Motivating English Farmers to Action / Motivera engelska bönder till åtgärder Catchment Sensitive Farming Bob Middleton Natural England.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Catchment Plan - Process and Progress Neil Punchard Catchment Partnership Officer Broads Authority Members Meeting - Friday 17 th January 2014.
Advertisements

Devon Floodplain Woodland Project Nick Whatley & Richard Knott Fisheries, Recreation and Biodiversity Team (Devon) March 2009.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
The Uplands and Flooding Amy Parrott: Policy Advisor, Flood and Coastal Risk Management Karen Eynon: Moors for the Future Project Manager, Making Space.
Canterbury Water Management Strategy in the Orari-Opihi-Pareora Zone CWMS – finding local solutions to water management challenges in the OOP zone.
The Ecosystem approach: from theory to application in England Tom Tew Natural England Delivering Nature’s Services.
USING RESEARCH TO INFORM INTEGRATED CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT A regional business perspective.
1. 2 Content Principles of the Water Framework Directive WFD and Agriculture WFD and CAP.
Managing wetlands for wildlife and people Tricia Henton 19 April 2010.
Wet Woodlands and the Water Framework Directive Ben Bunting, South West River Basin Programme Manager.
Ecosystems – Joining things up in floodplains Cranfield University: Joe Morris, Tim Hess, Peter Leeds-Harrison, Paul Trawick, Helena Posthumus, Quentin.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. DAVID SMALL DIRECTOR OF FOOD, FARMING AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY.
Presentation to CIWEM South Western Branch South West Water, Exeter 15 July 2008 WAgriCo - UK.
Uplands and climate change: government agency research interests Understanding impacts Evaluating risks Evaluating adaptation options Harriet Orr (EA)
(Görans Manure management presentation here). BAAP THE BALTIC SEA AGRICULTURAL RUN-OFF ACTION PROGRAMME.
Strategies, Law and Regulation in the EU : River Impacts on Oceans and Coasts Carl Gustaf Lundin Director, Global Marine & Polar Programme IUCN.
DEFRA 1 st IMPACT Workshop - 16/17 May 2002 How does this research fit within the UK? Dr Mervyn Bramley Flood Defence Development Manager, Environment.
The Challenge of Climate Change and Future Water Or: water we going to do about carbon? 23 April 2009 Institute of Water Officers Annual Conference Mike.
What is environmental law?. Why we love green tape Environmental laws are an essential element in achieving ecologically sustainable outcomes. These laws:
Preview of the Draft River Basin Management Plan SERBD Advisory Council September 2008.
1 Integrating water issues in farm advisory services The English Experience FAS and Water Workshop 21 st October 2009.
Current condition and Challenges for the Future Report s (Scotland and Solway Tweed)
A Pacific Response to Climate Change Green Economies An Extraordinary Emphasis on Biodiversity, Environment and Resilient Societies.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Why can voluntary agreements between water companies, farmers and authorities help to implement the European WFD and CAP reforms? Ingo Heinz University.
Dr Richard Johnson, Mountain Environments, UK.  Lead Partner: Germany: Research Institute of Forest Ecology and Forestry  Partner countries: Germany,
Sierra Leone NAPA Implementation: Incrementality of Adaptation Presented by N. Telahigue CLIMTRAIN 2 nd Workshop IFAD, Rome 20 Nov 2008.
Enver AKSOY, MSc Head of Strategy Development Board of MoFAL Policy approaches of Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock to pasture management in.
The Irwell Pilot an integrated approach to delivering sustainable water management and additional benefits Katherine Causer National Pilot Steering Group.
SAINT LUCIA PROPOSED PROJECT IDEAS GEF Regional Meeting Presented by: Mr. George James and Ms. Caroline Eugene.
Natural vs. Accelerated Soil Erosion Natural geologic erosion has occurred at a relatively slow rate since the earth was formed. Natural erosion produces.
Water Framework Directive and the SRDP Jannette MacDonald Land Unit, SEPA.
Greater Manchester a resilient city region U-Score Essential 5 In partnership with: European Commission Humanitarian Aid & Civil Protection Salford United.
Irwell Catchment Pilot Katherine Causer January 2012.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Building Resilience Well-being of Future Generations Act and the Environment (Wales) Bill Emily Finney – Resilience Policy, Welsh Government.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Roadmap to Improving Farm Efficiency and Profitability Setting the Scene Brian Ervine, Environmental Policy, DARD.
Current condition and Challenges for the Future Report s (Scotland and Solway Tweed)
AGRICULTURE AND THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE ANALYSIS Russell Todd.
Through urban river restoration
Bob Slater CFE Coordinator Warwickshire & Worcestershire 14 th May 2014.
Knowledge and research needs for wetlands and lakes IWRM presentation 18 November 2008 Johan Schutten Senior Wetland Ecologist SEPA.
Phase 2 Research Questions Theme 1: Nutrition, food safety and value addition 1)Which combinations of technology packages can reduce household vulnerability.
Community Engagement to Advance Mitigation Action.
State of Natural Resources Report Ruth Jenkins. Sustainable management of natural resources State of Natural Resources Report (SoNaRR) State of Natural.
Climate Change Adaptation Indicators. Adaptation Indicators- Origin and Purpose Adaptation Indicators.
Questionnaire Response Analysis David Cliffe FWAG National Resource Protection Specialist.
PUTTING WATER COMPANY INTERVENTIONS TO TACKLE DIFFUSE POLLUTION FROM AGRICULTURE INTO A BIGGER CONTEXT FOR GREATER EFFECTIVENESS Patrice Mongelard Catchment.
WagriCo UK Launch, Dorchester 5 May 2006 Tackling Diffuse Pollution: an integrated approach to improving water quality Bob Harris Environment Agency.
WAgriCo – UK update and overview Dr Jodie Whitehead 17 th July 2008 Insert image here.
Thematic assessments based on results from RBMPs Coastal and transitional ecological status & related presures Inland surface waters Hydromorphological.
WAgriCo An NFU Perspective
Environmental Services Training Group
Water and the Green Economy: The EEA perspective
9 Pilot River Basins Coordination: JRC RWER Outcome:
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
River Basin Planning & Flood Risk Management in Scotland
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Ecological and Environmental Stability
Rural development support for implementing the Water Framework Directive Expert Group on WFD and Agriculture Seville, 6-7 April 2010.
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
Waters and Communities Office Local Authority Waters Programme
WFD & Agriculture – Article 5
The Blueprint and Council Conclusions:
Dr Carla Turner Objectives Overview Our case study….
UK experience of Programmes of Measures
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
a) Thematic presentations: part 1: biophysical benefits
Presentation transcript:

Motivating English Farmers to Action / Motivera engelska bönder till åtgärder Catchment Sensitive Farming Bob Middleton Natural England

Agricultural Diffuse Pollution in England Diffusa utsläpp från jordbruket i England

Diffuse - agriculture Number of water bodies Land Drainage Water storage/ supply Abstraction Urbanisation Flood Protection Reasons for Failure CSO Barrier s Wider environ ment Mines Mixed urban runoff 0 Light colour = suspected Dark colour = confirmed Recreation Fin fisheries Inland navigation sewage works Coastal Erosion Shell fisheries

Diffuse - agriculture Number of water bodies Land Drainage Water storage/ supply Abstraction Urbanisation Flood Protection Reasons for Failure CSO Barrier s Wider environ ment Mines Mixed urban runoff 0 Light colour = suspected Dark colour = confirmed Recreation Fin fisheries Inland navigation sewage works Coastal Erosion Shell fisheries

Diffuse - agriculture Number of water bodies Land Drainage Water storage/ supply Abstraction Urbanisation Flood Protection Reasons for Failure CSO Barrier s Wider environ ment Mines Mixed urban runoff 0 Light colour = suspected Dark colour = confirmed Recreation Fin fisheries Inland navigation sewage works Coastal Erosion Shell fisheries 75% of sediment, 50-60% of nitrate 20-30% of phosphorus from agriculture

What are we doing about it? Vad gör vi åt det?

