Abstract Observed CMB polarization maps can be split into gradient-like (E) and curl- like (B) modes. I review the details of this decomposition, and the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational constraints on primordial perturbations Antony Lewis CITA, Toronto
Advertisements

Observational constraints and cosmological parameters
CMB Power spectrum likelihood approximations
Primordial perturbations and precision cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background Antony Lewis CITA, University of Toronto
Future 21cm surveys and non-Gaussianity Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge work with Anthony Challinor & Richard Shaw.
CMB and cluster lensing Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Lewis & Challinor, Phys. Rept : astro-ph/
Lensing of the CMB Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Review ref: Lewis, Challinor, Phys. Rep: astro-ph/
Weak Lensing of the CMB Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Cosmic Microwave Background Theory Antony Lewis CITA, University of Toronto
Primordial perturbations and precision cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background Antony Lewis CITA, University of Toronto
CMB Constraints on Cosmology Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Foreground cleaning in CMB experiments Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA, Trieste.
Cleaned Three-Year WMAP CMB Map: Magnitude of the Quadrupole and Alignment of Large Scale Modes Chan-Gyung Park, Changbom Park (KIAS), J. Richard Gott.
Systematic effects in cosmic microwave background polarization and power spectrum estimation SKA 2010 Postgraduate Bursary Conference, Stellenbosch Institute.
Phenomenological Classification of Inflationary Potentials Katie Mack (Princeton University) with George Efstathiou (Cambridge University) Efstathiou &
Distinguishing Primordial B Modes from Lensing Section 5: F. Finelli, A. Lewis, M. Bucher, A. Balbi, V. Aquaviva, J. Diego, F. Stivoli Abstract:” If the.
Cosmological Information Ue-Li Pen Tingting Lu Olivier Dore.
Is the Universe homogeneous and isotropic? Marc Kamionkowski (Caltech) Tsvi-fest, 17 December 2009 Statistically.
Component Separation of Polarized Data Application to PLANCK Jonathan Aumont J-F. Macías-Pérez, M. Tristram, D. Santos
The Cosmic Microwave Background. Maxima DASI WMAP.
The Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields: the Vector Curvaton Case Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, Karčiauskas, Lyth, Rodriguez, JCAP 13 (2009)
CMB as a physics laboratory
Added science from improved measurements of T and E modes S. A. Bonometto, E. Branchini, C. Burigana, L. P. L. Colombo, J. M. Diego, R. Fabbri, F. K. Hansen,
CMB polarisation results from QUIET
Foreground limits on the detectability of the B-mode by Bpol Enrique Martínez-González (IFCA) Marco Tucci (IAC) Bpol Meeting, 27-October-2006, Orsay.
Cosmic 21-cm Fluctuations from Dark-Age Gas Kris Sigurdson Institute for Advanced Study Cosmo 2006 September 25, 2006 Kris Sigurdson Institute for Advanced.
Separating Cosmological B-Modes with FastICA Stivoli F. Baccigalupi C. Maino D. Stompor R. Orsay – 15/09/2005.
The CMB and Gravity Waves John Ruhl Case Western Reserve University 3/17/2006, CERCA at St. Thomas.
The Implication of BICEP2 : Alternative Interpretations on its results Seokcheon Lee SNU Seminar Apr. 10 th
Cosmology, University of Bologna – May Cosmology: Polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background Steven T. Myers University of Bologna and the.
Weak Lensing 3 Tom Kitching. Introduction Scope of the lecture Power Spectra of weak lensing Statistics.
Trispectrum Estimator of Primordial Perturbation in Equilateral Type Non-Gaussian Models Keisuke Izumi (泉 圭介) Collaboration with Shuntaro Mizuno Kazuya.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
THE LARGE SCALE CMB CUT-OFF AND THE TENSOR-TO-SCALAR RATIO Gavin Nicholson Imperial College London with Carlo Contaldi Imperial College London (astro-ph/ )
The anisotropic inflation and its imprints on the CMB Kyoto University Masaaki WATANABE Ref: MW, Sugumi Kanno, and Jiro Soda [1] 2009, arXiv:
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us.
Probing fundamental physics with CMB B-modes Cora Dvorkin IAS Harvard (Hubble fellow) Status and Future of Inflationary Theory workshop August 2014, KICP.
Forthcoming CMB experiments and expectations for dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi.
The CMB TE Cross Correlation and Primordial Gravitational Waves Nathan Miller CASS Journal Club 11/6/07.
Cosmology : Cosmic Microwave Background & Large scale structure & Large scale structure Cosmology : Cosmic Microwave Background & Large scale structure.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
CMB as a dark energy probe Carlo Baccigalupi. Outline  Fighting against a cosmological constant  Parametrizing cosmic acceleration  The CMB role in.
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Primordial fluctuations 20  Isotropic 3K background. The most perfect blackbody we know Dipole (3.4 mK). Our motion relative to CMB.
Collaborators within DK-Planck community Lung-Yih Chiang (NBI) Andrei Doroshkevich (TAC,ASC FIRAN) Per Rex Christensen (NBI) Igor D. Novikov ( NBI) Pavel.
Daisuke Yamauchi ICRR, U Tokyo Weak lensing of CMB from cosmic (super-)strings 9/28/2011 Tohoku U with A. Taruya (U Tokyo, RESCEU), T. Namikawa.
JPL, 12 April 2007 Discovering Relic Gravitational Waves in Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation L. P. Grishchuk Cardiff University and Moscow State University.
Adventures in Parameter Estimation Jason Dick University of California, Davis.
Blind Component Separation for Polarized Obseravations of the CMB Jonathan Aumont, Juan-Francisco Macias-Perez Rencontres de Moriond 2006 La.
Can observations look back to the beginning of inflation ?
On the detection of the tensor-to-scalar ratio r using the CMB B-modes
The Cosmic Microwave Background
CMB, lensing, and non-Gaussianities
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
Dominic Galliano Supervisors: Rob Crittenden & Kazuya Koyama UK Cosmo, Tuesday 13 September 2011.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
BICEP2 Results & Its Implication on inflation models and Cosmology Seokcheon Lee 48 th Workshop on Gravitation & NR May. 16 th
Testing Primordial non-Gaussianities in CMB Anisotropies
Observational Cosmology Lab University of Wisconsin-Madison
Dust-polarization maps and interstellar turbulence
Stochastic Background
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
Laurence Perotto; LAL Orsay
Abstract Observed CMB polarization maps can be split into gradient-like (E) and curl-like (B) modes. I review the details of this decomposition, and the.
David Spergel, Paul Bode and Chris Hirata
Non-Gaussianity at low and high multipoles from WMAP data
Separating E and B types of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky Wen Zhao Based on: WZ and D.Baskaran, Phys.Rev.D (2010) 2019/9/3.
Presentation transcript:

Abstract Observed CMB polarization maps can be split into gradient-like (E) and curl- like (B) modes. I review the details of this decomposition, and the physical processes which give rise to the different types of polarization. The B- modes are a sensitive test of primordial gravitational waves as well as other things, and will need to be carefully distinguished from the larger E modes. I describe methods for performing E/B separation of the power spectra, as well as mode separation at the level of the map. I discuss the pros and cons of the various methods.

E/B Separation Antony Lewis CITA, Toronto Stokes parameters and E/B Possible E/B signals E/B separation - power spectrum methods - map-level methods

Polarization: Stokes Parameters - - QU Q -Q, U -U under 90 degree rotation Q U, U -Q under 45 degree rotation Spin-2 field Q + i U or Rank 2 trace free symmetric tensor θ sqrt(Q 2 + U 2 ) θ = ½ tan -1 U/Q

E and B Trace free gradient: E polarization Curl: B polarization 2D vector analogy: e.g.

E and B harmonics Expand scalar P E and P B in spherical harmonics Expand P ab in tensor spherical harmonics Harmonics are orthogonal over the full sky: E/B decomposition is exact and lossless on the full sky Zaldarriaga, Seljak: astro-ph/ Kamionkowski, Kosowsky, Stebbins: astro-ph/

CMB Signals Parity symmetric ensemble: Average over possible realizations (statistically isotropic): E polarization from scalar, vector and tensor modes B polarization only from vector and tensor modes (curl grad = 0) + non-linear scalars Power spectra contain all the useful information if the field is Gaussian

CMB polarization from primordial gravitational waves (tensors) Adiabatic E-mode Tensor B-mode Tensor E-mode Planck noise (optimistic) Weak lensing Amplitude of tensors unknown Clear signal from B modes – there are none from scalar modes Tensor B is always small compared to adiabatic E Seljak, Zaldarriaga: astro-ph/

Weak lensing of scalar mode E polarization Zaldarriaga, Seljak: astro-ph/ ; Hu: astro-ph/ LensPix sky simulation code: Can be largely subtracted if only primordial tensors + lensing Hirata, Seljak : astro-ph/ Okamoto, Hu: astro-ph/ Seljak, Hirata: astro-ph/

Pogosian, Tye, Wasserman, Wyman: hep-th/ Topological defects Seljak, Pen, Turok: astro-ph/ % local strings from brane inflation: lensing r=0.1 global defects: Other B-modes? Non-Gaussian signals

Regular vector mode: neutrino vorticity mode - logical possibility but unmotivated (contrived). Spectrum unknown. Lewis: astro-ph/ Similar to gravitational wave spectrum on large scales: distinctive small scale

Primordial magnetic fields - amplitude possibly right order of magnitude; not well motivated theoretically - contribution from sourced gravity waves (tensors) and vorticity (vectors) e.g. Inhomogeneous field B = 3x10 -9 G, spectral index n = -2.9 Also Faraday rotation B-modes at low frequencies Kosowsky, Loeb: astro-ph/ , Scoccola, Harari, Mollerach: astro-ph/ Lewis, astro-ph/ Subramanian, Seshadri, Barrow, astro-ph/ Tensor amplitude uncertain. Non-Gaussian signal. vectortensor

Inhomogeneous reionization Santon, Cooray, Haiman, Knox, Ma: astro-ph/ ; Hu: astro-ph/ Second order vectors and tensors: Mollerach, Harari, Matarrese: astro-ph/ Small second order effects, e.g. non-Gaussian vectors tensors no reion E lensing reion

Extragalactic radio sources: Tucci et al: astro-ph/ B modes potentially a good diagnostic of foreground subtraction problems or systematics Systematics and foregrounds, e.g. Galactic dust (143 and 217 GHz): Lazarian, Prunet: astro-ph/

B-mode Physics Large scale Gaussian B-modes from primordial gravitational waves: - energy scale of inflation - rule out most ekpyrotic and pure curvaton/ inhomogeneous reheating models and others non-Gaussian B-modes on small and large scales: - expected signal from lensing of CMB - other small second order signals - defects, magnetic fields, primordial vectors - foregrounds, systematics, etc.

Do we need to separate? P(sky|parameters) known, no: - in principle perform optimal parameter estimation without any separation, e.g. obtain P(A T |data) to see whether tensor modes present But: - possible non-Gaussian signal: P(sky|parameters) unknown - may want robust detection of B without assumptions - plot C l BB for visualisation - map of B-modes as diagnostic, for cross-correlation, etc. - if signal is Gaussian, need to prove it first: separation may be first step in rigorous analysis (to B/E or not to B/E?)

Cut sky E/B separation Pure E: Pure B: Without derivatives? Integrate by parts: Pure B in some window function: Separation non-trivial with boundaries Likely important as reionization signal same scale as galactic cut

Harmonics on part of the sky On part of the sky harmonics are not orthogonal: Can define cut-sky harmonic coefficients:

E/B mixing Cut-sky harmonic coefficients mix E and B: Pseudo-C l mix E and B:

Pseudo-C l / correlation function methods Most of the sky: Solve directly for un-mixed C l Kogut et WMAP: astro-ph/ ; Hansen and Gorski: astro-ph/ Equivalently: direct Legendre transform of correlation functions Crittenden, Natarajan, Pen, Theuns: astro-ph/ Chon, Challinor, Prunet, Hivon, Szapudi :astro-ph/ Bit of the sky: Coupling matrix is singular, inversion impossible Equivalently: Only part of correlation function so not Legendre invertible - Construct combination of correlation function integrals to remove mixing: Polarized SPICE

Properties Can achieve exact E/B power spectrum separation on average In any given realization some mixing: feels cosmic variance e.g. estimator is but If B=0 Fast, practical method for estimating separated power spectra: cosmic variance << noise for near future Only measures 2-point information, no guide to map-level separation

Map level E/B separation Circles on the sky In polar co-ordinates Lewis: astro-ph/ Bunn, Zaldarriaga, Tegmark, de Oliveira-Costa: astro-ph/ Lewis, Challinor, Turok: astro-ph/ General methods No cosmic variance: Chiueh, Ma: astro-ph/ ; Zaldarriaga: astro-ph/ About one axis: extracts some of the information, m=0 modes only About every possible axis: complicated, not independent

Real space measures Can measure B without derivatives or line integrals by taking window W so that Lewis, Challinor, Turok: astro-ph/ Bunn, Zaldarriaga, Tegmark, de Oliveira-Costa: astro-ph/ (in general) Find complete set of window functions: extract all the B information

General harmonic separation Extract pure E and B modes from observed cut sky No band limit: optimal result for B is if P - projects out the range of W - : P - can be constructed explicitly by SVD methods (astro-ph/ )

Solution for separation matrix D ii = 1 [D ii = 0] 0 [otherwise] Separation matrix is Want

Properties W - is a boundary integral - equivalent to projecting out line integrals `Ambiguous modes: residuals have E and B, cannot be separated Optimal: extracts all pure B information there is Slow: requires diagonalization of l max 2 x l max 2 matrix in general – computationally impossible unless azimuthally symmetric No assumptions about statistics: can test for Gaussianity etc.

Practical method Most of B from gravity waves on large scales l < 300 for high optical depth most from l < 30 But also E signal on much smaller scales - Impose low band limit by convolution, increase cut size correspondingly - More systematic method: use well supported modes if thenis nearly pure B Diagonalization computationally tractable for l max < 300 or use conjugate gradients Lewis: astro-ph/

Underlying B-modesPart-sky mix with scalar E Recovered B modes map of gravity waves Separation method Observation Lewis: astro-ph/

Conclusions Lots of interesting things to be learnt from B-modes E/B separation trivial on the full sky Separation non-local: mode and C l mixing on the cut sky Power spectrum separation methods simple and fast - cosmic variance, but smaller than noise for near future Map level separation methods - extracts all the B-mode information, not just 2-point - no assumptions about statistics (test for Gaussianity) - practical nearly exact computationally tractable methods available (on large scales; on all scales if azimuthal symmetry) - possible visual diagnostic of systematics etc.

Lewis, Challinor, Turok: astro-ph/