Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) Technical Assistance for Florida Medicaid PMHPs August 21 st, 2007 Christy Hormann, MSW PIP Review Team Project.
Advertisements

WELCOME to the PIP Technical Assistance Training for Florida HMOs/PSNs We will begin shortly. Please place your phone on mute, unless you are speaking.
Applying the Nursing Process to Drug Therapy
Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. Performance Improvement Projects Nursing Home Diversion Program Where Are We Now? Concurrent Breakout Session #2 Florida.
Standard 3 Plan and Manage Care NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
Welcome to the EQR Quarterly Meeting! Wednesday, March 26, :00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. (EDT) We will begin shortly. Call-in information is ,
Designs to Estimate Impacts of MSP Projects with Confidence. Ellen Bobronnikov March 29, 2010.
External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Tuesday, September 26, p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
1 The aim…. ‘to enable assessors to objectively assess a laboratory’s compliance with the new standards’
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Medication Regimen Review Guidance Training CFR § (c)(1)(2) F428.
Drug Utilization Review (DUR)
Causal / Barrier Analysis Florida EQR Quarterly Meeting
2.11 Conduct Medication Management University Medical Center Health System Lubbock, TX Jason Mills, PharmD, RPh Assistant Director of Pharmacy.
Chapter 15 Evaluation.
HEDIS Audit – Appropriate Monitoring and Oversight of Vendors Presenter: Yolanda Strozier, MBA Project Manager, EQRO Services.
a judgment of what constitutes good or bad Audit a systematic and critical examination to examine or verify.
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Slide 1 Plan−Do−Study−Act! Using the PDSA Cycle to Improve Your Performance Improvement Projects March 18, 2014 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
JCAHO UPDATE June The Bureau of Primary Health Care is continuing to encourage Community Health Centers to be JCAHO accredited. JCAHO’s new focus.
Performance Measures 101 Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group June 18, :15 p.m.–4:45.
Continuous Quality Improvement Drug Utilization Evaluation.
STANDARDS FOR THE PRACTICE RECREATIONAL THERAPY (ATRA, REVISED 2013) HPR 453.
Preliminary Results of the Special Health Care Needs Focused Study Tuesday, June 19, :15 p.m. –1:45 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA Sr. Director, Statistical.
Performance Improvement Projects: Validating Process, Tips, and Hints Eric Jackson, MA Research Analyst October 19, 2009.
NHDP Collaborative PIP Breakout Session Lessons Learned Wednesday, June 10, :15 am to 12 noon Presenter: Don Grostic, MS Associate Director, Research.
Slide 1 Florida SIPP Quarterly Meeting Presenter: Jolene Rasmussen, MS Healthcare Analyst, PIP Review Team March 23, 2011.
CHAPTER 1 The Nursing Process and Drug Therapy Mosby items and derived items © 2007, 2005, 2002 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc.
Successful Concepts Study Rationale Literature Review Study Design Rationale for Intervention Eligibility Criteria Endpoint Measurement Tools.
Copyright © 2013, 2010 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 2 Application of Pharmacology in Nursing Practice.
Performance Measures 101 Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group March 28, :00.
NHDP Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 30th, 2010 Presenters: Don Grostic, MS Associate Director, Research and Analysis Yolanda.
Validation of Performance Measures for PMHPs Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group.
Basic Nursing: Foundations of Skills & Concepts Chapter 9
Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Tuesday, June 27, :45 p.m. – 4:45 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA.
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Prepaid Mental Health Plans Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Cheryl L. Neel, RN,
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Slide 1 HMO/PSN Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 26, 2011 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Project Manager, PIP Review.
Monitoring for Inappropriate Use of Antipsychotic Medications F428 – Drug Regimen Review Process F329 – Unnecessary Medications Margie Huguet, RN, MCS.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101 Monday, June 18, :30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA Sr. Director of Statistical.
Standard 10: Preventing Falls and Harm from Falls Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 13 August 2012.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting PMHP Collaborative PIP Follow-up Within Seven Days After Acute Care Discharge for a Mental Health Diagnosis January 11, 2012 Presenter:
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Regional Dental Consultants’ Meeting Presented by Emerson Robinson, DDS, MPH Region II and V Dental Consultant.
Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team.
Managed Care Nursing Facility Quality Initiatives February 2, 2015.
Cindy Tumbarello, RN, MSN, DHA September 22, 2011.
Developing Program Indicators Measuring Results MEASURE Evaluation.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Building the Perfect PIP for HMOs and PSNs Facilitators: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Manager, Performance Improvement Projects Debbie Chotkevys, DHA, MBA.
The AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
The Nursing Process and Drug Therapy
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Clinical Data Exchange – Report Card
Strategies to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance and to Improve Infection Control Robin Oliver, M.D., CPE.
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Nursing Home Diversion Programs Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Cheryl L. Neel,
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101
Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews
Performance Improvement Projects: PIP Library
Performance Improvement Projects: From Idea to PIP
Optum’s Role in Mycare Ohio
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Module 4 Part 3 Operationalizing the Measures
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Team Health Services Advisory Group, Inc.

