Thomas R. Bane P.E. 605 Suwannee Street Mail-station 32 Tallahassee Florida 32399 (850) 414-4379 Roadside - Benefit – Cost.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling. Outline –Safety Modeling »Safety Modeling Process –Set-up for Worked Example –Develop / Build Safety Model »Project.
Advertisements

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
HSM Practitioner’s Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
HSM Applications to Two-Lane Rural Highways Predicting Crash Frequency and Applying CMF’s for Two-Lane Rural Highway Intersections - Session #6 6-1.
Spring  Crash modification factors (CMFs) are becoming increasing popular: ◦ Simple multiplication factor ◦ Used for estimating safety improvement.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety.
ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNTIES ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF SAFETY OPERATIONS SONYA BAKER TIMOTHY BARNETT MAY 13, 2015.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems CE 7640: Fall 2002 Prof. Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Lec 32, Ch5, pp : Highway Safety Improvement Program (objectives) Learn the components of FHWA’s Highway Safety Improvement Program Know typical.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Mobile Barriers and MUTCD Typical Applications 2010 Annual Meeting National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Temporary Traffic Control Technical Committee.
Murray Boulevard and Farmington Road Intersection Sirisha Kothuri Wei Feng Ping Guo Meead Saberi CEE 550 Transportation Safety Analysis.
8-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #8.
ETSI Methodology1 LCC Methodology Håkan Sundquist Structural Design and Bridges KTH.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
ITS Sketch Planning Tool Webinar 2:00 – 4:00 PM January 8, 2009.
Cost Benefit Analysis Do Speed Cameras Produce Net Benefits? Evidence from British Columbia, Canada.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Local Government Section
Fall 2014 Most of the Material taken from: Roadside Design Guide (2011) published by AAHSTO.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
1 CEE 763 Fall 2011 Topic 1 – Fundamentals CEE 763.
ROUNDABOUTS Improving Safety and Efficiency The Ohio Department of Transportation District Clark Ave. Ashland, OH Julie Cichello, P.E. District.
Incorporating Safety into Design CE 453 – Highway Design October 2, 2006 Jerry Roche, P.E. Transportation Safety Engineer FHWA – Iowa Division Federal.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Highway Costs Spring Highway Transportation Costs Type of CostExamples Highway investment costEngineering design, ROW, grading, drainage, pavement.
The 2010 Evaluation of Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 2010 Thomas M. Welch, P.E. State Transportation.
4. GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS
Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications Dick Albin Washington State Department of Transportation Presented at the AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Meeting.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
Chapter C Cross Section (ANSWERS )
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 101 Wyoming DOT Place guardrail when there is a fill slope of.
CE303: Introduction to Construction Blueprint Lab.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 126 Japan D a = expected damage in collision accidents after.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) By Josh Hinds.
BLOCK 4 SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Pavement Data Collection Project evaluation Select feasible alternatives Reconstruction Restoration Recycling.
Costs Life cycle costs Past and sunk costs Future and opportunity costs Direct, indirect and overhead costs Fixed and variable costs Average and marginal.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
1 Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements (ELCSI) Pooled Fund Study Roya Amjadi, Highway Research Engineer FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center 10/24/08.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
Edward L. Fischer P.E..  Ed, it was hard to read slides from back of room with this background.  Can I change it? Nancy Brickman.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
California’s Experience with HFST 1.  Overview  Challenging Locations  Collision Reduction (State and Local Roads)  Typical Placement and current.
Role of Safety Performance Functions in the Highway Safety Manual July 29, 2009.
Regina Bypass Project Information Session. Saskatchewan.ca Outline Background –The need for a bypass –Selecting the route –P3 delivery and procurement.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
Caldwell and Wilson (1999) 1. Determine primary rating factor for a road section based on traffic volume and user types 2. Primary rating factor is then.
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
ROUNDABOUTS Improving Safety and Efficiency
Northwest Ohio –Projections by Major Group,
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling
B/C methods Iowa DOT Texas.
Capitalized Cost Refers to the present worth of an infinite series A
Presentation transcript:

Thomas R. Bane P.E. 605 Suwannee Street Mail-station 32 Tallahassee Florida (850) Roadside - Benefit – Cost assessment See credit below: Thomas Bane

Reduction in Accident Costs Increase in Construction & Maintenance Costs R (b/c) = Benefit / Cost Ratio

Roadside Guide Design Technical Advisory RS 5.0 Non-Restricted Roadways Roadside Guide Design NCHRP RSAP

ROADSIDE 5.0 Technical Advisory Societal Costs/Severity Level

C:> _ roadside.exe Roadside Program is a DOS based program – Get acquainted with this Type of message! DO YOU WISH TO ENABLE THE PRINTER (Y/N)? Y

GLOBAL PARAMETER VALUES 1. FATAL ACCIDENT COST = $ 1,000, SEVERE INJURY ACCIDENT COST = $ 200, MODERATE INJURY ACCIDENT COST = $ 12, SLIGHT INJURY ACCIDENT COST = $ 3, PDO LEVEL 2 ACCIDENT COST = $ 3, PDO LEVEL 1 ACCIDENT COST = $ ENCROACHMENT RATE = ENCROACHMENTS/km/YR/VPD km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 13.0 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 12.8 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 12.4 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 12.0 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 11.6 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 11.1 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 10.7 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 10.3 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE 16. SWATH WIDTH = m 17. RESET ALL GLOBALS TO DEFAULT STARTUP VALUES. DO YOU WISH TO CHANGE A PARAMETER VALUE (Y/N)? Technical Advisory Y

GLOBAL PARAMETER VALUES 1. FATAL ACCIDENT COST = $ 2,600, SEVERE INJURY ACCIDENT COST = $ 505, MODERATE INJURY ACCIDENT COST = $ 165, SLIGHT INJURY ACCIDENT COST = $ 36, PDO LEVEL 2 ACCIDENT COST = $ 10, PDO LEVEL 1 ACCIDENT COST = $ 2, ENCROACHMENT RATE = ENCROACHMENTS/km/YR/VPD km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 13.0 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 12.8 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 12.4 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 12.0 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 11.6 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 11.1 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 10.7 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE km/h DES SPEED ENC ANGLE = 10.3 DEG AND TRAF VOL CAP = VPD/LANE 16. SWATH WIDTH = m 17. RESET ALL GLOBALS TO DEFAULT STARTUP VALUES. DO YOU WISH TO CHANGE A PARAMETER VALUE (Y/N)? N

CURRENT SEVERITY INDEX versus COST RELATIONSHIP SEVERITY INDEX COST 0.0 $ $ 2, $ 10, $ 26, $ 82, $ 170, $ 342, $ 639, $ 981, $ 1,469, $ 2,052, $ 2,600,000 PRESS ENTER TO CONTINUE

