Teaching Students to Read Like Detectives

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
Advertisements

Teaching Students to Read Like Detectives: The Common Core Way Douglas Fisher YouTube Channel fisherandfrey.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Text Complexity and Close Reading
Module 2 Text Comprehension
Respect Responsibility Resourcefulness. Common Core Math Overview.
Reading and Writing and the Common Core Standards Jen Fiegen Laura Norris Eva Petersen.
Text Complexity and Text-dependent Questions. Assessing Texts Quantitative measures Qualitative values Task and Reader considerations.
Teaching Students to Read Like Detectives
Collaborative Conversations Doug Fisher, PhD San Diego State University.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
Skills and Strategies to Help You Read Fiction. What is Fiction Made up stories that are productions of the imagination Types of Fiction: Myths Folk tales.
Close Reading Preparing for the arrival of Common Core Standards in Social Studies.
Close Reading Instruction
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
Close Reading of Complex Texts
“I’m ready for my close- up Mr. DeMille!” CLOSE READINGS By: Kimberley Cooper.
Section VI: Comprehension Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Module 1/ Chapter 1 Ramping Up for Complex Texts By Nancy Frey and Doug Fisher 1.1.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
Strategies for Close Reading Alicia Kubacki On the shoulders of Fisher and Frey as well as Beers and Probst.
Welcome to Implementing the Common Core State Standards
WORLD LANGUAGES : A Year of Transition. Today’s Outcomes  Celebrate the start of the school year  Greet new teachers  Explore areas of focus.
English Learners, Text Complexity and Close Reading Douglas Fisher
Welcome! Junior English Ms. Sara Teplinsky. Who is Ms. Teplinsky?  BGHS, Class of ‘98  B.A. English and Secondary Education, Indiana University  M.Ed.
Teaching Students to Read Like Detectives Douglas Fisher
Key Instructional Shifts in the Common Core: Finding the Evidence Helen S. Comba October 17,2013 eIMzfcxQ.
The Sneetches by Dr. Seuss
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
ACADEMIC CONVERSATIONS
Read It Like Common Core. Common Core CCSS Class.
ELA Common Core Text Complexity & Close Reading. “The clear, alarming picture that emerges from the evidence, is that while the reading demands of college,
CORY GILLETTE LITERACY COORDINATOR JANUARY 2014 Reading and Writing Curriculum in Darien Public Schools.
Common Core State Standards ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS GRADES 6-12.
Common Core, National and State Standards Lesson Plans.
Rigorous Reading Doug Fisher Follow me: dfishersdsu.
Collaborative Learning. (c) Frey & Fisher, 2008 TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY Focused Instruction Guided Instruction “ I do it ” “ We.
Meeting the Challenge of Common Core: Planning Close Reading CFN 604 October 21 st, 2014.
TKAM Philosophical Debate Task 1: Quote Analysis Task 2: Philosophical Debate Task 3: Reflection.
ERIKA LUSKY JULIE RAINS Collaborative Dialogue in the Classroom
ELA Common Core State Standards. Hunt Institute Videos  GLI&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL.
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
Close Reading. AGENDA Demands of complex text on the reader Close reading tools for comprehending complex text Question and answer opportunities with.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Unit 2 “What makes a character live?”
Collaborative Conversations
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 ELA/ELD Framework A Focus on Making Meaning.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
Closing In on Close Reading, Text Dependent Questions, and Rigorous Reading: Accessing Complex Texts Dr. Sheree Bryant Griffin RESA.
Common Core for the English Language Arts Doug Fisher Contact me at Videos on our FisherandFrey YouTube Channel.
ELA - 3 Common Core Vs Kansas Standards. DOMAIN Standards For Literature (RL)
Common Core for the English Language Arts Doug Fisher Contact me at Videos on our FisherandFrey YouTube Channel.
Constructive Conversation Smart Start Lessons
Middle School English Language Arts Learning Targets: I can…
Speaking and Listening in Grades K-2
Speaking and Listening in Grades 3-5
Outsiders and Outcasts
Collaborative Conversations
Building and Assessing Oral Proficiency in the English Classroom
Text-dependent Questions
Literacy Content Specialist, CDE
Doug Fisher Follow me: dfisherSDSU
Section VI: Comprehension
Unit 1 The Bonds Between Us.
Collaborative Learning
Close Reading for ALL Students at the Elementary Level
Socratic seminar Session #2.
Reading Bookmark- Individual Reading - Due 10/28
Presentation transcript:

Teaching Students to Read Like Detectives Doug Fisher Contact me at www.fisherandfrey.com Videos on our FisherandFrey YouTube Channel

Anchored K-12 4 Domains Reading Writing Speaking and Listening Language Anchored K-12

Where to start . . . . Reading standard 1 Reading standard 10 Speaking and Listening standard 1

10. Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.