Slide 2 Medication Review Medication review (including all prescriptions and over- the-counter medications) is important because it allows the licensed nurse or a pharmacist in consultation with the enrollee's physician: To assesses whether the enrollee’s medications are accurate, valid, non-duplicative and correct for the diagnosis To determine if therapeutic doses and administration are at an optimum level To determine if there is appropriate laboratory monitoring and follow-up taking place To assess for drug interactions, allergies, and contraindications

Slide 3 Medication Review LTC plans will benefit by conducting the Medication Review collaborative PIP. If conducted effectively, the PIP can : Improve performance in the targeted areas Keep plans focused on improving performance Improve enrollee satisfaction Improve enrollee health outcomes Reduce HCBS members’ risk of adverse medication interactions and over/under use of prescription, as well as OTC drugs

Slide 4 Activity I: Study Topic The documentation should include information that this is a collaborative topic across all LTC plans. If plan-specific data available, the data should be documented. If no plan-specific data available, an explanation should be provided. Describe how this topic has the potential to affect enrollee health, outcomes of care, functional status, or satisfaction

Slide 5 Activity II: Study Question Do targeted interventions increase the percentage of enrollees 18 years of age and older who are receiving HCBS and had a review of the enrollee’s medications and a medication list in the medical record or case file during the measurement year?

Slide 6 The eligible population is defined as: All enrollees 18 years of age and older as of December 31 of the measurement year who are receiving HCBS. The enrollee may not have more than one gap in continuous enrollment of up to 30 days during the measurement year. Activity III: Identify the Study Population

Slide 7 Activity IV: Select the Study Indicator Indicator 1: The number of enrollees 18 years of age and older receiving HCBS who had evidence of a list of the enrollee’s medications in the medical record or case file during the measurement year. Indicator 2: The number of enrollees 18 years of age and older receiving HCBS who had at least one medication review conducted by a licensed nurse or a pharmacist in consultation with the enrollee’s physician during the measurement year. Denominator: All eligible enrollees 18 years of age and older receiving HCBS.

Slide 8 Activity IV: Select the Study Indicator Measurement Periods Baseline January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 Remeasurement 1 January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 Remeasurement 2 January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016

Slide 9 All plans should use sampling if the eligible population is large enough, i.e. – greater than 411. Otherwise, plans need to use the entire eligible population. Specify the measurement period for the sampling methods used Provide the title of the applicable study indicator Identify the population size Identify the sample size Specify the margin of error and confidence level Describe in detail the methods used to select the sample Activity V: Use Valid Sampling Techniques

Slide 10 Activity VI: Define Data Collection Although the Medication Management service definition in the LTC waiver and the contract do not currently include a pharmacist in the review process, the Agency for Health Care Administration is in the process of making this change. The Agency would like to be proactive in designing the collaborative PIP measure, to avoid future inconsistencies in data collection and outcomes.

Slide 11 Administrative data collection or medical record/case file review Procedure Codes: Medication Management, Comprehensive medication services, BSNH2010 HN Medication Management, Comprehensive medication services, RNH2010TD Medication Management, Comprehensive medication services, LPNH2010TE Activity VI: Define Data Collection

Slide 12 HSAG Evaluation Elements: Data Collection The data collection procedures: Identify the data elements to be collected Include a defined and systematic process for collecting baseline and remeasurement data Activity VI: Define Data Collection

Slide 13 HSAG Evaluation Elements: Data Collection The manual data collection procedures: Include the qualifications of staff member(s) collecting manual data Include a manual data collection tool that ensures consistent and accurate collection of data according to indicator specifications (critical element) Activity VI: Define Data Collection

Slide 14 Activity VI: Define Data Collection HSAG Evaluation Elements: Data Collection The administrative data collection procedures: Include an estimated degree of administrative data completeness Describe the data analysis plan

Slide 15 Medical Record/Case File Review: Documentation must come from the same record and must include the following: A medication list in the record and evidence of a medication review by a licensed nurse or a pharmacist in consultation with the enrollee’s physician, and the date when the review was performed. Notation that the enrollee is not taking any medication and the date when it was noted. A review of side effects for a single medication at the time of prescription alone is not sufficient. An outpatient visit is not required to meet criteria. Activity VI: Data Collection

Slide 16 Collaborative PIP Completion The collaborative PIP should be completed on the new PIP Summary Form For the first year, the PIP Summary Form should be completed through the first six activities “Study Design” Plans should use the corresponding PIP Completion Instructions to ensure that all documentation requirements are addressed for each activity

Slide 17 Collaborative PIP Scoring HSAG will be using the outcome focused scoring methodology Improvement must be statistically significant over baseline for all study indicators to receive an overall Met validation status Activity IX is scored on an annual basis until statistically significant improvement over baseline has been achieved for all study indicators Once Evaluation Element 3, in Activity IX, receives a Met score, it will remain Met for the duration of the PIP

Slide 18 Collaborative PIP Scoring HSAG will not validate Activity X until Evaluation Element 3 of Activity IX is Met Once statistically significant improvement has been achieved for all indicators, the health plan will need to document a subsequent measurement period demonstrating sustained improvement in order to receive a Met in Activity X These scoring changes align the actual outcomes of the PIP with the overall validation status Greater emphasis on statistically significant and sustained improvement in outcomes

Slide 19 Questions and Answers