FSI Level IV Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2011 TAB TWELVE

THEMES for Data Analysis & Dialogue and Decision- making Data Director and D4SS Shared Leadership, Shared Ownership Culture Building to Support CSI Implementation and Monitoring SIP Evaluating Impact of SIP

FSI Materials White Binder MI-CSI Journal Book Talks: Team to Teach and From Questions to Actions Data Reference Points Manual Flashdrive Plastic Folders URL Bookmark

Inclusion Activity The EAGLE has Landed (MI-CSI) Eagle is a metaphor for You One person at each team will read the short ppt First Thought Share with team what or how you are prepared to help colleagues shift to embrace change Shared from Char-Am ISD, Jennifer Sabsook

Today’s Outcomes Receive updates, new content, and changes Participate in a Book Talk: Tools and Talk Examine the NEW Cut Scores Identify administrative, teacher, and student behaviors Network with colleagues Use work time to reflect, and plan SI initiatives to bring to schools

Today’s Roadmap Welcome 2011 Themes and Updates What has Changed Due Dates and Professional Learning Common Core State Standards Monitoring the Impact of Strategy Implementation SI Progress Monitoring Data 4 SS/Data Director/MISchooldata New 2011 Cut Scores are Adopted Network and Planning TAB TWELVE

Key Working Agreements A Facilitation Tool Respect all Points of View Be Present and Engaged Honor Time Agreements Get All Voices in the Room These breathe life into our Core Values

Parking Lot A Facilitation Tool Rest questions that do not benefit the whole group Place questions that do not pertain to content at this time Place questions that pertain, but participants do not want to ask at this time TAB TWELVE

LIVING BELIEF STATEMENT “Networking is not an option, but a critical part of how Facilitators of School Improvement learn and share their learning.”

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice (MI-CSI)

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps I.-III. Comprehensive Needs Assessment Components III. Summary Report/ Goal Management Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice I. School Data Profile/Analysis II. School Process Profile/Analysis I. School Data Profile/Analysis II. School Process Profile/Analysis III. Summary Report/ Goal Management TAB TWELVE

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile  I. School Data Profile  II. School Process Profile Analyze Data  I. School Data Analysis  II. School Process Analysis  III. Summary Report/Goals Management Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop Action Plan Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do TAB TWELVE

Stage One GATHER Step 1: Getting Ready 4 Considerations School Culture –Collaborative Inquiry Process –Vision, Mission, Core Values and Belief Statements School Decision Making –From Decide and Announce to Consensus Team Building –Stakeholder Analysis –Group vs. Team School Current Reality – ‘Where Are We?’ GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

Getting Ready, Data Collection/Analysis Implement and Monitor SI PLAN GATHER, STUDY, & DO through GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Document I (SDP/A) School Data Profile/Analysis Due Online: Document III (Summary Report/Goals Management) Summary Report/School Improvement Plan Due Online: Document II (SPP/A) School Process Profile/Analysis Due Online: a. MDE: School Process Rubrics 90 b. MDE: School Process Rubrics 40 c. NCA: Assist Self Assessment (Assist SA) d. NCA: Self Assessment (SA) TAB TWELVE

School Process Rubrics (SPR) document two Two Road Maps MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT EDUCATION MDE AdvancED ACCREDITATION NCA School Process Rubrics (CNA) 90 Rubrics Discussion Questions ASSIST Self Assessment (ASSIST SA/ES) 56 Rubrics Discussion Questions ( Required for the year of the QAR ) EDYES! 40 Process Rubrics 40 Rubrics (Required Cycles 1-4) Self Assessment (SA) 56 Rubrics Quality Assurance Review (QAR) TAB TWELVE

BUREAU of Assessment and Accountability (BAA) BAA Resources –BAA Secure Site –BAA Professional Learning Site –BAA Main Webpage –BAA Address *OEAA site will remain another 6 months and then will re-route users to the correct BAA resource TAB TWO BAA Fall Assessment handout id on table in white.

NEW Changes School Data Profile/Analysis will have all, but 2 sections pre-populated by BAA and CEPI (one is about teachers) This month State Board of Ed approved the new cut score (MEAP and MME) process for implementation this year ( ) (URL’s provided in the PM today) BAA has constructed a website that features resources related to “Beating the Odds”, and other resources. These resources can be accessed at

NEW Changes Response to Intervention Guidance Materials –Michigan’s definition and vision for RtI –Essential Components of Michigan’s RtI Framework –MDE Contact: Jan Oord at –MISD RtI Leadership Team

NEW Changes AdvancEd Accreditation ( ) EVALUATION Protocol for Accreditation –Organizational Effectiveness –Using FIVE Standards –Stakeholder Perceptions –Perception Surveys will be required (FREE SURVEYS) –Online accessible –Schools Student Performance –State and Local Assessments will be part of the Evaluation –Student Achievement (Growth) –MDE criteria and state specific (Top to Bottom)

2012 Explore, Plan, and ACT Middle and High Schools EXPLORE All 7 th graders must test between minutes Decommissioned Explore All 8 th graders must test between – minutes PLAN All 9 th graders must test between – minutes Decommissioned ACT All 10 th graders must test between – minutes Includes writing

NCA Fall Conference Lansing Center, Lansing 11.01, 08,14.11Common Core Rollout Ann Arbor (1), Grand Rapids (8) Saginaw (14) MDE Fall Conference Lansing Center, Lansing MDE/NCA Spring SI Conference Lansing Center, Lansing Important Dates Register at:

Important Dates Parent Involvement & Title I – Strengthening School, Family & Community Connections at MISD Literacy, Learning, and Laughter featuring the Common Core Standards for ELA for all K at MISD Writing Tracker at MISD Text Comprehension at MISD Vocabulary at MISD

REMINDER to REGISTER School Improvement Teams Work Day Title I only Title I only

Smarter Balanced Consortium Coming to a School Near You Michigan has signed on as one of the governing members Michigan has a vote, Joseph Martineau (BAA) sits on the board Upwards of 32 states have signed on Alternative to the MEAP, Appendix A Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Paperless by 2018

Common Core State Standards, Assessments Roll-Out and Implementation Plan Full Implementation Paperless by 2018 Implement Common Core Standards Pilot and Field Test Common Core Rollouts Ann Arbor Grand Rapids Saginaw Test Item Changes

Common Core State Standards K-12 ELA WEBSITES MDE’s Teaching For Learning CCRS Units and Resources

Publication of Common Core State Standards Alignment Documents The MI State Board of Education adopted the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) as Michigan’s K-12 content standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics in June Documents detailing the alignment of CCSS with Michigan’s Grade Level Content Expectations (GLCE) and High School Content Expectations (HSCE) in English Language Arts and Mathematics are now available. Alignment_Docs_358314_7.pdfhttp:// Alignment_Docs_358314_7.pdf

New Generation Science Standards Replace the Science Priority Expectations 20 Lead States Michigan is a LEAD State Achieve is involved Timeline: months

Social Studies Common Standards Team is forming to develop the standards 1 year behind Science

Make-Up Dates Make-up Days: must register – – SB-CEUs: 2.6 completed in MAY

SB-CEUs All SB-CEU earned after January 1, 2010 will be awarded to educators and administrators via a Secure Central Registry (SCR). After a program ends, SB-CEU Coordinators upload eligible participants into the registry. Once uploaded, participants will receive an directing them to the web address to complete a personal account in the SCR. At this time, the requirement for your personal account will be a valid address. In the near future, a Personal Identification Code (PIC) will also be required. Your PIC comes from your home district’s Human Resources Department. After completion of the personal account, participants follow the instructions to complete a required evaluation of the offering. After the evaluation is completed, SB-CEUs will be awarded and listed on an unofficial transcript.

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

Stage Four: DO Step 10: Monitor Plan DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

So…we’ve written a stellar school improvement plan… Overarching Questions How do we know we’re implementing it? How do we know the strategy is impacting student achievement? Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

The School Improvement Team ’ s role shifts from driving the process to helping determine the degree to which the strategies and activities are making a difference in student achievement and how to strengthen the various school improvement initiatives. Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

MONITOR MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN (Formative) IS IT WORKING? EVALUATE EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Summative) DID IT WORK? ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED WITH FIDELITY ? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO? DID WE IMPLEMENTTHE PLAN/STRATEGIES CORRECTLY & CONSISTENTLY? IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? DID WE GIVE IT ENOUGH TIME? ENOUGH RESOURCES? Implementation: Adult FocusedImpact: Student Focused MONITOREVALUATE MONITOR DID OUR STRATEGIES RESULT IN INCREASED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? WHAT UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES (GOOD AND BAD) HAVE OCCURRED? Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

MONITOR MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN (Formative) IS IT WORKING? EVALUATE EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Summative) DID IT WORK? ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED WITH FIDELITY ? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO? IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? Implementation: Adult FocusedImpact: Student Focused MONITOREVALUATE MONITOR Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Activities Connection to SPR 40/90, SA/Assist SA* Getting Ready to Implement Implement Monitoring Fidelity of Implementation and Impact How will you address the targeted areas in your Summary Report (SPP) ? How will you ensure readiness for implementation? How will you ensure that participants have the knowledge and skills to implement? POSSIBILE ACTIVITIES  Professional development around strategy  Purchase materials  Planning for implementation – Identify schedule for strategy use, personnel, mechanism for monitoring, rollout, etc.  Communication vehicles How will you ensure successful implementation for your selected activities? POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES  Communication – to whom? How?  Instructional technology*  Activities to support at-risk students (For Title One students)* Parent Involvement *Required Components How will you ensure the program/activity is implemented with fidelity? How will you monitor the programs impact on student achievement? POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES  Walkthroughs  PLC/CASL meetings  Documentation of impact  Demonstration classrooms  Gathering achievement data 39

Just Do IT! Monitor ImplementationMonitor Implementation Evaluate ImplementationEvaluate Implementation Monitor ImpactMonitor Impact Evaluate ImpactEvaluate Impact Adult Focused Student Focused Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Assessment Planner EXPLORE8 th ELPAK-12 th MEAP3-9 th MI-Access3-9 th MME/ACT11 th PLAN9 th D-ACT10 th State Assessment Target Audience/ Grade Levels AugSeptOct Created by Dodie Raycraft at St. Joseph ISD and modified by Lisa Asaro for MISD TAB TWO Handout Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Progress Monitoring Matrix Every 2 Months SNAPSHOT and Accounting STRATEGY –Administrators will…. –Teachers will… –Students will… –Baseline, Benchmark/Interim/Summative

School Improvement Monitoring TEMPLATE ACTIVITY Implement Who andEvidence Proposed Date Actual Date HowCollected Created by Lisa Guzzardo Asaro at Macomb ISD and Beth Brophy at Calhoun ISD TAB TEN Pamphlet Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Action Steps after Monitoring Template ACTIONS REQUIRED Who By When Resources orCompletion Support NeededDate Created by Lisa Guzzardo Asaro at Macomb ISD and Beth Brophy at Calhoun ISD TAB TEN Pamphlet Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Creating a Culture of SI AUGUST PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES ___ Complete School Improvement Plan and submit by September 1st and post to school website ___ Complete School Data Profile/Analysis and submit by September 1st ___ Complete and post to school website Annual Education Report 15 days prior to school starting. ___ Prepare to share School Improvement Plan at first faculty meeting ___ Provide an orientation for the School Improvement Team to share roles and responsibility descriptions, decision making process and documentation tool and, and develop key working agreements. ___ Review Professional Development Plan for alignment to SIP transmitted to MDE Created by Jennifer Sabsook at Char-Am ISD, Scott Felkey at Oakland Schools, Beth Brophy at Calhoun ISD, and Lisa Guzzardo Asaro at Macomb ISD

Stage One: GATHER Step 1: Getting Ready GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

“In God we trust, everyone else brings DATA”

One Common Voice – One Plan Stage One Gather: Step 2 Collect School Data What do you already know? What data do you need to know? What additional information/data do you need to know? Where can the information/data be found? Definitions Achievement Student Outcome Data How our students perform on local, state and federal assessments (subgroups) Demographic or Contextual Data Describes our students, staff, building, and community Process Data The policies, procedures, and systems we have in place that define how we do business Perception Data Opinions of staff, parents, community and students regarding our school TAB TWO

What types of data are/are not readily available in your building? 49 Demographic DataAchievement/ Outcome Data Process DataPerception Data Enrollment Subgroups of students Staff Attendance (Students and Staff) Mobility Graduation and Dropout Conference Attendance Education status Student subgroups Parent Involvement Teaching Staff Course enrollment patterns Discipline referrals Suspension rates Alcohol ‐ tobacco ‐ drugs violations Participation extra ‐ curriculars Physical, mental, social and health Local assessments: District Common Assessments, Classroom Assessments, Report Cards State assessments: MME, ACT, MEAP, MI-Access, MEAP Access, ELPA National assessments: ACT Plan, ACT Explore, ACT WorkKeys, NWEA, ITBS, CAT, MET NAEP, PSAT GPA Dropout rates College acceptance Policies and procedures (e.g. grading, homework, attendance, discipline) Academic and behavior expectations Parent participation – PT conferences, PTO/PTA, volunteers Suspension data School Process Profile Rubrics (40 or 90) or SA/SAR (NCA) Event occurred: Who, what, when, where, why, how What you did for Whom: Eg. All 8th graders received violence Prevention Survey data (student, parent, staff, community) Opinions Clarified what others think People act based on what they believe How do they see you/us? TAB TWO

Approved Cut Scores Stage One: Gather Step 2: Collecting School Data Presenter Dr. Harvey Czerwinski New Cut Scores – SCORES_365039_7.pdf SCORES_365039_7.pdf Cut Score FAQ – cores_FAQ_365040_7.pdf cores_FAQ_365040_7.pdf GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

Data Director D4SS MISchooldata.org Stage One: Gather Step 2: Collecting School Data Step 3: Build School Profile Presenter Dr. Jennifer Parker-Moore Demonstration Video for the use of to compare assessment data for a selected district to statewide results. The video is on a private link on YouTube at GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

New Cut Scores Go to data4ss.org click on Resources scroll down to Presentations click on last one on the list- Template Supporting Local District New Scale Scores ppt.Template Supporting Local District New Scale Scores

Network and Team Time Monitoring School Improvement School Responsive Scan Network with Colleagues Seek Assistance