7 Minimum Requirements (Basic Measures) Minimikrav (grundläggande åtgärder) Additional Incentives Ytterligare incitament Jordbruket och Vatten Miljö

8 Voluntary Action by Farmers Frivilliga insatser av jordbrukare

CSF started in 2006 we are working on a new phase of work from CSF works in 77 catchments: 66 CSFO led 11 led by partners We work in the highest priority catchments only focussed on WFD Protected Areas and areas protected for biodiversity. Approaches in each catchment are tailored to the local circumstances. 2015/16 budget: £39.5m CSF startade CSF arbetar i 77 upptagningsområden : 66 st leds av CSFO: 11 st leds av partner Vi arbetar i de mest prioriterade avrinningsområdena bara fokuserade på vattendirektivet skyddade områden och skyddade områden för biologisk mångfald. Tillvägagångssätt i varje avrinningsområde är anpassade till lokala förhållanden Budget 2015/16 : ca 500 milj SEK

Catchment Sensitive Farming Technical training and advice delivered directly or by contractors Teknisk utbildning och rådgivning levereras direkt eller genom entreprenörer

Catchment Sensitive Farming Grants for infrastructure adaptations Bidrag för anpassningar av infrastruktur

Catchment Sensitive Farming Grants for infrastructure adaptations Bidrag för anpassningar av infrastruktur

Catchment Sensitive Farming Markhanterings överenskommel ser Land Management Agreements

What CSF has achieved?/Vad CSF har uppnått ?

Reductions in pollution: pollutant loads/ Föroreningsminskningar: föroreningsnivåer Reduce agricultural pollutant losses 4 -12%. Equates to in-river pollutant reductions of 3 -7 %. Most effective for sediment <36%. CSF is making a significant contribution to meeting WFD and biodiversity targets. Real reductions in pesticide loads

Groundwater assessment CSF should make a significant contribution to nitrate reductions 48% of groundwater sites showing decreasing trends post-CSF Reductions in pollution: groundwaters/ Föroreningsminskningar: grundvatten

Assessment of EA habitat data across 62 CSF catchments. Examined trends in ecological status Evidence of improved ecological status following CSF activity, particularly at more polluted sites. The strongest response was evident for PSI –metric of sediment stress Ecological responses

Significant benefits for fisheries, soils, hazards, climate & water supply Potential to enhance targeting to maximise benefits, but local context is critical Other Benefits

62% uptake of measures Affected by time, cost, farm type, location & nature of advice 46% uptake within 3 years vs. 70% uptake at 4+ years 71% uptake of cost- saving vs. 56% uptake of net-cost measures Advice Uptake/Genomslag för rådgivning

Motivating farmers to take action Motivera bönder att vidta åtgärder

All farmers: 58% are aware of CSF Of those farmers engaged by CSF: 90% trust their CSFO 90% indicate their understanding of water pollution has improved Farmer awareness Farmer Awareness/Kännedom hos lantbrukare

Motivating farmers/ Motivera lantbrukare 67% engaged farmers motivated to reduce water pollution Key drivers for action: free advice, expertise & soil analysis capital grant scheme help with nutrient and fertiliser management plans CSF has allowed farmers to: implement planned changes keep up with existing, or ahead of future potential, regulations

Individual farmer Group of farmers Wider community groups inc farmers Social Mechanisms GOOD BAD UGLY Social Relationships & Resources Social Outcomes Environmental Outcomes depend on Social Outcomes We need the evidence to prioritise the most effective Social Mechanisms Social Situation Motivating farmers: social relations Motivera lantbrukare : sociala relationer

Characterising Farmers/karakterisera jordbrukare

Characterising farmers/Karaktärisera lantbrukare

‘Hard to Reach’ Farmers Socially isolated Suspicious Reluctant to meet new people ‘Victim Status’ May be older, may be illiterate, may suffer dementia Often stressed; may be suicidal ‘Hard to Reach’ Farmers Socially isolated Suspicious Reluctant to meet new people ‘Victim Status’ May be older, may be illiterate, may suffer dementia Often stressed; may be suicidal Characterising farmers/ Karaktärisera lantbrukare

How do we motivate farmers?/ Hur kan vi motivera lantbrukare? Understand the farmers we are working with. Strategies to engage hard to reach farmers. Tailor our offer the farmer’s interests. Talk about local issues supported by local evidence. Build trust through personal trust. Fit our work to farmers’ needs. Learn from everyone. Source: LEAF

Tack Search/ Sök ‘Catchment Sensitive Farming’