Horse Creek Damolition Presenters: Matt Stoecker, Stoecker Ecological and Thomas B. Dunklin Productions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
Advertisements

Restore Lawyer Creek Habitat: Targeting Steelhead and Chinook Salmon.
Westland-Ramos Fish Passage and Habitat Restoration Project BPA Project No September 23, 2004 Westland Irrigation District.
Protect and Restore Little Salmon River Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries/Watershed Program By Chad Fealko.
Planning for fish bearing waters between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead.
Middle Fork Project AQ 6 – Fish Passage Technical Study February 3, 2009.
Removal of the Marvel Slab reopens section of the Cahaba River Photos Courtesy of Paul Freeman, The Nature Conservancy BEFORE (October 15, 2004) AFTER.
Aquatic Habitat Guidelines - Stream Restoration Guidelines
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
Restoration Ecology 2011 Bradley Buckallew. Anadromous Born and spend juvenile life in freshwater Venture out into ocean to spend their adult lives Return.
Project Collaboration In 1999, as a result of several years of monitoring of neotropical migratory birds such as the willow flycatcher, Jim Steele from.
Reclamation Case Studies of Dam Removal Cassie C. Klumpp.
Fish Passage in California A Species Perspective Bob Pagliuco Natural Resource Management Specialist National Marine Fisheries Service.
Walker River Basin Research Projects James Thomas, Desert Research Institution.
Stanislaus River An overview…. History and Background One of largest tributaries to San Joaquin River Development of Basin began during the Gold Rush.
Hoover Dam – Colorado River. Reasons for Dams Flood Control 39,000 dams worldwide higher than 15 m (ICOLD, 1988)
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Stock Status of Steelhead In California Katie Perry, California Department of Fish and Game.
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
AFRP Area of Coverage Paynes and Antelope Creek Antelope Creek: 123 square miles Fall-run Chinook, spring-run Chinook, steelhead. 32 miles.
Watershed assessment, management and restoration of Little Kern golden trout in the Little Kern River, California Acknowledgements Assess the current status.
Thomas R. Payne & Associates Update on Flood Storage Fish Study Presented by Paul Schlenger, Bob Montgomery, Jim Shannon June 15, 2011.
Documenting O. mykiss life histories in the White Salmon River prior to the reintroduction of anadromous fish above Condit Dam. Brady Allen and Patrick.
NEWS _menacehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/climate_09_jellyfish _menace
North Bay steelhead: the historical record and implications for restoration Gordon Becker, Senior Scientist Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration.
VILLAGE OF PATCH, NM, FEASIBILITY STUDY Village of Patch Case Study Seattle Environmen tal Planning Class June, 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque.
Insert image in the space below, resize image to fill space as much as possible. Natural & man-made fish passage barriers.
Processing of a Fine Sediment Pulse after Dam Removal Sediment Budget and Longitudinal Trends Chiloquin Dam Removal – Sprague River Matt Cox, Desiree Tullos,
Cape Fear River Fisheries Restoration: An Economic Engine October 31, 2013 Dawn York, Coastal Scientist October 31, 2013 Dawn York, Coastal Scientist.
Zack Larson and Associates. Dual-frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON) is promising new technology for enumerating anadromous fish in rivers. DIDSON.
Evaluation of Fish Passage Improvement Projects in the South Coast and Rogue River Basins Duck Creek Associates Dylan Castle.
San Pedro Creek: A Longitudinal Profile Study Andrew Georgeades Anne Jurek Mary Snow.
The Columbia River Basin Where we’ve been. Where we’re going. October 18, 2005.
Understanding Creeks, Rivers, and Riparian Areas.
Clear and Foster Creek Fish Passage Assessment and Prioritization Project Draft Methodology Report: For the Clear and Foster Creek Fish Passage Assessment.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
US Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District Knife River Reducing Sediment Delivery Through Forest Restoration.
DAM BREAK RISK IN COLOMBIA A Geospatial Assessment of Population Vulnerability from Flood Inundation Eugene Derner, GEOG 594a Spring 2014.
Image or Graphic The Cove Run Brook Trout Restoration Project Presented By: Northern Garrett High School AP Environmental Science Students April 27, 2013.
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
NEWS _menacehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/climate_09_jellyfish _menace
Expected Long Term Site Evolution of Alameda Creek and former Salt Ponds following Tidal Marsh Restoration Matt Wickland Philip.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N The.
Movement of Resident Trout Transplanted Below a Barrier to Anadromy Peggy Wilzbach Mark Ashenfelter USGS California Cooperative Fish Research Unit, Humboldt.
Wetlands Restoration Opportunities in Region 4. Los Angeles River – DeForest Wetlands Currently a flood control detention basin Adjoins the Dominguez.
Hangman Creek Fisheries Enhancement BPA Project & Hangman Restoration Project: Wildlife BPA Project
Okanogan River Fish Update for the IOLBC Okanogan Basin Monitoring and Evaluation Program (OBMEP) Osoyoos Lake Water Science Forum Presenter: John.
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.
San Luis Rey Profile 560 Square miles; 342 below Henshaw Dam; Third largest watershed in San Diego County; 242 tributaries adding up to 759 miles of.
Fish and Game Commission Meeting February 5, 2014 Fisheries Branch Stafford Lehr Request for Emergency Regulatory Action.
Department of Public Works Submittal of Comments to the County of Los Angeles on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and Proposed Alternatives for the.
SONOMA CREEK AND SEDIMENT: KNOWING WHAT WE DON’T KNOW MAY 2011.
Lower Truckee River Bioassessment Symposium January 5 & 6, 2009 Desert Research Institute Status Report on Fish Populations in the Truckee River Matt Maples.
Alameda Creek Watershed San Francisco Public Utilities Commission October 27, 2009.
List 3 reasons why it is important to preserve freshwater fish species.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON CUMULATIVE IMPACTS EXAMPLE.
Salmon and Steelhead Conservation through adaptive management of water levels in the Jenner estuary NOAA’S National Marine Fisheries Service.
Ladd Creek Fish Passage Project
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Salmon Habitat and Still Creek Restoration
Results & Discussion Cont. Acknowledgements & References
a design technique for achieving fish passage
Fish Passage Restoration at Roy’s Pools
Pinole Creek Watershed Fish Passage Improvement Project
Upper Deschutes River Basin Steelhead Reintroduction
Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids
Second Semester Exam Review Day 4
On Recruitment of Steelhead in Mid Columbia Subbasins
Salmon Spawning Habitat and Sediments
Eightmile Creek Barrier Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Horse Creek Damolition Presenters: Matt Stoecker, Stoecker Ecological and Thomas B. Dunklin Productions

