Dynamo Effects in Laboratory Plasmas S.C. Prager University of Wisconsin October, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Site Visit Madison, May 1-2, 2006 Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport R. Kulsrud and H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic Self-organization.
Advertisements

Statistical Properties of Broadband Magnetic Turbulence in the Reversed Field Pinch John Sarff D. Craig, L. Frassinetti 1, L. Marrelli 1, P. Martin 1,
NONLINEAR COMPUTATION OF LABORATORY DYNAMOS DALTON D. SCHNACK Center for Energy and Space Science Science Applications International Corp. San Diego, CA.
Experimental Measurements of Non- MHD Dynamo Effects Summarized by S.C. Prager.
Self-consistent mean field forces in two-fluid models of turbulent plasmas C. C. Hegna University of Wisconsin Madison, WI Hall Dynamo Get-together PPPL.
P.W. Terry K.W. Smith University of Wisconsin-Madison Outline
Magnetic Relaxation in MST S. Prager University of Wisconsin and CMSO.
Exploring reconnection physics in SSPX and NIMROD Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA Center for Magnetic Self Organization La Jolla,
Turbulent transport of magnetic fields Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical.
Ion Heating Presented by Gennady Fiksel, UW-Madison for CMSO review panel May 1-2, 2006, Madison.
Control of Magnetic Chaos & Self-Organization John Sarff for MST Group CMSO General Meeting Madison, WI August 4-6, 2004.
Plans for Dynamo Research Presented by F. Cattaneo, S. Prager.
Outline: I. Introduction, background, and examples of momentum transport II. Momentum transport physics topics being addressed by CMSO - Physics, Plans,
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.
Outline: I. Introduction and examples of momentum transport II. Momentum transport physics topics being addressed by CMSO III. Selected highlights and.
Madison 2006 Dynamo Fausto Cattaneo ANL - University of Chicago Stewart Prager University of Wisconsin.
Magnetic Turbulence in MRX (for discussions on a possible cross-cutting theme to relate turbulence, reconnection, and particle heating) PFC Planning Meeting.
Collaborators: Jungyeon Cho --- Chungnam U.
Hall-MHD simulations of counter- helicity spheromak merging by E. Belova PPPL October 6, 2005 CMSO General Meeting.
Ion Heating and Velocity Fluctuation Measurements in MST Sanjay Gangadhara, Darren Craig, David Ennis, Gennady Fiskel and the MST team University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Self-consistent mean field forces in two-fluid models of turbulent plasmas C. C. Hegna University of Wisconsin Madison, WI CMSO Meeting Madison, WI August.
CMSO 2005 Mean field dynamos: analytical and numerical results Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic-Self Organization and Department.
The solar dynamo(s) Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas Chicago 2003.
Experimental Tests of Two-Fluid Relaxation D. Craig and MST Team University of Wisconsin – Madison General Meeting of the Center for Magnetic Self-Organization.
Dynamo and Magnetic Helicity Flux Hantao Ji CMSO & PPPL CMSO General Meeting Princeton, October 5-7, 2005 Contributors: Eric Blackman (Rochester) Stewart.
Comparing classical and lab plasma dynamos S. Prager University of Wisconsin useful discussions with D. Craig, H. Ji, J. Sarff, E. Zweibel.
Multiple reconnections and explosive events and in MST and solar flares Gennady Fiksel CMSO workshop, Princeton, NJ, Oct 5-8, 2005.
Magnetic Chaos and Transport Paul Terry and Leonid Malyshkin, group leaders with active participation from MST group, Chicago group, MRX, Wisconsin astrophysics.
MHD Dynamos in the Lab and Dynamos Beyond MHD. The lab plasma dynamo does Generate current locally Increase toroidal magnetic flux Conserve magnetic helicity.
Anomalous Ion Heating Status and Research Plan
Some New Data From FRC Experiment on Relaxation For discussions at Hall-Dynamo and Related Physics meeting CMSO June 10-11, 2004 at PPPL Guo et al, PRL.
Ideas for overseas contributions to CMSO Piero Martin Consorzio RFX Associazione Euratom-ENEA sulla fusione And Physics Dept., Univ. of Padova, Italy CMSO.
Outline Dynamo: theoretical General considerations and plans Progress report Dynamo action associated with astrophysical jets Progress report Dynamo: experiment.
Results from Magnetic Reconnection Experiment And Possible Application to Solar B program For Solar B Science meeting, Kyoto, Japan November 8-11, 2005.
Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.
