1 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg 2007 1/15SAFESPOTSAFESPOT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safe Driving Rules and Regulations
Advertisements

Driving in Urban Traffic
Defensive Driving What are the attributes of a good driver?
Powered-Two-Wheelers Road Safety The commitment of Piaggio & C. SpA Ljubliana, 23 April 2008.
Chapter 8 Driver Education Sharing the Road with Others Page
Driving In Different Environments & Situations
Responsible Driving Mastery Learning
Rules of the Road. Introduction This training will assist Spanish- speaking Motor Carriers in understanding some of the important traffic regulations.
Driver’s Safety Pg
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY What needs quick thinking and concentration? Intersection, junctions, roundabouts & U turns all require your.
Delaware State Driver’s Education Study Guide. Drivers have trouble seeing motorcycles in traffic. Why?
IMPROVING THE SAFETY OF NON-MOTORIZED ROAD USERS Antida Aversa Automobile Club of Italy.
Intersections & Right of Way
Chapter 4.
Vulnerable Road User needs towards ITS. HUMANIST Conference, June 2014, Vienna Duration: Consortium: Associated Members: Ertico, ECF,
DRIVING IN URBAN TRAFFIC
Chapter 9 Driving in Urban Traffic
Co-operative ITS APEC GNSS Implementation Team Geoff McDonald Transport and Main Roads.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
1 Safespot applications for Infrastructure-Based Co-Operative Road-Safety World congress on ITS, Beijin /15SAFESPOT Fabien Bonnefoi, Francesco Bellotti,
Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Initiative May 2005, ITS America Annual Meeting Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office U.S. Department.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 9 New Technologies Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
Safety Stand Down Toolbox Talk – Driving
Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
Road Safety Training Handicap International Belgium.
How nature affects driving. What are some other situations that might affect your ability to properly control a vehicle? ► Dawn/Dusk ► Rain ► Snow/Sleet.
Chapter 9 Driving in Urban Traffic. Traffic Complexity  Driving in heavy, fast moving, city traffic is very challenging.  Traffic is more dense  Move.
MODULE 3 THE HAZARDS OF DRIVING.
SAFESPOT Project SP1 Meeting 3 rd – 4 th April, Berlin 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads” Debra.
CAR 2 CAR FORUM 2009 the European Approach The SAFESPOT Integrated Project G. Vivo, R. Brignolo, L. Andreone Centro Ricerche FIAT Cooperative systems for.
Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 1Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Hans-Martin Gerhard Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Quiet.
Bringing intelligent systems to the market: the new European research challenge of Field Operational Tests Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector ICT for Transport.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
SAFESPOT Project SP1/SP4 Harmonization Meeting 9 th June, Lyon 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
Welcome To “Defensive Driving For the Commercial Driver” Heritage Group Safety.
Meeting of State Pooled Fund Partners April 20, 2005 "Reducing Crashes at Rural Intersections: Toward a Multi-State Consensus on Rural Intersection Decision.
Eric Eiswerth Safety Research Project Manager FORD AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY OFFICE 2011 AASHTO Annual Meeting The Vehicle of the Future: Greener, Safer, Smarter.
SAFESPOT SP2 Meeting Paris, December 2 nd SP2 Meeting Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads” Mr.
Interacting With Other Users. Most collisions occur when two or more objects try to occupy the same space at the same time. Drivers must identify movement.
V2V and V2I communication: SODIT experimentation Jean-Jacques HENRY President, SODIT 11 September,2010 SODIT (Société pour le Développement and l’Innovation.
Urban Traffic Traffic is more dense City traffic hazards are closer Use IPDE Process.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
SAFESPOT Project Kick off Meeting February 16 th and 17 th 2006 Rome 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart.
SP2 Progress Meeting – Data Fusion September 2007, Paris 1 Infrastructure Side Data Fusion Tobias Schendzielorz Technische Universität München.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Traffic accidents Traffic accidents are one of the most important problems in the world, as the failure of the negative repercussions for communities and.
Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
 Since 2008, approximately 150 pedestrians have been killed annually in traffic related crashes on New Jersey roadways.  Vehicle-pedestrian collisions.
Driving Environments. Rural Driving  The speed limit on rural roads when not posted is 35 mph.  Many rural roads are two-lane, two-way roadways.  Curves.
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 1 Title S. Marco, S. Manfredi (CSST) SP1 Meeting PONTEDERA 1st March 2007 INFRASENS Functional Architecture.
MODULE 4 DRIVING CONDITIONS THE CONDITIONS THAT DRIVE US This sessions presents defensive driving skills and techniques necessary to avoid collisions.
SF-SP1 Plenary Meeting March 01-02/03/2007 Pontedera - PIAGGIO 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
Using functional analysis to determine the requirements for changes to critical systems: Railway level crossing case study Joe Silmon, Clive Roberts Centre.
TRAFFIC SAFETY Presented By Sgt. Debra Newsome Canton Police Department.
V7 Vulnerable road user safety.
 ROAD SAFETY: the European Union Policy European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport «Road Safety.
Right-of-Way Unit 1. What is Right of Way? Legally granted access.
© International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2009 Page 1 Improve Road Safety – Target the Main Cause Effectively UNECE Road Safety Seminar Minsk, 13 May.
CHAPTER 5 DEFENSIVE DRIVING. I. Preventing Accidents A. Most accidents are caused by driver error. B. Standard Accident Prevention Formula: 1. Be Alert.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
© International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2007 Page 1 Improve Road Safety – Target the Right User “ Results of the European Truck Accident Causation study”
Loughborough University research areas
Ch. 5: Defensive Driving Smojver.
How nature affects driving
USING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND Prof SIGNS
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office
Unit II. I. Accident Prevention
Presentation transcript:

1 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15SAFESPOTSAFESPOT Fabien Bonnefoi, Francesco Bellotti, Tobias Schendzielorz 1*.Cofiroute, France, 6 à 10 rue Troyon Sèvres, tel: , 2. Dept of Electronics and Biophysical Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy 3. Dept. of Traffic Engineering and Control, Technische Universität München, Germany « FROM USER NEEDS TO APPLICATIONS: THE SAFESPOT APPROACH BASED ON ROAD ACCIDENT DATA ANALYSIS »

2 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 The SAFESPOT IP Project of the European Commission Information Society and media Cooperative system /Communication V2V and V2I 8 Sps and 51 partners from all domains… « By combining data from vehicle and road-side sensors, the SAFESPOT applications will allow an extension of the time in which a potential accident is detected(…). »

3 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 COSSIB and WP2 SP5 – COSSIB Cooperative system Infrastructure based Applicative Sub Project COFIROUTE = SP5 leader + WP2 leader Planning: Five main steps (WP) WP2 User need and requirement analysis WP3 Specifications and Simulation WP4 Development and prototype WP5/6 Field Test/Evaluation Cofiroute PEEK ANAS Centro Ricerche Fiat Conseil Général Côtes d’Armor Daimler Chrysler DIBE LCPC Lacroix Trafic Mizar München University Renault SIEMENS Sodit TNO

4 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 COSSIB

5 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 Objective and Method WP5.2 Objective: « Define clearly the needs and requirements of infrastructure-based safety systems within the context of the overall SAFESPOT project.» WP5.2 Method:

6 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 Data Analysis 1st analysis: European data (Complete but coarse grain) –Eurostat –Database CARE – EACS –Project SAFETY NET Rankers PENDANT Type of results: Indicators Vs Classification AccidentsInjuryDeathRisk level 1 Mortality index 2 1 st Urban – 75%70%55%0.57 – % 2 nd Rural – 20%20%35%0.43 4,6% 3 rd Motorway – 5%10% % Urban Rural Motorway 1 (death per million vehicles/km) 2 (percentage of lethal accidents in the total number of accidents)

