Increasing the Accessibility of Large-Scale Assessments of Reading Proficiency for Students with Disabilities National Accessible Reading Assessments Projects:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Principles and Issues Paper American.
Advertisements

Designing Accessible Reading Assessments National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Overview of DARA Project.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals of Project NARAP Collaboration General Advisory Committee Project Details (ETS and PARA) Plans for.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Discussion of the Principles and Issues.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Sampling Issues and Accessible Assessments Christopher Johnstone National Center on Educational Outcomes.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Project General Advisory Committee October Meeting Review.
Copyright © 2004 Educational Testing Service Listening. Learning. Leading. Using DIF to Examine the Validity and Fairness of Assessments for Students With.
PARA Project Overview, Results, Next Steps Martha Thurlow and Deborah Dillon National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Analysis of Current Characteristics of State Reading Assessments Christopher Johnstone National Center on.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Martha Thurlow.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Research Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Principles and Guidelines NARAP Goal 3.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Introduction.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 8, 2006 Overview of.
Principal Investigators: Martha Thurlow & Deborah Dillon Introduction Assumptions & Research Questions Acknowledgments 1. What characteristics of current.
Effective Decision Making Accommodations and Modifications Tools to Tune the HSGQE Assessment Process Prepared by dept. of Education & Early Development.
Improving Practitioner Assessment Participation Decisions for English Language Learners with Disabilities Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
Lecturette 2: Educational Mandates & Universally Designed Large Scale Assessments.
Surveys 1 compiled by Anna Bączkowska 2 Attractions -Scan wide field of issues, populatins, programmes (large-scale data - generalisable results) -gathers.
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Reading Aloud Tests of Reading Review of Research from the Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Projects Cara.
Implementing Virginia’s Growth Measure: A Practical Perspective Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director, Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O Leaving No Child Behind: Are English Language Learners With Disabilities Considered? Martha Thurlow, Jane.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Designing and Using Assessment and AYP Reports for Improved Achievement at State and Local Levels Martha.
National Center on Educational Outcomes What Item Level Data Tell Us About Universal Design: Fantasy, Foolishness, or Fuel for Fire? in Large- Scale Assessments.
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Accommodation Policies and Score Comparability Issues Martha L. Thurlow University of Minnesota.
Effective Performance Evaluations Presented By: Barrie Jaffe Lale Kumral.
Longitudinal Analysis of Effects of Reclassification, Reporting Methods, and Analytical Techniques on Trends in Math Performance of Students with Disabilities.
CHAPTER FIVE (Part II) Sampling and Survey Research.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research on Making Large-Scale Reading Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities June.
Lynn Thompson Center for Applied Linguistics Startalk Network for Program Excellence Chicago, Illinois October 16-18, 2009 Formative and Summative Assessment.
Overview of the USA Health, Social problems and education.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
The interaction of measurement, models and accountability: How values affect our growth model choices. Jennifer L. Dunn Center for Assessment.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
Project Advisors and Partners Eileen Ahearn, NASDSE Martha Thurlow, NCEO June 23, 2010.
Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Cara Cahalan Laitusis Educational Testing Service Martha Thurlow NCEO.
Audit Planning Process
Modifying Achievement Test Items: A Theory-Guided & Data-Based Approach Stephen N. Elliott Learning Sciences Institute and Department of Special Education.
Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Incorporating Universal Design Principles in Next Generation Assessment Item Design Sheryl Lazarus.
CIS meeting Budapest 3-4 July 2013 Christophe Duhamel the Global Strategy to Improve Rural and Agricultural Statistics 3 components of the plan.
January 13-15, 2015 | Costa Mesa, CA. Welcome to the Symposium!
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments A Multistage Adaptive and Accessible Reading Assessment for Accountability Cara Cahalan Laitusis ETS.
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Introduction and Overview Welcome !
Universal Design for Learning Universal Design for Learning in Postsecondary Education May 14, 2015 Sam Catherine Johnston.
Description Enhanced Assessment for Students with Visual and Print Disabilities NSCA June 2012.
Laurene Christensen and Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational Outcomes April 4, 2009 ACTIVITIES THAT WORK: SELECTING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION.
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Putting Accessibility to the Test: Design of a Multistage Reading Assessment for Accountability Cara Cahalan Laitusis.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Overview Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Council.
Invitational Research Symposium Alternate Assessments Based on Modified Achievement Standards in Reading Invitational Research Symposium Alternate Assessments.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment PARA Field Test Martha Thurlow, Deborah Dillon, Jamal Abedi, Marsha Brauen June 22, 2010 Partnership for.
Thinking About Teacher/Leader Effectiveness at Scale ARRA Strategic Planning Meeting Phoenix, AZ December 18, 2009.
1Your reference The Menu of Indicators and the Core Set from the South African Point of View Moses Mnyaka 13/08/2009.
METHODOLOGICAL STUDIES
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING vs. MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING Session 1 1.
3 STUDENT ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT
The ABCs of Accessibility and Accommodations in State Assessments Martha Thurlow, Sheryl Lazarus, and Laurene Christensen National.
Martha Thurlow, Phd Linda Goldstone, MS APRIL 22, 2017
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
What States are Doing That Meet the 1% Cap
Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
PSYCH 655 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
QUALITY DEVELOPMENT IN COLOMBIA AND LATIN AMERICAN
Person Centered Planning
Collaboration and partnerships among campuses to create system-ness
Qualities of a good data gathering procedures
Presentation transcript:

Increasing the Accessibility of Large-Scale Assessments of Reading Proficiency for Students with Disabilities National Accessible Reading Assessments Projects: Designing Reading Assessments for Students with Disabilities

How can tests of reading proficiency be accessible and valid for all students? Two five-year projects funded by the U.S. Department of Education in 2004 to address this question Educational Testing Services University of Minnesota Currently in their second year

Goal 1: Definition of Reading Formulate a definition of the construct of reading proficiency that provides a basis for research and development for accessible large-scale tests of reading proficiency.

Goal 2: Program of Research Conduct a program of research on the assessment of reading proficiency to determine the effects of various factors of test development, design, and administration on accessibility, validity, and comparability for students with disabilities that affect reading.

Goal 3: Principles and Guidelines Develop research-based principles and guidelines for making large-scale assessments of reading proficiency more accessible for students who have disabilities that affect reading.

Goal 4: Develop & Test Instruments Develop and field-test instruments and/or methods for assessing reading proficiency that are suitable for large- scale administration for school accountability purposes, that are accessible to students who have disabilities that affect reading.

Todays Session: Overview of the Designing Accessible Reading Assessment (DARA) Project by Cara Cahalan (ETS) Overview of the Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Project by Martha L. Thurlow (University of Minnesota) Developing a Definition of Reading Proficiency by Deborah R. Dillon (University of Minnesota) & John P. Sabatini (ETS) Gathering Public Reactions to a Definition of Reading Proficiency by Teresa C. King (ETS) & Christopher J. Johnstone (University of Minnesota) Discussant: Arnold Goldstein (National Center for Education Statistics)