Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Analysis of Current Characteristics of State Reading Assessments Christopher Johnstone National Center on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Test Construction
Advertisements

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Principles and Issues Paper American.
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Overview of DARA Project.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals of Project NARAP Collaboration General Advisory Committee Project Details (ETS and PARA) Plans for.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Formulating Public Opinion on Definitions of Reading Proficiency Christopher Johnstone Council for Exceptional.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Discussion of the Principles and Issues.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Sampling Issues and Accessible Assessments Christopher Johnstone National Center on Educational Outcomes.
PARA Project Overview, Results, Next Steps Martha Thurlow and Deborah Dillon National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
Increasing the Accessibility of Large-Scale Assessments of Reading Proficiency for Students with Disabilities National Accessible Reading Assessments Projects:
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Martha Thurlow.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Research Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 8, 2006 Overview of.
Principal Investigators: Martha Thurlow & Deborah Dillon Introduction Assumptions & Research Questions Acknowledgments 1. What characteristics of current.
1 K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.
Extended Assessments Elementary & Middle/High Reading Oregon Department of Education and Behavioral Research and Teaching January 2007.
TEKS : Write multiple brief responses to teacher-provided, open-ended questions to make connections within and across genres (e.g., literary-literary,
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Reading Aloud Tests of Reading Review of Research from the Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Projects Cara.
Developing an Assessment
National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Accessible Reading Approaches for Students with Disabilities Christopher Johnstone Ann Clapper.
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Accommodation Decisions: Policy, Training, and Monitoring as Critical Aspects of an Objective Approach.
GA Milestones Parent Night March 9, Testing Schedule O Wednesday – April 15 O ELA Part I (Two 70 minute sessions) O Thursday – April 16 O ELA Part.
Understanding the Science and Social Studies Tasks.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
New York State Teacher Certification Examinations: Academic Literacy Skills Test July 29, 2013.
+ 21 st Century Skills and Academic Standards Kimberly Hetrick Berry Creek Middle School Eagle County School District.
Benefits from Formal and Informal Assessments
ELA Coordinators Meeting: Close Reading and Text Complexity Tamra Gacek October, 2012 Literacy and Early Learning Unit Office of Teacher Effectiveness.
English Language Arts Grade Level Considerations for Grades 3–5.
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5 Whitney Shook, Assistant Principal/Testing Coordinator Lori Dunagan, Curriculum Support.
Language Arts and Social Studies A cross-curricular approach to instruction Session 1.
CAHSEE California High School Exit Exam. Purpose of the CAHSEE Improve student achievement in high school Improve student achievement in high school Help.
{ Allegan AAESA March 17, 18, 2014 Linda Jordan. Agenda WelcomeClosingShare What’s Working? Questions Updates Work Time 2.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research on Making Large-Scale Reading Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities June.
STAR Reading is a computer-adaptive assessment that is designed to give teachers accurate, reliable and valid data quickly so they can make good decisions.
Lessons Learned from the 2013‐14 LEAP/iLEAP. By the end of this presentation, participants will learn what the student performance on spring LEAP/iLEAP.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.
May 6, 2014 Facilitated by Jennifer Gondek Instructional Specialist for Inclusive Education, TST BOCES.
Academic Literacy The Academic Literacy course is designed to extend the reading proficiency of grade 7 students. By the end of this course,
Sample Elementary San Antonio Independent School District 2002–03 Name Principal.
Ready, Set, Go Presented By: Instructional Design and Innovation Team Moore County Schools November 6, 2012.
Assessment Developing an Assessment. Assessment Planning Process Analyze the environment Agency, clients, TR program, staff & resources Define parameters.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Gates-MacGinitie Characteristics. Test Elements o 1. Vocabulary Test measures a student’s reading vocabulary o 2. Comprehension test measures a student’s.
Winston-Salem / Forsyth County Schools Revised Unit Maps Grades 3-5.
Process Skill Reading / Fluency. Students read grade-level text with fluency and comprehension.[1] October 20147th Grade ELAR.
TAKS Reading Process Analyze the Task Activate Prior Knowledge Plan and Predict Read Use Information.
PSSC Meeting – December 4 th  School Review Results  Assessment results  The Field (the discussion was sparked from the School Review)  Miscellaneous.
I NTERNATIONAL B ENCHMARKING S TUDY — C ONTENT A LIGNMENT Mary J. Pitoniak, Nancy Glazer, Luis Saldivia Educational Testing Service June 22, 2015 National.
Bart D. Christie, Principal Carla Rivas, Assistant Principal Fifth Grade Teachers Sera Azcuy Lloyd Cohen Betty Cosculluela Jennie Flores Kristina Saliers.
NAEP READING FOR 2009 Michael L. Kamil Stanford University.
KLC Meeting Explore the two samples provided considering the following questions: What are some of the possible similarities you see in how you.
Exploring the Literacy Standards: CCSS & Main Idea.
GA Milestones. Testing Schedule April 13 – May 4, 2016 Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Spring Administration End of Grade (EOG) in language arts,
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
K-6 Critical Areas of Focus K-6 Key Fluencies Kindergarten – Critical Areas of Focus.
LEAP TH GRADE.
EED 475 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
EED 475 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EED 475 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Assessment Information
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Norman L Webb.
K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update
Presentation transcript:

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Analysis of Current Characteristics of State Reading Assessments Christopher Johnstone National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Methods Document review of state reading assessments to determine themes found in state test blueprints and test specifications Reviewed 38 states that published blueprints or test specifications on the World Wide Web for Grades 4 and 8.

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Test specifications and blueprints Terms often used interchangeably Test specifications outline: – statistical specifications (the weight of each test item, the number of items, and the difficulty level) – content specifications (describes content to be covered), and – item specifications Blueprints contain outline: –desired test objectives, topics, or tasks –subtopics to be covered (within major performance standards) –rank order of topics by importance.

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Results Results were organized into two major themes: –the purpose of the test (the constructs or standards assessed) –the breakdown of the tests (the number of items, the type of items, and the number of items dedicated to each construct or standard).

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Constructs assessed Foundational skills (including vocabulary, word identification, word analysis, word structure, and fluency) Comprehension (including general understanding, main idea, comprehension strategies, literal comprehension, comprehension of literary and informational text) Analyze and interpret text (including analysis of text, interpretation of text, extending meaning of text, and critical literacy)

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Purpose (Construct)Grade 4 % __Grade 8 % Foundational skills Vocabulary3737 Word identification2416 Word analysis1313 Fluency88 Comprehension Reading comprehension5558 Comprehension: literary text2626 Comprehension: expository text2129 Analysis and interpretation Analysis and interpretation (general)2626 Analysis: literary text2932 Analysis: expository text2424 Percentage of States with Constructs

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Mean Percent of Items by Construct (across states)

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Grade 4 item types (mean percentage of items)

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Grade 8 item types (mean percentage of items)

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment General Conclusions Comprehension constructs are found most frequently across states. Within states, comprehension and analysis constructs are tested, on average, with twice as many items as foundational constructs. On average, there are 8-9 times as many multiple choice items as constructed response (timing of items was not found in data)

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Implications for students with disabilities Accommodations that address disability- specific issues related to foundational skills, comprehension, and analysis. Issues related to multiple choice tests. Elements of assessment that improve accessibility but do not change constructs assessed.

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment NARAP Research Read aloud accommodation research (related to comprehension constructs) (Cahalan et al., 2006) Multiple choice test studies: Distractor analysis and distractor experimental studies (Abedi et al., 2006). Discrepancy and accessibility surveys (Moen et al., 2006).

Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Research Results Results will be used to inform general principles of accessible assessment (to be developed collaboratively between PARA and DARA). Results will also be used to inform the development of testlets or sample items to be used in experimental research.