Primacy Revision Application The Arsenic Rule. Major Points Components of Primacy Revision Application Attorney General’s Statement Special Primacy Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEM Drinking Water Program Water Resources Study Committee.
Advertisements

METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
Medicaid Expansion in Pennsylvania Premium Assistance and the Medicaid Waiver Process.
Introduction to Uniform Guidance Presented to Engineering Research Network – Nov 19, 2014 by Sponsored Programs Accounting.
Copyright Eastern PA EMS Council February 2003 Health Information Portability and Accountability Act It’s the law.
Compliance Supplement  What is the Compliance Supplement  Important sections of the CS  For what should or should not be used  New Information for.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Looking Ahead.
North Carolina Chief 101 Firefighter Safety, OSHA and NFPA.
FAMILY EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS AND PRIVACY ACT Electronic Signatures This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
POINT OF ENTRY POINT OF USE BOTTLED WATER
Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) Regulatory Determinations Water Quality Training Roundtable 2000 February 7, 2000.
Medicaid Hospital Utilization Review and DRG Audits: Frequently Asked Questions The Department of Medical Assistance Services Division of Program Integrity.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
PROPOSALS THE REVIEW OF THE 1958 AGREEMENT AND THE INTRODUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL WHOLE VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL (IWVTA) IWVTA Informal Group WP th Session.
Value Engineering at FHWA
WWLC Standard Operating Procedures Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
HIPAA Revisions! Section 1104 THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT February 17, Nachimson Advisors, LLC.
SCHC, 9/27/2005 US Implementation of the Globally Harmonized System The GHS Journey Continues…
Ground Water Rule Workshop Department of Environmental Conservation September 22-23, 2009 Dan Weber & Gloria Collins Regulations Team DEC Drinking Water.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: Date: Oversight Throughout the Supply Chain: Is It Adequate? DOT OIG Audit: Assessment of FAA's Risk-Based.
MRWS GROUND WATER RULE (GWR) PREPARED BY JOHN CAMDEN MRWS GROUND WATER TECH
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
1 Restructuring EPA’s Stationary Source Audit Program (SSAP) Allowing Private Providers to Supply Audit Samples.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Three Land Use Decisions.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007.
Purpose of Water Treatment c. Safe Drinking Water Act and SDWA amendments.
1 TCEQ Drinking Water Sample Collector Training October 2006 Alicia Diehl TCEQ Public Drinking Water Section UCMR Sampling TCEQ Drinking Water Sample Collector.
BY: Winston G. Smith Environmental Engineer UST/PCB & OPA Enforcement & Compliance Section EPA Region 4.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Three Land Use Planning Decisions.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
MSRA Implementation Status Update. 2 Implementation Strategy Divide tasks Priority 1 – Due date specified in the Act Priority 2 – Required, but no due.
Human Subjects Research Requirements (EDGAR Part 97) General Rule When federally-supported research involves human subjects, it must be approved by an.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
SAFE DRINKING WATER GENERAL UPDATE TO CHAPTER 109 June 19, 2007 Bureau of Water Standards and Facility Regulation.
Water Quality Standards Regulation (9 VAC ) Rulemaking: Bacteria, Ammonia, Human Health and Aquatic Life Criteria.
Let Auditing Be Your Superpower
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
Anna Preston Vance, HA of Paris
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Changes to Exempt Categories
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards Proposed Rulemaking
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Public Comment Webinars January 14, 2015 and January 15, 2015
Changes to Exempt Categories
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Human Subjects Research Requirements (EDGAR Part 97)
Informed Consent (SBER)
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
TRTR Briefing September 2013
National Environmental Monitoring Conference
What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL.
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Preparing for a Stack Test
2019 AWOP National Meeting Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
Presentation transcript:

Primacy Revision Application The Arsenic Rule

Major Points Components of Primacy Revision Application Attorney General’s Statement Special Primacy Requirements Waivers Monitoring Plan New System Monitoring Bundling

1/22/03 States must submit complete and final primacy revision application 1/22/05 States with an extension must submit complete and final primacy revision application 1/23/06 10 µg/L MCL becomes enforceable 1/22/01 Final Rule Timeline

Components of Primacy Revision Application Primacy revision checklist Text of Primacy Agency’s regulations Primacy revision crosswalk Reporting and record keeping Special primacy requirements Attorney General’s Statement

State Primacy Revision Checklist * New requirement from the 1996 Amendments. Regulations published in the April 28, 1998 Federal Register. ** New regulations published in the August 19, 1998 Federal Register. *** New regulations published in the August 14, 1998 Federal Register.