Horse Creek Santa Barbara

Sisquoc River Steelhead Barrier Assessment and Recovery 2003  Funded by the Coastal Conservancy  Identified migration barriers  Historic steelhead documentation/current observations  Habitat assessment  Prioritize barriers for fish passage projects  Funded by the Coastal Conservancy  Identified migration barriers  Historic steelhead documentation/current observations  Habitat assessment  Prioritize barriers for fish passage projects

Key Findings  Santa Maria R. was 2nd largest steelhead run in SB Co.  Twitchell Dam (1950’s) blocked 264 miles, Cuyama R.  Majority spawners used Sisquoc R. (Shapovalov, 1945)  Over 203 miles historically accessible in Sisquoc River.  Abundant high quality spawning and rearing habitat.  Historic documentation and current wild O. mykiss population.  31 anthropogenic barriers identified, plus natural barriers.  Horse Creek Dam blocks the most habitat at 19 miles  Most limiting factor to Sisquoc steelhead is reduced surface flow for migration on the Santa Maria River caused by inadequate releases from Twitchell Dam and excessive groundwater withdrawal

Historic Steelhead Documentation  Sisquoc River 1916 (above)  “ The stream is so full of mountain trout. I am confident that we saw in some places more than 500 at one sight….and had no difficulty capturing all we wanted with our hands.” Stephen Bowers 1879

Current Steelhead Documentation

Sisquoc R. Habitat

Sisquoc R. Steelhead Survey 2005  Adult Steelhead over- summering 6 feet down in a cave under this bedrock ledge. Funded by DFG