Societal Costs $981, SI=7.0

% Accidents Property Damage Only Fatalities Non-Fatal Injuries

1. TITLE: 2. TRAFFIC VOLUME = 38,900 VPD - TRAFFIC GROWTH RATE = % PER YEAR 3. DIVIDED HIGHWAY TOTAL LANE(S) = 6 LANE WIDTH = m 4. CURVATURE (RADIUS IN METERS) = %999,999 GRADE (PERCENT) = EFFECTIVE BASELINE CURVATURE GRADE USER TOTAL TRAFFIC VPD ENC/km/YR FACTOR FACTOR FACTOR ENC/km/YR ADJACENT 19, OPPOSING 19, DESIGN SPEED = 70 km/h ENC ANGLE = 12.4 DEG ADT CAP = 23,700 VPD/LANE 7. OFFSET (A) = m LENGTH (L) = m WIDTH (W) = m 8. INITIAL COLLISION FREQUENCY = IMPACTS/YEAR ADJACENT CFTA = CFSU = CFCU = CFFA = OPPOSING CFTO = CFSD = CFCD = CFFO = SEVERITY INDEX = SU= 4.40 SD= 2.00 CU= 4.40 CD= 1.00 FACE= 2.20 ACCIDENT COST $ 238,935 $ 26,940 $ 238,935 $ 10,250 $ 38, PROJECT LIFE = 13 YR DISCOUNT RATE = %/YR TRAFFIC CUTOFF YR = 200 CRF = KC = KT = KJ = INSTALLATION COST = $ 35,000 SALVAGE VALUE = $ 0 2. REPAIR COST/ACC $ SU= 2000 SD= 1000 CU= 2000 CD= 1000 F= MAINTENANCE COST/YR = $ PRESENT WORTH = $ 88,590 ANNUALIZED $ 10,600 ACCIDENT COST = $ 52,310 ANNUALIZED $ 6,259 HIGHWAY DEPT. COST = $ 36,280 ANNUALIZED $ 4,341 O CHANGE OR ACCESS: INPUT ITEM NUM. OR FUNCTION KEY (SEE BELOW) PLUS ENTER. PRINTSTORERECALLHELPGLOBALSI v $DIRSI DEFGRAPHQUIT

Actual Horizontal Offset

Effective Offset Frnd = 1+  slope Efficiency Factors: Es = 1+ slope/0.4 D slope-brake = m (  slope) Slope => Vaulting =>

1. TITLE: 2. TRAFFIC VOLUME = 38,900 VPD - TRAFFIC GROWTH RATE = % PER YEAR 3. DIVIDED HIGHWAY TOTAL LANE(S) = 6 LANE WIDTH = m 4. CURVATURE (RADIUS IN METERS) = %999,999 GRADE (PERCENT) = EFFECTIVE BASELINE CURVATURE GRADE USER TOTAL TRAFFIC VPD ENC/km/YR FACTOR FACTOR FACTOR ENC/km/YR ADJACENT 19, OPPOSING 19, DESIGN SPEED = 70 km/h ENC ANGLE = 12.4 DEG ADT CAP = 23,700 VPD/LANE 7. OFFSET (A) = m LENGTH (L) = m WIDTH (W) = m 8. INITIAL COLLISION FREQUENCY = IMPACTS/YEAR ADJACENT CFTA = CFSU = CFCU = CFFA = OPPOSING CFTO = CFSD = CFCD = CFFO = SEVERITY INDEX = SU= 4.40 SD= 2.00 CU= 4.40 CD= 1.00 FACE= 2.20 ACCIDENT COST $ 238,935 $ 26,940 $ 238,935 $ 10,250 $ 38, PROJECT LIFE = 13 YR DISCOUNT RATE = %/YR TRAFFIC CUTOFF YR = 200 CRF = KC = KT = KJ = INSTALLATION COST = $ 35,000 SALVAGE VALUE = $ 0 2. REPAIR COST/ACC $ SU= 2000 SD= 1000 CU= 2000 CD= 1000 F= MAINTENANCE COST/YR = $ PRESENT WORTH = $ 88,590 ANNUALIZED $ 10,600 ACCIDENT COST = $ 52,310 ANNUALIZED $ 6,259 HIGHWAY DEPT. COST = $ 36,280 ANNUALIZED $ 4,341 O CHANGE OR ACCESS: INPUT ITEM NUM. OR FUNCTION KEY (SEE BELOW) PLUS ENTER. PRINTSTORERECALLHELPGLOBALSI v $DIRSI DEFGRAPHQUIT

