EE2006 25 July 2006 Enhancing the Design and Assessment of Practical Work in the Engineering Curriculum Sean Wellington 25 July 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Foundation A Look at the Evaluation Process by The Teacher Foundation (TTF)
Advertisements

Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Use of an objective assessment tool to evaluate students basic electrical engineering skills Nandini Alinier University of Hertfordshire, U.K. Engineering.
Student Learning Strategies for Success in Computer Networking July 06 Student Learning Strategies for Success in Computer Networking By Name Neville Palmer.
24-26 July 2006EE2006 Conference, Liverpool, UK1 Dr T. Laoui 1, John ODonoghue 2 University of Wolverhampton 1 School of Engineering and Built Environment.
Introducing PBL to a first-year curriculum: results and experiences Frank Forsythe [ project leader ] Malcolm Campbell Paul Keen.
Personal Development Plans (PDPs) Subject-specific PDPs in Economics.
Supporting further and higher education Setting the scene Rhona Sharpe Learner Experience Support Project.
Qualifications Update: National 5 Music Qualifications Update: National 5 Music.
Qualifications Update: National 5 Drama Qualifications Update: National 5 Drama.
Assessment: Aligning Assessment to Learning Outcomes by Dr Charles Juwah Department for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Assessment RGU: DELTA.
Writing Effective Learning Outcomes Department for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Assessment RGU:DELTA.
Enhancement Themes Professor David Lines The Robert Gordon University.
Peer peer-assessment & peer- feedback
Innovation in Assessment? Why? Poor student feedback regarding feedback timeliness and usefulness Staff workloads Student lack of awareness as to what.
Year Two Year Three Year One Research methods teaching in the social sciences: An integrated approach to inquiry- based learning.
Phyo Kyaw Synoptic Learning and Assessment: An Experience Report.
Student Opinion of Learning Activities on Computing Undergraduate Degrees John Colvin and Alan Phelan University of Worcester February 2006.
Academic assessment of work placement – made easy?
Feedback to students: What do we know about feedback and learning?
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Registry
Operation of Central Progression and Award Boards Laurence Fuller Head of Student Records and Examinations Planning and Academic Administration.
Day 2 Planning a Practice Curriculum  Small group review of SWOT analysis. Identify learning available and constraints Identify different specialities.
What is the meaning of Meaning?. Is this a good question?
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
Criterion-Referenced Assessment on Dissertation (Level 4 Subject) Faculty T&L Forum on Outcome-based Curriculum and Criterion-referenced Assessment 1 April.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Alternative Assesment There is no single definition of ‘alternative assessment’ in the relevant literature. For some educators, alternative assessment.
CB330005S Review and Planning UND: April 2007.
Curriculum Leadership Course Chemistry Module 5: Managing Curriculum Change Fong Wai Hung
SPEAC - PROGRAMME An initiative to bridge between offered and desired learning.
Aim to provide key guidance on assessment practice and translate this into writing assignments.
From Numbers To Learning. Vision Of FEN We believe in providing a holistic educational system, encompassing all learning fields that emphasize achievement.
Introducing Assessment
Inspiration Day 2007 To Evaluate or not Evaluate (Our Teaching), That is the Question.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
INTRODUCTION.- PROGRAM EVALUATION
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
Welcome to the Secondary PGCE New Mentor meeting.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Learning outcomes and introduction to assessment Pg Certificate in Higher Education Professional Practice Jannie Roed and Sue Moron-Garcia 6 th May 2009.
Assessing Student Performance in Practice Colin Bright – Solent University June Tilling – Soton University.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Learning Outcomes: Keeping it Real Liz Warr. Eduspeak  Dialect particularly spoken in Educational Development Units, including favoured phrases such.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Marek Frankowicz.  Top-down  We have an idea of a new program  We formulate program learning outcomes  We divide the program into modules  We develop.
Learning Learning Outcomes, Qualification Frameworks, Goals, Cycles, Levels, Credit, Workload, Profiles Andy Gibbs Bishkek 2011.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Results Student Engagement : Students generally found logbooks easy to use and practical in the hospital setting. Purpose : There appeared to be a perceived.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
C ENTRE FOR E XCELLENCE IN T EACHING & L EARNING A SSESSMENT FOR L EARNING Assessment for Learning in Practice: case studies from Northumbria's CETL Gill.
The selection of appropriate assessment methods in a course is influenced by many factors: the intended learning outcomes, the discipline and related professional.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
1 California Teaching Performance Assessment Background.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Assessment. Summative assessment Summative assessment is the process of evaluating (and grading) the learning of students at a point in time. The University.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
To enable learners to investigate the technical and tactical requirements of a sport and methods of improving their own technical and tactical ability.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Grading based on student centred and transparent assessment of learning outcomes Tommi Haapaniemi
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Talk about the assignment! April 27th 2015 #TOOC15 Webinar.
Assessment for Learning Centre for Academic Practice Enhancement, Middlesex University.
Task Design in Undergraduate Mathematics Leigh Wood Chair, Standing Committee on Mathematics Education Australian Mathematical Society Associated Dean,
Bloom, Assessment & Aims and Objectives Module: ES204 Lecturers – Dr Justin Rami.
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Classroom-based assessment to promote equity
Presentation transcript:

EE July 2006 Enhancing the Design and Assessment of Practical Work in the Engineering Curriculum Sean Wellington 25 July 2006

EE July 2006 The problem A first year undergraduate Circuit Theory module: Conventional approach to learning and teaching – lectures, small group problem classes and practical work. Comprehensive learner support materials (including lecture notes and laboratory worksheets) From 2004/05 introduced a revised approach to the organization and assessment of the practical programme intended to: Promote greater student engagement with the practical activity Improve transparency of assessment process, in particular to allow students to self-manage their study Reduce assessment workload for staff

EE July 2006 The module A first year undergraduate Circuit Theory module: Knowledge and Understanding 1. Describe and apply the conventions and techniques of linear circuit analysis Cognitive skills 2. Analyse the behaviour of DC and sinusoidal AC networks 3. Analyse the transient response of linear first and second order passive networks Practical and Professional skills 4. Record and interpret the results of laboratory experiments

EE July 2006 The process

EE July 2006 Assessment criteria Threshold/Pass (40 – 50%) Complete and document a programme of practical laboratory work Undertake routine tests, report and comment on the results Use electronic test equipment Good/Merit (60 – 70%) Complete and document a programme of practical laboratory work Research information related to the problem domain Undertake a planned series of tests, analyse and discuss the results Select and use electronic test equipment Excellent/Distinction (75 – 100%) Complete and document a programme of practical laboratory work Initiate and undertake searches for information related to the problem domain, evaluate it and recommend actions based on the information Undertake a planned series of tests, analyse and discuss the results, and recommend actions based upon the information Select and use electronic test equipment

EE July 2006 An example task for Good/Merit

EE July 2006

EE July 2006 Observations (1) Student attainment Majority of students achieve only a Threshold pass for the practical work – often this is a tactical decision However, the formative/summative assessment process effective in supporting students to achieve at least the minimum standard required for the module Student feedback Very positive about the module in general. Value the transparent approach to assessment of practical work and the ability to organize their own workloads Appreciate the role of practical work in supporting their learning, but some respondents would prefer closer alignment between the lecture and practical programmes

EE July 2006 Observations (2) External Examiners Very positive feedback – in particular alignment with Learning Outcomes and use of explicit criteria to differentiate between different levels of achievement Staff reflections We are continuing to refine the approach and believe it could be usefully adopted for other subjects/modules

EE July 2006 Further information Sean Wellington Faculty of Technology Southampton Solent University East Park Terrace SOUTHAMPTON SO14 0RD Tel: +44 (0)