EPA’s Proposed Geologic Sequestration Rule  Administrator Johnson signed July 15, 2008  120 day comment period  Final rule in 2010 or 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPA’s Underground Injection Control Program
Advertisements

What’s in a Name: EPA Region VIII’s (Non-)Application of the E&P Exemption to Natural Gas Condensate
EPA’s Proposed Rules for Geo-Sequestration of CO 2 Ben Knape Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Alert: Waste Spill Environmental Science. Artesian well.
Cleanup of Contaminated Areas Aaron D. Green, Project Manager Remediation Branch IDEM’s Office of Land Quality.
Slide 6- 1 CERCLA Chapter 6 Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act “CERCLA”
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Hazardous Materials. Regulation of Hazardous Materials Over 1000 new man-made chemical enter commerce each year Pose a potential risk to life, health.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
Jerevan November Tailing dams inspection Juliane Knaul Legal Expert, Agency of Mining, Geology and Minerals of Brandenburg, Germany AGENCY.
Environmental Regulation and Hydraulic Fracturing in California
CWAG 2010 WATER LAW CONFERENCE The Broadmoor Colorado Springs, Colorado April 29 – 30, 2010.
Hazardous waste. Threatens human health or the environment in some way because it is –toxic –chemically active –corrosive –flammable –or some combination.
The Arsenic Rule Waste Disposal Options. Impacts on Disposal Alternatives Concentration of contaminants in the waste stream Concentration of contaminants.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
The Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Presentation for the Radionuclide Webcast August 4, pm.
1 Hydraulic Fracturing Regulatory Processes in Louisiana James H. Welsh Commissioner of Conservation.
It’s not my Fracking Problem! Regulations, Liability, and the Process of Hydraulic Fracturing Katie Heath November 30, 2010.
EPAs Proposed Ground Water Protection Standards 40 CFR 192 an Industry Perspective Peter Luthiger Mesteña Uranium LLC.
COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION CLASS II UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL RULES AND REGULATIONS Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Thursday,
Carbon Capture and Storage State Legislation Kathy G. Beckett Midwest Ozone Group January 22-23, 2009.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
8/27/2015 ENDANGERING TYPES OF CLASS V WELLS GEOLOGY SECTION 2012 SEMINAR September 6, 2012 Wichita, KS.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 24.1 Chapter 24 Environmental Law.
The Injection Connection: A Regulatory Framework for Geologic Sequestration of Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide  2010 Diane Perkins All Rights Reserved.
The Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS CO 2 Storage Dave Hill 1.
Environmental Compliance Assistance Workshop for Colleges and Universities September 13-14, 2005 Chapel Hill, NC.
Regulatory Aspects of the Underground Hydrocarbon Storage (UHS) Program and the Role Contractors Have in This Lyons Celebration Center, Lyons, Kansas February.
U.S. Environmental History 1965 Solid Waste Disposal Act (WSDA) 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) – Identification of wastes (characteristics.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT.  History of the Act ◦ The primary purpose of TSCA is to regulate chemical substances and mixtures  It does so by regulating.
Waste Management Overview & Land Disposal Restrictions.
Bonn, Germany Sunday, 25 March 2012 The Carbon dioxide Capture and geological Storage As project activities Under CDM – The Durban Regulation First SDM.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
Update on EPA Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Activities: Presentation at the KDHE Geology Section’s Fall 2012 Seminar David Garrett, Environmental.
Idaho Solid Waste Facility Record Keeping June 20, 2006 Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
Jeopardy $100 Land + SeaTrash/MinesPollutionWater Miscellaneous $200 $300 $400 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency.
Environmental Regulations. Learning Objectives TLW understand the history of environmental regulations TLW be able to describe key content of environmental.
MassDEP Underground Storage Tank Program Program Requirements for Owners and Operators Winter 2015 Workshops 1.
Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.
Module 9: Natural Resource Assessment and Damages (NRD)
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Update On Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action Financial Assurances Activities Permitting.
Jody Blanke, Professor Computer Information Systems and Law Mercer University, Atlanta 1.
Clear thinking on Nuclear: Waste disposal 1.One site for high-level radioactive waste is easier to monitor, regulate, and secure 2.A repository will provide.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
Understanding the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Hazardous Waste Definition Exemption Jeff Bowman, TEEX.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS CO 2 Sequestration Dave Hill 1.
Rules and Exceptions - The Costs of “Cheap” Coal.
Date faculty of lawgroningen centre of energy law CCS and issues of post- injection liability Mark Wissink
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
Radioactive Materials Licensing Authorizing licenses for: Low-level radioactive waste disposal By-product material disposal Public water system NORM waste.
EM530 – Unit 3 February 19, 2012 Welcome!!. Administrative Issues? Do you have any items that need to be clarified/explained?
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
Long-Term Stewardship: Ensuring the Safe Use of Contaminated Sites Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Brownfields 101: Liability EPA Brownfields 2006 Conference November 12, 2006 Barbara Kessner Landau, Esq. Bernstein, Cushner & Kimmell, P.C.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
RCRA Regulatory Overview for RPMs
Liability Under CERCLA
Environmental Protection Agency
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Presentation transcript:

EPA’s Proposed Geologic Sequestration Rule  Administrator Johnson signed July 15, 2008  120 day comment period  Final rule in 2010 or 2011

