Intrasexual vs. intersexual (epigamic) sexual selection Mating preferences in Drosophila and pigeons Certainty of Maternity, Uncertainty of Paternity “Battle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Insect Societies Lecture 21.
Advertisements

EVOLUTION & ETHICS.  a social behavior counts as altruistic if it reduces the fitness of the organism performing the behavior, but boosts the fitness.
Evolution of the Family Evolution by Kin Selection Genetic Trait Expressed in Actor (Ego) Must Affect Genotypic Fitness of Individual Related to Actor.
1 Concepts of Evolution Alfred Wallace. 2 Natural Selection through Sexual Reproduction From so simple a beginning, endless forms….
Helpful behaviour. Helpful behaviour Helpful behaviour.
Conflict between individuals. 8.1 Sex Allocation Conflict Conflict: when the sex allocation optima for individuals differ sexes have different worth to.
+. Reciprocal altruism: One organism provides a benefit to another in the expectation of future reciprocation Assumes that cheaters can be identified/punished.
The eusocial insects: Isoptera: Termites Hymenoptera: Ants, bees, wasps.
Chapter 13 Opener: Weaver ants form superbly cooperative societies
Diversity of reproduction Asexual reproduction Parthenogenesis Hermaphrodites Sequential hermaphrodites - protogyny (F  M) or protoandry (M  F) Sexual.
Sociality and Social Behaviour. Level of Sociality Mating strategy Communication System Kin Selection Altruism Predator Pressure Resource Defence Parental.
Recipient/Donor Effects Non-Kin and Relatives. Kin Selection Question: Reproductive Altruism Eusocial Insects Reproductive, Worker Castes Cooperative.
Altruism and the Family The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour.
Types of Social Interactions Cooperation = mutualism Cooperation = mutualism – Fitness gains for both participants Altruism Altruism – Fitness gain for.
Kin Selection and Social Behavior. I. Motivation Cooperative behaviors are widespread. Why?
Altruism: Voluntary or Coerced? Altruism Requires Decrease Actor’s Direct Fitness Increase Recipient’s Direct Fitness Social Insects Eusociality  Sterile.
Chapter 13 Opener: Weaver ants form superbly cooperative societies
Sexual Selection Variance in reproductive success
2 WORK-STUDY JOBS 1. Endangered species and biodiversity Duties: - collect data on endangered species traits - enter data into Access database 2. Plant-insect.
Figure 13.1 Energy budget of subordinate, nonbreeding “helpers” that associate with breeding pairs in the cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher.
How is sexual selection different from natural selection?
Eusociality Conflicts over reproduction Definition and occurrence
The Evolution of Social Behavior Chapter 13 Or Why can’t we all just get along?
BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 9- Part II Kin selection.
Darwin’s Puzzle: Why are Males and Females Different?
Types of Social Interactions
Sociality and the adaptive value of helpful behavior
Chapter 52 Biology Raven and Johnson 7th Ed.
Behavioral Ecology Photo from Wikimedia Commons. Ethological Underpinnings of Behavioral Ecology Photo from Konrad Lorenz.
Chapter 51: Behavioral Ecology
Second Exam: Thursday 2 April 2015 Covers Chapters 5, 8, 9, and 10
Ecology Available
Behavioral Ecology Introduction Social behavior Sexual selection.
Living in groups also has benefits and costs.
SEX By: Ronald F. White, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy College of Mount St. Joseph.
Units of Selection. We think that the only way that adaptations can arise is through natural selection. The effects of such adaptation can be seen at.
Reading: Chapter 12 pg. For all laboratory sections: Remember to complete problem set 1 (problems 1-15) for laboratory next week. Problems can be found.
