NSF Site Visit Madison, May 1-2, 2006 Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport R. Kulsrud and H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic Self-organization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plans for Magnetic Reconnection Research Masaaki Yamada Ellen Zweibel for Magnetic Reconnection Working group CMSO Planning Meeting at U. Chicago November.
Advertisements

NONLINEAR COMPUTATION OF LABORATORY DYNAMOS DALTON D. SCHNACK Center for Energy and Space Science Science Applications International Corp. San Diego, CA.
Dynamo Effects in Laboratory Plasmas S.C. Prager University of Wisconsin October, 2003.
Self-consistent mean field forces in two-fluid models of turbulent plasmas C. C. Hegna University of Wisconsin Madison, WI Hall Dynamo Get-together PPPL.
Magnetic Relaxation in MST S. Prager University of Wisconsin and CMSO.
Control of Magnetic Chaos & Self-Organization John Sarff for MST Group CMSO General Meeting Madison, WI August 4-6, 2004.
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.
Madison 2006 Dynamo Fausto Cattaneo ANL - University of Chicago Stewart Prager University of Wisconsin.
Self-consistent mean field forces in two-fluid models of turbulent plasmas C. C. Hegna University of Wisconsin Madison, WI CMSO Meeting Madison, WI August.
Experimental Tests of Two-Fluid Relaxation D. Craig and MST Team University of Wisconsin – Madison General Meeting of the Center for Magnetic Self-Organization.
Dynamo and Magnetic Helicity Flux Hantao Ji CMSO & PPPL CMSO General Meeting Princeton, October 5-7, 2005 Contributors: Eric Blackman (Rochester) Stewart.
Comparing classical and lab plasma dynamos S. Prager University of Wisconsin useful discussions with D. Craig, H. Ji, J. Sarff, E. Zweibel.
Magnetic Chaos and Transport Paul Terry and Leonid Malyshkin, group leaders with active participation from MST group, Chicago group, MRX, Wisconsin astrophysics.
Anomalous Ion Heating Status and Research Plan
General Meeting Madison, August 4-6, 2004 Plans and Progress of Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic.
Basic Plasma Physics Principles Gordon Emslie Oklahoma State University.
Results from Magnetic Reconnection Experiment And Possible Application to Solar B program For Solar B Science meeting, Kyoto, Japan November 8-11, 2005.
MHD Concepts and Equations Handout – Walk-through.
Momentum Transport During Reconnection Events in the MST Reversed Field Pinch Alexey Kuritsyn In collaboration with A.F. Almagri, D.L. Brower, W.X. Ding,
MHD modeling of coronal disturbances related to CME lift-off J. Pomoell 1, R. Vainio 1, S. Pohjolainen 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki.
PHY 042: Electricity and Magnetism Energy of an E field Prof. Hugo Beauchemin 1.
Continuum Mechanics General Principles M. Ali Etaati Eindhoven University of Technology Math. & Computer Science Dept. CASA Apr
What can helicity redistribution in solar eruptions tell us about reconnection in these events? by Brian Welsch, JSPS Fellow (Short-Term ), Space Sciences.
Sept. 12, 2006 Relationship Between Particle Acceleration and Magnetic Reconnection.
Fluid Kinematics Fluid Dynamics . Fluid Flow Concepts and Reynolds Transport Theorem ä Descriptions of: ä fluid motion ä fluid flows ä temporal and spatial.
New England Space Science Meeting 3 Feb 1, 2006 Implications of Reconnection Nathan Schwadron Feb 1, 2006.
Free Energies via Velocity Estimates B.T. Welsch & G.H. Fisher, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Helicity • Magnetic helicity measures
