (mod) hydride generation atomic fluorescence for dissolved As & Se EPA 1640 (mod) preconcentration inductively coupled plasma- mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) –Dissolved Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn Clean preservation & digestion (chemical & uv) EPA 1631e and EPA for low-level Hg EPA 1638/ ICP-MS –“Work Horse” method for remaining priority pollutant metals EPA 1632 (mod) hydride generation atomic fluorescence for dissolved As & Se EPA 1640 (mod) preconcentration inductively coupled plasma- mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) –Dissolved Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L EPA METHOD 1631E Low-level mercury –Purge & trap/ Cold vapor atomic fluorescence –Reporting limit (ML) ppb (MDL ppb) Approved for CWA use November 2002 –Driven by Great Lakes Initiative (WQC 1.3 pptr) and National Toxics Rule (WQC 12 pptr) Most difficult clean method to perform –Ease of contamination at sub-pptr level is great –Good results achievable using good equipment and guidance Low-level mercury –Purge & trap/ Cold vapor atomic fluorescence –Reporting limit (ML) ppb (MDL ppb) Approved for CWA use November 2002 –Driven by Great Lakes Initiative (WQC 1.3 pptr) and National Toxics Rule (WQC 12 pptr) Most difficult clean method to perform –Ease of contamination at sub-pptr level is great –Good results achievable using good equipment and guidance

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L EPA 1631E vs Method 1631Method Status Approved 40 CFR part Approved 40 CFR part 136 MUR Digestion BrCl / SnCl2 / NH2OHHCl KBr /KBrO3 /SnCl2 / NH2OHHCl Separation Vapor Separation Gold Trap Vapor Separation Dryer Tube (Nafion) Detection CVAFS MDL / ML 0.2 / 0.5 ng/L1.8 / 5.0 ng/L Range 0.5 – 100 ng/L5 – 100 ng/L

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L STARTING A CLEAN HG MONITORING PROGRAM Decide how much assistance you want or need –Continuum: turnkey to using all in-house resources –Optimal compromise: Specialized clean equipment and analysis laboratory (vendor) All sampling done using in-house personnel with level of training needed from specialized lab Decide how much assistance you want or need –Continuum: turnkey to using all in-house resources –Optimal compromise: Specialized clean equipment and analysis laboratory (vendor) All sampling done using in-house personnel with level of training needed from specialized lab

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L OPTIMAL SAMPLING PROCEDURE Use in-house personnel who are interested in the challenge Use reliable, blanked bottles & equipment Powder-free gloves (multiple easy change) Ground cover & all plastic sampling gear Clean outer clothes CleanBox Don’t skimp on field blanks or field dups –Field blanks exactly same as samples Don’t sample in the rain Ground shipping Use in-house personnel who are interested in the challenge Use reliable, blanked bottles & equipment Powder-free gloves (multiple easy change) Ground cover & all plastic sampling gear Clean outer clothes CleanBox Don’t skimp on field blanks or field dups –Field blanks exactly same as samples Don’t sample in the rain Ground shipping

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L BETWEEN A ROCK & A HARD PLACE EPA 1631E FULL METHOD COMPLIANCE CHALLENGING –Is a rigorous, onerous and difficult method to perform according to EPA guidance –From our experience full method compliance is poor in most commercial labs Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) “Catch 22” –Permittee responsible for submitting valid data EPA 1631E FULL METHOD COMPLIANCE CHALLENGING –Is a rigorous, onerous and difficult method to perform according to EPA guidance –From our experience full method compliance is poor in most commercial labs Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) “Catch 22” –Permittee responsible for submitting valid data

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L QUESTIONS TO ASK POTENTIAL 1631E LABORATIES “Innocent”, non-leading questions to see what the prospective lab knows: # 1: What modifications have they made to promulgated method in their implementation of EPA method 1631E? # 2: Ask for suggested compliant sampling plan # 3: Ask for sample data report including narrative # 4: Ask for recent reports for ALL performance test (PT) sample programs they participate in # 5: Ask about turnaround time (TAT) # 6: Ask for raw instrument data run log “Innocent”, non-leading questions to see what the prospective lab knows: # 1: What modifications have they made to promulgated method in their implementation of EPA method 1631E? # 2: Ask for suggested compliant sampling plan # 3: Ask for sample data report including narrative # 4: Ask for recent reports for ALL performance test (PT) sample programs they participate in # 5: Ask about turnaround time (TAT) # 6: Ask for raw instrument data run log

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L CONCLUSIONS Clean Hg and metals methods coming –Adaptable to virtually any sampling scenario –You can make them work to your advantage Use of trained in-house personnel is optimal Use EPA 1631E not EPA –Can report 1631E data at MQL of 5 pptr if needed Chose your equipment and laboratory vendor carefully –No field preservation, no icing, no expedited shipping allows you to use any clean metals or Hg lab you want to Clean Hg and metals methods coming –Adaptable to virtually any sampling scenario –You can make them work to your advantage Use of trained in-house personnel is optimal Use EPA 1631E not EPA –Can report 1631E data at MQL of 5 pptr if needed Chose your equipment and laboratory vendor carefully –No field preservation, no icing, no expedited shipping allows you to use any clean metals or Hg lab you want to

A L B I O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L QUESTIONS? Paul N. Boothe, PhD. ALBION ENVIRONMENTAL 4505 Boyett Street Bryan, TX (979)