District Determined Measures aka: DDMs The Challenge: The Essential Questions: 1.How can I show, in a reliable and valid way, my impact on students’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework October 2011.
District Determined Measures
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Connecting the Process to: -Current Practice -CEP -CIITS/EDS 1.
Paul Toner, MTA, President Heather Peske, ESE, Associate Commissioner for Ed Quality Teachers Union Reform Network Conference November 1, 2013 Massachusetts.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 1 Welcome!  Please complete the four “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Student Learning and Growth Goals 101: Requirements and Recommendations Spring 2015 Webinar.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Watertown Public Schools Assessment Report 2009 Ann Koufman-Frederick & WPS Administrative Council School Committee Meeting December 7, 2009 Part I MCAS,
District Determined Measures aka: DDMs What is a DDM? Think of a DDM as an assessment tool similar to MCAS. It is a measure of student learning, growth,
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Unpacking the Educator Evaluation System Non-Professional Status Teachers entering the Evaluation System.
District Determined Measures
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
SLO Process A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Title IIA: Connecting Professional Development with Educator Evaluation June 1, 2015 Craig Waterman.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Dr. Deborah A. Brady Ribas Associates, Inc.. First Hour  Overview of District Determined Measures  The Timeline  Quality Assessments  Tools from DESe.
Today’s website:
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
Student Learning targets
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
North Reading Public Schools Educator Evaluation and District Determined Measures: Laying the Foundation Patrick Daly, Ed.D North Reading Public Schools.
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education July, 2011
DDMs for School Counselors RTTT Final Summit April 7, 2014 Craig Waterman & Kate Ducharme.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.
District-Determined Measures Planning and Organizing for Success Educator Evaluation Spring Convening: May 29, 2013.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Melrose High School MCAS Presentation October 22, 2013.
MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion.
Special Educator Evaluation Matt Holloway Educator Effectiveness Specialist.
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Next Steps Prepared by the MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice January 2012.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Student Growth Objectives Unifying Standards, Instruction, and Assessment to Improve Student Learning June
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Morris School District Grade 4 and 5 Math Grouping Alternative BOE Approved June 2015.
New Hope-Solebury School District Effective Educator Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
The New Educator Evaluation System
The New Educator Evaluation System
The New Educator Evaluation System
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

District Determined Measures aka: DDMs

The Challenge: The Essential Questions: 1.How can I show, in a reliable and valid way, my impact on students’ learning something important over the course of the year? 2.What data do I already collect, or do I need to collect, that will show my students’ growth that is fair to all groups of students? 3.Does this data fairly and accurately represent my impact on the students I teach or work with?

What is a DDM? Think of a DDM as an assessment tool similar to MCAS. It is a measure of student learning, growth, and achievement related to MA curriculum frameworks or other relevant set of professional standards for a particular discipline. But, a DDM can also be unlike MCAS: – A portfolio – A capstone project – A commercial assessment (e.g., DRA2, Lexia Core5) – ACCESS for ELLs – Indirect measures: Attendance/discipline/graduation rates, course taking patterns, social/emotional/behavioral learning over time. Useful for Specialized Instructional Support Personnel (SISP).

What Qualities Must a DDM Have, especially since it is tied to teacher evaluation ? 1.Must be aligned to and target most the important learning standards, or objectives/student outcomes, for grade level & content area (content validity). 2.Must be informative: informs educators about where students fall short or excel; measures students’ progress/growth effectively. Tells us something useful. 3.Must be free of any bias (e.g., non-verbal students, cultural/vocabulary backgrounds). All groups of students (honors and disabled) should have an equal chance to demonstrate growth. 4.Has common administration protocols. Note: Testing accommodations on a student’s IEP must also be implemented for DDMs. 5.Has a common scoring guide and process. 6.Will yield a range of performance & growth: high, moderate, low. Moderate = 1 year’s progress. Needs to discriminate between strong and weak performers. 7.Are equally rigorous across schools, grades, and content areas.

Four Basic Types of DDMs 1.Pretest and Posttest 2.Repeated Measures (done in short, regular intervals: e.g., DRA2 or running records, Lexia Core5 or Strategies for Older Students) 3.Holistic Evaluation (e.g., portfolio) 4.Posttest only (e.g., end of unit, term, or course assessments; capstone project) Note: A DDM should show growth over a year. One can use a series of units to do so.

What is Required of All Educators? At least 2 DDMs per educator used over a 2 year period to measure Impact on Student Learning (typically not for the same students)(exceptions: adjustment counselor’s case load) : Pilot as many DDMs as possible : 1st year implementation of joint committee approved DDMs ( with extension): As part of new Educator Evaluation System, educators receive first round of Impact ratings (high, moderate, low) based on two years of data and collaborative (educator/evaluator) professional judgment. Note: “Moderate” growth is defined as 1 year’s progress/growth over 1 year’s time and relative to one’s academic peers; the amount of growth we would reasonably expect for a student over one school year relative to his/her academic peers.

Two Ratings for All Educators Summative Rating: Based on Professional Practice and Goals Ratings Exemplary 1-yr Self-Directed Growth Plan 2-yr Self-Directed Growth Plan Proficient Needs Improvement Directed Growth Plan Unsatisfactory Improvement Plan LowModerateHigh Rating of Impact on Student Learning (Using two or more DDMs over two years: multiple measures of performance, including MCAS Student Growth Percentiles and ACCESS where available) 7 Impact Rating on Student Performance

2 DDMs over 2 Years: Some Scenarios If you teach or do… 1.Multiple subjects (e.g., K/elementary level). 2.One subject or grade level course only (e.g. middle school). 3.Multiple courses and/or grades (e.g., high school). 4.Specialized Instructional Support (for SISP). 5.“Co-teachers” (e.g. Title 1, ELL, SpEd): use same DDMs/SGPs. You need or can use… 1.1 DDM for ELA; 1 DDM for math (Gr 4 & 5: must use 1 MCAS SGP; can use both ELA & Math SGP). 2.2 DDMs for that subject or course for all sections (Gr 6-8: 1 must be MCAS SGP for ELA & math teachers). 3.You and your supervisor will need to identify which two courses’ DDMs to use that best represent the core of your work. 4.Portfolio; Indirect Measures (e.g., attendance, discipline, or behavioral data, etc.).

What Needs to be Done by When? By June 1, 2014, all districts need to submit to DESE a DDM implementation plan for onward. District DDM Plan needs to indicate the two-three DDMs to be developed and used for each grade level, course, or role. Recommendation: Use what assessments you currently have and modify them to meet DESE standards for DDMs. A joint committee (elementary & secondary) has been formed to review and approve all DDMs before they are used as part of the Educator Evaluation System. This group will also determine how to use DDM results to determine Impact Ratings. Note: All DDM work will be eligible for PDP credit.

The Challenge: The Essential Questions: 1.How can I show, in a reliable and valid way, my impact on students’ learning something important over the course of the year? 2.What data do I already collect, or do I need to collect, that will show my students’ growth that is fair to all groups of students? 3.Does this data fairly and accurately represent my impact on the students I teach or work with?

The End Q & A