Department of Pharmacology L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad-09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple-choice question
Advertisements

Split-Plot Designs Usually used with factorial sets when the assignment of treatments at random can cause difficulties large scale machinery required for.
Experimental Design True Experimental Designs n Random assignment n Two comparison groups n Controls threats to internal validity n Strongest evidence.
Multiple Comparisons in Factorial Experiments
Research Study Designs
Incomplete Block Designs. Randomized Block Design We want to compare t treatments Group the N = bt experimental units into b homogeneous blocks of size.
Statistical considerations Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Chapter 4Design & Analysis of Experiments 7E 2009 Montgomery 1 Experiments with Blocking Factors Text Reference, Chapter 4 Blocking and nuisance factors.
1 Chapter 4 Experiments with Blocking Factors The Randomized Complete Block Design Nuisance factor: a design factor that probably has an effect.
DOX 6E Montgomery1 Design of Engineering Experiments Part 3 – The Blocking Principle Text Reference, Chapter 4 Blocking and nuisance factors The randomized.
Chapter 4 Randomized Blocks, Latin Squares, and Related Designs
Stratification (Blocking) Grouping similar experimental units together and assigning different treatments within such groups of experimental units A technique.
Design and Analysis of Experiments
Design of Experiments and Analysis of Variance
Instructor: Mr. Le Quoc Members : Pham Thi Huong Tran Thi Loan Nguyen Ngoc Linh Hoang Thanh Hai ANOVA IN DEPTH – DESIGNS AND EXAMPLES.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Statistical Considerations for Bioequivalence.
1 Multifactor ANOVA. 2 What We Will Learn Two-factor ANOVA K ij =1 Two-factor ANOVA K ij =1 –Interaction –Tukey’s with multiple comparisons –Concept of.
C82MST Statistical Methods 2 - Lecture 7 1 Overview of Lecture Advantages and disadvantages of within subjects designs One-way within subjects ANOVA Two-way.
Chapter 9 - Lecture 2 Some more theory and alternative problem formats. (These are problem formats more likely to appear on exams. Most of your time in.
Chapter 3 Analysis of Variance
Review of Matrix Algebra
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
Chapter 10 - Part 1 Factorial Experiments.
Incomplete Block Designs
Chapter 9 - Lecture 2 Computing the analysis of variance for simple experiments (single factor, unrelated groups experiments).
Outline Single-factor ANOVA Two-factor ANOVA Three-factor ANOVA
Statistical Analysis. Purpose of Statistical Analysis Determines whether the results found in an experiment are meaningful. Answers the question: –Does.
Common Designs for Controlled Clinical Trials A.Parallel Group Trials 1.Simplest example - 2 groups, no stratification 2.Stratified design 3.Matched pairs.
ANOVA Chapter 12.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 7 ANOVA. Program for today F Analysis of variance; F One factor design; F Many factors design; F Latin square scheme.
Statistical Analysis Statistical Analysis
Research Methods in Psychology
QNT 531 Advanced Problems in Statistics and Research Methods
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.
به نام ايزد يکتا Clinical Trial Design Dr. Khalili 1  The common types  Advantages and limitations  Usual applications.
PROBABILITY & STATISTICAL INFERENCE LECTURE 6 MSc in Computing (Data Analytics)
Chapter 8 Experimental Design: Dependent Groups and Mixed Groups Designs.
Analysis of Covariance ANOVA is a class of statistics developed to evaluate controlled experiments. Experimental control, random selection of subjects,
Two-way ANOVA Introduction to Factorial Designs and their Analysis.
Psychology 301 Chapters & Differences Between Two Means Introduction to Analysis of Variance Multiple Comparisons.
Chapter 4 analysis of variance (ANOVA). Section 1 the basic idea and condition of application.
1 Chapter 13 Analysis of Variance. 2 Chapter Outline  An introduction to experimental design and analysis of variance  Analysis of Variance and the.
Two-Way Balanced Independent Samples ANOVA Computations.
Testing Hypotheses about Differences among Several Means.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
1 A nuisance factor is a factor that probably has some effect on the response, but it’s of no interest to the experimenter…however, the variability it.
Essential Question:  How do scientists use statistical analyses to draw meaningful conclusions from experimental results?
Educational Research Chapter 13 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10 th Edition.
Control of Experimental Error Blocking - –A block is a group of homogeneous experimental units –Maximize the variation among blocks in order to minimize.
1 Always be contented, be grateful, be understanding and be compassionate.
Bioequivalence Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
Chapter 13 Design of Experiments. Introduction “Listening” or passive statistical tools: control charts. “Conversational” or active tools: Experimental.
Three or More Factors: Latin Squares
Econ 3790: Business and Economic Statistics Instructor: Yogesh Uppal
ANOVA Overview of Major Designs. Between or Within Subjects Between-subjects (completely randomized) designs –Subjects are nested within treatment conditions.
1 Topic 14 – Experimental Design Crossover Nested Factors Repeated Measures.
1/54 Statistics Analysis of Variance. 2/54 Statistics in practice Introduction to Analysis of Variance Analysis of Variance: Testing for the Equality.
Experimental Designs The objective of Experimental design is to reduce the magnitude of random error resulting in more powerful tests to detect experimental.
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
Experimental Design-Chapter 8
Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs
Statistics for Business and Economics (13e)
Econ 3790: Business and Economic Statistics
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
Between-Subjects Experimental Designs
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Repeated Measures Balancing Practice Effects with an Incomplete Design
Chapter 10 – Part II Analysis of Variance
ANOVA: Analysis of Variance
Presentation transcript:

Department of Pharmacology L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad-09

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SPECIFIC DESIGN UNDER CROSSOVER ADVANTAGES / DISADVANTAGES ANOVA FOR CROSSOVER BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY TEST FOR CARRYOVER EFFECT

INTRODUCTION The crossover design(changeover design) is a very popular & often desirable design in clinical experiment. comparative bioavailability or bioequivalence studies, in which two or more formulation of same drugs are compared Each patient acts his or her own control

In this design typically two treatment are compared, with each patient or subject taking each treatment in turn. The treatment are taken on two occasion often called visits, period, or legs. The order of treatment is randomized that is – “Either A is followed by B or B is followed by A ” A B or B A first week second week first week second week Where A and B are the two treatment

Each patient receive both the treatments ( drug & placebo) Comparison is “within” patient not “between” the patients The smaller the within or intrasubject variability relative to between or intersubject variability the more efficient will be crossover design.

Crossover Trial period- 1 period- 2 Drug Placebo patient order-1 Placebo Drug order-2 placeb o

Specific design under crossover are: Two treatment two period crossover design Two treatment four period crossover design (switchover design) Latin square Design Graeco Latin square Design Balance incomplete block Design (BIBD)

Two treatment two period crossover design In a study involving two treatment in which each subject receive both the treatment. Even number of subject are selected. half of them are assigned to first treatment(A), rest half to other treatment(B) in the first period After washout period planned the subject received treatment A or B in first period are treated with treatment B or A respectively in second period. This design is very often used in bio-eqivalence studies & comparison of two antihypertensive agent

Two treatment two period crossover design: Subject No. Period 1 Period 2 1 AB 2 AB 3 BWash out periodA 4 AB 5 BA 6 = include wash out period after each treatment period

Two treatment four period crossover design (switchover design) Like in previous design the patient are randomly assigned to two treatment and thereafter two treatments are given alternatively for more than two period. Switchover design are used in disease that are associated with periodic conditions. In females some diseases are associated with menstrual cycles. These menstrual cycle may be ovulatory or non-ovulatory if any study is restricted to only two cycle it is likely that one or both menstrual cycle in some female are non-ovulatory. So in order to have exposure to ovulatory as well as non-ovulatory cycle. more than two period are included in study design.

Two treatment four period crossover design (switchover design) Subject NO A B A B 2 B A B A 3 B A B A 4 A B A B 5 A B A = include wash out period after each treatment period

Latin square design In a study where three or more treatments are involved with a condition that each subject is required to be exposed to all treatments in different sequence. In this design with three treatments, total number of subjects (generally in multiples of three)is randomly assigned to three treatment group in period one. The treatment in 2 nd & 3 rd period is given in cyclic order (namely A to B,B to C or C to A) Such design are used in bioequivalence and agriculture experiment.

Latin square Design Subject NO period period period3 1 A B C 2 C A B 3 B C A 4 B C A 5 A B C 6 C A = include wash out period after each treatment period

Graeco Latin square design This design is used when effect of treatment and factor are required to be studied simultaneously in cases where number of treatment and number of factor is exactly the same. In this design subjects are assigned to different combination of treatment and factor in period1 Where A,B and C are treatment and x,y and z are factor and combination's available are treatment A with factor x (Ax),B with factor y (By) and C with factor z (Cz) This design is mostly used in agricultural experiments and some times to identify drug-drug or drug-food interaction.

Graeco Latin square Design Subject NO period period period3 1 Ax By Cz 2 Cz Ax By 3 By Cz Ax 4 By Cz Ax 5 Ax By Cz 6 Cz Ax = include wash out period after each treatment period

Balance incomplete block Design (BIBD) in bio-equivalence(BE) studies simple three – treatment, three period crossover design can actually be used. BE studies, carried out with this design will need withdrawal of blood sample in each period. thus over the three periods, total volume of blood sample withdrawal from each subject exceed ethically permitted upper limit posing ethical issues. So study carried out using statistically valid design – four treatment & two periods – BIBD As per this design if there are four treatment A,B,C and D, six possible pair of treatments can be formed namely,AB, AC, AD, BC,BD and CD. Subject are first assigned randomly to six pairs treatment, then remaining subjects are assigned randomly to exactly opposite pairs. Next six subject will be assigned to exactly opposite combination

Balance incomplete block Design (BIBD) Subject NO period period 1 A B 2 C D 3 B C 4 A D 5 A C 6 B = include wash out period after each treatment period

Advantage of Crossover design v/s parallel design Increase precision relative to parallel group design More economical: one-half number of patient or subject have been recruited to obtain same number of observation as in parallel design. Cross-over design in term of cost depend on the economy of the patient recruitment, cost of experimental observations as well as relative within-patient /between patient variation. The smaller the within patient variation relative to between patient variation.the more efficient will be crossover design. Cross-over design may actually Save the time because fewer patient are needed to obtain equal power compared to the parallel design.

