OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 1 Development of New Generation Cooperatives in Agriculture for Renewable Energy Research, Development,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Institute of Local and Global Consequence Future of Biofuels in Alabama Larry Fillmer Auburn University.
Advertisements

Office of the Biomass Program Traci Leath U.S. Department of Energy Atlanta Regional Office Southern Bio-Products Conference Biloxi, MS March 4 th, 2004.
ECONOMIC MODELING OF A LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS BIOREFINING INDUSTRY Francis M. Epplin Lawrence D. Mapemba Gelson Tembo Department of Agricultural Economics.
Portfolio of New Bioproducts and Energy Resources from Wood: bio-based chemicals, biofuels/biodiesel, biodegradable plastics/thermoplastic polyesters,
1 South Dakota Energy Infrastructure Authority: Legislative Briefing January 18, 2006 Kevin D. Kephart Vice President for Research Dean, Graduate School.
Abstract Use capacity planning model to design biorefinery o Determine times to build, expand, and number of processes Compare integration versus non-integration.
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Minnesota’s agriculture in a carbon constrained economy Bjorn Gangeness November 27, 2007.
Growing Energy How Biofuels Can Help End America’s Oil Dependence Jeff Fiedler Natural Resources Defense Council March 22, 2005.
Minnesota’s Better Energy Future Mike Bull, Assistant Commissioner, Renewable Energy The Next Generation Energy Initiative.
AfDB Experience in Bioenergy Finance Geoffrey Manley Principal Investment Officer Private sector Operations Department African Development Bank.
Applying Greenhouse Gas Emissions Lifecycle Assessment Jennifer L. Christensen WISE Intern 2009 August 5, 2009.
Bio-energy: Questions Producers Should be Asking Ray Massey University of Missouri Commercial Agriculture Program.
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG REGIO EUROPEAN COMMISSION ‘Bioenergy’ in Cohesion Policy Beth Masterson & Mathieu Fichter.
DOE/USDA Biomass Feedstock Gate Review Meeting March, 2005 Note: Each presentation is allotted 35 minutes; 20 min. for the presentation and 15 min. for.
Renewable Fuels in Minnesota Commissioner Gene Hugoson.
Renewable Fuels in Minnesota Commissioner Gene Hugoson.
Marketing Agreements/Cooperatives United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
Renewable Fuels in Minnesota Commissioner Gene Hugoson.
Opportunities and Challenges of Expanding Agriculture’s Contribution to the Energy Supply Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte University of Tennessee.
Module 1: Understanding Bioenergy Resources
USDA’s Bio-Economic Initiative Algae Biomass Summit San Diego, CA Oct 01, 2014.
Small Farm Profitability: Is Wind Energy the Answer? 1
1 Sustainable Communities Leadership Summit North Little Rock, AR October 16, 2013.
Biofuels Now and Tomorrow Tom Williams National Renewable Energy Laboratory FLC Far West / Mid-Continent Meeting September 2005.
Rick Cruse Iowa Water Center Iowa State University The Bioeconomy: Water Quality Implications Presented at: EPA-State Innovation Symposium January 9, 2008.
Governor’s Ethanol Coalition Biofuels/Biorefinery Update Washington, DC March 1, 2006 William F. Hagy III Deputy Administrator, Business Programs USDA.
Beyond Theory—Creating a New Biomass Energy Market in the Midwest Gary Radloff Midwest Energy Policy Director.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Biofuels in the USA Dennis Ojima.
Pennsylvania Biomass Energy Opportunities. Co-firing Biomass with Coal The opportunity to burn biomass with coal to produce electricity is better in PA.
United States Department of Agriculture Renewable Energy Programs Advance Biofuels Leadership Conference 2011 USDA’s Support For The President’s Clean.
R &D of Biomass Feedstocks for Non-Energy Uses
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses Harry S. Baumes, Ph. D. Associate Director Office of Energy Policy and New Uses Presented.
William Goldner, Ph.D. Chair, Biobased Product and Bioenergy Coordination Council and National Program Leader, Competitive Programs, CSREES and Harry Baumes,
Forest Biomass Sustainability: Policy Themes & Research Needs Alan A. Lucier, Ph.D. Senior Vice President, NCASI FIA User Group Meeting & Biomass / Bioenergy.