September 2005 Magnetic field excitation in galaxies.
Charge-Exchange Spectroscopy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Mark Nornberg Santhosh Kumar, Daniel Den Hartog Alexis Briesemeister 2012 ADAS Workshop.
The UW Plasma Physics Group Clint Sprott, Paul Terry, Ellen Zweibel, Stas Boldyrev, Dalton Schnack, Cary Forest, Stewart Prager Presented to Introductory.
MHD Concepts and Equations Handout – Walk-through.
Momentum Transport During Reconnection Events in the MST Reversed Field Pinch Alexey Kuritsyn In collaboration with A.F. Almagri, D.L. Brower, W.X. Ding,
INTRODUCTION OF WAVE-PARTICLE RESONANCE IN TOKAMAKS J.Q. Dong Southwestern Institute of Physics Chengdu, China International School on Plasma Turbulence.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP Abstract Measurements of the radial equilibrium potential profiles have been successfully obtained with a Heavy Ion Beam Probe.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8: Conserved quantities / mirror / tokamak.
Non-disruptive MHD Dynamics in Inward-shifted LHD Configurations 1.Introduction 2.RMHD simulation 3.DNS of full 3D MHD 4. Summary MIURA, H., ICHIGUCHI,
Center for Multi-scale Plasma Dynamics. Bill Dorland, Maryland.
MMFW Madison, Wisconsin 6 May 2011 D.J. Den Hartog, R. M. Magee, S.T.A. Kumar, V.V. Mirnov (University of Wisconsin–Madison) D. Craig (Wheaton College)
Chapter 5 Diffusion and resistivity
Kinetic Effects on the Linear and Nonlinear Stability Properties of Field- Reversed Configurations E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 APS DPP Meeting, October 2003.
Multiscale issues in modeling magnetic reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland IPAM Meeting on Multiscale Problems in Fusion Plasmas January 10,
Effect of Magnetic Helicity on Non-Helical Turbulent Dynamos N. KLEEORIN and I. ROGACHEVSKII Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, ISRAEL.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP E ~ 0 V/m in Locked Discharges Average potential ~ 580 V  ~ V less than in standard rotating plasmas Drop in potential.
Stability Properties of Field-Reversed Configurations (FRC) E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 International Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference Corpus Christi, TX,
Tech-X Corporation1 Boundary Conditions In the NIMROD Code S.E. Kruger Tech-X Corporation D.D. Schnack U.W. - Madison.
Turbulent Dynamos: How I learned to ignore kinematic dynamo theory MFUV 2015 With Amir Jafari and Ben Jackel.
1 Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive.
Hiroshi Tojo, IAEA TM/ISTW2008, Frascati, Italy, October 2008 Features of High Frequency Mode during Internal Reconnection Events on MAST Graduate School.
Weixing Ding University of California, Los Angeles,USA collaborators: D.L. Brower, W. Bergerson, D. Craig, D. Demers, G.Fiksel, D.J. Den Hartog, J. Reusch,
MHD and Kinetics Workshop February 2008 Magnetic reconnection in solar theory: MHD vs Kinetics Philippa Browning, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics,
The Joint Meeting of 4th IAEA Technical Meeting on Spherical Tori and 14th International Workshop on Spherical TorusFrascati, 7 to 10 October Ideal.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
Turbulent Convection and Anomalous Cross-Field Transport in Mirror Plasmas V.P. Pastukhov and N.V. Chudin.
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Chicago, Illinois Non-symmetric components were intentionally added to the.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2011, Salt Lake City, Utah When the total flow will move approximately along the.
Simulation of Turbulence in FTU M. Romanelli, M De Benedetti, A Thyagaraja* *UKAEA, Culham Sciance Centre, UK Associazione.
IAEA-TM 02/03/2005 1G. Falchetto DRFC, CEA-Cadarache Association EURATOM-CEA NON-LINEAR FLUID SIMULATIONS of THE EFFECT of ROTATION on ION HEAT TURBULENT.
= Boozer g= 2*1e -7 *48*14*5361 =.7205 =0 in net current free stellarator, but not a tokamak. QHS Mirror Predicted Separatrix Position Measurements and.
Plasma Turbulence in the HSX Stellarator Experiment and Probes C. Lechte, W. Guttenfelder, K. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, D.T. Anderson HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Plan V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, , Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.Petersburg, Russia Poloidal and Toroidal.
Huishan Cai, Jintao Cao, Ding Li
Characteristics of Biased Electrode Discharges in HSX
Presentation transcript:

