WOULD REACH ENHANCE MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS? CEFIC Laegis Workshop Brussels November 30th 2006 Jacques LEHRE – Rhodia Françoise LABROUSSE – Jones Day PAI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 WTO WORKSHOP ON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE & CAPACITY BUILDING DESTINATION INSPECTION SCHEME (DIS) AS A GATEWAY OBJECTIVE FOR CEPS MODERNISATION, COMPLIANCE.
Advertisements

New EU Rules on Derivatives Trading The EMIR Reporting Technical Standards Victoria Cooley OTC Derivatives & Post Trade Policy Financial Conduct Authority.
Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the PCT Audit Procedure Background: The Act was passed in November The Act will be fully in force by January.
Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
1. European Commission Status GHS Implementation in the European Community Global Thematic Workshop on Strengthening Capacities to Implement the GHS Johannesburg.
REACH and SDS Requirements Presented by Paula Laux Senior Regulatory Specialist Wercs Professional Services.
Chemicals Inventory Management as a Tool to Check Compliance with Restricted Substances Regulations Ursula Schumacher.
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
Procedure under the Merger Regulation. Procedure – legal documents The Merger Regulation Art. 4 – notification of concentration Art. 7 – suspension of.
The Substitution Approach in the “White Paper on the Future EU Chemicals Policy” European Conference on Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals Hamburg, 13.
Turning our REACH expertise into practical help for industry A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR THE 2013 REGISTRATION AND OTHER REACH ONGOING DUTIES On the REACH road.
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
Introduction to REACH Awareness and Compliance Assistance Workshop for the Exporters of Apparel Date: 3rd August 2011 Venue: India Habitat Centre, New.
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
The Implications of REACH for the Plastics Industry Sarah Plant Industrial Issues Executive.
REACH in the eyes of a downstream user The changing market of cosmetic ingredients Aleksandra Sołyga-Żurek Warsaw, 23.XI.2011.
Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Financial Intermediaries and Resettlement Planning Instruments.
REACH: Protecting Your Supply Chain Georjean L. Adams EHS Strategies, Inc. November 17,
European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals REACH Key issues for the paper industry CEPI Open Seminar – European Paper Week 1 December 2005.
Standards and Standardization. Standard Levels Standards preside according to the level. Their effect, image and their scope of work change from one level.
Project co-financed by European Union Project co- financed by Asean European Committee for Standardization Implementing Agency 1 Module 13 GMP Workshop.
Câmara dos Despachantes Oficiais CONFIAD Paneuropean Network Workshop on Customs Customs Valuation Fernando Carmo CONFIAD Paneuropean Network - President.
Experiences with registrations - 5 years on the road On the REACH Road 23 November 2011 Kevin Pollard ECHA – Dossier Submission and Dissemination.
1 The role of the only representative Simona Fajfar.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Presentation 4: How can I know if nanomaterials are used in my workplace?
The Draft SADC Annex on Trade in Services UNCTAD Secretariat Sub-regional Conference on Improving Industrial Performance and Promoting Employment in SADC.
REACH New requirements for introduction of chemicals on EU market Jana Kovačičová Centre for Chemical Substances and Preparations Bratislava, Slovakia.
REACH and CLP What formulators need to know. Purpose of this presentation This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals.
DMF Procedures and Communication between API, FP Manufacturers and Regulatory Authorities Jean-Louis ROBERT National Health Laboratory L – 1011 LUXEMBOURG.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
EU Regulation 1907/2006 on the Registration Evaluation and Authorisation of CHemicals REACH Lunch & Learn Beach Ballroom, Aberdeen 29 th August 2007 R.
CHAPTER 19 INVESTMENT BANKING. Investment Banking Investment Banks (IB) are the most important participant in the direct financial markets Assist firms.
SEMINAR “The impacts of EU Legislation REACH on Textile & Clothing Industries” October 28, 2008 ITKIB – Istanbul By Adil ELMASSI Director Environmental.
The Doha Declaration and the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement Islamabad, 28 November 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
Communication in the Supply Chain
1 REACH, the Future EU policy for Chemicals European Conference in Eretria April 27, 2004 Tony Musu – European Trade Union Technical Bureau/ETUC.
© CHCS CHCS Aspects of REACH (2) Peter Short Chemical safety consultant Safety Data Services Poole.
& H AS HEALTH AND SAFETY AUTHORITY REACH and Downstream Users Marie McCarthy REACH GI Inspector Health and Safety Authority.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF DIGITAL LIBRARIES By TALWANT SINGH ADDL DISTT. & SESSIONS JUDGE; DELHI.
EPA essential principles for reform of chemicals management legislation – lessons from REACH Dr Veerle Heyvaert London School of Economics Chemical Regulation:
CHEMSTEWARDS SOCMA COMPLIANCE MORE FOR MEMBERS - VISIT SIEF and Consortium Management Issues under REACH Dr. C. T. Helmes Senior Director.
Malaysia Update on “draft” proposal for the Environmentally Hazardous Substance (“EHS”) Notification and Registration Scheme.
H. Wriedt / G. Kittel REACH in 30 minutes - EWHN Conference 2006, Jurmala/Latvia Arbeit Gesundheit & Beratungs- Informationsstelle & REACH in 30 minutes:
REACH A modern chemicals policy Anya Oram Head of the Economic and Commercial Affairs Section Delegation of the European Commission in Canada.
Overview & Implications for Affinia Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals.
Can REACH become the New Global Model? Helsinki Chemicals Forum 20 May 2010 Jukka Malm, Director ECHA – Directorate of Assessment.
ECHA activities relating to Nanomaterials
TAIEX workshop Beograd, 31.maj Status and obligations of Serbian exporters to EU of substances, formulations and articles Simona Fajfar.
Context  Brief reminder of REACH – overview and timeline  Where are we today with VOC regulations?  What to expect in the future?
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
REACH and CLP What formulators need to know. Purpose of this presentation This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency,
Ukraine (nr 46514): Expert Mission on Supervision of Investment Funds` Activities - TAIEX On-site supervision of the investment funds industry in Poland.
Compassionate use programs and the European regulatory system Filip Josephson M.D., Ph.D. Clinical Assessor.
Introduction to REACH Flavie Guérin U.S. Mission to the EU 15 November 2011.
We personally care 31 May 2016 – Working Group on Cosmetic Products EU Cosmetics Regulation – Article 15.2 Criteria for exempting CMR1A and 1B from being.
2echa.europa.eu/reach-2018 Purpose of this presentation This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency, to assist.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by.
Position of the Japanese Government and Possible impact of the REACH on Japanese trade relations with the EU.
Latest Developments and Impact on the Financial Sector
Potential Impact on the Cotton Industry
ดูแลด้วยความรับผิดชอบ
The Mutual Recognition Regulation
CCMI 9 September 2015 Public Hearing: Nanotechnology for a competitive chemical industry Social aspects: education, health and safety.
REACH 2018 Registration How to prepare and mitigate Supply Chain Disruption REGISTRATION under REACH provides data on a chemical substance relating to.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Conclusions from the Review of REACH
Presentation transcript:

WOULD REACH ENHANCE MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS? CEFIC Laegis Workshop Brussels November 30th 2006 Jacques LEHRE – Rhodia Françoise LABROUSSE – Jones Day PAI

Table of Contents What are the potential business impacts of REACH? How can M&A be impacted by REACH? How will the M&A process be impacted by REACH? Conclusion Annex : REACH due diligence questions

WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL BUSINESS IMPACTS OF REACH? Additional administrative costs: even if a "sharing principle" has been enacted by the EU, REACH will mean significant registration costs  These costs have to be justified vs size and profitability of the product lines concerned Public information on hazards: a clear benefit of REACH in a sustainable development context, yet changes in labelling or information made public on the Internet could alter downstream user's or final customer's attitude  Medium or long term commercial position could be impacted Restrictions or prohibitions: implementation of REACH could potentially lead to a ban of certain hazardous products  Product lines would have to be stopped or substitutes found

HOW CAN M&A BE IMPACTED BY REACH? REACH could trigger further concentration of business lines: producers and importers having limited market shares may decide to exit and focus their REACH efforts on their core businesses  This would mean additional small to medium size transactions (mostly intra- European, but non-EU countries could take advantage of this situation to get to key technologies) REACH could trigger further off-shoring: some non EU countries, already attractive because of their production costs, may be seen as even more interesting if they have lesser administrative requests on hazardous products  New production capacities can either be built from scratch or acquired Open question : can REACH impact value of public companies?: publicly traded companies could suffer from the media coverage of REACH when it comes into force (link between chemicals and risks to human health)  Private equity funds could take advantage of drop in share value

1 – Before REACH is in force or fully clarified (year 2007) Buyers will be in an awkward situation: they cannot ask for clear information or warranties by Sellers (because Sellers will not know), still they cannot ignore the potential impacts of REACH  This uncertainty could drive purchase prices down It will be the best moment for Sellers to exit: the earlier the better for a company that has a REACH impacted business to divest, waiting means potentially selling at the same time as all the others with a similar problem  Dilemma: selling faster may mean selling cheaper (because of uncertainty, see above) Ideal is for Buyers already active in the concerned business line: they will have the registration fees anyway and they can get a good price (see above)  These Buyers could be pro-active (suggest exit to concerned companies) HOW WILL THE M&A PROCESS BE IMPACTED BY REACH (1/3)?

2 – When REACH is in force and first implementation under way (year depending on product volumes) Sellers will have to provide information about the registration processes: Buyers will want to see appropriate documentation in the data room  One specific point: Buyer and Seller could be part of the same consortium as far as registration is concerned (this would make things easier) Uncertainty is lower than before but still exists: Costs of registration will be better known but in specific cases where restrictions or authorizations are possible, final decision of EU agency may take months  Concluding a transaction in the middle of the REACH process may be difficult in the cases when restrictions or authorizations are expected. Buyers will want to wait for the agency final decision This period may be the worst for M&A: Urge of companies to exit "difficult products" will be at its highest (because REACH will be in its launching phase) while feasibility of transactions will be at its lowest (because REACH is a long process, time limit of authorization could be 5 years) HOW WILL THE M&A PROCESS BE IMPACTED BY REACH (2/3)?

HOW WILL THE M&A PROCESS BE IMPACTED BY REACH (3/3)? 3 – After first implementation of REACH ( depending on product volumes) REACH will be just another administrative document to produce: First thing Buyers will ask is obviously full REACH registration for all the products of the target  REACH registration documents will be placed in data room The European dimension of REACH could then be a plus: The registration will cover all EU countries, reducing the need to investigate on a country by country basis in multi-country deals

CONCLUSION REACH is surely a painful process to go through and an additional complexity to M&A deals in the immediate future, yet REACH could be a facilitator to the transactions involving hazardous products once the companies are done with their registrations.

Annex: REACH due diligence questions

A. Before the Entry Into Force of REACH 1)How is the Target impacted by REACH?  Are the products manufactured or imported by the Target subject to REACH ? Scope of REACH: all substances whether manufactured imported or used as intermediates or placed on the market, either on their own, in preparations or in articles Exemptions: radioactive, subject to customs supervision, non isolated intermediates, waste Out of the scope: food, water, minerals, etc.  If the Target’s substances fall within the scope of REACH, what legal regime the Target must follow for each of the substances produced or imported ? Registration Authorisation  What is the role of the Target under REACH? Manufacturer, Importer, or Downstream User

2) Depending on the substances and the role of the Target, what measures need to be taken in order to achieve compliance with REACH?  Register substances Submit a technical dossier, for substance in quantities of 1 tonnes and more, and Submit a chemical safety report, for substances in quantities of 10 tonnes or more.  If it is considered necessary by the authorities for certain substances, implement restrictions or request an authorisation.

3)Depending on the substances, when is the deadline to be compliant with REACH obligations?  Registration: Phase-in substances (Substances listed in the European Inventory of Existing Chemical Substances, or that have been manufactured in the Community, but not placed on the Community market, in the last 15 years or the so-called “no longer polymers” of Directive 67/548): pre-registration required between 12 and 18 months after the entry into force of REACH Non-phase-in-substances (substances not produced or marketed prior to the entry into force of REACH): within 3 years after the entry into force of REACH for substances of high concern and substances produced or imported over 1000 tonnes, within 6 years after the entry into force of REACH for substances produced or imported between 100 and 1000 tonnes, and within 11 years after the entry into force of REACH for substances produced or imported between 1 and 100 tonnes  Authorisation: application must be submitted 18 months before the “sunset date(s)” (the date(s) from when the substance is placed on the market and the use of the substance is prohibited unless an authorisation is granted)

4)What steps have been taken with respect to other Producers/Importers in order to share data/reduce costs and to prepare a joint submission? Have any agreements been negotiated with other Producers/Importers? Have any financial agreement been agreed with other Producers/Importers for sharing registration/authorisation costs?  Registration Lead registrant submits the information on the hazardous properties of the substance and its classification Other joint registrants submit their company details and their production volume However, possibility to opt out of this scheme. Joint submission is an option regarding the Chemical Safety Report  Authorisation: possibility to apply for an authorisation alone or in a group of Manufacturers/Importers/Downstream users

5) If Target is a Downstream User, what should be specifically done?  Has appropriate risk management measures been implemented in compliance with REACH?  Has the Downstream User taken appropriate steps to ensure that its uses of substances subject to REACH will be adequately registered/authorized?  Have contractual documents been reviewed/updated to take into account REACH obligations (including between the Downstream User and its suppliers and clients)? 6) Has the Target taken the necessary steps in order to be compliant in a timely manner? Have the financial cost of compliance with REACH been evaluated and reserved?  Financial costs for achieving compliance  Financial costs resulting from potential restrictions and ban of certain substances

B. After the Adoption of REACH and during the Period of its Entry into Force 1)Has the portfolio of substances produced or imported by the Target been analysed to assess whether it is subject to REACH or not? 2)Have the substances been pre-registered or registered or are they in the process of being pre-registered or registered? 3) Could the substances produced or imported by the Target be subject to the authorisation procedure?  Are the substances on the candidate list? If so, there is a risk that an authorisation may be required in the future;  If the substance is subject to an authorization, did the Target take the necessary steps to apply for an authorisation (alone or jointly)? What is the deadline for obtaining the authorisation? 4) What are the risks if the Target is not in compliance with REACH obligations within the deadline?  Substance is not allowed to be manufactured or imported  Sanctions by Member States

C. After all REACH obligations have entered into force 1) Review ongoing compliance of the Target with REACH obligations:  If there is an authorised substance in the portfolio of the Target, when has the authorization been granted?  What is the duration of this authorisation?  Will there be a need to apply for a renewal/other authorisation in the future? 2) Have adequate measures been taken in order to obtain registration/authorization for new substances?