National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Principles and Guidelines NARAP Goal 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learner-Centered Education Course Redesign Initiative Builds upon work of prior LCE grants Will award grants of $40,000 - $50,000, with the option.
Advertisements

WHATS NEXT? May – June 2007 Teams develop project proposals July 15, 2007 Teams submit final proposal plans July 30, 2007 Grants awarded August – December.
WECC TEPPC – March 25, 2010 Proposed Revisions to PCC Regional Planning Document 1 Proposed Revisions to Overview of Policies and Procedures for Regional.
Feedback on FIN.REP. Implementation by the Industry November 2007.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals of Project NARAP Collaboration General Advisory Committee Project Details (ETS and PARA) Plans for.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Project General Advisory Committee October Meeting Review.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 8, 2006 Overview of.
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
1 Massachusetts Draft of Prekindergarten Standards in Mathematics and English Language Arts Susan Wheltle, Donna Traynham, and Barbara Libby Massachusetts.
Continuous Improvement Plan The will to win is meaningless without the will to prepare. ~ Joe Gibbs.
PARCC Progress Update 1 June 26, In the Last Year… 2 June 2012 Minimum Technology Specifications, Version 1.0, Released Item Development Began August.
Common Core State Standards Initiative An Initiative of the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best.
Early On System Updates Winter 2011 Early On Training and Technical Assistance (EOT&TA)
Child Care Regulations for Licensure Presentation Kevin Savage Licensing Administrator March 31, 2015 Healthy Children and Youth, Strong Families, Diverse.
Prepared by Jan Sheinker, Ed.D Points of view or opinions expressed in the paper are not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Education, or Offices.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Standard Setting Inclusive Assessment Seminar Marianne.
June 23, 2003 Council of Chief State School Officers What Does “Proficiency” Mean for Students with Cognitive Disabilities Dr. Ron Cammaert Riverside Publishing.
How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.
Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
Writing Policy Review Process Rebecca Woosley Carol Franks Renee Boss KDE Literacy Consultants 1.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
Proposal for Governance Review Wednesday, 29 July 2015 Steven Ponnoosamy, Executive Special Projects Assistant - Governance Proposal for Governance Review.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
InTeGrate Assessment David Steer, University of Akron Ellen Iverson, Carleton College May 2012.
Conducting Re-evaluations Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework Director of Special Education Eligibility, Theresa Nicholls | Fall 2015.
California Adult Education Strategic Plan Planning Overview CAEAA Conference January 29, 2009.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
Technical Assistance Paper Program Year Miami-Dade County Public Schools Adult ESOL Program presents: ADULT ESOL Technical Assistance Paper
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Base Plan Development Overview 2007 Transmission Summit July 31, 2007 New Orleans, Louisiana.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Common Core State Standards Initiative State Board of Education January 28, 2010.
Modifying Achievement Test Items: A Theory-Guided & Data-Based Approach Stephen N. Elliott Learning Sciences Institute and Department of Special Education.
Ninth Annual Meeting of the WG: Objectives and Agenda Jennifer H. Madans U.S.A.
Classified Evaluation System April 2015 Why are we here? Why are things changing? How does this affect me? How can I provide input?
Assessment for Learning and Development Principal Council Meeting North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Office of Early Learning February 2014.
CAROLE GALLAGHER, PHD. CCSSO NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STUDENT ASSESSMENT JUNE 26, 2015 Reporting Assessment Results in Times of Change:
2012 Instructional Materials Process for Bridge Year Drew Hinds and Paula Merritt Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department of.
Public Health Curriculum Review Developing the future public health workforce through high quality training Name: Position: Date:
Independent Office of Evaluation IFAD’s Approach to Evaluation of Agriculture programmes Presentation at ECD Workshop, Addis Ababa, 6 November 2015.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Assessing Very Low-Achieving Children with Disabilities Using Large Scale Assessments Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update August NSDI Strategic Plan – Purpose/Scope Purpose: Develop a concise, updated strategic plan to guide the Federal government’s.
Standards Review Update. Standards Review Timeline ELA and Math –Last year, more than 130,000 reviews and more than 20,000 comments were collected on.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Curriculum Directors Meeting February 24, 2016.
Project Parkway Timeline to 2011 April 1, 2010 Town Hall Meeting Steering Committee Schools February 2009 May 18, 2009 Project Parkway Community Kick-
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March (Excerpted version.
MA-PAL TASK 1 LEADERSHIP THROUGH A VISION FOR HIGH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
2017/8 NomCom Review: Status Update
Test Blueprints for Adaptive Assessments
Curriculum Development Updates
Office of Developmental Programs
Strategic Planning Council December 8, 2006
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
SPR&I Regional Training
Preparation for New Curriculum Proposal System (CPS)
Informal document GRVA nd GRVA, 28 Jan Feb. 2019
GEF policies: progress and next steps
Proposed Review Cycle to
An Update of COSO’s Internal Control–Integrated Framework
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
ETS WG, 30 January-1 February 2006 Agenda Item
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Student Assignment Review Advisory Committee
Timeline for Noc strategic plan
Presentation transcript:

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Principles and Guidelines NARAP Goal 3

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goal 3 Purpose To develop research-based principles and guidelines for making large-scale assessments of reading proficiency more accessible for students who have disabilities that affect reading.

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects What We Are Doing Projects met in July 2007 to start to develop evidence-based principles Projects initially worked separately to flesh out individual principles Projects discussed the first melded version of principles (9-7-07) and made revisions via biweekly (approximately) conference calls

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Process A Principles Committee will review and comment on proposed principles and guidelines that are gleaned from NARAP and other research The Principles Committee is a stakeholder group that includes researchers, a parent, a student, state assessment and special education representatives, and others

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Process Principles and Guidelines will be shared and input sought at other conferences after Principles Committee input: Association of Test Publishers (ATP) Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Format 1. Principle [ rules that define the overarching goals to achieve accessibility ] Rationale for Principle [reason why need, clarification of terms, overview of guidelines] Guideline 1-A. [ implementation approaches and procedures ] Description of essence of meaning, summary of nature of evidence Level of Evidence: High, Medium, or Low Guideline 1-B..... Guideline 1-C.....

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Draft Principles (see Handout for Guidelines) 1.Reading assessments should be accessible to all students in the testing population, including students with disabilities. Guidelines 1-A – 1-E 2. Reading assessments should be grounded in research in the field of reading. Guidelines 2-A – 2-D

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Draft Principles (see Handout for Guidelines) 3. Reading assessments should be created following rigorous and well-documented test design, test development, and item development procedures. Guidelines 3-A – 3-G

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects 4. Reading assessments should reduce undesirable variance that distorts the measurement of the construct of reading achievement that the assessment has been designed to measure. Guidelines 4-A – 4-C Draft Principles (see Handout for Guidelines)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects 5. Reading assessments should allow for the measurement of component skills when the measurement of reading achievement may be obscured by a lack of access skills. Guidelines 5-A – 5-B Draft Principles (see Handout for Guidelines)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects 6. Reading assessments should report assessment results, including score information, in a way that encourages correct interpretation and use. Guidelines 6-A – 6-C Draft Principles (see Handout for Guidelines)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Timeline DateActivity Sept, 2007Notify Principles Committee Oct-Dec, 2007Develop draft of Principles and Guidelines Jan/Feb, 2008Meet with Principles Committee Spring, 2008Gather additional feedback on Principles and Guidelines Summer, 2008Finalize Principles and Guidelines