2 Key Points Regarding SDWA  SDWA UIC – 42 USC § 300h et seq.  Establishes minimum federal standards to protect USDWs  USDW – any aquifer capable of supplying water to a public water system with < 10,000 mg/L TDS  EPA has broad emergency powers under “imminent and substantial endangerment” 42 USC § 300i  contaminant which is present or is likely to enter a USDW (i.e., “endangerment”)  EPA can order shut down of wells, remediation, replacement of water supplies  Violations – administrative orders, civil actions and criminal enforcement  UIC Regulations – 40 CFR Part

3 UIC Program  Collective State/Federal Experience  Over 9B gallons of hazardous waste injected each year  Over 2B gallons of brine from oil & gas every day  Over 1B gallons of municipal wastewater every day  Well Classes  I – deep haz waste/industrial non-haz/municipal (500)  II – oil & gas fluids/brines/hydrocarbon storage (147,500)  III – mineral extraction (17,000)  IV – shallow haz/radioactive wastes (subject to 1984 ban)  V – experimental technology (650,000)  VI – geologic sequestration (NEW)

4 UIC – Delegated State Primacy

5 UIC Progam Elements  Site Characterization  Area of Review and Corrective Action  Well Construction  Well Operation  Site Monitoring  Well Plugging and Post-Injection Site Care  Financial Assurance  Public Participation

6 GS Rule - Overview  EPA considered 4 alternatives: opted for “tailored requirements approach”  Applicable to all U.S. and up to 3 miles offshore  Beyond scope: risks to air, human health, ecosystems  State primacy for Class VI  must promulgate regulations at least as stringent as the final rulemaking  Targeted formations: below lowermost USDW (deep saline, depleted oil/gas, unmineable coal seams, basalt)

7 GS Rule - Overview  Plans required AoR and Corrective Action Monitoring and Testing Emergency and Remedial Response Post-injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan  Increased frequency of mechanical integrity monitoring from 5 to 1 year  Tracers (odorants) not required but recommended to detect leaks  Multi-barrier, continuous monitoring (confining zone, USDW, surface air, soil gas) with alarms and automatic shut-off valves  State discretion to require monitoring for CO2 in surface air  Raises question whether federally enforceable

8 GS Rule - Overview  Permit issued through post-injection site care (50+ years)  Periodic updates to AoR models and corrective action status  States/Tribes may be more stringent than EPA  Estimated cost of commercial scale GS well $3.40/t CO2 of which $1.20/t is attributable to new GS rule (compared to $42/t CO2 for capture at IGCC plant)

9 Liability Concerns - RCRA “... EPA cannot make a categorical determination as to whether injected CO2 is hazardous under RCRA...”  Defined “carbon dioxide stream” to exclude hazardous wastes  CO2 stream composition will depend on flue gas scrubbing technology, additives, CO2 capture technology.  Test as hazardous per 40 CFR 261 (characteristic wastes: reactive, ignitable, corrosive and toxic)  If hazardous, cannot use Class VI

10 Liability Concerns - CERCLA  “... whether or not there is a ‘hazardous substance’ that may result in CERCLA liability from a sequestration facility depends entirely on the make-up of the specific CO2 stream and of the environmental media (e.g., soil, groundwater) in which it is stored.”  Impurities in CO2 stream that are hazardous substances, e.g., mercury  Chemical reactions with groundwater that create hazardous substances after injection, e.g., sulfuric acid, carbonic acid  Dissolution of minerals that may liberate heavy metals

11 CERCLA (cont’d)  Potential for case-by-case claim for Natural Resource Damages or response costs – Trustees (U.S., State, Tribes) may pursue  Defense to liability – “federally-permitted release”  Expressly applies to UIC (42 USC 9601(10) and 9707(j))  courts have construed narrowly – nicknamed “disappearing exemption” N/A if release is (1) not expressly permitted; (2) exceeds the limitations established in the permits; or (3) occurs during a time period when there were no permits.

12 CERCLA (cont’d) “Class VI permits will need to be carefully structured to ensure that they do not ‘authorize’ inappropriate hazardous releases... include clarifying if there are potential releases from the well which are outside the scope of the Class VI permit.” What releases and “potential” releases should be included in a permit application and permit? What is an “inappropriate” release?

13 Practical Challenges  Phased corrective action/monitoring wells  Negotiating site access agreements  What happens if access denied?  EPA recommends monitoring groundwater for heavy metals and organics to track plume and pressure front. - How much sampling? - What are the risks? - What happens if contamination is identified unrelated to UIC?

14 Post-Injection Site Care  50 years (possibly longer) or less time if demonstration of no endangerment (monitoring and modeling in sync) “...could be 100 years (or longer) if monitoring and modeling information suggest that the plume may still endanger USDWs...”  Deed recordation for the facility property (in perpetuity) - What about other properties below plume?  Financial Assurance Terminates after completed P-I site care approved and no longer endangerment Specifies only a “general duty” to obtain financial care (guidance to be provided later) May allow bi-furcated approach (well plugging v. P-I site care)

15 Long-Term Liability Transfer  “ SDWA does not provide EPA with the authority to transfer liability from one entity to another.” UIC regulations allow permit to be transferred Trust responsibilities for owner/operator are in perpetuity EPA says owner/operator may still be held responsible after post-injection site care for unanticipated migration that endangers USDW although parties may agree to contractually shift liability, such agreements may not be binding on the government