West Contra Costa Unified School District: CONTRACTOR DEBARMENT POLICY Appeal Process Following Debarment Hearing Facilities Sub-Committee February 12,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP The Basics of Bid Protests on Federal and California State Procurements Christopher R. Rodriguez.
Advertisements

November 19, Employment and Recruitment 2. Non-Discrimination Notice 3. Sexual Harassment 4. Criminal Background Check 5. Child Abuse and Neglect.
Procedural Safeguards
A Procedure for Major Consulting Services Contracts February 8, 2008.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
 A. Government Services Committee Resolution GSCJA Legislative authority for an elected official to supervise a Navajo Nation central government.
Determining Responsive Bids and Responsible Bidders and Offerors Presenter: J. Peter Stamps, CPPO, VCO VA Dept of General Services.
RFP vs. IFB A BASIC APPROACH TO THE BID PROCESS – WHEN RFPs or IFBs ARE USED 2010 AASBO Spring Pre-Conference Workshop Rosa Saenz, PGPC, Inc. Bill Munch,
Utah Procurement Code Training
Are you Sure About That? Pete Stamps CPPO, VCO Paul Higgins VCO.
Gene Shawcroft, P.E. Central Utah Water Conservancy District April 29-30, 2013.
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
Reporting Requirements and Procedures. Trafficking in Persons Reporting Requirements FAR Combating Trafficking in Persons* –Contractors shall.
Standards Aligned Systems MANDATE WAIVER PROGRAM 2008.
Additive Alternates on ODOT let Projects -A discussion- Joe Anthony Supervisor, Construction Cost Section Office of Estimating.
Protests & Appeals July 16, 2014 Kent D. Beers Chief Procurement Officer.
Due Process in Dismissal of Teachers
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
Harassment, Intimidation, and Bullying Policies and Legislation
The Threshold Has Changed: Now What Should I do? Presented by Jan Giffin, CPPO, CPPB, VCO Procurement Management Account Executive, DGS/DPS.
Rail Freight Assistance Program (RFAP) S ETTING THE S TAGE FOR THE F UTURE Rail Transportation Assistance Program (Rail TAP) RFAC Meeting April 28, 2010.
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
Office of Business Development Training
1 TURKISH REVIEW SYSTEM Nihal SAGUN Public Procurement Authority Head of Department 27 FEBRUARY 2008 ANKARA.
B. Proposed Revisions to UT HOP 3.16 Threatened Faculty Retrenchment (D )— Janet Staiger (professor, radio- television-film and committee chair).
School District Purchasing. Purchasing Authority Arizona Statutes Arizona Statutes Arizona Administrative Code Arizona Administrative Code  Primary source.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop CDBG LABOR STANDARDS.
CDBG Labor Standards Tonya Mole, Pam Truitt  September 4, 2014.
Encouraging Diversity Growth & Equity 123: Demonstration of Good Faith Todd McGonigle EDGE Program Manager Phone (614) FAX (614)
Debarment and Enjoinment Procedures for Construction Steve Owens Senior Assistant Attorney General and Chief Real Estate and Land Use Section Bert Jones.
Multiple Award Contracts Training Presented by Jennifer Salts State of Utah - Division of Purchasing 1.
Labor Standards Pam Truitt  September 10, Key Regulations & Statutes  Davis-Bacon Act  Copeland Act (Anti-kickback Act)  Contract Work Hours.
Child & Adult Care Food Program Serious Deficiency Process & Provider Appeals.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast David Peterson – La. AG’s Office – Asst. Attorney General - AG Designee to CPRA Ken Ortego – Vilar and Elliott.
WELCOME TO UNB. MARK McGEEHAN Assistant Manager, Procurement Services 3 plus years with UNB 28 years in Healthcare Procurement Current member of APPA.
West Contra Costa Unified School District: CONTRACTOR DEBARMENT POLICY Facilities Sub-Committee October 9, 2012.
Chapter 19: Ethical Responsibilities Chapter 19 Ethical Responsibilities.
2004 REGULAR LEGISLATIVE SESSION Prepared by: Office of Contractual Review.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
Arthur Schofield Executive Director Accreditation Standards (405) Arthur Schofield Executive Director Accreditation Standards (405)
Suspension and Debarment in the U.S. Department of Transportation DOT Office of Inspector General Presentation at National Fraud Awareness Conference on.
VENDORS MANUAL Presented by Dennis Blackwell, MBA, CPPB, VCO.
© 2011 Dannis Woliver Kelley This training is provided for educational, compliance and loss-prevention purposes only and, absent the express, prior agreement.
Dismissal Procedure Checklist. Initial Warning 1.Has the company acted immediately upon becoming aware of the unsatisfactory performance? 2.Was the employee.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop CDBG Labor Standards.
© 2011 Orbach Huff & Suarez 1 Lease Leaseback Project Delivery Method Kimble Cook Orbach, Huff & Suarez.
JEOPARDY PROCUREMENT EDITION Methods StandardsMystery ProceduresRegulations Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 FINAL.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Sealed Bids Unit 5.
Small Purchase of Professional Service Providers Administrative Rule R
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Getting Started: Basic Administrative Requirements Unit 1.
Food Purchasing for Child Care National Food Service Management Institute The University of Mississippi
CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE TOWN OF MIAMI LAKES Construction Services October 28, 2013.
Elevating the Quality of Life in the District. Debriefing Procedures Department of General Services Contracting and Procurement Division Policy, Research,
Section 504 training.
Managing the Protest Process
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
Wyoming Statutes §§ through
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association
Bidding Requirements Review Questions.
Session #2: Local Board Review of AEFLA Applications
Education Employment Procedures Law of 2001
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Demystifying Article 15A – MWBE Requirements
Leadership/ communication and commitment
Contests, Hearings, SDO Decisions & Appeals
GACCP SPRING TRAINING Presentation to: GACCP NOW / COMP Providers
Presentation transcript:

West Contra Costa Unified School District: CONTRACTOR DEBARMENT POLICY Appeal Process Following Debarment Hearing Facilities Sub-Committee February 12, 2013

© 2012 Orbach Huff & Suarez, LLP Debarment Rational  The award of contracts to contractors who fail to deal with the District in good faith compromises the integrity of the capital program and contracting process and results in the improper expenditure of public funds.  The Debarment Policy safeguards public trust by providing the Board of Education with a means to protect itself from business relations with dishonest, unethical or otherwise irresponsible persons.  The Debarment Policy affords appropriate due process and equal protection through a 3-step hearing / appeal process.

© 2012 Orbach Huff & Suarez, LLP Debarment Policy Debarment Policy is designed to accomplish the following:  Comply with Public Contract Code sections 1103 and  Implement Board Policy (“BP”) 3311 and Administrative Regulation (“AR”) 3311 to ensure that District contracts are let to responsible bidders.  Establish grounds for debarment.  Set forth procedures to debar non-responsible contractors from bidding or contracting with the District.  Establish due process safeguards, including an opportunity to appeal to the Board of Education.

© 2012 Orbach Huff & Suarez, LLP Reasons for Debarment Submission of false information in response to an advertisement or invitation for bids or quotes, a request for qualifications or a request for proposals; Failure to comply with the terms of a contract; A pattern and practice of disregarding or repudiating terms or conditions of District contracts.

© 2012 Orbach Huff & Suarez, LLP Process  Initiation of Debarment Proceedings Initiated by written “Notice of Proposed Debarment”  Contractor’s Request for a Hearing The request must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days.  Order Relative to Hearing The Hearing Officer shall issue an order granting the Contractor's request for a hearing, establishing the time and place thereof, and advising the Respondent of the consequences of a failure to appear at the hearing. The date of the hearing shall be held between forty-five (45) and sixty (60) calendar days of the date of the District’s receipt of the Respondent’s request for a hearing.

© 2012 Orbach Huff & Suarez, LLP Process, cont.  Hearing  Decision “Debarment”: The administrative determination against a Contractor declaring that the Contractor is non- responsible and/or is debarred from participating in the competitive process for contracts with the District or from entering into contracts with the District for a period of time commensurate with the seriousness of the offense or failure specified in the debarment order.  Opportunity for Appeal to Board of Education

© 2012 Orbach Huff & Suarez, LLP Appeal Process  Contractor must request review by filing a written appeal with the Board of Education within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the Hearing Officer's final determination.  An appeal may be granted or denied at the discretion of the Board of Education or its designee.  The Board of Education or its designee shall issue a determination within thirty (30) days of submission of the appeal.  Decision of the Board of Education shall be final. Following appeal to the Board of Education, Contractor may pursue judicial review, as provided for by statute.