7 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 Data analysis by areas Type of Accident # with bodily injury # fatal accidents % with bodily injury % fatal accidents Accident caused by turning into a road %15% Accident between vehicles moving along in carriageway %7% Accident caused by turning off the road %9% Other accident %13% Driving accident %25% Accident caused by crossing the road %29% Accident involving stationary vehicles %1% Detailed data from countries / regions or cities (related to partners and test sites) Specific papers, ex: road departure or Intersection Sources (examples): - Italy and the city of Turin - French motorways and rural roads of the Brittany province - Urban areas in Germany, and from the Netherlands. Causes of accidentsUrban Roads% Driving in distracted or erratic fashion Vehicle not respecting safety distance Exceeding speed limit Making an irregular manoeuvre Failure to give priority Failure to stop at stop sign Failure to give priority to vehicle from right Turning in an irregular way Overtaking in irregular way Proceeding in wrong direction Pedestrian run over on zebra crossing Avoiding another vehicle Vehicle stopped without any stop sign shown1440 Avoiding an animal3320 Insufficient headlights550 TOTAL accidents due to driving behaviour Urban roadsTOTAL Accid. Death sInjuredAccid. Death s Injure d Fine Rain Fog Snow Hail Wind Other Total

8 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 Safety related scenarios NB: Factors not always considered as main cause (cf Excessive Speed vs Priority) NameSpeed and dangerous driving TypeWrong speed, dangerous driving42% Aggravating factorSpeed LocationHighway Extension 1 Typeexcessive speed19% Extension 2 Typeovertaking12% Extension 3 Typewrong speed with traffic condition5,9% Extension 4 Typewrong speed with weather condition3,4% Extension 4 Typeinsufficient safety distance1,7% General scenarios: 8 Special black spot scenarios: 5 By areas (total):15

9 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 24 use cases classified by categories Example: Use cases

10 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 Use cases Detailed use cases –Purpose –Rational –Risk sources –Successful end conditions –Failed end conditions –Trigger –Frequency of occurrence –Scenario description (step1,step2, etc.) –Extensions –Related User Needs –Related Requirements –Related use cases –Open issue –Comments

11 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 SP5 Applications INITIAL LIST OF APPLICATIONS (Technical Annex) FINAL LIST OF APPLICATIONS Speed alert and road departure prevention Speed Alert – SpA Smart signalling for safety enhancement Road Departure Prevention – RDep Safety margin for Assistance and emergency vehicles Safety Margin for Assistance and Emergency Vehicles – SMAEV Safe urban intersectionCo-operative Intersection Collision Prevention System – CICPS Hazard and incident warningHazard and Incident Warning – H&IW

12 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 Potential Impact Based on the Safety related scenarios Gives Percentage of accidents or situations that are covered by each application Road departure prevention Scope: Accident causes: All causes where a road departure can be the main or an aggravating factor and where the application speed alert is not strongly relevant. Related Use cases: -Obstacles : SP5_UC16 -Misjudgement : SP5_UC21 -Rule violation: SP5_UC32 -Critical environment conditions : SP5_UC41, SP5_UC42, SP5_UC45 -Safety improving driver assistance : Potential impact (The Road Departure application will impact on all the 3 main environments) Urban area Scenario : Driver’s lack of vigilance - leaving the carriageway: 20% Supposing a 100% reliable system working on all the cars, then we could expect that the Road Departure application would cover around 20% of the German urban lethal accidents. Rural area The French data analysis on rural roads reports that between 30% and 40% of the accidents are of “Run-off road” type. These figures give an idea of the potential impact of a 100% reliable SAFESPOT system working on all the cars and in all the areas. Motorway Scenario : Driver’s lack of vigilance - Veer of the lane 25% A 100% reliable SAFESPOT system should be able to manage about 25% of road departure accidents in Italian and French motorways.

13 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 Application and use cases priority Rule violationUse case Name Related application Safety Critical Scenario URBANRURALMOTORWAYTOTAL SP5_UC31 Safe signalized intersection (red light violation) Safe urban intersection Intersection black spot 6511 SP5_UC32 Prevention of Driver Excessive Speed Speed alert / Road Departure Rule violation / Road departure / Drowsiness / 8917 SP5_UC33 Right of way (stop sign), not signalized roads Safe urban intersection Priority / Stop signs SP5_UC34 Ghost drivers (wrong way driving) Speed alert, Hazard and incident warning Wrong way driving 47 (S) 11

14 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 Test sites and evaluation Evaluation of -Level of detection on real condition -Driver response to the system Numerous test site around Europe - cities - rural roads - motorways - bridge and tunnels

15 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15 THE END Thank you for your attention ! Questions ?