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTFEDERAL CITATION S TATE C ITATION (D OCUMENT TITLE, P AGE NUMBER, S ECTION / PARAGRAPH ) D IFFERENT FROM FED. REQUIREMENT ? E XPLAIN ON SEPARATE SHEET S UBPART A - GENERAL §141.2D EFINITIONS Point-of-entry treatment device (POE)§141.2 Point-of-use treatment device (POU)§141.2 §141.6E FFECTIVE DATES Except as provided inparagraphs (a) through (k) of this section, and in (a)(2), the regulations set forth in this part shall take effect on June 24, §141.6 (a) The regulations set forth in §§141.11(d); (a), (c) and (i); (a) and (e); (a)(3) and (a)(4); (f); (e) and (f); (e); (a); (a) and (b); (a), (d) and (e); (b)(3); and (d) shall take effect immediately upon promulgation. §141.6(c) The arsenic MCL listed in § is effective for the purpose of compliance on January 23, Requirements relating to arsenic set forth in Secs (i)(4), (k)(3) introductory text, (k)(3)(ii), (b), (b), (b)(16), (c), (d), and (b) revisions in Appendix A of subpart O for the consumer confidence rule, and Appendices A and B of subpart Q for the public notification rule are effective for the purpose of compliance on January 23, However, the consumer confidence rule reporting requirements relating to arsenic listed in Sec (b) and (f) are effective for the purpose of compliance on February 22, §141.6(j) Regulations set forth in Secs (i)(1), (i)(2), (f)(15), (f)(22), (h)(11), (h)(20), (e), (j), and (k) are effective for the purpose of compliance on January 22, §141.6 (k) State Primacy Revision Crosswalk

Special Primacy Requirements Implementation Guidance Note: Guidance Often Goes Beyond Minimum Requirements = “Must” Guidance = “May” or “Should”

Special Primacy: Requirements Arsenic Final Rule § special primacy requirements §142.16(j)(1) Waivers §142.16(j)(2) Monitoring plan §142.16(k) New systems and new sources

If Primacy Agency chooses to issue waivers: Describe procedures - application requirements, review process for “use” or “susceptibility” waivers, evaluation criteria, and any other documentation Use existing or update waiver program approved under the organic and inorganic National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR) (i.e. the Phase II/V Rules) Or §142.16(j)(1): Arsenic Waivers

Guidance: Use Existing Waiver Program Submit documentation that existing waiver program will be used Submit any revisions to existing waiver program

Guidance: Develop a new Waiver Program To move to reduced monitoring Use waiver Not appropriate for arsenic Used, manufactured, or stored in zone of influence Susceptibility waiver System-by-system waiver Analytical results Vulnerability assessment

A Primacy Agency must submit a monitoring plan that will ensure all systems complete the required monitoring by the regulatory deadlines States may develop a new plan States may note that they will use the same plan as they submitted for Phase II/V Plan must be enforceable under State law Or §142.16(j)(1): Monitoring Plan

Guidance: Monitoring Plan Can phase-in monitoring over the 3-year compliance period based on system size or source of water Can require one-third of systems to monitor each year of the 3-year compliance period

§142.16(k): New Systems A Primacy Agency must submit initial monitoring requirements for new systems that begin operation after Jan. 22, 2004: How monitoring schedule will assure drinking water is protective of public health Specify the time frame by which public water system (PWS) must demonstrate compliance

Guidance: New Systems Recommend 1 sample for all contaminants prior to PWS operation Ensure initial monitoring frequency targets contaminants of concern Pesticide monitoring: Consider seasonal variation Geologically abundant IOCs

Attorney General’s Statement All applications must include AG Statement Certifying Primacy Agency regs are adopted and enforceable Primacy Agency does not have audit privilege and immunity laws or if they do: They do not prevent Primacy Agency from meeting requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act (Options in Imp. Guidance) If audit and privilege statement submitted with previous application Indicate date of previous submittal AG must certify that Primacy Agency audit laws have not changed since the date of that submittal

Bundling State Primacy Packages Combine documentation into one Primacy Revision Application Package for Arsenic Rule Radionuclides Rule Variance and Exemption Rule Others?

Benefits of Bundling Reason to issue an extension Limit transactional costs One document to develop and submit for approval Only have to go to Attorney General once Monitoring plan special primacy requirements for arsenic and radionuclides are similar