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Summary of UCB MURI workshop on vector magnetograms Have picked 2 observed events for targeted study and modeling: AR8210 (May 1, 1998), and AR8038 (May.
§7.1 EMF and Ohm’s Law Christopher Crawford PHY
Chapter 7 Electrodynamics
Usually a diluted salt solution chemical decomposition
Challenging problems in kinetic simulation of turbulence and transport in tokamaks Yang Chen Center for Integrated Plasma Studies University of Colorado.
Multiscale issues in modeling magnetic reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland IPAM Meeting on Multiscale Problems in Fusion Plasmas January 10,
Boundaries, shocks, and discontinuities. How discontinuities form Often due to “wave steepening” Example in ordinary fluid: –V s 2 = dP/d  m –P/  
Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
Angular momentum conservation: 1
ME 254. Chapter I Integral Relations for a Control Volume An engineering science like fluid dynamics rests on foundations comprising both theory and experiment.
CSI /PHYS Solar Atmosphere Fall 2004 Lecture 09 Oct. 27, 2004 Ideal MHD, MHD Waves and Coronal Heating.
Overshoot at the base of the solar convection zone What can we learn from numerical simulations? Matthias Rempel HAO / NCAR.
1 Non-neutral Plasma Shock HU Xiwei (胡希伟) 工 HU Xiwei (胡希伟) HE Yong (何勇) HE Yong (何勇) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Huazhong University of Science and.
Nonlinear interactions between micro-turbulence and macro-scale MHD A. Ishizawa, N. Nakajima, M. Okamoto, J. Ramos* National Institute for Fusion Science.
3D simulations of solar emerging flux ISOBE Hiroaki Plasma seminar 2004/04/28.
Turbulent Dynamos: How I learned to ignore kinematic dynamo theory MFUV 2015 With Amir Jafari and Ben Jackel.
II. MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (Space Climate School, Lapland, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
1 Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
New England Space Science Meeting 3 Feb 1, 2006 Implications of Reconnection Nathan Schwadron Feb 1, 2006.
IB Assessment Statements  Electric Potential Difference  Define electric potential difference.  Determine the change in potential energy.
MHD and Kinetics Workshop February 2008 Magnetic reconnection in solar theory: MHD vs Kinetics Philippa Browning, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics,
Electrostatics Chapter Properties of Physical Objects Mass/Inertial: – Gravity mass: inertia in gravitational interaction – Kinetic mass: inertia.
Centre for Astrophysics Space- and time-dependent heating of solar coronal loops S. W. Higgins & R. W. Walsh
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2011, Salt Lake City, Utah When the total flow will move approximately along the.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
Electromagnetic Induction. Magnetic Flux The magnetic flux is important in understanding electromagnetic induction. The magnetic flux (Φ) is a measure.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
Coronal Mass Ejection: Initiation, Magnetic Helicity, and Flux Ropes. L. Boundary Motion-Driven Evolution Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic,
Solar Magnetic Fields. Capacitors in Circuits Charge takes time to move through wire  V is felt at the speed of light, however Change in potential across.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
Introduction to Space Weather
Christopher Crawford PHY
Introduction to Space Weather
Fluid Kinematics Fluid Dynamics.
ELL100: INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRICAL ENG.
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
Presentation transcript:

NSF Site Visit Madison, May 1-2, 2006 Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport R. Kulsrud and H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic Self-organization

Major Goals I.Study basic properties of magnetic helicity. II.Determine role of helicity conservation and transport during magnetic self-organization. III.Assess applicabilities of the helicity concept to astrophysical circumstances. Is magnetic helicity really conserved in reality? Can the concept of helicity be extended to 2-fluid plasmas? Can the helicity conservation illuminate dynamo process? How is the helicity related to solar dynamo, flares, and CMEs (coronal mass ejections)?

Introduction: Magnetic Helicity There are many flux conserving quantities (e.g. the flux point mappings for the coronal field). Only one can be expressed simply: magnetic helicity, where A is the vector potential: A=B. Conservation of magnetic helicity is a key element of the concept of magnetic self-organization.

Physical Interpretation of Helicity Helicity represents the amount of flux linkages between pairs of lines. Consider two flux tubes 1 and 2. In first volume since the integral is the flux in the second tube by Stokes theorem. Similarly for the second volume so the total helicity is simply If the loops were not linked, K=0. Gauge invariant definitions exist.

Major Goals I.Study basic properties of magnetic helicity. II.Determine role of helicity conservation and transport during magnetic self-organization. III.Assess applicabilities of the helicity concept to astrophysical circumstances. Is magnetic helicity really conserved in reality? Can the concept of helicity be extended to 2-fluid plasmas? Can the helicity conservation illuminate dynamo process? How is the helicity related to solar dynamo, flares, and CMEs (coronal mass ejections)?

Test Helicity Conservation in Simulation and MST (Horiuchi & Sato, 88) MHD simulation: MST experiment: Internal + external measurements

Helicities in 2-fluid Plasmas Self-helicities: Electron-helicity reduces to magnetic helicity when size is larger than electron skin depth (c/w pe ). Ion-helicity will be significantly different from magnetic helicity if ion flow is large (e.g. Alfvenic) Different relaxed states under conservation of these helicities canonical momentum: =e,i: ( Steinhauer & Ishida, 1998; Mahajan &Yoshida, 1998; Hegna, 1998)

Parallel Flow Profile Appears to Become More Uniform During Relaxation in MST Will be studied also numerically using 2-fluid code and PIC code

Major Goals I.Study basic properties of magnetic helicity. II.Determine role of helicity conservation and transport during magnetic self-organization. III.Assess applicabilities of the helicity concept to astrophysical circumstances. Is magnetic helicity really conserved in reality? Can the concept of helicity be extended to 2-fluid plasmas? Can the helicity conservation illuminate dynamo process? How is the helicity related to solar dynamo, flares, and CMEs (coronal mass ejections)?

Helicity Conservation and Dynamo Large-scale magnetic field is generated by the -effect. Most such large-scale magnetic field contains helicity (e.g. solar magnetic field). However, the total helicity should be conserved for timescales shorter than the resistive time. Two possibilities: –Transport helicity across scales. –Transport helicity across space. Lab

K Transported Outward While W Dissipated Locally during Relaxation in MST

Helicity Transport Driven by Fluctuations The required helicity flux across the r = b surface can be quantified by evaluating each of three parts: Helicity flux due to fluctuations: outward helicity transport

Fluctuations Also Drive a Nonzero - Effect in Mean Ohms Law Electric field mostly electrostatic

-effect Closely Related to Helicity Flux Averaging is taken in the periodic direction(s) Helicity flux points towards the un-averaged direction(s). Thus, limiting helicity transport can affect -effect

Major Goals I.Study basic properties of magnetic helicity. II.Determine role of helicity conservation and transport during magnetic self-organization. III.Assess applicabilities of the helicity concept to astrophysical circumstances. Is magnetic helicity really conserved in reality? Can the concept of helicity be extended to 2-fluid plasmas? Can the helicity conservation illuminate dynamo process? How is the helicity related to solar dynamo, flares, and CMEs (coronal mass ejections)?

Motivations to Study Helicity in Solar Physics Most large-scale magnetic field contains helicity (e.g. S and reversed S loops). Why solar flares are sporadic in space and intermittent in time with constant shearing motion of magnetic field on the surface? – Related to helicity flux? Helicity piling up is a reason for CME? Closely related to the solar dynamo process Correlations found between helicity flux and X-ray flux (Kusano et al.)

Major Goals : Summary and Plans I.Study basic properties of magnetic helicity. II.Determine role of helicity conservation and transport during magnetic self-organization. III.Assess applicabilities of the helicity concept to astrophysical circumstances. Assessments of helicity concept, its conservation, and its extensions to 2-fluid plasmas. More data expected from experiments and simulations Experimental verification of relation between magnetic helicity transport and -effect. Further study by AC helicity injection experiments Evaluation of role of magnetic energy and helicity during solar flares and CMEs.

END