 Educational equity and school improvement are mutually inclusive goals. Excellence cannot exist without equitable experiences and results for all students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving School Leadership: Contexts and Success For them, conventional wisdom is not convenient truth. Keynote for OECD Workshop Brussels, February 1-2,
Advertisements

Association of American Colleges and Universities.

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Report to the KSD Board June 9, Provide Kent School District the necessary guidance and assistance to create an equitable, academically enriching,
Eight Week Intervention Program for Preschool Children Prior to Kindergarten Entry Board of Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
This We Believe: Keys to Educating Young Adolescents The position paper of the Association for Middle Level Education.
Teacher Education for the Global Age The Imperative for Change LONGVIEW FOUNDATION for Education in World Affairs and International Understanding, Inc.
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
“The Great Equalizer: Equality, Equity, and Social Justice” Blane Harding University of Kansas.
The Professional Teacher Learner-Centered Education EveryTeacher Teacher Development Planning Team June 14, 2004.
Our department is defined by the broad range of specialized skills, services, and programs we deliver to support our students, and their families and communities.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
1 Cultural Competencies, Part IV: Race & Ethnicity Maggie Rivas April 11, 2007.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
Community Engagement and Early Childhood Education Zipporah Hightower, Managing Director of Program Shanita LeFlore, Manager of Program Tuesday, May 27,
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
1 PUT TITLE HERE Presentation to School Council on the Ontario’s Equity and Inclusive Education Strategy April 15, 2010.
Step Up and Lead for Equity
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.
Key priorities, challenges and opportunities to advance the agenda for children in middle income countries of CIS, Eastern and Southern Europe Yuri Oksamitniy.
Moving From Parts to a Whole Tools That Unite Partners Around A Whole Child Vision Youth in the Middle Jessica Cameron Project Manager, Whole Child Initiative.
New Voices/Nuevas Voces Program: Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in Early Childhood Education and Intervention Betsy Ayankoya Dina Castro.
Focusing on Diverse Young Learners in State Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Dan Haggard & Alejandra Rebolledo Rea New Mexico Department of Children,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
1 Curriculum and Instruction Report Pocantico Hills School February 28, 2005.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Questions Teachers Have Related to Equity and Some Possible Solutions
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
The Achievement Gap and Equal Educational Opportunity Presented by July & Linda July 23, 2004.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Early Childhood and Diversity in Iowa: Challenges and Opportunities Setting the Context Charles Bruner September 26, 2007.
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
Michigan’s Child Welfare System Why is Overrepresentation a Critical Issue?
OUR MOVEMENT: UNDERSTANDING THE BIG PICTURE. 2 OVERVIEW Theory of Change Programmatic Approach.
1 Sharing the Aid Awareness Challenge: How to Reach Diverse Groups in Urban and Rural Settings Jane Collins Cissy VanSickle Session 23.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
Chapter 15 Schooling in the United States Jessica Barron Doug Strahler.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
Better Together Inclusion works 1. Our Vision In Peel, all children play, learn and grow together 2.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Photo of children Student Discipline Leading for Equity.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
BY : GLORIA M.AMENY-DIXON MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY PREPARED BY : ROSIDAWATI BT AB AB RAHMAN ( P73938 )
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK (S/CDN) September 14, 2006 Albany Marriott Hotel Presented by: Jean C. Stevens Interim Deputy Commissioner New York.
Culture of Community. 1 Creating our YSU Culture of Community Division of Multicultural Affairs Culture Of Community Council Culture Of Community Collaborative.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
The Role of Local Government in Multicultural Policy –
Markisha Smith, EdD & Rudyane Rivera-Lindstrom, MEd
Diversity and ECE.
The Dual Capacity-building Framework for Family-School Partnerships
Elizabeth Hoerath Manager FSL Policy and Implementation Unit
The Role of Local Government in Multicultural Policy –
NJCU College of Education
Who are we teaching? How do we differentiate instruction?
Quality Education Commission Presentation to the Senate Committee
Beyond The Bake Sale Basic Ingredients
Ensuring Equity for All Students
Presentation transcript:

 Educational equity and school improvement are mutually inclusive goals. Excellence cannot exist without equitable experiences and results for all students. While educators make many efforts to "level the playing field" for all students, we know that some groups of students do not experience equal learning opportunities and do not achieve at the academic and citizenship levels necessary. Such groups of students include: children and youth who are female or male (depending on the academic subject), immigrants, ethnic minorities, American Indians, the migrant or homeless, the neglected or delinquent, the students who are improving their Academic English proficiency, individuals with disabilities, and children and youth who live in high poverty areas. This session will provide an opportunity to challenge major assumptions and reach the underpinnings of our educational pedagogy. Office of Educational Equity Oregon Department of Education

 Brutal Facts: The National Picture  Historical Opportunity: The National Discourse and The State Discourse of the Needed Pedagogical Work  Office of Educational Equity: Access, Excellence & Social Justice  Humility and Will David Bautista, Assistant Superintendent Office of Educational Equity Ideas that Work at the State Level 2013

Historical Opportunity  Reflection  Dialogue  Being Passionate about our Work

Diversity, Access, Equity and Learning  Principle One: Learning is a Complex Process  Principle Two: Learning Needs to be Understood Within the Sociopolitical Context of Education  Principle Three: Educational Reform Needs to be Based on Access and Equity for All Students  Principle Four: The Nature of Teacher-Student Relationships is Central to Student Learning

 “The situation is dire, the agenda urgent. From parent associations to Capitol Hill, from classroom teachers to the White House—there is work to be done and passion to be spent by all of us who appreciate the stakes for our children and for the nation’s future. If we fail in this work, we will forfeit our position of economic and moral leadership. We will risk the future of our people and of America as we know it.” The Equity Commission of Excellence

The Courage to Act “Our system does not distribute opportunity equitable. Our leaders decry but tolerate disparities in student outcomes that are not only unfair, but socially and economically dangerous. Our nation’s state commitments to academic excellence are often eloquent but, without more, an insufficient response to challenges at home and globally.” The Equity Commission of Excellence February 2, 2013

 Equitable School Finance systems so that a child’s critical opportunities are not a function of his or her zip code;  Teachers, Principals and Curricula effective enough to provide children with the opportunity to thrive in a changing world;  Early Childhood Education with an academic focus, to narrow the disparities in readiness when kids reach kindergarten;  Mitigating Poverty’s Effects with broad access not only to early childhood education, but also to a range of support services necessary to promote student success and family engagement in school; effective measures to improve outcomes for student groups especially likely to be left behind—including English-language learners, children in Indian country or isolated rural areas, children with special education needs, and those involved in the child welfare or juvenile justice systems; and  Accountability and Governance reforms to make clearer who is responsible for what, attach consequences to performance, and ensure that national commitments to equity and excellence are reflected in results on the ground, not just in speeches during campaigns. Commission’s report provides a five-part framework of tightly interrelated recommendations to guide policymaking:

 Governor’s 40/40/20  Education focus on “0 to 20”  Strategic Plans: o Oregon Department of Education o Statewide ELL Plan o Equity Lens  Deputy Superintendent Appointed  Legislature attention to the education demands Historical Opportunity

Oregon: The State of Education  Age 25 and Older  28.9% of Oregonians hold a Bachelors degree or more  26.7% hold a 1-year certificate or Associates degree  11.1% of Oregonians do not hold a high school diploma

 10% Advanced Degree  18% Bachelors Degree  35% Some College/Associates  25% High School Graduate  11% Less than High School All Oregon

White  11% Advanced Degree  20% Bachelors  36% Some College/Associates  25% High School Graduate  8% Less than High School Sub-group

Black-African American  10% Advanced Degree  14% Bachelors Degree  42% Some College/Associates  20% High School Graduate  15% Less than High School Sub-group

Hispanic/Latino  3% Advanced Degree  8% Bachelors Degree  23% Some College/Associates  22% High School Graduate  44% Less than High School Sub-group

Asian/Pacific Islander  20% Advanced Degree  23% Bachelors  23% Some College/Associates  18% High School Graduate  15% Less than High School Sub-group

American Indian/Alaska Native  3% Advanced Degree  11% Bachelors  49% Some College/Associates  24% High School Graduate  13% Less than High School Sub-group

The Case for Equity  Equity requires the intentional examination of systemic policies and practices that, even if they have the appearance of fairness, may in effect serve to marginalize some and perpetuate disparities.

Equity Lens  The primary focus of the equity lens is on race and ethnicity. While there continues to be a deep commitment to many other areas of the opportunity gap, we know that a focus on race by everyone connected to the educational milieu allows direct improvements in the other areas. We also know that race and ethnicity continue to compound disparity. We are committed to explicitly identifying disparities in education outcomes for the purpose of targeting areas for action, intervention and investment.

Beliefs  We believe that everyone has the ability to learn and that we have an ethical responsibility and a moral responsibility to ensure an education system that provides optimal learning environments that lead students to be prepared for their individual futures.  We believe that speaking a language other than English is an asset and that our education system must celebrate and enhance this ability alongside appropriate and culturally responsive support for English as a second language.

 We believe students receiving special education services are an integral part of our educational responsibility and we must welcome the opportunity to be inclusive, make appropriate accommodations, and celebrate their assets. We must directly address the over-representation of children of color in special education and the under-representation in “talented and gifted.” Beliefs

 We believe that the students who have previously been described as at risk, underperforming, under-represented, or minority actually represent Oregon’s best opportunity to improve overall educational outcomes. We have many counties in rural and urban communities that already have populations of color that make up the majority. Our ability to meet the needs of this increasingly diverse population is a critical strategy for us to successfully reach our 40/40/20 goals. Beliefs

We believe that intentional and proven practices must be implemented to return out of school youth to the appropriate educational setting. We recognize that this will require us to challenge and change our current educational setting to be more culturally responsive, safe, and responsive to the significant number of elementary, middle, and high school students who are currently out of school. We must make our schools safe for every learner. We believe that ending disparities and gaps in achievement begin in the delivery of quality Early Learner programs and appropriate parent engagement and support. This is not simply an expansion of services -- it is a recognition that we need to provide services in a way that best meets the needs of our most diverse segment of the population, 0-5 year olds and their families.

We believe that resource allocation demonstrates our priorities and our values and that we demonstrate our priorities and our commitment to rural communities, communities of color, English language learners, and out of school youth in the ways we allocate resources and make educational investments. We believe that communities, parents, teachers, and community- based organizations have unique and important solutions to improving outcomes for our students and educational systems. Our work will only be successful if we are able to truly partner with the community, engage with respect, authentically listen -- and have the courage to share decision making, control, and resources.

We believe every learner should have access to information about a broad array of career/job opportunities and apprenticeships that will show them multiple paths to employment yielding family-wage incomes, without diminishing the responsibility to ensure that each learner is prepared with the requisite skills to make choices for their future. We believe that our community colleges and university systems have a critical role in serving our diverse populations, rural communities, English language learners and students with disabilities. Our institutions of higher education, and the P-20 system, will truly offer the best educational experience when their campus faculty, staff and students reflect this state, its growing diversity and the ability for all of these populations to be educationally successful and ultimately employed.

We believe the rich history and culture of learners is a source of pride and an asset to embrace and celebrate. And, we believe in the importance of supporting great teaching. Research is clear that “teachers are among the most powerful influences in (student) learning.” An equitable education system requires providing teachers with the tools and support to meet the needs of each student.

Conclusion  I used to think…  Now, I think…