1. TITLE: 2. TRAFFIC VOLUME = 38,900 VPD - TRAFFIC GROWTH RATE = % PER YEAR 3. DIVIDED HIGHWAY TOTAL LANE(S) = 6 LANE WIDTH = m 4. CURVATURE (RADIUS IN METERS) = %999,999 GRADE (PERCENT) = EFFECTIVE BASELINE CURVATURE GRADE USER TOTAL TRAFFIC VPD ENC/km/YR FACTOR FACTOR FACTOR ENC/km/YR ADJACENT 19, OPPOSING 19, DESIGN SPEED = 70 km/h ENC ANGLE = 12.4 DEG ADT CAP = 23,700 VPD/LANE 7. OFFSET (A) = m LENGTH (L) = m WIDTH (W) = m 8. INITIAL COLLISION FREQUENCY = IMPACTS/YEAR ADJACENT CFTA = CFSU = CFCU = CFFA = OPPOSING CFTO = CFSD = CFCD = CFFO = SEVERITY INDEX = SU= 4.40 SD= 2.00 CU= 4.40 CD= 1.00 FACE= 2.20 ACCIDENT COST $ 238,935 $ 26,940 $ 238,935 $ 10,250 $ 38, PROJECT LIFE = 13 YR DISCOUNT RATE = %/YR TRAFFIC CUTOFF YR = 200 CRF = KC = KT = KJ = INSTALLATION COST = $ 35,000 SALVAGE VALUE = $ 0 2. REPAIR COST/ACC $ SU= 2000 SD= 1000 CU= 2000 CD= 1000 F= MAINTENANCE COST/YR = $ PRESENT WORTH = $ 88,590 ANNUALIZED $ 10,600 ACCIDENT COST = $ 52,310 ANNUALIZED $ 6,259 HIGHWAY DEPT. COST = $ 36,280 ANNUALIZED $ 4,341 O CHANGE OR ACCESS: INPUT ITEM NUM. OR FUNCTION KEY (SEE BELOW) PLUS ENTER. PRINTSTORERECALLHELPGLOBALSI v $DIRSI DEFGRAPHQUIT

1. TITLE: 2. TRAFFIC VOLUME = 38,900 VPD - TRAFFIC GROWTH RATE = % PER YEAR 3. DIVIDED HIGHWAY TOTAL LANE(S) = 6 LANE WIDTH = m 4. CURVATURE (RADIUS IN METERS) = %999,999 GRADE (PERCENT) = EFFECTIVE BASELINE CURVATURE GRADE USER TOTAL TRAFFIC VPD ENC/km/YR FACTOR FACTOR FACTOR ENC/km/YR ADJACENT 19, OPPOSING 19, DESIGN SPEED = 70 km/h ENC ANGLE = 12.4 DEG ADT CAP = 23,700 VPD/LANE 7. OFFSET (A) = m LENGTH (L) = m WIDTH (W) = m 8. INITIAL COLLISION FREQUENCY = IMPACTS/YEAR ADJACENT CFTA = CFSU = CFCU = CFFA = OPPOSING CFTO = CFSD = CFCD = CFFO = SEVERITY INDEX = SU= 4.40 SD= 2.00 CU= 4.40 CD= 1.00 FACE= 2.20 ACCIDENT COST $ 238,935 $ 26,940 $ 238,935 $ 10,250 $ 38, PROJECT LIFE = 13 YR DISCOUNT RATE = %/YR TRAFFIC CUTOFF YR = 200 CRF = KC = KT = KJ = INSTALLATION COST = $ 35,000 SALVAGE VALUE = $ 0 2. REPAIR COST/ACC $ SU= 2000 SD= 1000 CU= 2000 CD= 1000 F= MAINTENANCE COST/YR = $ PRESENT WORTH = $ 88,590 ANNUALIZED $ 10,600 ACCIDENT COST = $ 52,310 ANNUALIZED $ 6,259 HIGHWAY DEPT. COST = $ 36,280 ANNUALIZED $ 4,341 O CHANGE OR ACCESS: INPUT ITEM NUM. OR FUNCTION KEY (SEE BELOW) PLUS ENTER. PRINTSTORERECALLHELPGLOBALSI v $DIRSI DEFGRAPHQUIT

ROADSIDE 5.0 Condition 1 Acc. Costs 1 Acc. Costs 2 Reduction in Accident Costs Condition 2 Reduction in Accident Costs