1 Sustainable Biomass Feedstock Assessment in the Northeast Sun Grant Region Peter Woodbury, Zia Ahmed, Christian Peters, Jenifer Wightman (Cornell University)
Energy and Products from Agricultural Biomass: Prospects and Issues F. Larry Leistritz Donald M. Senechal Nancy M. Hodur Presented at: IAIA 2007 Conference,
1 Closing the Biomass Power Cost-Price Gap B.R. Bock 3/5/04 Southern Bio-Products Conference Green Power Track Biloxi, MS.
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 1 Hybrid Poplar Production in Minnesota on a Large Scale Mark Downing Agricultural Economist Oak.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
USDA – Strategies for Promoting the Production of Advanced Biofuels Chavonda Jacobs-Young, Ph.D. Advanced Biofuels Leadership Conference April 27, 2010.
L ONG T ERM G LOBAL B IOFUEL P ROJECTIONS W ITH A GRICULTURAL R ESOURCE U SE UNDER D IFFERENT O IL P RICE S CENARIOS John Miranowski Professor of Economics,
Supply chains for the UK to 2050 A. Bauen (*), R. Slade, S. Jablonski and C. Panoutsou The context The aim of this work is to explore the potential for.
America’s Energy Future Presented to: 2006 BIO World Congress America’s Energy Future- Role of Agricultural and Forestry Community July 14, 2006 Toronto,
Estimated Impacts of Attaining 60 Billion Gallons of Ethanol by 2030 on Agriculture and the Nation’s Economy Governor’s Ethanol Coalition Kansas City,
BioEnergy Research Collaborative Tom French Manager - Strategic Programs, SRNL Nick Rigas Director - South Carolina Institute for Energy Studies, Clemson.
Defra Bioenergy Crops R&D Programme Bruno Viegas Sustainable Farming and Food Science Division.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Logistics of Biomass Supply Agricultural crops and residues Shahab Sokhansanj, Ph.D., P.Eng. Bioenergy.
Biomass: New Market for Farmers and Ranchers Roger Johnson, President National Farmers Union USDA Ag Outlook ForumFebruary 25, 2011.
America’s 21st Century Transportation Fuel Ethanol From Biomass.
Growing the New Tomorrow… SowHarvestReap Mesquite Fuels & Agriculture.
National Forest Restoration Working Partnership Grant Multi-collaborative effort to explore the use of woody biomass for cellulosic ethanol development.
APCA Agricultural Policy Options for Improving Energy Crop Economics Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
Governors’ Ethanol Coalition Recommendations: Current Status and Next Steps Farm Bill 2007.
2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review Feedstock Platform Analysis Shahab Sokhansanj, Bob Perlack, Anthony Turhollow November 14, 2005.
An Overview of Oregon Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency Yao Yin.
Commodity vs Value-Added Services: Lost in Translation Commodity vs Value-Added Contractor Services Research Team CII Annual Conference 2005: Research.
SunGrant Feedstock Partnership Woody Crops Program The Woody Biomass Team.
National Institute of Food and Agriculture – USDA Catalyzing Partnerships in Renewable Aviation Fuel Production Systems CAAFI Biennial General Meeting.
Rural Housing Service Rural Utilities Service Rural Business-Cooperative Service USDA Rural Development U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Department of Economics Biofuel Economics Intensive Program in Biorenewables Ames, Iowa June 9, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Biofuel Report Summary Biofuels Team - David Terry Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop Denver,
CriteriaYesNoEffectiveness of CVC 1. Continuity of Participation4100% 2. Representation and Access3175% 3. Self Efficacy4100% 4. Information Exchange and.
Bioenergy Policies Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University June 23, 2008.
Logistical Efficiency with Dedicated Energy Crops
Next Gen. Energy Board By Jerry Larson.
Production and Economics of Perennial-based Woody and Herbaceous Biomass Crops under alley-cropping Systems Gregg Johnson1, David Smith2, Joshua Gamble2,
AFBF Renewable Energy Conference Golden, Colorado August 17, 2005
Session 4: Biofuels: How Feasible Are Large-Scale Goals for Biofuel Penetration in the US and Canada? Ken Andrasko, EPA Session Objectives: Gauge.
Drivers RED Directive 2009/28/EC for 2020
Presentation transcript:

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 1 Development of New Generation Cooperatives in Agriculture for Renewable Energy Research, Development, and Demonstration Projects Mark Downing Agricultural Economist Oak Ridge National Laboratory OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 2 Acknowledgements A diverse presentation such as this one benefits from years of on-going collaboration with a variety of backgrounds and disciplines and circumstances. I would like to thank: Chris Demeter, Janet Cushman, Lynn Wright, Anthony Turhollow, Lynn Kszos, Marie Walsh, Bob Perlack, Rich Bain, Rick Freeman, Gregg Marland, Robin Graham, Ken Campbell, Chris Hanson, Robert Hanson, Bob Hansen, Ralph Overend, Greg Larson, Jerry Tuskan, Tom Kroll, Bill Bergusen, Don Riemenschneider, Dan Langseth, Dan Netzer, Sarah Rensink, Sheila Faber, Michele Bielik, David Cobia, Jim Cooper, C. Philip Baumol, John Ferrell, Steve Hanson, Marvin Duncan, Randall Torgerson, Jerry Nadeau, David Barton, Ralph Groschen. Notwithstanding their invaluable contributions, any mistakes or errors within this presentation remain my own responsibility. The views necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Government, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and UT-Battelle.

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 3 Introduction New Generation Cooperatives Bioenergy cooperatives –Data –Methods –Results Discussion

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 4 Assumptions Closed membership Initial investment equity level high Have the right to deliver Value of delivery rights can appreciate or depreciate

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 Agriculture and Energy Commodity production Co-product or bio-refinery approach Biomass Power for Rural Development Initiative

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 6 Agriculture and Energy Commodity production –Alfalfa stems for power and leaves for meal –Hybrid poplar for co-firing and for wood fiber –Switchgrass for co-firing and as a perennial crop –Willow on non-CRP land and for co-firing

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 7 Agriculture and Energy Biomass Power for Rural Development –Power –Rural development –USDA and DOE joint solicitation –Preceded by 12 paper feasibility studies

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 8 MnVAP Minnesota Valley Alfalfa Producers Cooperative –Duality of alfalfa commodity –Gasification and high-protein leaf-meal –Cooperation with an electric utility – confounded by a state mandate –Production, processing, and marketing

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 9 Prairie Lands Bio-products Market grass crops in southern Iowa Value-added role for switchgrass Ethanol, co-firing with electric, plastics Deal with production, harvesting, and storage

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 Willow Bioenergy Producer’s Cooperative Salix Consortium Co-firing option Non-CRP land in New York State Planting, harvesting, storage, marketing

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 11 Minnesota Agro-Forestry Cooperative Not a Biomass Power for Rural Development offspring –From DOE Feedstock Development Program at ORNL –Fiber commodity, co-firing option second –Compounded issues with electric location –Historical research was tremendous

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 12 Necessary conditions Legislative Long term corporate strategy –Business viability –Economic sustainability Public sector efforts

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 13 Sufficient conditions Specify plant and construction oversight goals Develop a mutually agreeable and defensible mission statement and vision Incorporate planning advisors and consultants Leadership development by producers

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 14 Sufficiency… Commitment by owners Error recognition by management Identification and management of risk Assumption of options Sufficiency of capital Communication in management

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 15 Sufficiency… Securing an appropriate business location Projecting the market(s) accurately Projecting operating costs accurately Assumed reliance on government-based marketing Excessive debt/equity ratio

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 16 Discussion How you set up a cooperative Ability to control production Stock vs non-stock form of business Exclusivity in the farming community Plant and social science research Business culture