1 Agenda for 6th Class Admin –Slide handouts –Name plates out –Lunch Friday, 12:30 outside Rm 433 (Faculty Lounge –Make up class This Wednesday, 9/17,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
Advertisements

1 Agenda for 10th Class Admin –Handouts Extras to me ASAP –Name plates –Remember to put on the bottom of all writing assignments: "I have not consulted.
1 Agenda for 6th Class Admin –Handouts –Name plates –Next week’s office hours M 9/30 4:30-5:30 (not 3:20-4:20) 1995 Exam: Responding to Complaint Review.
Experts & Expert Reports  Experts and the FRE  FRCP, Rule 26 and experts  How are experts used in patent litigation?  What belongs in a Rule 26 report?
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
Motion to Compel A party is entitled to secure discovery from another party without court intervention.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
1 Agenda for 9th Class Admin –Handouts Return extras to me during class –Name plates Sanctions (continued) –Phillips –A Civil Action Summary Judgment –Celotex.
Motion for Summary Judgment The Keys to Success. How does this work?  Summary judgments are governed by Rule 166(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
1 Agenda for 8th Class Admin –Handouts –Name plates –No class next Friday, 9/26 Experts (continued) Sanctions –Phillips Introduction to Summary Judgment.
1 Agenda for 7th Class Admin –Slides –Name plates out Work Product Experts Introduction to Sanctions.
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Pleading Pre-trial Discovery Resolution without Trial Trial & Post-trial Appeal.
1 Agenda for 6th Class Admin –Slide handouts –Name plates out Review of Relation Back 1995 Exam Discovery –Intro & Scope –Depositions –Relevance Steffan.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 24 DISCOVERY V.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 9Slide 1 Advantages of a Deposition You can ask specific follow-up questions based on the answers you get You can ask specific.
1 Agenda for 12th Class Admin – Handouts – Name plates – Lunch. W 10/23 – M 10/28 class will start at 1:25 – A Civil Action screening W 10/30 7:30PM WCC.
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY III.
1 Agenda for 12th Class Admin –Handouts –Name plates –Writing groups on web –Welcome to Shakay Amirkhanyan prospective student Experts (continued) Sanctions.
Mon., Nov. 19. Supplemental Jurisdiction U.S. Const. Article III. Section. 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising.
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
1 Agenda for 6th Class Admin –Slide handouts –Name plates out –Office hours Thursday 2-2:45 Not 2-3PM Relation Back 1995 Exam Discovery –Intro & Scope.
Legal Document Preparation Class 12Slide 1 Functions of the Discovery Process Narrow the issues –After investigation, you can more easily determine which.
1 Agenda for 6th Class Misc. –Name plates out Rule 11 examples (continued) Answer Intro to Amendment.
1 Agenda for 6th Class Misc. –Name plates out –Lunch Friday Rule 11 (continued) Answer Intro to Amendment.
1 Agenda for 5th Class Misc. –Name plates out –Slide handout –Thursday office hours canceled this week Today 5-6PM instead Answer Amendment Relation Back.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 20 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 11, 2002.
1 Agenda for 21st Class Admin – Handouts – Name plates Discussion of mock mediation Arbitration Fees – Fee shifting problem – Accounting in A Civil Action.
Tues. Nov. 19. discovery scope of discovery attorney-client privilege.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 15 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 11, 2001.
1 Agenda for 11th Class Admin –Handouts Slides German Advantage –Name plates Summary Judgment in a Civil Action JMOL New Trial Introduction to Appeals.
1 Agenda for 10th Class Admin –Handouts Slides SJ in a Civil Action –Name plates –No office hours this week me for appointment Review of Discovery.
Interrogatories & Depositions Civil Litigation I - Unit 6.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 20 DISCOVERY I Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 7, 2005.
1 Agenda for 9th Class Admin –Handouts –Name plates Experts (continued) Sanctions –Phillips –A Civil Action Introduction to Summary Judgment.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
1 Agenda for 8th Class Admin –Slide handouts –Name plates out Discovery –Review of Scope –Work Product –Experts –Intro to Sanctions.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
© Sara M. Taylor 2002 Rules of Discovery  State  Federal.
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2002 Class 21 October 15, 2002.
1 Agenda for 14th Class Admin –Handouts Extras to me ASAP –Name plates –Next class is Tuesday –Welcome Brittany Wiser Emily Milder Review of Summary Judgment.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY II October 11, 2005.
1 Agenda for 8th Class Admin –Handouts –Name plates –Lunch Discovery –Experts –Sanctions.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION F CLASS 22/23 DISCOVERY IV.
Wed., Nov. 12. discovery scope of discovery 26(b)(1): Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s.
Forms of Pretrial Discovery in the Auto Property Damage Case Mark Demian and Jeffrey Dubin Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLP.
Tues., Nov. 11.
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
Agenda for 7th Class Admin Slide handouts Name plates out Friday lunch
Agenda for 11th Class Admin Handouts Slides German Advantage
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Agenda for 8th Class Admin Slide handouts Name plates out Discovery
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Agenda for 6th Class Misc. Name plates out Slide handout Amendment
Agenda for 7th Class Admin Slide handouts Name plates out Friday lunch
Tues. Nov. 12.
Agenda for 11th Class Admin Handouts Slides German Advantage
Agenda for 9th Class Admin Handouts Name plates Sanctions Phillips
Agenda for 7th Class Admin Slide handouts Name plates out Friday lunch
Agenda for 8th Class Admin Handouts Slides Phillips Name plates out
Agenda for 14th Class Admin Name plates Handouts Slides Shavell
Agenda for 10th Class Admin Handouts Slides SJ in a Civil Action
Agenda for 13th Class Admin Name plates Handouts Slides Polinsky
Agenda for 11th Class Admin Handouts Slides German Advantage
Agenda for 9th Class Admin Handouts Name plates
Agenda for 6th Class Misc. Name plates out Slide handout Relation Back
Agenda for 6th Class Misc. Name plates out Slide handout
Agenda for 10th Class Admin Handouts Slides SJ in a Civil Action
Presentation transcript:

1 Agenda for 6th Class Admin –Slide handouts –Name plates out –Lunch Friday, 12:30 outside Rm 433 (Faculty Lounge –Make up class This Wednesday, 9/17, Rm 3, 12-1:50 Discovery –Intro & Scope –Depositions –Relevance Steffan v Cheney Davis v Precoat –Privilege –Privacy Stalnacker –Intro to Work Product & Experts

2 Assignment for Next Class I Work Product –FRCP 26(b)(3), –Yeazell , –Writing Assignment / Questions to think about Briefly summarize Hickman What discovery device, if any, did Fortenbaugh use to secure statements from the survivors? If petitioner sent the tug owners interrogatories requesting detailed summaries of any witness statements, would such discovery be barred by the reasoning in Hickman? Would it be barred by FRCP 26(b)(3). PP. 495ff Q1, 3, 4b-d, 5 –Optional Glannon , ,

3 Assignment for Next Class II Experts –FRCP 26(a)(2), (b)(4), (c)(1) –Yeazell –Questions we will discuss in class / writing assignment : Briefly summarize Thompson and Chiquita –Incorporate into your summaries of Thompson and Chiquita answers to p. 502 question 1 499ff Qs 1-4; 502ff Qs 2-3. Note that 503 Q3 should refer to 26(b)(4)(B), not 26(a)(2)(B). Suppose plaintiff has lung cancer which he thinks might have been caused by exposure to asbestos. Plaintiff’s lawyer has a doctor extract 10 lung samples, which she then sends to 10 pathologists. 9 say the lung cancer was caused by smoking, but the 10 th says it was caused by asbestos. The lawyer discloses the 10 th pathologist as one who will testify at trial, but says nothing about the other 9 to the defendant. Can defendant’s lawyer find out that plaintiff consulted 10 pathologists? Can she find out their identities? Can she depose the other 9? Why is this important? –Optional. Glannon , ,

