State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Using Data to Meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Middle School Principal’s Breakout Session November 16, 2005.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
1 Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November 16, 2010 Michael Gillespie, Principal.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Title I Coordinators’ Meeting: Guiding Students to Proficiency December 07, 2005.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Understandin g the API & the AYP APLUS+ Annual Conference October 2010 Del Mar, California Diane Grotjohn
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
Meeting AYP and Generating API: Preventing “Leakage”
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
SANGER HIGH SCHOOL CALIFORNIA DISTINGUISHED SCHOOL CALSTAT LEADERSHIP SITE FOR COLLABORATION
Ross Valley School District STAR, API and AYP Summary Toni Beal, Director of Student Services September 27, 2011.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
2012 Accountability Determinations
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions
Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Key Concepts & Questions Adequate Yearly Progress
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
The RFEP Process RFEP: Redesignated Fluent English Proficient
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
Presentation transcript:

State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) vs. Academic Performance Index (API) Understanding the Difference

Contents: 1.Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2.Review of AYP Progress Report from Spring 2007 Testing 3.State Testing Accountability: Academic Performance Index (API) 4.Review of API Progress Report from Spring 2007 Testing 5.Preventing “Leakage” 6.Summary

Federal Testing Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) All Title I Schools must meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) school wide. Failure to meet AYP for two consecutive years in a single curricular area or AYP component will move a school into Program Improvement (PI) status. Curricular Areas: Language Arts and Math

Exiting Program Improvement (PI) To exit PI status, a PI school must meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in each AYP component for two consecutive years.

AYP Criteria for Elementary/Middle School: 1. Participation Rate: 95% participation rate must be met in CSTs (and CAPA) for all 2 nd -8 th graders and for each “significant” sub group.

AYP Criteria Elementary/Middle School: Annual Measurable Outcomes (AMO) ELA ’07= 24.4% ’08= 35.2% ’09= 46.0% Mathematics ’07=26.5% ’08=37.0% ’09=47.5% 2. Testing Proficiency (AMO): Minimum Percentage of students at Proficient to Advanced levels of the California Standards Test (CST)

Figure #2- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students

AYP Criteria for Elementary/Middle School/High School: 3. Academic Performance Index (API) Elementary, Middle and High School levels: Minimal School API Score of 590 (620 in Spring ‘08) Or Increase of 1 API point per year

ALL Title I Schools are accountable for significant subgroups If a Title I School has a subgroup population which is: 100 students or greater who are to be STAR tested, or 99 to 50 students which represent at least 15% of the total number of students to be tested, the subgroup must meet: Participation Rate and Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) Proficiency Rates.

3 Key Subgroups English Learners Socio Economically Disadvantaged Special Education

Key Subgroup: EL Students Includes RFEPS.

Key Subgroup: Socio Economically Disadvantaged Free and Reduced Lunch. Parents did not graduate from High School.

Key Subgroup: Special Education Any student with an IEP. Exited Special Ed Students count for Proficiency (2 years max). Math Proficiency Provision.

Review New AYP Report Accountability Progress Report

Academic Performance Index (API) California State Testing Accountability

The Big Two: Elementary & Middle School API Component Breakdown 1. ELA CST: 50% 2. Math CST EOC: 30%

API Participation Rate: Elementary & Middle School 85% participation rate must be met in California Standards Tests (CST) Grade Level Exams excludes End of Course tests (EOC)

Calculating API Key to Understanding API Growth

Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings based on ELA CST Quintile API Weights Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic

Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings based on Math CST Quintile API Weights Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic Numbers of Students

Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings based on ELA CST Quintile API Weights Gain in API Weight N/A Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic

Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students API For Academic Performance Index (API), greatest gains will occur when moving students from the lowest CST levels due to weighting factors.

Review New API Report Accountability Progress Report

Meeting AYP and Generating API: Preventing “Leakage”

“Leakage” AYP Two Reasons AYP is not met: 1. Failure to move Basic students to Proficiency. 2. Having students “leak” multiple quintile levels out of proficiency.

Figure #2- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students

“Checking for Leaks”: XXXX Middle School Spring 2004 to Spring 2005 CST results Targeted Intervention Program in Math 50 students moved to CST proficiency 60 students move out of CST proficiency Net Growth of Proficient students in Math: -10

“Leakage” API Two Reasons API drops: 1. Failure to move students from Far Below Basic to Below Basic. 2. Having students “leak” multiple quintile levels.

Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings and Weights Quintile API Weights Gain in API Weight N/A Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic

Preventing “Leaks”: Early monitoring of proficient and above students with student work and the periodic assessments in ELA and Math. Provide early differentiated instruction for struggling proficient students in IWT.

To Insure API Growth, While Implementing the Core Program Elements with Fidelity, Consider: Fully Reviewing School-wide Intervention Program, including IWT.

Prevent Leakage: Elementary CST Comparison Data. Procedure to create an SIS report which compares two or more years of CST data for individual students. Type/Press: Main Screen- #7 Testing Menu-#4 CST Menu-#2 Current Teacher Report All or Specific Room- Press Enter Checking for “Leaks”: Elementary

ID99,2 (current year) “1” (for active) (enter today’s date) “2” (select by class number) “Y” (enter by district course #) – Grade 6 Math Grade 7 Math – Algebra I – Algebra Readiness (proceed to next step) “T” (sort by teacher) Press enter (Do start a new page or switch to Don’t) (create a new report) Type in title, then enter Checking for “Leaks”: Secondary

Key to Meeting AYP and Generating API: Positive Annual Gains

Goal: Move One Testing Level Per Year regardless of assessed level.

Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students

Wade Hayashida Categorical Program Coordinator Local District