Dynamo Effects in Laboratory Plasmas S.C. Prager University of Wisconsin October, 2003

The lab plasma dynamo does Generate current locally Increase toroidal magnetic flux Conserve magnetic helicity Act through alpha and other effects Arise from fluctuations superposed on the mean field Achieve a nonlinearly saturated steady state (with full backreaction) The lab plasma dynamo does NOT Generate magnetic field from a small seed field Increase magnetic energy (it redistributes magnetic field)

The toroidal magnetic field is measured by the safety factor q weak field, large fluctuations self-organized strong field, small fluctuations externally controlled Dynamo and self-organization occurs in laboratory plasmas with weak toroidal magnetic field

Examples: reversed field pinch (RFP) spheromak The RFP: toroidal plasma with helical magnetic field apply toroidal electric field E T --> j T --> B P --> J P

The RFP Today, approximate as cylinder

The MST Experiment (Madison Symmetric Torus) T ~ 1 keV; n ~10 13 cm -3 ; I ~ 0.5 MA, S ~ 10 6

The Spheromak a compact torus

Outline Evidence for field generation The standard MHD model The backreaction Measurements of the MHD dynamo Dynamo effects beyond MHD (measurements) Open issues and relation to astrophysics

Evidence of field generation Cowlings Theorem Toroidal flux generation Ohms law

Cowlings theorem applied to the RFP A time-independent, cylindrically symmetric plasma cannot contain a reversed magnetic field Proof: assume B z is reversed. at the radius where B z = 0 Thus, magnetic flux decays within reversal surface, in constrast to experiment BzBz r

in experiment E || j || radius additional current drive mechanism (dynamo)

The Standard MHD model Mean field ohms law dynamo effect For high conductivity, Lab: from tearing instability (reconnection) Astrophysics: from convection, rotation…

The nonlinear dynamo energy source instability dynamo Quasilinear theory: current diffusion Nonlinear MHD computation: a complete description (Bhattacharjee, Hamieri; Strauss;Boozer…..)

yields a collection of spatial Fourier modes (~R/a) z r Flow vectors In poloidal plane: 2 counter-rotating vortices, in toroidal plane: more complicated magnetic field: stochastic

Nonlinear MHD Computation radius

The Lab Dynamo and the Backreaction The lab dynamo is strong, with the backreaction, self-induced Compare with backreaction theories predicting dynamo suppression (Cattaneo/Vainshtein, Kulsrud/Hahm, Gruzinov/Diamond, Bhattacharjee) From Pouquet et al., for isotropic, homogenous turbulence backreaction

Combining two equations, large resistivity -suppression with small resistivity No obvious suppression, laboratory regime, Astrophysical regime???

Measurements of MHD dynamo Measure each term in Ohms law In the hot core passive spectroscopy, active spectroscopy (under development) (charge exchange recombination spectroscopy) (den Hartog, Craig, Ennis) Laser Faraday rotation (Ding, Brower, UCLA) Motional Stark effect (Craig, den Hartog, under development In the cool edge Insertable probes: magnetic, Langmuir (E), spectroscopic

Active Spectroscopy

3-Wave Polarimeter-Interferometer System MST R 0 = 1.50 m a = 0.52 m I p = 400 kA n e ~ m -3 B 0 ~ 4 kG Faraday rotation/interferometer system

Spectroscopic probe

Measure quantities during discrete dynamo event Toroidal Magnetic Flux (Wb) MST time (ms)

Flow velocity fluctuations

time (ms) r/a = 0.9 MHD dynamo dominant at some radii, not everywhere r/a = 0.8 Measurement of MHD dynamo Volts m Volts m time (ms) r/a = 0.9 r/a = 0.8

Dynamo Effects Beyond MHD Hall dynamo Diamagnetic dynamo Kinetic dynamo (current transport)

Hall dynamo: a two-fluid effect MHD dynamo Hall dynamo Two fluid effects also alter the dynamo

Quasilinear Theory of Hall Dynamo Three layer analysis Ideal MHD v e ~ v i Ideal two-fluid v e ~ v i distance from reconnection layer 0 d R, d e s Resistive two- fluid v i ~ 0 V. Mirnov

For experimental parameters distance from resonant surface dede s

Faraday rotation angle time (ms) 2426 Magnetic fluctuations Measuring fluctuations with Faraday rotation

Time Evolution of Current Density Fluctuation

m = 1, n = 6 The reconnection current sheet

Hall Dynamo Measurements W. Ding et al

Hall dynamo localized in radius

The diamagnetic dynamo parallel component of mean-fields, or, writing yields MHD dynamo diamagnetic dynamo

Measurement of diamagnetic dynamo Ji et al TPE-1RM20 RFP Different dynamo mechanisms dominate in different parameter regimes

Kinetic Dynamo Radial transport of parallel current (electron momentum) by particle motion along stochastic magnetic field Can show, radial flux of parallel current ~ not yet measured

Open questions ( and relation to astrophysics) Nonlinear aspects of MHD dynamo Is nonlinear physics of growing field similar to that of steady state dynamo Does strong dynamo effect in lab have implication for astrophysical dynamo saturation? What is the role of reconnection in astrophysical dynamos? Does current (magnetic field) transport play a role in astrophysics? What is role of nonlinear coupling in altering wave functions near reconnection surface?(Need a nonlinear theory)

Non-MHD effects What are the relative contributions of the various mechanisms? Dependence on parameters? Does the detailed mechanism matter? Are non-MHD mechanisms active in astrophysics?