Mating Systems & Social Behavior
Second Exam: Thursday 2 April 2015 Covers Chapters 5, 8, 9, and 10 Lectures 10 to 19 plus Agriculture Global Warming The Vanishing Book of Life on Earth.
The Evolution of Social Behavior: Examining Motivations for Altruism John Cuchural Storia della Filantropia Professoressa Giuliana Gemelli June 19 th,
1 Behavioral Biology Chapter 52 Biology Raven and Johnson 7 th Ed.
Hamilton’s Rule – Kin Selection. KIN SELECTION & ALTRUISM Kin Selection: selection of a trait through helping relatives, either 1.descendant kin (offspring):
Take home final exam April 29 th DUE: May 5 th in my office by 1pm 1100 to 1300All classes meeting at 0800 or 0830MWF Exam format How many: MC? (50%) Short.
10. Cooperation and Helping. Inclusive Fitness Direct Fitness (Individual Fitness): personal reproductive success measured as the number of offspring.
S ELECTION FOR INDIVIDUAL SURVIVAL AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS CAN EXPLAIN DIVERSE BEHAVIORS Chapter 51, Section 3 August 31, 2015-Septermber 1, 2015.
Kin selection. actor +- + cooperativealtruistic - selfishspiteful recipient Individual interaction behaviors.
Second Exam: Thursday 29 October 2015 Covers Chapters 5, 8, 9,10, and 11 Lectures 10 to 19 plus Agriculture Global Warming The Vanishing Book of Life on.
Announcements. Recipient’s fitness Actor’s fitness increases decreases Cooperation AltruismSpite Selfishness Types of social action.
AP Biology Social behaviors  Altruistic behavior  reduces individual fitness but increases fitness of recipient  kin selection How can this.
Social Behavior Hermits must have lower fitness than social individuals Clumped, random, or dispersed (variance/mean ratio) mobility = motility = vagility.
Social interactions between organisms present the opportunity for conflict and cooperation Interaction between individuals can have 4 possible outcomes.
The evolution of cooperation. Altruism and the selfish gene n Altruism: benefit b to recipient at cost -c to the donor.
1) Relatedness “r” A) means degree of shared genetic similarity among relatives over-and-above the baseline genetic similarity within a population B) ranges.
Social Behavior Hermits must have lower fitness than social individuals Use of Space Clumped, random, or dispersed (variance/mean ratio) mobility = motility.
Reciprocal Altruism (Trivers 1971) Donor ––> Recipient Small costs, large gains, reciprocated Sentinels Robert Trivers Biological basis for our sense of.
Kin Selection and Social Behavior. I. Motivation Cooperative behaviors are widespread. Why?
Lecture 6: Units of Selection continued Most Extreme example of Kin Selection: EUSOCIALITY Eusociality: 1)Overlap in generations 2)Co-operative brood care.
Classical Kin Selection. Kin Selection Kin Selection  Natural Selection Fitness: Lifetime Reproductive Success Inclusive Fitness Direct & Indirect Components.
Sexual Selection - Recognized as a deviation from predictions offered by a strict selection model. In this case, there are different selective pressures.
Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies C. Cornwallis, S. West, K. Davis & A. Griffin Nature; 2010.
Sexual Selection Mating Preferences Sex that invests the most is the most choosy about mates Competition for the best mates of the opposite sex Jealousy,
Evolution and its Effects on Ecology
Mating Systems Continued
Exam Review “Need”, “want” and “try” are all words to be careful with (or avoid!) in explaining evolution… “Need”… Will he get one? Will his species get.
How did eusociality originate?
Altruism.
Leks. Runaway Sexual Selection (Fisher). Handicap Hypothesis (Zahavi)
Animal Behaviour Part II
Living in groups also has benefits and costs.
Inclusive Fitness Vivian Hubby.
Presentation transcript:

Intrasexual vs. intersexual (epigamic) sexual selection Mating preferences in Drosophila and pigeons Certainty of Maternity, Uncertainty of Paternity “Battle of the sexes” Cuckoldry —> jealousy Desertion —> Mating Rituals, Complex Courtship Sex that invests most in most choosy about mates Natural selection produces a correlation between male genetic quality and female preference “Sexy son” phenomenon (females cannot afford to mate with males that are not attractive to other females) Mating systems, monogamy, polygamy, polygyny threshold Marsh nesting (wrens, blackbirds, jacanas) Pinniped harems and sexual size dimorphisms Floating populations of non-breeding males Handout 5

Red-eyed Vireo Ecological sexual dimorphisms

A. J. Marshall

Four Possible Situations Involving an Individual ’ s Behavior and Its Influence on a Neighbor ________________________________________________________________ Neighbor(s) Gain Neighbor(s) Lose ________________________________________________________________ Individual Gains Pseudo-altruistic behaviorSelfish behavior (kin selection) (selected for) ________________________________________________________________ Individual Loses True altruistic behaviorMutually disadvanta- (counterselected) geous behavior (counterselected) _________________________________________________________________

W. D. Hamilton (1964) Kin Selection Inclusive Fitness Hamilton’s rule: r n b – c > 0 r = coefficient of relatedness n = number of relatives that benefit b = benefit received by each recipient c = cost suffered by donor r n b > c “ Adaptive Geometry of a Selfish Herd ”

“ Adaptive Geometry of a Selfish Herd ”

Eusocial Insects Hymenoptera (“thin wings”) Ants, bees, wasps, hornets Workers are all females Haplodiploidly Isoptera (“same wings”) Termites (castes consist of both sexes) Endosymbionts Parental manipulation Cyclic inbreeding

Kin selection, inclusive fitness Hamilton’s rule: r n b > c (coefficient of relatedness) Pseudo-altruistic behavior Eusocial Insects Hymenoptera (“thin wings”) Ants, bees, wasps, hornets—all workers are females Haplodiploidly Isoptera (“same wings”) Termites (castes consist of both sexes) Endosymbionts Parental manipulation Cyclic inbreeding “Adaptive Geometry of a Selfish Herd”

White-Fronted Bee Eater, Kenya

White-Fronted Bee Eater Colony Female tossing out an egg

Helpers at the Nest in White-Fronted Bee Eaters in Kenya __________________________________________________________________ Breedersr * Number of Cases% Cases __________________________________________________________________ Father x Mother Father x Stepmother Mother x Stepfather Son x Nonrelative Brother x Nonrelative Grandfather x Grandmother Half brother x Nonrelative Uncle x Nonrelative Grandmother x Nonrelative Grandson x Nonrelative Great grandfather x Nonrelative Nonrelative x Nonrelative Total __________________________________________________________________ * r = coefficient of relatedness.

Reciprocal Altruism (Trivers 1971) Donor ––> Recipient Small costs, large gains, reciprocated Sentinels Robert Trivers Biological basis for our sense of justice? Friendship, gratitude, sympathy, loyalty, betrayal, guilt, dislike, revenge, trust, suspicion, dishonesty, hypocrisy

Game Theoretic Approaches Costs versus benefits of behaviors “ tit for tat ” strategy can lead to cooperation ( “ the future casts a long shadow back on the present ” ) Evolutionarily stable strategies = ESS (a tactic that when present in a population, cannot be beaten) Tit for Tat with Forgiveness John Maynard Smith

Evolution of Self Deceit Subconscious mind Polygraph playback experiments

Helpers at the Nest in White-Fronted Bee Eaters in Kenya Reciprocal Altruism (Trivers) Donor ––> Recipient Small costs, large gains, reciprocated Sentinels, selfish callers Biological basis for our sense of justice? Friendship, gratitude, sympathy, loyalty, betrayal, guilt, dislike, revenge, trust, suspicion, dishonesty, hypocrisy Game Theoretic Approaches Costs versus benefits of behaviors “tit for tat” strategy + forgivenesscan lead to cooperation (“the future casts a long shadow back on the present”) Evolutionarily stable strategies = ESS Evolution of self deceit makes for better liars Subconscious mind Polygraph playback experiments