4 Last Class Amendment & Relation Back –Analyze all factors / requirements –Don’t analyze relation back unless plaintiff is bringing claim barred by statute of limitations –If statute of limitations problem Necessary to analyze amendment and relation back separately But no relation back is reason to deny amendment 1995 Exam –Best answers Saw multiple reasons for 12(b)(6) Identified invalid legal theory as most strategically advantageous –On exam, should mention other grounds for 12(b)(6) »Missing element, conclusory allegations, etc. –In practice, need to decide whether worth client’s money, court’s time, and possibility of alienating judge and opposing counsel –Answer, etc.

5 Discovery Biggest innovation of 20 th century procedure Costs and benefits –Enormously expensive, time consuming, intrusive –Improves accuracy and thus enhances justice, Promotes settlement Main methods –Depositions, requests for documents (including s) Largely unsupervised –Lawyers make requests directly to opposing counsel Judge’s permission not generally required –Lawyers respond directly to opposing counsel Judge does not ordinarily see –Lawyers can bring problems to judge’s attention –Motions to compel, motions to protect, motions for sanctions –But judges don’t like to be involved –Often magistrate judges handle Discovery does not preclude other means of investigation

6 Discovery: Scope FRCP 26(b)(1). Any non-privileged matter relevant to claim or defense Privileges – attorney-client, doctor-patient, self-incrimination Relevance – Information is relevant if it helps prove or disprove a claim or defense –Need not be determinative Hit and run accident. Plaintiff says offending car was yellow. Fact that defendant owns yellow car is relevant –Sufficient that reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence –May do broader discovery relevant to “subject matter involved in the action” with court permission Limitations –Privilege –Special rules for work product and experts –Cost outweighs likely benefit. 26(b)(2)(C )(iii) –Annoying, embarrassing, oppressive. 26(c)(1) –Court may issue protective order. 26(c)(1)

7 Discovery: Depositions Much like oral testimony at trial –Deponent sworn, opposing counsel present, court reporter transcribes –Lawyer asks questions, deponent must answer –No judge Only depose witnesses controlled by or friendly to opposing side –Don’t need discovery to get info from own side or friendly witnesses –Deposition is expensive and other lawyer present Only supposed to instruct deponent not to answer for 3 reasons. FRCP 30(c)(2) –To protect privilege –To enforce court ordered limitation discovery –To made motion to court under FRCP 30(d)(3) –Otherwise, can object to question (e.g. irrelevant, hearsay, embarrassing, duplicative), but deponent must answer But if question is really improper, is opposing side likely to complain to judge?

8 Questions on Discovery Briefly summarize Davis v Precoat Metals and Stefan v Cheney Pp. 463ff. Q1-4 Pp. 488ff Q1 Briefly summarize Stalnaker Pp Qs 2, 4b

9 Work Product Work Product 26(b)(3) –No discovery of “documents and tangible things prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial … [unless] substantial need” –Designed to protect lawyers notes from discovery But maybe broader?

10 3 Kinds of Experts Expert who will testify at trial –Heightened discovery –FRCP 26(a)(2)(A). Disclosure of name of testifying expert –FRCP 26(a)(2)(B). Testifying expert must prepare report and report must be disclosed –FRCP 26(b)(4)(A). Opposing party may depose testifying expert Non-testifying expert, hired in anticipation of litigation or to prepare for trial –Treated like other work product –FRCP 26(b)(4)(D). Non-testifying expert, hired in anticipation of litigation or to prepare for trial, is shielded from discovery Unless “exceptional circumstances” 26(b)(4)(D)(ii) Experts not hired in anticipation of trial –Subject to discovery like ordinary witnesses –E.g. engineer who designed product which may be defective; doctor who examined patient for treatment (not for litigation purposes) –Disclosure of facts and opinions, 26(a)(2)(D) But not as extensive disclosure as required of testifying experts