Electron Cloud Simulations Using ORBIT Code - Cold Proton Bunch model April 11, 2007 ECLOUD07 Yoichi Sato, Nishina Center, RIKEN 1 Y. Sato ECLOUD07.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1Y. SatoIndiana University; SNS, ORNL Electron Cloud Feedback Workshop Indiana University, Bloomington 03/15-19/2004 Simulation of e-Cloud using ORBIT.
Advertisements

Heat load due to e-cloud in the HL-LHC triplets G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo 19th HiLumi WP2 Task Leader Meeting - 18 October 2013 Many thanks to: H.Bartosik,
Summary of the two-stream instability session G. Rumolo, R. Cimino Based on input from the presentations of G. Iadarola, H. Bartosik, R. Nagaoka, N. Wang,
March 14-15, 2007ECloud Feedback, IUCF1 Electron-Cloud Effects in Fermilab Booster K.Y. Ng Fermilab Electron-Cloud Feedback Workshop IUCF, Indiana March.
RedOffice.com Presentation templates Slide No. 1 RFA Detector Data of Electron Cloud Build-up and Simulations Eric Wilkinson Mentor: Jim Crittenden Cornell.
Using Tune Shifts to Evaluate Electron Cloud Effects on Beam Dynamics at CesrTA Jennifer Chu Mentors: Dr. David Kreinick and Dr. Gerry Dugan 8/11/2011REU.
Electron Cloud Modeling for CesrTA Daniel Carmody Mentors: Levi Schächter, David Rubin August 8th, 2007.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update T. Demma, INFN-LNF.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
By Jeffrey Eldred Data Analysis Workshop March 13th 2013 Intro to Electron Cloud: An experimental summary.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
1 Electron Cloud Measurements at the Fermilab Main Injector Bob Zwaska Fermilab ECloud07 Workshop April 9, 2007.
Electron-Proton Dynamics for Long Proton Bunches in High Intensity Proton Rings Development and Simulations of Electron Cloud Module in ORBIT Code Jan.
Electron Cloud Simulations Using ORBIT Code - Cold Proton Bunch model March 14, 2007 EP feedback workshop at Indiana University Bloomington Yoichi Sato,
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CesrTA Experimental Plan M. Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration November 17, 2008.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Analysis of 2008 Beam Instability Data S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, M. Plum HB2008.
1 CERN 1 Mar E-CLOUD Build-up in Grooved Chambers Marco Venturini Center for Beam Physics, LBNL ECL2 -- CERN, 1-2 March 2007.
Electron cloud in the wigglers of ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Physics of electron cloud build up Principle of the multi-bunch multipacting. No need to be on resonance, wide ranges of parameters allow for the electron.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Midwest Accelerator Physics Meeting. Indiana University, March 15-19, ORBIT Electron Cloud Model Andrei Shishlo, Yoichi Sato, Slava Danilov, Jeff.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Accelerator Systems DivisionOak Ridge National Laboratory March 10-12, 2003 ORBIT SIMULATIONS AND RESULTS Jeff Holmes Accelerator Physicist September 30,
Progress on electron cloud studies for HL-LHC A. Axford, G. Iadarola, A. Romano, G. Rumolo Acknowledgments: R. de Maria, R. Tomás HL-LHC WP2 Task Leader.
Simulation of multipacting thresholds G. Iadarola and A. Romano on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, 8 September, 2015.
Vacuum Devices for accelerator studies Bernard HENRIST CERN TE dept. – Technology Department VSC group – Vacuum Surfaces and Coatings OLAV III Oak Ridge.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Coherent Space Charge Tune Shift.
Benchmark and Study of PSR Longitudinal Beam Dynamics Sarah M. Cousineau, Jeffrey A. Holmes, Slava Danilov MAP Workshop March 18, 2004.
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 Future Needs and Future Directions Maximizing the LHC Performances J.M. Jimenez …when Nature persists.
Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang.
FCC-hh: First simulations of electron cloud build-up L. Mether, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo FCC Design meeting.
Ion effects in low emittance rings Giovanni Rumolo Thanks to R. Nagaoka, A. Oeftiger In CLIC Workshop 3-8 February, 2014, CERN.
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 ELECTRON CLOUDS AND VACUUM EFFECTS IN THE SPS Experimental Program for 2004 J.M. Jimenez Thanks.
Simulation of the new PS EC detector: implementation and results A. Romano, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo LIU-PS Student Day 20 April 2015.
RFA Simulations Joe Calvey LEPP, Cornell University 6/25/09.
U. Iriso CELLS, Barcelona, Spain Electron Cloud Mitigation Workshop 2008 Nov st, 2008 Electron Cloud Simulations for ANKA in collaboration with.
Electron Cloud Studies at DAFNE Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
Progress and Plans for Main Injector beam Pipe Coatings Dave Capista Linda Valerio Project X Collabration Meeting WG3 MI/Recycler September 8, 2010.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
Benchmarking simulations and observations at the LHC Octavio Domínguez Acknowledgments: G. Arduini, G. Bregliozzi, E. Métral, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte and.
Electron cloud feedback collaboration meeting Participants: ANL: Kathy Harkay SNS: S. Cousineau, S. Henderson, Jeff Holmes, Y. Sato SLAC: A. Chao LANL:
Two beam instabilities in low emittance rings Lotta Mether, G.Rumolo, G.Iadarola, H.Bartosik Low Emittance Rings Workshop INFN-LNF, Frascati September.
OPERATED BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 Alexander Novokhatski April 13, 2016 Beam Heating due to Coherent Synchrotron Radiation.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements
402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Study of the Heat Load in the LHC
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Detailed Characterization of Vacuum Chamber Surface Properties Using Measurements of the Time Dependence of Electron Cloud Development Jim Crittenden.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Shielded Button Measurement/ECLOUD Simulation Comparison for 5
Ecloud in quadrupole & Sextupole
J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)
All material for this talk may be obtained at
First Results on Electron Cloud Generation and Trapping in a PSR Quadrupole Magnet R. J. Macek, A. A. Browman & L. J. Rybarcyk, 9/26/06 Acknowledgements:
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Study of the Heat Load in the LHC
Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update
SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)
A Head-Tail Simulation Code for Electron Cloud
Electron Cloud Update US LHC Accelerator Research Program
CINVESTAV – Campus Mérida Electron Cloud Effects in the LHC
Presentation transcript:

Electron Cloud Simulations Using ORBIT Code - Cold Proton Bunch model April 11, 2007 ECLOUD07 Yoichi Sato, Nishina Center, RIKEN 1 Y. Sato ECLOUD07

Outline ECloud Properties to Cold Proton Bunch in ORBIT  Proton Bunch Slope Dependence of ECloud Growth and Energy Distribution of Electrons Hitting Surface (triangular longitudinal line density profiles) Proton bunches of same head triangles and the effect of bunch slope Proton bunches of same tail triangles and the effect of primary electron amount  Prompt-Swept Electron Simulation and Discussion of Physics Parameters with Comparing PSR Data Constant proton loss rate to beam intensity Assumption of proton loss rate function of beam intensity  ECloud Recovery Simulation After Swept Proton loss rate estimation Inconsistency between the recovery estimation and prompt-swept slope fit  Conclusions 2 Y. Sato ECLOUD07

PBunch Triangular Profiles 120ns PB tail 100ns PB tail 110ns PB tail 90ns PB tail Energy band 250eV-300eV corresponds to SEY peak The energy distribution of surface hitting electrons of off-peak-band reduces ECloud growth The longer tail of pBunch causes the larger eCloud and its higher growth rate. The steeper tail pBunch gives the higher energy of hitting electrons (E_0 > 250eV) and the lower SEY that may lead the lower growth rate. 3 Y. Sato ECLOUD07

PBunch Triangular Profiles The carry-over and primary electrons before the peak of pBunch slightly change eCloud peak and growth rate. However, the slight differences imply that the pBunch effect to drive electrons may be mitigated by the existence of inside electrons during the beginning of pBunch tail slope. To have long head in pBunch profile is a possible way to accumulate more protons in a bunch. Effect of primary electrons stored in the head of proton bunch And effect of carry over electrons surviving beam gap 4 Y. Sato ECLOUD07

Future Study for Artificial PBunch  Comparison of ep instability between Long head profile (short gap) and isosceles triangular profile (large gap) using ORBIT capability of simulating proton bunch dynamics. Even a short gap can remove the ep oscillation of carry-over eCloud in front of the next bunch.  Simulation of ECloud development to proton bunches of triangular + saw profile. We can expect to mitigate trailing edge multipaction. The saw ratio and frequency should be optimized. Certainly, the biggest problem: how to realize them, is remaining. 5 Y. Sato ECLOUD07

Prompt-Swept Electron Data from Electron Sweeper at PSR Beam Pulse HV pulse Electron Signal (prompt electron) Swept electron signal  The prompt electrons come out at the tail of the beam pulse. The Electron Sweeper (ES) functions as a large area Electron Detector (ED) until the HV pulse arrives.  The swept electron signal is narrow during HV at the end of the gap. The two experimental features: (1)swept electron slope is flatter than prompt electron slope, (2)swept electron slope has saturation in high intensity beam. 6 Y. Sato ECLOUD07

Prompt-Swept Electrons constant proton loss rate to beam intensity in ORBIT In ORBIT, if both SEY_max & proton loss rate are constant to beam intensity, prompt- swept slopes are much flatter than experimental data. Prompt e in ORBIT means peak of surface current after recovery. Swept e in ORBIT means EC line density at PB head after recovery. SEY_max = 1.5 ~ 2.0 & proton loss rate = 4E-6/turn SEY_max = 2.0 & proton loss rate = 1E-8/turn ~ 4E-6/turn The ORBIT simulations are performed for field free section, where ED/ES locates in PSR. PSR features are reproduced qualitatively but not quantitatively. 7