Looking up Horse Creek Canyon Dam Sisquoc River

Horse Ck. Dam  Built 11/3/1969 after Wellman Fire  Sacrete bags on concrete footing, with re-bar  Dam crest 62 feet  Dam height 10 feet (5’ Dam, 5’ perched)  Filled with sediment  Stream gage, never used  Built 11/3/1969 after Wellman Fire  Sacrete bags on concrete footing, with re-bar  Dam crest 62 feet  Dam height 10 feet (5’ Dam, 5’ perched)  Filled with sediment  Stream gage, never used

Horse Creek Habitat and Barriers  21.8 mi2, ’ elev  Dam 850 feet upstream from Sisquoc River  19 miles of habitat (poor to good) upstream of dam to natural barriers.  Both perennial and intermittent reaches.  No trout observed, Arroyo Chub present.  21.8 mi2, ’ elev  Dam 850 feet upstream from Sisquoc River  19 miles of habitat (poor to good) upstream of dam to natural barriers.  Both perennial and intermittent reaches.  No trout observed, Arroyo Chub present.

Horse Ck. Upstream of the Dam

Also Upstream in Horse Creek

Channel Assessment Study 2005  Funded by American Rivers/NOAA Fisheries  Michael Love and Assoc. and Stoecker Ecological  Longitudinal Profile 2,200’  7 channel cross sections  2 downstream, 1 at dam, 4 upstream  Wolman pebble count of stored sediment 250’ u/s  Funded by American Rivers/NOAA Fisheries  Michael Love and Assoc. and Stoecker Ecological  Longitudinal Profile 2,200’  7 channel cross sections  2 downstream, 1 at dam, 4 upstream  Wolman pebble count of stored sediment 250’ u/s

Plan Map Longitudinal Profile Survey

Sediment Deposit Upstream of Dam Horse Creek

Cross Section at Dam

Downstream Reference Channel

Anticipated Removal Outcome  Channel incision 2,321’ upstream  15,400 cubic yards of sediment u/s mobilized (Annual Sisquoc R. 255, ,000 yd3) 4-6% increase in one year, but will take more  Sediment released relatively course (gravel and cobble) Wolman pebble count.  Minimal to no negative impacts downstream  Unobstructed wildlife/fish passage and improved habitat and surface flow upstream  Channel incision 2,321’ upstream  15,400 cubic yards of sediment u/s mobilized (Annual Sisquoc R. 255, ,000 yd3) 4-6% increase in one year, but will take more  Sediment released relatively course (gravel and cobble) Wolman pebble count.  Minimal to no negative impacts downstream  Unobstructed wildlife/fish passage and improved habitat and surface flow upstream

The Preferred Alternative  Removal  Obsolete  Not consistent with Wilderness and Wild Scenic management  Most effective fish and wildlife passage  Restore surface flows and channel complexity  Inexpensive vs. fishway  Removal  Obsolete  Not consistent with Wilderness and Wild Scenic management  Most effective fish and wildlife passage  Restore surface flows and channel complexity  Inexpensive vs. fishway  Explosives  Staged release of sediment not necessary  No danger to people  Difficult access  Inexpensive vs. heavy equipment  Reduced impact to bank and channel  DFG and CCC technical support and explosives (ammonium nitrate) available for project  Interest in gaining experience/knowledge with this technique

Detonation Cords Going Off

 Coastal Conservancy, Los Padres Nat. Forest, American Rivers, NOAA Fisheries, Dept. Fish and Game, California Conservation Corps, Community Environmental Council, Sisquoc Ranch, Thomas B. Dunklin Productions/Joan Dunning, Stoecker Ecological, Forest Watch

Un-Dam it and they will come!  Matt Stoecker   Photo/Assistance thanks:  Bob, Doug, Jim Stoecker  Thomas Dunklin  Michel Love  Shaw Allen  Kevin Cooper  Tony Llanos  Donna Toth  Matt Stoecker   Photo/Assistance thanks:  Bob, Doug, Jim Stoecker  Thomas Dunklin  Michel Love  Shaw Allen  Kevin Cooper  Tony Llanos  Donna Toth