Successful and Not Successful Implementation THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE FACTORS Funding for this project is made possible through a Cooperative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Twelve Cs for Team Building
Advertisements

Integration of Program and Program Support CARE Mali.
Nancy S. Dickinson, MSSW, PhD The Use of Evidence in Child Welfare Practice and Policy: An International Perspective on Future Directions Jerusalem, May.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
533: Supervisor Training Series Module 1: The Preparatory and Beginning Phases of Child Welfare Supervision.
Initiating & Sustaining a Mentoring Program Dr. Virginia Strand- Fordham University Jodi Hill-Lilly, MSW & Tracy Davis, MSW Connecticut Department of Children.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Kansas Kansas Workforce Initiative The Importance of Supervisors Michelle Levy and Roxanne Emmert-Davis September 15, 2010.
An Experimental Study of Child Welfare Worker Turnover Nancy S. Dickinson, University of Maryland John S. Painter
EVALUATION FINDINGS AND STATE SUCCESS STORIES AUGUST 30, CDC Field Triage Decision Scheme Implementation Project.
Workplace Health A Model of Worklife Michael P. Leiter, PhD COR&D Acadia University.
The Kansas Child Welfare Workforce Profile SSWR 2011 Annual Conference January 14, 2010 Alice Lieberman, Ph.D. and Michelle Levy, A.M.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.
DHS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY Presenter: Rosemary Calhoun Presentation to: DHS Leadership Date: July 16, 2014 Georgia Department of Human Services.
The View from the Agency Perspective. Jefferson County State supervised, county administered child welfare system 180 employees in the Division Serving.
Using An Organizational Assessment : A framework to Help Agencies Build on Strengths, Recognize Challenges, and Develop a Comprehensive Work Plan, CWDA.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
PARENT, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Kansas Relating Supervision to Workforce Outcomes Justin Thaw, MSW Excellence in Supervision Conference September 22, 2011.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
Assessment GroupDepth of analysis and clarity of issues (4) Contextuality Practicability, Novelty of recommendtns (4) Quality of Presentation (Consistancy.
Evidence-based Strategies for Improving Child Welfare Performance, Staff Retention and Client Outcomes XIX ISPCAN International Congress on Child Abuse.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
2008 Indiana State Personnel Department Conference Presented by Krista F. Skidmore, Esq., SPHR, President Strategic Doing—A Model to Align and Execute.
CSWE Child Welfare Symposium Child Welfare Workforce Retention Research in New York State New York State Social Work Education Consortium.
Develop your Leadership skills
Performance Monitoring : Thoughts, Lessons, and Other Practical Considerations.
SEN 0 – 25 Years Pat Foster.
“Survey Says…”: Work-Life Implications from the Budget Cuts Survey Tahira M. Probst, Ph.D. Washington State University Vancouver This material is based.
Funding for this project is made possible through a cooperative agreement between the University at Albany, SUNY and the U.S. DHHS/ACF Children’s Bureau.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
Organizational Culture and Climate in Ohio’s Office of Families and Children Michelle Graef, Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center Kristin Gilbert,
Association for Behavior Analysis Conference Sustainable Programs: In Search of the Elusive Randy Keyworth Ronnie Detrich Jack States.
The effects of an organizational intervention on child welfare agency atmosphere and workforce stability Jessica Strolin, PhD Jim Caringi, LiCSW Thank.
Chapter 12 The Manager as Leader.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
School Safety. Session Objectives: Become familiar with school safety factors and early warning signs Assess school safety Discuss the role of stakeholders.
Advancing Cooperative Conservation. 4C’s Team An interagency effort established in early 2003 by Department of the Interior Secretary Gale Norton Advance.
TELECONFERENCE/WEBINAR ON MAY 6,2010 2:30 – 4:00 PM EASTERN THE NATIONAL CHILD WELFARE RESOURCE CENTER FOR ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENT Building Ongoing.
Promoting school connections for youth in child welfare Joan Rock, Implementation Coordinator Kristen Hayden-West, Implementation Coordinator Jessica Strolin-Goltzman,
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Community Partnerships to Protect Children: Challenges and Opportunities Deborah Daro.
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
SUPERVISION: SIGNS OF SAFETY STYLE Phase 1 The Supervision Contract Phase 2 Case Specific Supervision Phase 3 Performance Booster Phase 4 Review of P.E.
Changing... Leading... Learning... ORGANIZATIONAL INTERVENTION SAN FRANCISCO-BAY AREA 1.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Management Practices Lecture 27.
Department of Public Welfare – Business Review Board Project/System Name Date.
October 20 th, Beliefs and Expectations for Site Council Seek and listen to the insights of all stakeholder perspectives and groups. Deal with issues.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
Strategic Workforce Interventions Andrew L. Reitz Barbara Schmitt Child Welfare League of America.
Healthcare Organization Employee Experience Michael Mabanglo, PhD, LCSW February 16, 2016.
The Role of Evaluation and Stakeholder Values in California’s Title IV-E Child Welfare Waiver Demonstration Project Evaluations Charlie Ferguson, Ph.D.
Jayne Schaefer, BA Workforce Programs Manager Mather LifeWays Evanston, Illinois Toward Building a Sustainable Long-Term Care Workforce: LEAP.
Characteristics of Transformed Organizations Robert L. Schalock, Ph.D. Invitational Conference on Challenges and Developments Facing Service Providers.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
1 Oregon Department of Human Services Senior and People with Disabilities State Unit on Aging-ADRC In partnership with  Portland State University School.
The Role of Evaluation and Stakeholder Values in California’s Title IV-E Child Welfare Waiver Demonstration Project Evaluations Charlie Ferguson, Ph.D.
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
14 Work Design.
Opportunities for Growth
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Quality Improvement In the Clubhouse.
Presentation transcript:

Successful and Not Successful Implementation THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE FACTORS Funding for this project is made possible through a Cooperative Agreement between the University at Albany, SUNY and the U.S. DHHS/ACF Children’s Bureau ( Grant number 90CT0149. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Children’s Bureau.

Climate & Implementation Organizational climate is:  Predictor of positive service quality  Associated with worker performance  Associated with client outcomes  Associated with worker job satisfaction  Associated with worker retention  Associated with innovative implementations

Focus of the Study  Hypothesis 1: Successful implementation of a change initiative is associated with a more positive organizational climate.  Hypothesis 2: Administrator position is associated with a more positive perception of the organizational climate.

Intervention  Child Welfare Workforce Initiative (CWWI)  Not-for-profit agencies contracted to serve children and families in the public child welfare system  Informed by Learning Organization and National Implementation Research Network (NIRN)

Intervention continued  Collaborated with agencies for 18 months to address a substantial change initiative  Agency Design Team consisting of managers, supervisors, and line staff with authority to develop strategies and implement the change  CWWI provided an expert in organizational change and team facilitation

Intervention Model  4-Phase model:  1 st Explore change initiative and conduct assessment with data and agency stakeholders  2 nd Identify the solution and plan for implementation  3 rd Implementation  4 th Evaluation and stabilization

Sample  3 agencies completed implementation vs. 3 agencies that did not complete implementation  870 employees  83% of all employees at baseline; 65% at follow-up

Psychological Climate Survey  Role Dimension Ambiguity, Conflict, Overload  Job Dimension Importance, Autonomy, Challenge  Organization Dimension Innovation, Justice, Support  Supervisor Dimension Trust & Support, Goal Emphasis, Work Facilitation

Administrators and Non-Administrators: Differences in Perceived Climate  85 (40.5%) Administrators defined as Executive Director/CEO, Program Director, Manager, Department Head  125 (59.5%) Non-Administrators defined as Supervisors, Social Workers, Caseworkers, Case Planners, and Childcare Workers

Design & Analysis  Pre-post, longitudinal design  OLS Regression – implemented/non-implements to each climate dimension  OLS Regression – administrator/non-administrator to each climate dimension

H1: Confirmed Successful implementation of a change initiative is associated with a more positive organizational climate  3 of 4 Organizational Climate Dimensions were significant:  Organization  Job  Role  Supervision was not significant

Organization Dimension Significant  Innovation is the a bility to adopt or implement new ideas, processes, or products successfully  Justice is making d ecisions fairly = accurate information and hearing all concerns  Support is caring about employee wellbeing, opinions, and general satisfaction

Job Dimension Significant  Importance is work is highly meaningful and makes a contribution to team and children/families  Autonomy is the authority to make decisions on how to do job and control assignments  Challenge is job requires use of full knowledge and skills

Role Dimension Significant  Ambiguity is having unclear authority for decision-making  Conflict is rules & regulations interfere with doing a good job, or too many people directing  Overload is amount of work and pressure interfere with doing a good job

H2: Confirmed Administrator position is associated with a more positive perception of the organizational climate  Administrators have a more positive perception of the organizational climate than direct care workers in Organization & Job Dimensions  Administrators have an intrinsic wider scope of authority and empowerment- in both implemented and non-implemented agencies.  Successful implementation is likely due to administrators’ approach and behavior toward employees during the innovative process

Implications  Administrators and child welfare workers from agencies that successfully implement change, report having a significantly more positive organizational climate.  Administrators desiring to implement change initiatives can create a positive organizational climate by being attentive to the organizational, role and job dimensions.

Implications  Essential is creating a supportive environment that:  employees feel their opinions are heard,  decisions are made fairly with full information, and  leaders impart a sense of concern and investment in employees.

Implications  Administrators generate the foundation for an innovative environment by providing workers with:  a sense of security,  recognition for accomplishments,  clarity in job responsibilities,  autonomy within their sphere of authority, and  a creative atmosphere.

Inference  Individual and organizational innovation engages employees in discussions and fosters a work environment that sustains learning and innovation.  Organizations having such innovative capacity are more successful in responding to their environments and will likely enjoy improved performance and outcomes.

Thank You NANCY CLAIBORNE, PHD SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WELFARE UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK