Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 1 BEA Address Construct and Supporting Leading Practices/Standards April 1, 2010 Craig Adams, ODUSD(I&E) BEI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Move Update & Compliance Fundamentals M & W Printers and United States Postal Service.
Advertisements

Effective management Accurate tracking Easier automation.
CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (CAGE CODES) DFARS Case 2003-D040 DFARS Parts 204, 212, 213 and 252 are amended to remove policy on Central Contractor.
Addressing, Automation & Presort Lloyd M. Moss. Agenda Overview of how Addressing, Automation and Presort earn postal discounts Addressing Requirements:
Enterprise Architecture. 2 Agenda What is Enterprise Architecture (EA)? Roles in EA? Why is EA Important? Tangible Benefits from EA? What Do We Need to.
Connecting People With Information DoD Net-Centric Services Strategy Frank Petroski October 31, 2006.
Connecting People With Information Conclusions DoD Net-Centric Data Strategy (DS) and Community of Interest (COI) Training For further information .
Grants & Acquisition Data Elements An Exercise in Standardization Presentation at the DATA Act Town Hall September 2014.
LEVERAGING THE ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT Louise Edmonds Senior Manager Information Management ACT Health.
1 Overview of Fulton County GIS Address Model Carl Anderson Fulton County GIS.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names In the United States Geographic Names In the United States The National Map & Other.
November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education Quarterly Special Education Meeting American Recovery and Reinvestment Act November.
Total Address Quality. Total Address Quality 2 OSV At A Glance OSV produces over 500 Million envelopes every year! OSV processes over 4 Million addresses.
Mail Entry & Payment Technology Agenda  Benefits of IMpb  IMpb Requirements Unique Barcode Shipping Services File (SSF)  Postal Wizard Enhancements.
The BIM Project Execution Planning Procedure
Using Digital Flood Hazard Data in the National Flood Insurance Program FGDC Coordination Working Group Scott McAfee Paul Rooney April 5 th, 2005.
The United States Thoroughfare, Landmark and Postal Address Data Standard Presentation to: FGDC Coordination Group By URISA International March 16, 2010.
Procedures to Develop and Register Data Elements in Support of Data Standardization September 2000.
Justice Information Network Strategic Plan Development Justice Information Network Board March 18, 2008 Mo West, JIN Program Manager.
FGDC Standards Process Review Survey Results Summary Julie Binder Maitra FGDC Standards Coordinator April 13, 2010 Coordination.
CONTRACTUAL FLOW DOWN OF DPAS PRIORITY RATINGS
Civilian Human Resources Management  Military Health Systems  Military and Other Human Resources Management Department of Defense – Human Resources Management.
FCM Quality of Life Reporting System Metadata By: Acacia Consulting and Research June 2002.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY WARFIGHTER SUPPORT.
9/15/ SUPPORT THE WARFIGHTER DoD CIO 1 (U) FOUO Conclusions Version 1.2 DoD Net-Centric Data Strategy (DS) and Community of Interest (COI) Training.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Authoritative Source for Location Lora Muchmore Director ODUSD(I&E) Business Enterprise Integration Directorate.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010 Dennis Wisnosky DoD Business Mission Area Chief Technical Officer & Chief Architect in the Office of the Deputy Chief Management.
Chapter 1 In-lab Quiz Next week
COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
Addressing, Automation & Presort Lloyd M. Moss Senior Product Manager Pitney Bowes Group 1 Software.
Federal XML Naming and Design Rules and Guidelines Mark Crawford.
FGDC Address Standard Update: What's Next? Address Standard Working Group Martha Wells, GISP Carl Anderson, GISP Sara Yurman, GISP Ed Wells, GISP Hilary.
Tommie Curtis SAIC January 17, 2000 Open Forum on Metadata Registries Santa Fe, NM SDC JE-2023.
GSA’s Office of Governmentwide Policy Office of Asset and Transportation Management Standards and Federal Asset Management Bob Holcombe Director – Personal.
Address Levels Business Use Alignment. Introduction Objective is to provide layers of address granularity tailored to business use Address use levels.
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY WARFIGHTER SUPPORT.
How Voluntary Consensus Standards Impact Federal Asset Management Bob Holcombe.
New River Valley Emergency Communications Regional Authority
Overview of Issues and Interests in Standards and Interoperability Mary Saunders Chief, Standards Services Division NIST.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
DOC Web Policies & Best Practices Jennifer Hammond NOAA Research WebShop 2002 August 7, 2002.
Defense Information Systems Agency A Combat Support Agency E3 Engineering Division 13 December 2011 Defense Information Systems Agency A Combat Support.
DoD IT Portfolios - DoD Directive
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Authoritative Source for Location Lora Muchmore Director ODUSD(I&E) Business Enterprise Integration Directorate January.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
1 Defense Logistics Agency DOD Activity Address Directory (DODAAD) Reengineering Data Enhancements.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mr. Daniel Carrasco Chief, Contracting Division USACE – LA District 13 OCT 2015.
MPE – Enabling ALL to securely SEE, DECIDE, ACT MPE - Highlights  Establish Core Implementation Working Group  Build Joining, Membership, and Exiting.
1 The FGDC Standards Program Presented by Julie Binder Maitra FGDC Standards Coordinator To Interagency Council on Standards Policy June 4, 2003.
OMB Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance (Endorsed) Ivan DeLoatch, Staff Director Lew Sanford Jr. & Wendy Blake-Coleman NGAC Meeting, February 4, 2009.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Information Resource Stewardship A suggested approach for managing the critical information assets of the organization.
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e As of: 3/1/2016 Air Force Weather Agency CEISC Committee Focus Shift - Proposed Modification to.
OMB Circular A-16, Revised NSDI Data Themes Housing Jon Sperling HUD/Office of Policy Development & Research Housing: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
January 30, 2013 Geopolitical Entities, Names, and Codes Standard January 30, 2013.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
COBIT. The Control Objectives for Information and related Technology (COBIT) A set of best practices (framework) for information technology (IT) management.
FGDC Address Data Standard Scope, Status, and Structure  United States Street, Landmark, and Postal Address Data Standard"  Scope: Street, landmark,
Overview of Draft U.S. Address Data Standard Martha McCart Wells, GISPSpatial Focus, Inc. Ed Wells, GISPWMATA Carl Anderson, GISPFulton County, GA Sara.
Role Responsibilities
Improving Mission Effectiveness By Exploiting the Command’s Implementation Of the DoD Enterprise Services Management Framework - DESMF in the [name the.
Industry IT Standards in DoD
Database Systems – Data Hygiene
New User Guide Learning how to use your NxPay Account
GSBPM AND ISO AS QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TOOLS: AZERBAIJAN EXPERIENCE Yusif Yusifov, Deputy Chairman of the State Statistical Committee of the Republic.
Stephanie Hirner ESTP ”Administrative data and censuses
Fundamental Science Practices (FSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey
Presentation transcript:

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 1 BEA Address Construct and Supporting Leading Practices/Standards April 1, 2010 Craig Adams, ODUSD(I&E) BEI

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 2 Agenda Net-Centric Requirements Source and Type History BEA Address Attributes Benefits Leading Practices and Standards

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 3 Net-Centric Requirements DoDD Data Sharing in a Net-Centric Department of Defense 4.6 “Data interoperability shall be supported by making data assets understandable and by enabling business and mission processes to be reused where possible.” 5.6. “The Heads of the DoD Components shall: Ensure implementation of Net-Centric data sharing, including establishing appropriate plans, programs, policies, processes, and procedures consistent with policies herein.” E “Netcentricity is a robust, globally interconnected network environment (including infrastructure, systems, processes, and people) in which data is shared timely and seamlessly among users, applications, and platforms.” DoDI Procedures for Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS) 4.0. It is DoD policy that: IT and NSS employed by U.S. Forces shall, where required (based on capability context), interoperate with existing and planned, systems and equipment, of joint, combined and coalition forces and with other U.S. Government Departments and Agencies, as appropriate The Heads of the DoD Components shall: Ensure IT and NSS interoperability, supportability, and information assurance is designed, developed, tested, evaluated, and incorporated into all DoD Component IT and NSS. When necessary, recommend tradeoffs among operational effectiveness, operational suitability, information assurance, and IT and NSS interoperability and supportability to the USD(AT&L), the ASD(NII)/DoD CIO, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Commander, USJFCOM. PL : National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 and OMB Circular A-119 directs federal agencies to use voluntary consensus standards [such as ISO 3166] in lieu of government-unique standards [such as FIPS 10-4] in their procurement and regulatory activities, except where inconsistent with law or otherwise impractical.

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 4 Address Type and Source General Address Types include: –Physical: for example a Thoroughfare (Street) Address o For example: 20 North Main Street, Suite 101 –Non Physical: for example a Postal Address o Including PO Box addresses, rural delivery addresses, etc o Many DoDAACs can share the same physical address o addresses may not be linked to any physical address RPILM looks at address as one of the physical attributes of a real property asset –Assigned by government authority (in DoD by Real Property AO) –Can have one or more over the life of the real property asset

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 5 Output versus Data Structure The output format is familiar to everyone: –Mr Jones –20 North Main Street, Suite 101 –Columbus, Ohio The underlying data structure is the issue: –Recipient Name = “Mr Jones” –Street Number = “20” –Street Direction = “North” –Street Name = “Main” –Street Type = “Street” –City = “Columbus” –State = “Ohio” –Zip Code = “ ”

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 6 BEA Address Construct Attributes Instead of two text lines, the BEA decomposes street address into the following attributes: –Street Number –Street Name –Street Type –Street Direction –City * –Postal Zone (zip code)* –Country Primary Subdivision (state) * –Country Subdivision (county) * –Country * *Data elements generally accepted, and not included in later slides Data elements in Green are BEA street address or equivalent

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 7 Benefits of the BEA Decomposed Address Construct Compliance benefits : –Automated address validation –Automated identification of duplicate addresses –Greater chance of match against USPS zip+4 barcode databases –Reduced likelihood of undeliverable addresses –Automated error checking to ensure use of standards (e.g., abbreviations) –Interoperability of address information across multiple organizations –Efficient linkages to geospatial information leading to more robust and accurate geopolitical information –Single DoD address construct enables single point of data entry by the authoritative source, eliminates redundant address maintenance, and results in improved cost efficiencies and data accuracy Research reveals: –Decomposed street addresses are the pervading leading practice that is either in development or has been implemented across multiple government and non-governmental organizations –Majority of street address standards are more complex than what is articulated in the BEA.

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 8 Examples of Leading Practices and Standards The Address Standards Working Group sponsored by Urban and Regional Planning Information Systems Association (URISA), National Emergency Number Association (NENA), Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), and the U.S. Census Bureau has developed and has out for public comment the “U.S. Thoroughfare, Landmark, and Postal Address Data Standard” Thoroughfare Address Class: –Complete Address Number {Address Number Prefix} + {Address Number} + {Address Number Suffix} –Complete Street Name {Street Name Pre Modifier} + {Street Name Pre Directional} + {Street Name Pre Type} + {Street Name} + {Street Name Post Type} + {Street Name Post Directional } + {Street Name Post Modifier}

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 9 The UPU S-42-5, Feb 2006, International Postal Address Components and Templates, is an international postal standard was issued by the Universal Postal Union in It decomposes its thoroughfare address construct (page 19) into: –Street Number or Plot –Preceding Thoroughfare Qualifier –Thoroughfare Name –Thoroughfare Type –Succeeding Thoroughfare Qualifier (e.g. North, SW, Upper, etc) Examples of Leading Practices and Standards Continued

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 10 The USPS Pub 28, Postal Addressing Standards, is the US postal standard and was issued by the US postal Service in July It addresses both format and content. Format describes how the various elements appear on the mailpiece. Content describes the content that constitute the various address elements. It’s street address elements (pages 9 & 36) are: –Primary Address Number –Predirectional –Street Name –Suffix –Postdirectional Examples of Leading Practices and Standards Continued

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 11 The International Digital Enterprise Alliance (IDEA) Address Data Interchange Specification (ADIS) is an open specification for the domestic and international interchange of address data. Version 7-1 is out for comment and will update version 4-1. ADIS delivery address subcomponents include: –Primary House Number –Primary House Type –Primary House Indicator –Primary Preceding Street Type –Primary Preceding Street Qualifier –Primary Street Name Prefix –Primary Street Name –Primary Succeeding Street Type –Primary Succeeding Street Qualifier Examples of Leading Practices and Standards Continued

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 12 The Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) eXtensible Address Language (2002) decomposes its thoroughfare address construct as follows: –Thoroughfare Number –Thoroughfare Number Prefix –Thoroughfare Number Suffix –Thoroughfare Pre Direction –Thoroughfare Leading Type –Thoroughfare Name –Thoroughfare Trailing Type –Thoroughfare Post Direction Examples of Leading Practices and Standards Continued

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 13 Questions What address standards are currently in use throughout DoD, by community? What versions of each of the standards are in use in DoD? What impediments to change exist? What can be done to reach the goal of address interoperability?