Poverty Law 1 Appeals and Hearings, Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, 2013 copyright Monica Bogucki.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process
Advertisements

THE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH FOR CENTRAL MICHIGAN CONSUMER GRIEVANCE SYSTEM.
Member “Grievance” and “Appeals” Process Venture Behavioral Health Member Services Department.
Constitutional Law Part 7: Due Process and Fundamental Rights Lecture 4: Procedural Due Process.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS. 2 Court System  District Court  Trial Court  Some “specialty” courts including  Family Court  Drug Court  Juvenile Court 
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
The Appeals Process by Gina chandler
Understanding More About Poverty, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W., J.D copyright Monica Bogucki Understanding More About Poverty, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W.,
Overview of Income Maintenance Programs 2012 Copyright Monica Bogucki.
MANDATED REPORTING, Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki Copyright 2013 Monica Bogucki.
Poverty Law 1, MFIP Assets Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, 2012 Copyright.
SUBPOENAS IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CASES IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CASES.
Poverty Law 2 Permanency Planning Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki 2013 Copyright.
Bobby Carter Criminal Court Thirtieth Judicial at Memphis.
Options for Youth, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W., J.D. Copyright 2013 Monica Bogucki.
1 Academic Adjustments & Auxiliary Aids & Documentation Office for Civil Rights US Department of Education This presentation is not to be reproduced in.
Administrative Law Chapter 2 - Part I. Takings Review What is a "taking"? What due process is involved? What about compensation? How is compensation measured?
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Fair Hearings Training Presented by University of Miami School of Law, Children & Youth Law Clinic, Caitlin Currie, Shana Schoem and Seida Wood.
A dvocating for our Students: Administrative Advocacy and Fair Hearings Jodie Berger Legal Services of Northern California Vickie Hay Orange Coast College.
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process Presented by Katie Casada Hornberger Office of Clients’ Rights Advocacy.
Students with Disabilities Parentally Placed in Nonpublic Elementary or Secondary Schools VESID Special Education Services New York State Education Department.
Overview of Services. The Alliance protects the rights of abused and neglected children and youth by providing free legal services and advocacy. We assist.
Social Work Ethics copyright 2012 Monica Bogucki.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
Chapter 5 Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act Jacob, Decker, & Hartshorne 1.
Understanding More About Poverty, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W., J.D copyright Monica Bogucki Understanding More About Poverty, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W.,
Roles of the Professional “The system depends on every professional doing his/her job.” Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki 2010 Copyright Monica Bogucki.
1 Disclosures © HIPAA Pros 2002 All rights reserved.
Poverty Law 1 MFIP-S Five Year Time Limit Overview of Emergency Assistance Programs Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki 2013 copyright Monica Bogucki.
June Data Practices in Minnesota. June Outline for this presentation Minnesota data practices laws Classification of government data Government.
Poverty Law 1, MFIP Assets Adjunct professor Monica Bogucki, 2006 Copyright.
The Alliance For Children's Rights Overview of Services.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
1 FERPA Family Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 Joanne M. Adamchak Assistant General Counsel.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) Also known as the Buckley Amendment Statute: 20 U.S.C. § 1232(g) Regulations: 34 CFR Part 99.
Poverty Law 1, Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, MFIP-S Income Lecture Copyright 2012 Monica Bogucki.
Presented By Bailey Busdeker, CPSTS Recovery Resources September 24 th, 2015.
MANDATED REPORTING, Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki Copyright 2011 Monica Bogucki.
Data Practices in Minnesota December Outline for this presentation Minnesota data practices laws Classification of government data Government entity.
Poverty Law 1, MFIP Assets Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki 2015 Copyright.
Poverty Law 1 MFIP-S Five Year Time Limit Overview of Emergency Assistance Programs Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD 2015 Copyright.
Understanding More About Poverty, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W., J.D copyright Monica Bogucki Understanding More About Poverty, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W.,
Poverty Law 1, Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, MFIP-S Income Lecture Copyright 2015 Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD.
Social Security and SSI Practice—Deconstructing a Denial Notice Thomas Yates Health & Disability Advocates
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki Copyright 2013.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) The Last Gasp of Liberal United States Supreme Court Due Process Jurisprudence 1.
Roles of the Professional “The system depends on every professional doing his/her job.” Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki 2016Copyright Monica Bogucki.
Section 504 training.
Options for Youth, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W., J.D.
AHCCCS/ALTCS Service Appeal Process Flow Chart
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD
MANDATED REPORTING , Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki
State Welfare Hearings
Poverty Law 1 MFIP-S Five Year Time Limit Overview of Emergency Assistance Programs Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD Copyright.
Poverty Law 1, MFIP-S Income Lecture Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki
Poverty Law 1 Appeals and Hearings Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD 2017 Copyright Monica Bogucki.
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
Bellwork.
SSA Adverse Decisions and Administrative Finality
Social Security Disability Benefits By Sara G. Khaki, Esq
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD
What to Expect at a Medicaid Fair Hearing
MANDATED REPORTING , Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki
Understanding More About Poverty, Monica Bogucki, B. S. W. , J. D
Overview of Emergency Assistance Programs MFIP-S Five Year Time Limit Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD 2019 Copyright.
Poverty Law 1, MFIP-S Income Lecture Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki
Poverty Law 1 Appeals and Hearings, Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD 2019 copyright Monica Bogucki.
Presentation transcript:

Poverty Law 1 Appeals and Hearings, Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, 2013 copyright Monica Bogucki

Appeals and Hearings Department of Human Services Appeals ▪Who can appeal? ▪Applicant ▪Participant ▪Former Participant ▪Minn. Stat. 256J.40

What can be appealed ▪Unfavorable Inaction i.e. delay in processing applications ▪Sanctions ▪Overpayments ▪Unfavorable Action, reductions, suspensions, terminations, and denials ▪Use of vendor payments ▪Minn. Stat. 256J.40

What kinds of programs are covered under the DHS appeal process? ▪MFIP-S ▪Food Stamps ▪Medical Assistance ▪General Assistance ▪Social Service appeals,..... Minn.Stat. 256J.40,

Programs covered under the appeal process continued ▪Minnesota Supplemental Aid ▪Other Health Care- Minnesota Care ▪Emergency Assistance,.... ▪Administrative Disqualification Hearings ▪Minn. Stat ,

State Distric t Court Commissioner Human Services Judge State Appellate Court

County’s Responsibility to give notice County agency MUST give participant WRITTEN notice of all adverse actions affecting the participant ▪Must state: ▪Reasons for action: Legal basis and Factual basis ▪Participant’s right to appeal the action ▪Tell about the continued benefits pending appeal ▪Mail to last known address

What are continued benefits pending appeal? ▪What are the benefits to the client? ▪What are the disadvantages to the client? ▪Minn. Stat subd. 10 and 256J.40,

How do you appeal? What constitutes an appeal? ▪Written request for hearing to state agency within 30 days after receiving written notice of the action, decision, or final disposition, or within 90 days if one can show good cause.

Expedited Appeals for Emergency Assistance or other Urgent Matters ▪County has a duty to promptly make a decision to resolve the emergency, Minn. Stat subd.6 ▪Agency summary must be issued within two days of receiving the request

Expedited Appeal ▪Expedited hearing ▪Must issue decision at earliest date to resolve emergency ▪Commissioner must issue decision within 5 days of recommended decision

Fair Hearing Process ▪Based on Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) ▪This case established the fair hearing process ▪It has subsequently been adopted through federal regulations, state statutes

Pre-hearing conferences ▪Client is entitled to pre-hearing conferences ▪Minn. Stat subd. 5 ▪What is the purpose of a pre-hearing conference?

Appeal Agency Summaries Minn. Stat subd. 3 State facts, legal basis and attach exhibits Appellant must receive at least three working days before the date of the hearing Request continuance if not timely

Interpreter Interpreter, Minn. Stat , subd. 12 Human Services Judge has a duty to inquire and determine if participant needs an interpreter If interpreter is needed, hearing must be continued

Ex parte Contact No Ex parte Contact, Minn. Stat , subd. 9 Human Services Judge shall not have ex parte contact on substantive issues with the agency, any person or witness

Interactive Video Technology vs. face-to-face hearing Minn. Stat subd. 10 Right to face-to-face hearing If the appellant or witness has a physical or mental disability that would impair their ability to fully participate in a hearing, then the hearing must be in person. Minn. Stat subd. 4

Access to files Right to complete file Right to a free file Minn. Stat , subd. 2

What happens at a hearing? ▪Informal ▪Record is kept by a tape recording ▪Referee, Usually in person hearing but can be a telephone hearing ▪impartial decision maker ▪Hearsay is allowed ▪Subpoena

Client right to reimbursement of some expenses Minn. Stat. 256J.40, MFIP Child care Transportation Other reasonable and necessary expenses Also includes witnesses

County has a duty to reasonably accommodate clients ▪American with Disabilities Act ▪Rehabilitation Act of 1973

Examples ▪Ann is 34 years old and has a severe mental health condition. She is living by herself and recently applied for general assistance program. Ann’s mental health diagnosis is manic depression. She has serious mood swings. She is currently very depressed and unable to get the application and verification completed in time..

Example continued ▪The county has denied her application for lack of verification from her employer. The county financial worker did not offer any assistance to Ann. Ann missed her 30 day appeal deadline by the time she came to your legal office. Please give Ann advice.

Dan is a single parent receiving MFIP benefits. He has a one- year-old child. Dan received the following notice in the mail.

▪September 19, 2012 ▪Dan Johnson ▪ th Avenue South ▪Minneapolis, MN ▪Dear Mr. Johnson, ▪Your MFIP benefits are being terminated on October 1, We are terminating your benefits because you did not give use the proper verification. ▪Sincerely, ▪Ms. Jones, Financial Worker

Beth and her two children are receiving MFIP-S benefits. On Sept. 3rd, Beth received a notice saying her MFIP benefits would be terminated on October 1st. On September 6th, Beth appealed her termination of MFIP benefits.

Beth forgot to put in her appeal that she wanted continued benefits pending appeal. Beth didn’t receive her October grant. Please give her legal advice.

Fraud Issues Civil Issues, Overpayment Administrative Disqualification Hearings, Minn. Stat Criminal Action, Minn. Stat , Wrongfully Obtaining Public Assistance

Tennessen Warning Minn. Stat (a) the purpose and intended use of the requested data within the collecting government entity; (b) whether the individual may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data; (c) any known consequence arising from supplying or refusing to supply private or confidential data; and (d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data. Minnesota Government Data Practices Act

Reconsideration Person seeking reconsideration has the burden to demonstrate why the matter should be reconsidered. Minn. Stat , subd. 5