© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How are the number of seats per state assigned by the Constitution?
Advertisements

Appendix 1 The Huntington - Hill Method. The Huntington-Hill method is easily compared to Webster’s method, although the way we round up or down is quite.
+ Apportionment Ch. 14 Finite Math. + The Apportionment Problem An apportionment problem is to round a set of fractions so that their sum is maintained.
The Apportionment Problem Section 9.1. Objectives: 1. Understand and illustrate the Alabama paradox. 2. Understand and illustrate the population paradox.
1 How the Founding Fathers designed algorithms for assigning fair representation for the new United States of America How Will the Next Congress Look?
4.1 Apportionment Problems
Other Paradoxes and Apportionment Methods
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Chapter 1 The Whole Numbers.
Chapter 14: Apportionment Lesson Plan
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Fairness in Apportionment How do you decide whether a method for apportioning representatives is fair?
Chapter 15 Section 4 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 4 Number Representation and Calculation.
Chapter 15: Apportionment
Math for Liberal Studies.  The US Senate has 100 members: two for each state  In the US House of Representatives, states are represented based on population.
Discrete Math CHAPTER FOUR 4.1
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 3 - Slide Election Theory Apportionment Methods.
Chapter 14: Apportionment Lesson Plan
§ Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.3 Apportionment Methods.
Chapter 15: Apportionment
Slide 15-1 Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. SEVENTH EDITION and EXPANDED SEVENTH EDITION.
Dividing Decimals; Average, Median, and Mode
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 5.4 Dividing Decimals.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4.4 Dividing Decimals.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Decimals.
Dividing Decimals by Whole Numbers
Other Apportionment Algorithms and Paradoxes. NC Standard Course of Study Competency Goal 2: The learner will analyze data and apply probability concepts.
The Webster and Hill Method for Apportionment Both are like the Jefferson method.
Chapter 15: Apportionment Part 7: Which Method is Best? Paradoxes of Apportionment and Balinski & Young’s Impossibility Theorem.
 z – Score  Percentiles  Quartiles  A standardized value  A number of standard deviations a given value, x, is above or below the mean  z = (score.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment 4.1Apportionment Problems 4.2Hamilton’s.
HAWKES LEARNING SYSTEMS Students Matter. Success Counts. Copyright © 2013 by Hawkes Learning Systems/Quant Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Section 2.1.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment 4.1Apportionment Problems 4.2Hamilton’s.
Classwork: Please read p in text p. 144 (1, 11, 19a, 23) Homework (Day 14): p. 144 (2, 12, 20b, 24)
Webster and Huntington – Hill Methods (Txt: 4.6, p. 152 & SOL: DM.9) Classwork: p. 147 (43) and p. 161 (15) Homework (day 15): p. 147 (44) and p. 161 (16)
1 Message to the user... The most effective way to use a PowerPoint slide show is to go to “SLIDE SHOW” on the top of the toolbar, and choose “VIEW SHOW”
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Chapter 4: The Mathematics of Sharing 4.6 The Quota Rule and Apportionment Paradoxes.
Getting Your Fair Share Jelly beans, student groups, and Alexander Hamilton Everyone wants to make sure that they get their fair share, but dividing assets.
§ The Population and New-States Paradoxes; Jefferson’s Method.
Chapter 15: Apportionment Part 5: Webster’s Method.
Apportionment There are two critical elements in the dictionary definition of the word apportion : (1) We are dividing and assigning things, and (2) we.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment 4.1Apportionment Problems 4.2Hamilton’s.
1 Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition Peter Tannenbaum.
Chapter 4: The Mathematics of Apportionment. "Representatives...shall be apportioned among the several States, which may be included within this Union,
Independent Practice Problem There are 15 scholarships to be apportioned among 231 English majors, 502 History majors, and 355 Psychology majors. How would.
Apportionment Apportionment means distribution or allotment in proper shares. (related to “Fair Division”)
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment 4.1Apportionment Problems 4.2Hamilton’s.
Apportionment So now you are beginning to see why the method of apportionment was so concerning to the founding fathers……it begs to question, why not just.
AND.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
APPORTIONMENT An APPORTIONMENT PROBLEM:
Chapter 14: Apportionment Lesson Plan
Chapter 14: Apportionment Lesson Plan
Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics
Chapter 15: Apportionment
Chapter 15: Apportionment
Section 15.4 Flaws of the Apportionment Methods
Section 15.3 Apportionment Methods
HAMILTON – JEFFERSON - WEBSTER
Warm Up – 3/7 - Friday Find the Hamilton Apportionment for 200 seats.
Chapter 4—The Mathematics of Apportionment
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Chapter 5 Decimals © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
4 The Mathematics of Apportionment
Warm Up – 3/10 - Monday State A B C D E Population (millions)
Quiz.
Warm Up – 3/13 - Thursday Apportion the classes using Adams Method
Flaws of the Apportionment Methods
Presentation transcript:

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Apportionment Methods

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 3 Objectives 1.Find standard divisors and standard quotas. 2.Understand the apportionment problem. 3.Use Hamilton’s method. 4.Understand the quota rule. 5.Use Jefferson’s method. 6.Use Adam’s method. 7.Use Webster’s method.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 4 Standard Divisors and Standard Quotas Standard Divisors The standard divisor is found by dividing the total population under consideration by the number of items to be allocated. The standard quota for a particular group is found by dividing that group’s population by the standard divisor.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5 Example 1: Finding Standard Quotas The Republic of Margaritaville is composed of four states, A, B, C, and D. The table of each state’s population (in thousands) is given below. StateABCDTotal Population Standard Quota

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 6 The standard quotas are obtained by dividing each state’s population by the standard divisor. We previously computed the standard divisor and found it to be 63. Example 1: Finding Standard Quotas

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 7 Standard quota for state A Standard quota for state B Standard quota for state C Standard quota for state D Example 1: Finding Standard Quotas

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 8 StateABCDTotal Population Standard Quota Notice that the sum of all the standard quotas is 30, the total number of seats in the congress. Example 1: Finding Standard Quotas

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 9 Apportionment Problem The standard quotas represent each state’s exact fair share of the 30 seats for the congress of Margaritaville. –Can state A have 4.37 seats in congress? The apportionment problem is to determine a method for rounding standard quota into whole numbers so that the sum of the numbers is the total number of allocated items. –Can we round standard quotas up or down to the nearest whole number and solve this problem? The lower quota is the standard quota rounded down to the nearest whole number. The upper quota is the standard quota rounded up to the nearest whole number.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 10 Here’s the apportionment problem for Margaritaville. There are four different apportionment methods called Hamilton’s method, Jefferson’s method, Adam’s method, and Webster’s method. Apportionment Problem

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 11 Hamilton’s Method 1.Calculate each group’s standard quota. 2.Round each standard quota down to the nearest whole number, thereby finding the lower quota. Initially, give to each group its lower quota. 3.Give the surplus items, one at a time, to the groups with the largest decimal parts until there are no more surplus items.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 12 Example: Consider the lower quotas for Margaritaville. We have a surplus of 1 seat. The surplus seat goes to the state with the greatest decimal part. The greatest decimal part is 0.38 for state C. Thus, state C receives the additional seat, and is assigned 8 seats in congress. Hamilton’s Method

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 13 A group’s apportionment should be either its upper quota or its lower quota. An apportionment method that guarantees that this will always occur is said to satisfy the quota rule. A group’s final apportionment should either be the nearest upper or lower whole number of its standard quota. The Quota Rule

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 14 Jefferson’s Method 1.Find a modifier divisor, d, such that each group’s modified quota is rounded down to the nearest whole number, the sum of the quotas is the number of items to be apportioned. The modified quotients that are rounded down are called modified lower quotas. 2.Apportion to each group its modified lower quota.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 15 A rapid transit service operates 130 buses along six routes, A, B, C, D, E, and F. The number of buses assigned to each route is based on the average number of daily passengers per route. Use Jefferson’s method with d = 486 to apportion the buses. Example 3: Using Jefferson’s Method Route ABCDEFTotal Average Number of Passengers ,24515, ,000

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 16 Solution: Using d = 486, the table below illustrates Jefferson’s method. Example 3: Using Jefferson’s Method

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 17 Adam’s Method 1.Find a modifier divisor, d, such that when each group’s modified quota is rounded up to the nearest whole number, the sum of the quotas is the number of items to be apportioned. The modified quotients that are rounded up are called modified upper quotas. 2.Apportion to each group its modified upper quota.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 18 A rapid transit service operates 130 buses along six routes, A, B, C, D, E, and F. The number of buses assigned to each route is based on the average number of daily passengers per route. Use Adam’s method to apportion the buses. Example 4: Using Adam’s Method Route ABCDEFTotal Average Number of Passengers ,24515,53522,65065,000

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 19 Solution: We begin by guessing at a possible modified divisor, d, that we hope will work. We guess d = 512. Example 4: Using Adam’s Method

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 20 Because the sum of modified upper quotas is too high, we need to lower the modified quotas. In order to do this, we must try a higher divisor. If we let d = 513, we obtain 129 for the sum of modified upper quotas. Because this sum is too low, we decide to increase the divisor just a bit to d = instead. Example 4: Using Adam’s Method

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 21 Webster’s Method 1.Find a modifier divisor, d, such that when each group’s modified quota is rounded to the nearest whole number, the sum of the quotas is the number of items to be apportioned. The modified quotients that are rounded down are called modified rounded quotas. 2.Apportion to each group its modified rounded quota.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 22 A rapid transit service operates 130 buses along six routes, A, B, C, D, E, and F. The number of buses assigned to each route is based on the average number of daily passengers per route. Use Webster’s method to apportion the buses. Example 5: Using Webster’s Method Route ABCDEFTotal Average Number of Passengers ,24515, ,000

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 23 Solution: We begin by guessing at a possible modified divisor, d, that we hope will work. We guess d = 502, a divisor greater than the standard divisor, 500. We would obtain 129 for the sum of modified rounded quotas. Because 129 is too low, this suggests that d is too large. So, we guess a lower d than 500. Say, d = 498. Example 5: Using Webster’s Method