Patient and Public Involvement in Commissioning Trish Turner Public Involvement Manager

Commissioning New whole systems process Need to involve the public 5 workshops Not perfect - but better than it was Continually evaluating and revising Sharing good practice (and our mistakes!)

Criteria 19.80% 18.20% 15.60% 15.00% 12.60% 11.80% 7.00%

Proposal Does this proposal involve patients, carers and the public in how their care is delivered? Details? Does this proposal meet known public expectations and health wants? Is there any evidence for patient experiences or satisfaction from this proposal? If so, describe.

Flow Chart Proposal: 4Discussed with relevant agencies/multi- disciplinary teams 4Consulted with co-ordinator at PCT 4Finance verified with organisations finance department

Flow Chart (cont…) Cost-data removed benefits-only data submitted to each ClinicalModernisationPublic 2 reps

Flow Chart (cont…) Scoring Panel 1 x Chair 2 x Observers

Flow Chart (cont…) Benefit scores Administrator combines with cost information and ranks in cost-value PCT Board makes purchasing decisions Recommendation to Board

Planning Group Age Concern Youth & Community Service Diverse Communities Forum Expert Patient Programme Carers Forum Learning disabilities Self-Advocacy WN Patient Partnership PPIF WN CVS UEA PCT

Citizens Jury 155,648 persons in WNPCT area 50% male/50% female 57% working age 22% under 19 21% aged % carers 20% long-term health conditions under 2% BME

Citizens Jury

Stages Step 1 - committee person making decisions as Panellist Step 2 - shadow by non-committee person Step 3 - non-committee person taking more decisions with support Step 4 - Panellist shadowed by another non- committee person

Issues Training Expenses Advocacy/Support Funding Voluntary sector support

More Information... Further info: Contact: Trish Turner Tel: