National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Project General Advisory Committee October 17 2005 Meeting Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Core Standards Update on Activities Looking towards Supporting Teacher Decision Making.
Advertisements

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Principles and Issues Paper American.
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Overview of DARA Project.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals of Project NARAP Collaboration General Advisory Committee Project Details (ETS and PARA) Plans for.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Formulating Public Opinion on Definitions of Reading Proficiency Christopher Johnstone Council for Exceptional.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Formulating Public Opinion on Reading Definitions American Educational Research Association San Francisco,
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Discussion of the Principles and Issues.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Analysis of Current Characteristics of State Reading Assessments Christopher Johnstone National Center on.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
Increasing the Accessibility of Large-Scale Assessments of Reading Proficiency for Students with Disabilities National Accessible Reading Assessments Projects:
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Research Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Principles and Guidelines NARAP Goal 3.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Introduction.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 8, 2006 Overview of.
Principal Investigators: Martha Thurlow & Deborah Dillon Introduction Assumptions & Research Questions Acknowledgments 1. What characteristics of current.
Standards and Indicators for Quality McKinney-Vento Programs: New and Improved National Center for Homeless Education May 2006.
Amelia Courts, WESTELL Putting it All Together WV Department of Education.
Implementing the Public Agenda for College and Career Success: 90 Day Goal Plan for Improving College Readiness through Implementation of the Common Core.
Improving Practitioner Assessment Participation Decisions for English Language Learners with Disabilities Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
Measuring the Common Core Standards Models for engaging postsecondary in student readiness for college and careers.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Common Core State Standards Initiative An Initiative of the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best.
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Reading Aloud Tests of Reading Review of Research from the Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Projects Cara.
Cornelia Orr, Executive Director National Assessment Governing Board 12 th Grade NAEP Preparedness Research Plans and Progress.
Local Assessment Validity Study Rayne A. Sperling Jonna M. Kulikowich Penn State Research Team.
New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Standard Setting Inclusive Assessment Seminar Marianne.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O What the heck does proficiency mean for students with significant cognitive disabilities? Nancy Arnold,
Alignment Issues for AA- AAS Diane M. Browder, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte October 11, 2007.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Research on Making Large Scale Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities Institute of Education.
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
BILC Standardization Initiatives and Conference Objectives
Praxis Program™ Update OCTEO Conference April 16, 2010 Dublin, OH Ines Bosworth, Client Relations Director Dena Hoffman, Marketing Director.
Overview. Three-year grant to create a national teacher performance assessment Based upon the Performance Assessment for Teacher Candidates (PACT) from.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Statewide Assessment Update Vince Dean, Ph.D. Director, Office of Standards & Assessment January 30, 2013 SIFN.
East Central Regional Center Ohio College Tech Prep SCTAI Update September 26, 2012 Secondary Career-Technical Alignment Initiative (SCTAI)
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
DEVELOPING ALGEBRA-READY STUDENTS FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL: EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF EARLY ALGEBRA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:Maria L. Blanton, University of Massachusetts.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
ENHANCE Update Research Underway on the Validity of the Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process ECO Center Advisory Board Meeting March 8, 2012 Arlington,
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
MULTIPLE MEASURES What are they… Why are they… What do we do… How will we know… Dr. Scott P. Myers KLFA Wednesday, August 28, 2013.
Presentation to the Michigan Assessment Consortium January 20, 2012.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research on Making Large-Scale Reading Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities June.
Accommodations in Oregon Oregon Department of Education Fall Conference 2009 Staff and Panel Presentation Dianna Carrizales ODE Mike Boyles Pam Prosise.
Including Quality Assurance Within The Theory of Action Presented to: CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
Curriculum Update Curriculum and Instructional Leaders Meeting July 19,
EDUCATOR EVALUATION New Regulation adopted on June 28, 2011.
Nancy Hudson CCSSO HEAP Coordinator Expanding the Reach of HEAP Demonstration of.
PARCC Consortium 1 AR CO IL LA MA MS NM NY OH TN MD NJ RI Governing Board States DC 2010 Governing members: Governing members: Administering.
Illustration of a Validity Argument for Two Alternate Assessment Approaches Presentation at the OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Steve Ferrara American.
CAROLE GALLAGHER, PHD. CCSSO NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STUDENT ASSESSMENT JUNE 26, 2015 Reporting Assessment Results in Times of Change:
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions 1 Peggy G. Carr National Center for Education Statistics November 17, 2007.
1 Instructional Practices Task Group Chicago Meeting Progress Report April 20, 2007.
Update on English Language Learners State Board of Education Achievement Committee December 9, 2013.
Common Core Standards English Language Arts 1. Overview of the Initiative o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12 in English Language.
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Introduction and Overview Welcome !
CCC Administrative Tasks November 19, General Tasks Schedule, organize and facilitate 4-5 CCC meetings/year Develop agenda, materials and minutes.
So What is Going to be Happening with State Assessment for Students with Disabilities for 2007/2008? Peggy Dutcher Fall 2007 Assessment and Accountability.
Development of an Online Suite of Career, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Assessments for Individuals who are Deaf Deb Guthmann Ed.D and Josephine Wilson.
Steps for development and evaluation of an instrument - Revision
Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
National Agricultural Literacy Assessment Instrument: LMALI
Presentation transcript:

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Project General Advisory Committee October Meeting Review of Year 1 and Next Steps Cara Cahalan-Laitusis

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Review Goals of the project Update on progress towards Goal 1 and 2 Communication Plan Next Steps for Goals 1, 2, and 3

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals for Project 1.Develop a definition of reading proficiency 2.Research the assessment of reading proficiency 3.Develop research-based principles and guidelines making large-scale reading assessments more accessible for students who have disabilities that affect reading 4.Develop and field trial a prototype reading assessment

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goal 1 Formulate a definition of the construct of reading proficiency that can be used as a basis for research and development for accessible large-scale tests of reading proficiency that provide (a) a valid measure against academic standards, and (b) individual interpretive, descriptive, and diagnostic reports for the full range of students with disabilities that affect reading.

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Tasks for Goal 1 Convened Definition Panel Created 3 Draft Definitions Conducted Focus Groups Finalized Definition Drafted Position Paper Second Meeting of Definition Panel Drafted Principles and Issues Paper

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Members of Definition Panel Peter Afflerbach, University of Maryland Donna Alvermann, University of Georgia Diane Browder, University of North Carolina – Charlotte Donald Deshler, University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning Dave Edyburn, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee Russell Gersten, Instructional Research Group Cay Holbrook, University of British Columbia Michael Kamil, Stanford University Peggy McCardle, National Institute for Child Health and Human Development Susan Rose, Associate University of Minnesota Deborah Simmons, Texas A&M University Dorothy Strickland, Rutgers University Richard Wagner, Florida State University Brenda Jane (BJ) Wiemer, Kirk Day School Joanna Williams, Columbia Teachers College

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goal 2 Conduct a program of research on the assessment of reading proficiency (as defined under Goal One) to determine the effects of various factors of test development, design, and administration (item development, field test methods, presentation modes, formats, schedules, etc.) on accessibility, validity, and comparability for students with disabilities that affect reading.

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects The program of research must be designed to produce an empirical base for developing accessible reading assessments that can provide –a valid measure of proficiency against academic standards, and –individual interpretive, descriptive, and diagnostic reports for students with disabilities that affect reading.

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Tasks for Goal 2 Set of papers synthesizing disability issue papers (PARA) Studies underway to examine psychometric properties of state assessments for students with disabilities (PARA and DARA) Data collection underway for large experimentally designed differential boost study (DARA)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Communication Websites – – – Joint NARAP Brochure Joint conference presentations Newsletter Planning for NARAP reports

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Conference Submissions 2005 Submissions: –CCSSO Large Scale Assessment –OSEP Project Directors 2006 Submissions: –CEC –LDA –ATP –IRA –AERA –NCME –CCSSO

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Next Steps for Goal 1 Focus Group Report –Edit and publish as joint NARAP report Issues and Principles Paper –Take feedback from GAC and DP –Finalize report –Publish as NARAP report

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Next Steps for Goal 2 Revise research plans to better align research with Reading First definition Develop new types of test questions that assess fundamental skills and can be group administered Pilot test new approaches

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Preliminary Steps for Goal 3 Identify Principles Committee Collect current test development guidelines Develop prototype process for development of new item types