State standards were forward-mapped K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9-10 11-12 State standards were forward-mapped Existing State Standards

Anchor standards are backward-mapped 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9-10 11-12 Anchor standards are backward-mapped Backward design of CCSS-ELA standards

Assessing Texts Quantitative measures Qualitative values Task and Reader considerations

Language Convention and Clarity Background Prior Cultural Vocabulary Standard English Variations Register Genre Organization Narration Text Features Graphics Density and Complexity Figurative Language Purpose Levels of Meaning Structure Knowledge Demands Language Convention and Clarity

Levels of Meaning and Purpose Density and complexity Figurative language Purpose

Levels of Meaning and Purpose Is it about talking animals, or the USSR? Is it entertainment, or political satire? Is it straightforward, or ambiguous? 1370L Grades 11-12

Allegory for tolerance Author’s Purpose Allegory for tolerance Mirrored events of early Civil Rights movement (1961) “Now, the Star-Belly Sneetches Had bellies with stars. The Plain-Belly Sneetches Had none upon thars. Those stars weren’t so big. They were really so small You might think such a thing wouldn’t matter at all..” But, because they had stars, all the Star-Belly Sneetches Would brag, ‘We’re the best kind of Sneetch on the beaches.’ With their snoots in the air, they would sniff and they’d snort ‘We’ll have nothing to do with the Plain-Belly sort!’ And whenever they met some, when they were out walking, They’d hike right on past them without even talking.” 530L Grades 2-3

Complex themes Relationship between love and pain Masculinity Loyalty and war 730L Grades 2-3

Structure Genre Organization Narration Text features and graphics

Structure Changes in narration, point of view Changes in font signal narration changes Complex themes 560L Grades 2-3

Structure Stream of consciousness narration Unreliable narrators Nonlinear structure Time shifts written in italics 870L (grades 4-5)

Language Conventions Standard English and variations Register

Language Conventions Non-standard English usage “Out in the hottest, dustiest part of town is an orphanage run by a female person nasty enough to scare night into day. She goes by the name of Mrs. Sump, though I doubt there ever was a Mr. Sump on accounta she looks like somethin’ the cat drug in and the dog wouldn’t eat.” (Stanley, 1996, p. 2) AD 660L (Adult-directed)

British slang circa 1982 ATOS 4.4 Grades 2-3 “The doorbell went. I put the blind back to how it was, checked I'd left no other traces of my incursion, slipped out, and flew downstairs to see who it was. The last six steps I took in one death-defying bound. Moron, grinny-zitty as ever. His bumfluff's getting thicker, mind. "You'll never guess what!" "What?” "You know the lake in the woods?" "What about it?" "It's only"--Moron checked that we weren't being overheard--"gone and froze solid! Half the kids in the village're there, right now. Ace doss or what?" ATOS 4.4 Grades 2-3 Bumfluff- light facial hair (“peach fuzz”) Ace doss-easy and fun

Knowledge Demands Background knowledge Prior knowledge Cultural knowledge Vocabulary

Knowledge Demands Domain-specific vocabulary (radioactive, acidity, procedure, vaccination) Background knowledge (diseases, safety risks, scientific experimentation) 1100L Grades 6-8

Cultural Knowledge Demands Buddhist philosophy Search for spiritual enlightenment Eightfold Path to Nirvana 1010L Grades 6-8

Language Convention and Clarity Background Prior Cultural Vocabulary Standard English Variations Register Genre Organization Narration Text Features Graphics Density and Complexity Figurative Language Purpose Levels of Meaning Structure Knowledge Demands Language Convention and Clarity

It’s not enough to have complex text in the room It’s not enough to have complex text in the room. Students need to read and discuss complex text.

TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY “I do it” Focused Instruction Guided Instruction “We do it” “You do it together” Collaborative “You do it alone” Independent STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY A Structure for Instruction that Works

In some classrooms … TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY “I do it” Focused Instruction “You do it alone” Independent STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY

In some classrooms … TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY “You do it alone” Independent STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY

And in some classrooms … TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY “I do it” Focused Instruction Guided Instruction “We do it” “You do it alone” Independent STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY

TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY “I do it” Focused Instruction Guided Instruction “We do it” “You do it together” Collaborative “You do it alone” Independent STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY A Structure for Instruction that Works

TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY “I do it” Focused Instruction Guided Instruction “We do it” “You do it together” Collaborative “You do it alone” Independent STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY A Structure for Instruction that Works

Comprehension and Collaboration 1. Prepare for and participate in collaborations with diverse partners, building on each others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.

K-2 Features Following the rules of discussion Moving from participation to turn taking Sustaining discussion through questioning Adult support

3-5 Features Preparation for discussion Yielding and gaining the floor Posing and responding to questions From explaining own ideas to explaining the ideas of others

6-8 Features Using evidence to probe and reflect Collegial discussions include goals and deadlines Questions connect ideas from several speakers Acknowledge new information

9-10 Features Use prepared research in discussion Voting, consensus, and decision making Ensure hearing full range of opinions or options Summarize and synthesize points of disagreement

11-12 Features Civil, democratic discussions Questions probe reasoning and evidence Resolving contradictions Determine what additional info is needed

Talk occurs on grade level topics, texts, and issues.

1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

Close Analytic Reading ©2012 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

“Salvador, Late or Early” A Close Reading of “Salvador, Late or Early” Close reading is almost always and encounter with the text first…no modeling first Participants read and then answer a question Doug will read to them and model thinking focusing on one thing…sentence structure Traditionally this piece would be one of three pieces read in one period Now this text would be read for three days (Cisneros, Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories, 1991)