Disadvantage of Crossover design v/s parallel design Take longer to complete than a parallel study because of extra testing period. Missing data pose a more serious problem than in parallel design. If an observation is lost in one of the legs of two period crossover the statistical analysis is more difficult and the design loses some efficiency. The most serious problem with use of crossover design is one common to all Latin square design is differential carryover or residual effect.

Carryover effect occurs when the response on second period(legs) is depend on the response in the first period Differential carryover effect where the short interval between administration of dosage forms X and Y is not sufficient to rid the body of drug when formulation X is given first. This results in an apparent larger blood level for formulation Y when it is given subsequent to formulation X. carryover effects are not as obvious. These effects can be caused by such uncontrolled factors as psychological or physiological states of the patients, or by external factors such as the weather, clinical setting, assay techniques, and so on.

B A Carryover effect Sufficient long washout period ensure that carryover of blood concentration of drug is absent.

Analysis of variance Table for the crossover Bioequivalence study (AUC) sourced.fSSMSP Subject period Treatment Error Total *p < 0.05.

Data for the Bioequivalence comparing drug A and drug B

AUC ∑si∑si subjectorderAB 1AB BA AB AB BA BA AB BA BA AB AB BA Mean ∑ x

The AUC data in Table is the data for the first period are obtained by noting the order of administration. Subject 1 took product A during the first period (290) subject 2 took B during the first period (163); and so on. Therefore, the first period observations are 290,163,187, 168, 220, 133,294,190,168, 250, 293,188 (sum = 2544) ∑p 1 = 2544 The second period observations are 210, 201,116,77, 200,151, 140,97,228,161,240,154 (sum =1975 ) ∑p 2 = 1975

The period sum of square can be calculated as follow: Where ∑ x 1 and ∑ x 2 are sums of all observations in the first and second period N is the number of subject C.T. is the correction term

∑ x t is the some of all observation : = 4519 ∑ x A is the some of observation for product A = 2513 ∑ x B is the some of observation for product B = 2006 ∑ P 1 is sum of all observation for period 1 =2544 ∑ P2 is sum of all observation for period 2 = 1975 ∑x 2 T is the some of squared observation = Calculation for ANOVA :

Total degrees of freedom = Total number of observations - 1 = 24-1 = 23 Degree of freedom for subject = Total no. of subject - 1 = 12 – 1 = 11 Degree of freedom for period = Total no. of period - 1 = 2 – 1 = 1

Degree of freedom for treatment = Total no. of treatment - 1 = 2 – 1 = 1 Degree of freedom for Error = Total d.f – subject d.f – period d.f – treatment d.f = = 10

Calculate the mean square (MS) It is obtained by dividing each sum of squares with corresponding degrees of freedom General equation: MS= SS/df

period MS F= Error MS = 12.6 Treatment MS F= Error MS =10.0 To test the different among the treatment & among the product F ratio is formed :

Test for carryover (sequence) effect: Compute some of squares due to carryover effect by comparing the results for group I to group II Group I and Group II which differ in order of treatment group I ( treatment A first, B second) and group II (treatment B first, A second) It can be demonstrated that in absence of sequence effects the average result for group I is expected be the equal to the average result for group II.

Data for bioequivalence study comparing Drug A and Drug B

The sum of squares is calculated as : The sequence some of squares is

The proper error term to test the sequence effect is within group Means square represented by some of squares between subject within group sum of squares = Where (C.T ) I and (C.T) II are correction term for group I and group II, within group some of square is == =

the within group some of square has 10 degree of freedom i. e. 5 from each group. The mean square is : sum of square = d.f 10 = 3894 Test the sequence effect = sequence some of square within group mean square = = 1.19

The effect is not significant at 5% level If the carryover effect is not significant proceed with the usual analysis If the carryover effect is significant,the usual analysis is not valid. The recommended analysis use only first period result deleting the data contaminated by carryover.( second period result) using only the first period data so the analysis is appropriate for one way analysis of variance.

References:- Pharmaceutical Statistics, practical and clinical application, forth edition by S. Bolton & C. Bon Basic principle of clinical research and methodology edition by sk gupta

“SUCCESS is never PERMANENT” “FAILURE is never FINAL”, So do not stop trying until your VICTORY Makes a HISTORY THANK YOU