Prompt-Swept Electrons: Assumption of Proton Loss Rate Function of Beam Intensity Now, we assume proton loss rate in drift space, where ED/ES locates, is an increase function of beam intensity (reasonable from space charge). Starting from the prompt-swept values of (7uC beam, 4e-6/turn proton loss rate), we performed simultaneous fitting on both prompt swept slopes with varying a single parameter “proton loss rate” to different beam intensity, 4uC ~ 8uC beam. The searched proton loss rate to fit simultaneously experimental prompt-swept slopes becomes an almost exponential function of beam intensity. This is another possible way to estimate proton loss rate. 8 Y. Sato ECLOUD07

Prompt-Swept Electrons: Profile Dependence ~6uC/pulse, prompt e and swept e slopes are flipped in different pulse profiles. ORBIT suggests that a desirable proton profile depends on beam intensity. Actual proton pulse profiles measured in PSR. Now, they seek to have square one. All my simulations for prompt-swept and recovery adopt nonotched profile except for below one. 9

Recovery of ECloud: PSR and ORBIT 7.5 uC proton pulse measured in PSR shows 5 turn recovery of EC peak after clearing electrons in beam gap by HV-applied electron sweeper. In ORBIT simulation, a set of parameters [SEY_max=2.0, Proton loss rate ~1E-8/turn, e- yield per lost proton=100] provides 5 turn recovery of EC to 7.5uC proton beam in field free section. Both surface current and line density of EC show the same number of recovery turns Energy range of electrons hitting surface keeps almost same in recovery turns. The amount of carry-over electrons has little effect on the energy range. Same carry-over electrons in PB head of [2 nd turn, p_loss=2E-8/turn] and [3rd turn, p_loss=1E-8]. Difference of EC peaks comes from new primary electrons (Trailing Edge Multipaction). The carry over electrons before PB peak have weaker effect on EC than the new primary electrons after PB peak. 10

Inconsistency of proton loss rate between recovery estimation and prompt-swept slope fit  To perform the simultaneous fit on prompt-swept slopes, we start from the case of [SEY_max=1.7, 7uC beam, p_loss=4e-6/turn]. However, if we try to start from the case of [SEY_max=1.7, 7.5uC beam, p_loss=1e-7/turn], which matches the recovery estimation, we cannot reproduce prompt-swept slopes.  [SEY_max=2.0, 6.3uC beam] has minimum of eCloud (both prompt and swept) in lowering p_loss < 1e-8/turn.  The recovery process may be dominated by other eCloud sources. Now, in our simulation, only primary electrons from lost proton and secondary emitted electrons are considered as eCloud source.  If electrons traveled from quadrupole area to drift space are dominant, the number of recovery turns depends on the traveling time. 11 Y. Sato ECLOUD07

Conclusions  Longer head beam profile is a possible way to accumulate more protons without making electron cloud larger. Proton bunch ep dynamics should be examined.  Simulated prompt-swept e of constant p_loss and SEY_max reproduces qualitative features, but not quantitative.  Introducing p_loss function to beam intensity is a possible way for quantitative discussion. A possible p_loss function that fits prompt-swept slopes simultaneously is exponential.  Comparing the number of turns of recovery process between experimental data and simulations, proton loss rate of 7.5uC beam is ~ 1E-8/turn for SEY_max=2.0 and ~1E-7/turn for SEY_max= Y. Sato ECLOUD07

Conclusions, cont.  Both of recovery estimation and p_loss function assumption indicates quite low proton loss rate for low beam intensity in field free straight section, and it would hard to cause ep-instability. ECloud kick on proton beam could be mostly non-straight section.  There is inconsistency between the recovery estimation of proton loss rate and the assumption of proton loss rate function of beam intensity is needed. We cannot perform the simultaneous fitting of prompt- swept electron slopes including the point of the parameters estimated by recovery process. We may need additional model of ECloud source.  The actual PSR proton bunch profiles depend on beam intensity. However, this effect does not change prompt-swept electron slopes so much.  Therefore, we need to have other model of ECloud source as shoot electrons from quadrupole area. 13 Y. Sato ECLOUD07

Main Concern of ORBIT Electron Cloud Module: e-p problem Proton beam bunch PSR: ~60 m in 90 m ring SNS: ~200 m in 248 m ring Vacuum Chamber Wall Captured e- before bunch released e- Secondary electrons Lost proton e- born at wall from proton loss Secondary electrons Tertiary electrons Using Electron Cloud Module in ORBIT, we can simulate Two stream instability to captured electrons inside beam bunch (serious source of ECE) Trailing edge multipactor (big source of electrons) multipaction = increase of electrons from secondary e- emission energy gain 14