1 9.09 Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE PRoBE Presentation Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations Study Skills for Third Graders.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report to the KSD Board June 9, Provide Kent School District the necessary guidance and assistance to create an equitable, academically enriching,
Advertisements

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
SCHOOL COUNSELING Fran Hensley, M.A.Ed. School Counselor
Individual Behavior Improvement Intervention Cara Roberts COU 783, Fall 2011 Missouri State University.
School Counseling and Guidance Program Intentional Guidance (Results sample)
Freshman On Track Chicago Public Schools Freshman Connections: A Strategic Approach US Department of Education College Access Affinity Group April 30 th,
Dr. Laura Taylor: Assistant Superintendent Mr. Orlando Thomas: Director CHAMPAIGN UNIT 4 SCHOOL DISTRICT DISCIPLINE FROM A SOCIAL JUSTICE LENS.
Questionnaire Report for Grades 6 to12 Eanes Independent Schools.
Materials Support Assessment Professional Development Community/ Administrative Involvement Curriculum Materials Science: It’s Elementary Bringing science.
PRoBE Presentation Anger Group Michelle Peters. SIMS S tudents, I nterventions, M easurements, S ettings  Students—Fourth and Fifth Grade students who.
P ROBE P RESENTATION Missouri State University In partial fulfillment for School Counselor Internship COU 783 Greta Carpenter Fall 2009 Dr. Marci Dowdy,
PRoBE Presentation Partnerships for Results Based Evaluation Social Skills 7 th and 8 th Grade Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements.
International Conference on Lifelong Leaning ICLLL 2011
Improving Self-esteem in 6 th Grade Girls By: Kimberly Ramacciotti Missouri State University Fall 2009 Conducted at Carver Middle School.
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
PST Problem Solving Team Meetings Denita Reed Lynda Carroll.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
PRoBE Presentation 6 th grade Study Skills Kristin Budzyna Cherokee Middle School Springfield Public Schools COU 783, Spring 2010.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Learn How to Complete the ACE & Get a College Credit Too.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
PRoBE Presentation Partnerships for Results Based Evaluation Improving a Child’s Self-Esteem 2 nd and 3 rd grade Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment.
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
EDUCATIONAL COUNSULTANCY SERVICES
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
By Shawn Wallace COU 781 Fall 2011 Dr. Dowdy.  Reclassified freshmen are students who did not pass a minimum of 5 credits during their first year in.
GIFTED PROGRAM EVALUATION LONG BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT DEBORAH HOLT LBSD GIFTED COORDINATOR JUNE 25, 2013.
How does your program define and measure success? o School counselors get evaluated once a year by a supervisor; mainly the school principle o Teachers.
SLLA Test Prep Session #2 November 2008 Dr. Tamerin Capellino.
Student Support Team (SST) Training A Humanware Strategic Plan Activity Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
1 PROBE Missouri State University in partial fulfillment of COU 781-Secondary Field Experience Dr. Marci Dowdy.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Small Group Counseling Center City Public Charter Schools District-Wide Professional Development March 14, 2014 Presenters: Natalie Battle Connie Ward.
Virginia WebEx Program Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Chapter 13 Working with Parents. Introduction  Increased stressors on today’s families impact children  Childhood stress, depression, and suicide are.
Hammarskjold Middle School Supporting Students Interventions.
What should we expect from 2 nd year students? A realistic approach. Tuesday 25 th February 2014 Tutor CPD Seminar.
Samantha Crawford Sigmon 170 Gaywood Drive Bassett, VA
Problem Solving December 17, 2012 Aubrey Tardy Michelle Urbanek.
In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for Secondary Field Experience Missouri State University Fall 2009 Dr. Marci Dowdy, Faculty.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
High Schools That Work An evidence-based design for improving the nation’s schools and raising student achievement.
The School Counseling Program
Wiki High School Comprehensive School Counseling Program
Ekaterina P. Forrester, Ph.D.
IMPROVING THE ROLE OF GENERAL EDUCATION TEACHERS TO PARTICIPATE MEANINGFULLY IN INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAMS Tanya Gonzales, M.Ed. SWTLC, April 2014.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Using Data in a School Counseling Program Miss M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School.
Johnson Middle School Johnson Middle School SCHOOL PROFILE 700 Student Population Virginia Public Schools Grades Number of Classrooms:28.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT  EDU 320 Week 1 Individual Assignment Personal Philosophy Paper  EDU 320 Week 1 DQ 1  EDU 320 Week 1 DQ.
Internship Experience
University of Southern Mississippi
PRoBE Missouri State University
Missouri Comprehensive Guidance Program
Third Grade Behavior Intervention
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Board Presentations Protocol:
PRoBE Presentation 1st Grade Self-Control Group
3rd Grade Homework Club Missouri State University
WCPSS 3rd Grade Explorers
The Counseling Department’s
NICKAJACK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL School Counseling Advisory Council
Can E-learning Replace the Traditional Classroom
Study Skills Probe Fall 2009
Counseling Review: Second-Grade Tier 2 Intervention
University of Southern Mississippi
Presentation transcript:

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE PRoBE Presentation Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations Study Skills for Third Graders Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Counselor Internship COU 783 Mike Wills Fall 2009 Dr. Marci Dowdy, Faculty

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE STUDY SKILLS INTERVENTION Office of Counseling Rountree Elementary School Springfield, Missouri Public Schools Judith Johnson, Professional Counselor Mike Wills, Counselor-In-Training

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Purpose Statement  Strong study skills are needed by all students.  Group will help students to develop study skills necessary to improve academic achievement and test performance.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Description (SIMS Model)  Students—Referred and selected by teachers and counselor.  Intervention—Structured study group.  Measurements—Tests, Grades, Student Perceptions, Attendance, Discipline.  Setting—Counselor’s Office.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Student Selection  Teacher Recommended.  Counselor Recommended.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Participants  Five Students: Third Grade Class 1.Female, black 2.Male, white 3.Male, white 4.Female, white 5.Male, white, Shows ADHD/Autism Characteristics 6. Male, black, Dropped/Moved from district

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Goals of Study Group  Identification of study skills.  Development of study skills.  Implementation of study skills.  Positive interactions among students with common needs.  Improvement of academic achievement and test performance.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Pre-Group Preparation  Defined as a six to seven week group.  Interview/screening completed for all group members.  Invitations extended to all group members.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Pre-Group Preparation Continued  Met with group members.  Lesson Plans.  Pre-Test.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Program Intervention: Group Sessions Session 1: Introduction—Ice Breakers, Group Rules, Expectations Session 2: Keys to Learning: Pre-Tests, Skills Poster Session 3: Study Skills: Clutter Control/Environment Session 4: Investigating for Understanding: Table of Contents, Glossary, Index, Bold Type—Science Textbook Session 5: Finding the Facts: Who, What, When, Where, Why, How—Martin’s Big Words Session 6: Post-Tests Session 7: Closure

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Data  Performance Assessment Series Scores  Pre- and Post-Tests  Student Perception Rating References: 1.Attendance—Above 95%, all students 2.Discipline—Minimal to no issues, all students

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Data-Performance Assessment Series

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Data Study Skills Test A

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Data Study Skills Test B

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Student Responses Identification of Key Topics Learned 1. Be Honest, Respectful, Resourceful. 2. Complete Work. 3. None. 4. Be Responsible, Respectful, Honest. 5. Be Nice.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Challenges  Diverse population in abilities, ethnic origin, and gender.  Group was skewed in that all participants needed improvement.  Time constraints of school schedule.  Student attention span.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Positives  Learned skills.  Students liked the group.  Benefit from group reinforcement.  Strengthened student connection with counselor.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Positives Continued  Development of self-awareness and confidence.  Practice of new behaviors.  More effective response to some of the issues and concerns life presents.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Conclusions  Short targeted deliveries beneficial.  Participatory activities work best.  Mentoring within the group is a plus.  Open-ended test questions resulted in less positive results.  Learned more social skills than test skills.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Suggestions for Future Research  Conduct second group to determine if continued skills instruction provides additional return to the students.  Utilize close-ended questions whenever possible.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Use of Data  Communicate to Stakeholders, e.g. parents, teachers, administrators.  Communicate to others how program is making a positive difference in the lives of students in school.

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE References   

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Appendix A Study Skills Documents

Wills Partnerships for Results Based Evaluations PRoBE Thank You  Questions  Comments