Madison 2006 Dynamo Fausto Cattaneo ANL - University of Chicago Stewart Prager University of Wisconsin.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Magnetic Chaos and Transport Working Group Proposed Plans for Center Research P.W. Terry Leonid Malyshkin Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory.

Advertisements

NSF Site Visit Madison, May 1-2, 2006 Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport R. Kulsrud and H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic Self-organization.

Statistical Properties of Broadband Magnetic Turbulence in the Reversed Field Pinch John Sarff D. Craig, L. Frassinetti 1, L. Marrelli 1, P. Martin 1,

NONLINEAR COMPUTATION OF LABORATORY DYNAMOS DALTON D. SCHNACK Center for Energy and Space Science Science Applications International Corp. San Diego, CA.

Experimental Measurements of Non- MHD Dynamo Effects Summarized by S.C. Prager.

Dynamo Effects in Laboratory Plasmas S.C. Prager University of Wisconsin October, 2003.

Self-consistent mean field forces in two-fluid models of turbulent plasmas C. C. Hegna University of Wisconsin Madison, WI Hall Dynamo Get-together PPPL.

P.W. Terry K.W. Smith University of Wisconsin-Madison Outline

Magnetic Relaxation in MST S. Prager University of Wisconsin and CMSO.

Turbulent transport of magnetic fields Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical.

Ion Heating Presented by Gennady Fiksel, UW-Madison for CMSO review panel May 1-2, 2006, Madison.

Pulsar radio wave dispersion, intermittency, and kinetic Alfvén wave turbulence Paul Terry Stas Boldyrev.

Control of Magnetic Chaos & Self-Organization John Sarff for MST Group CMSO General Meeting Madison, WI August 4-6, 2004.

Plans for Dynamo Research Presented by F. Cattaneo, S. Prager.

Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.

Outline: I. Introduction and examples of momentum transport II. Momentum transport physics topics being addressed by CMSO III. Selected highlights and.

Extragalactic Magnetic Fields and Dynamo Hui Li with K. Bowers, X. Tang, and S. Colgate (Los Alamos National Lab) Extragalactic magnetic fields and Magnetized.

Collaborators: Jungyeon Cho --- Chungnam U.

Self-consistent mean field forces in two-fluid models of turbulent plasmas C. C. Hegna University of Wisconsin Madison, WI CMSO Meeting Madison, WI August.

CMSO 2005 Mean field dynamos: analytical and numerical results Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic-Self Organization and Department.

The solar dynamo(s) Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas Chicago 2003.

Chicago, October 2003 David Hughes Department of Applied Mathematics University of Leeds Nonlinear Effects in Mean Field Dynamo Theory.

Experimental Tests of Two-Fluid Relaxation D. Craig and MST Team University of Wisconsin – Madison General Meeting of the Center for Magnetic Self-Organization.

Dynamo and Magnetic Helicity Flux Hantao Ji CMSO & PPPL CMSO General Meeting Princeton, October 5-7, 2005 Contributors: Eric Blackman (Rochester) Stewart.

Comparing classical and lab plasma dynamos S. Prager University of Wisconsin useful discussions with D. Craig, H. Ji, J. Sarff, E. Zweibel.

Multiple reconnections and explosive events and in MST and solar flares Gennady Fiksel CMSO workshop, Princeton, NJ, Oct 5-8, 2005.

Magnetic Chaos and Transport Paul Terry and Leonid Malyshkin, group leaders with active participation from MST group, Chicago group, MRX, Wisconsin astrophysics.

MHD Dynamos in the Lab and Dynamos Beyond MHD. The lab plasma dynamo does Generate current locally Increase toroidal magnetic flux Conserve magnetic helicity.

Global Simulations of Astrophysical Jets in Poynting Flux Dominated Regime Hui Li S. Colgate, J. Finn, G. Lapenta, S. Li Engine; Injection; Collimation;

General Meeting Madison, August 4-6, 2004 Plans and Progress of Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic.

Proposed Study of Dynamo Activity Associated with Astrophysical Jets Carl Sovinec, Univ. of WI, Engineering Physics study suggested by Stirling Colgate.

Outline Dynamo: theoretical General considerations and plans Progress report Dynamo action associated with astrophysical jets Progress report Dynamo: experiment.

Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.

INI 2004 Astrophysical dynamos Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization Computations Institute Department of Mathematics.

September 2005 Magnetic field excitation in galaxies.

The UW Plasma Physics Group Clint Sprott, Paul Terry, Ellen Zweibel, Stas Boldyrev, Dalton Schnack, Cary Forest, Stewart Prager Presented to Introductory.

Momentum Transport During Reconnection Events in the MST Reversed Field Pinch Alexey Kuritsyn In collaboration with A.F. Almagri, D.L. Brower, W.X. Ding,

The CD Kink Instability in Magnetically Dominated Relativistic Jets * The relativistic jets associated with blazar emission from radio through TeV gamma-rays.

INTRODUCTION OF WAVE-PARTICLE RESONANCE IN TOKAMAKS J.Q. Dong Southwestern Institute of Physics Chengdu, China International School on Plasma Turbulence.

Magnetization of Galactic Disks and Beyond Collaborators: Dmitry Shapovalov (Johns Hopkins) Alex Lazarian (U. Wisconsin) Jungyeon Cho (Chungnam) Kracow.

New Mechanism of Generation of Large-Scale Magnetic Field in Turbulence with Large-Scale Velocity Shear I. ROGACHEVSKII, N. KLEEORIN, E. LIVERTS Ben-Gurion.

Krakow 2010 Galactic magnetic fields: MRI or SN-driven dynamo? Detlef Elstner Oliver Gressel Natali Dziourkevich Alfio Bonanno Günther Rüdiger.

Cosmological MHD Hui Li Collaborators: S. Li, M. Nakamura, S. Diehl, B. Oshea, P. Kronberg, S. Colgate (LANL) H. Xu, M. Norman (UCSD), R. Cen (Princeton)

Non-disruptive MHD Dynamics in Inward-shifted LHD Configurations 1.Introduction 2.RMHD simulation 3.DNS of full 3D MHD 4. Summary MIURA, H., ICHIGUCHI,

Center for Multi-scale Plasma Dynamics. Bill Dorland, Maryland.

1 Hantao Ji Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Experimentalist Laboratory astrophysics –Reconnection, angular momentum transport, dynamo effect… –Center.

Kinetic Effects on the Linear and Nonlinear Stability Properties of Field- Reversed Configurations E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 APS DPP Meeting, October 2003.

Multiscale issues in modeling magnetic reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland IPAM Meeting on Multiscale Problems in Fusion Plasmas January 10,

Making Magnetic Fields: Dynamos in the Nonlinear Regime Collaborators: Alex Lazarian --- U. Wisconsin Jungyeon Cho --- Chungnam U. Dmitry Shapovalov ---

Effect of Magnetic Helicity on Non-Helical Turbulent Dynamos N. KLEEORIN and I. ROGACHEVSKII Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, ISRAEL.

Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.

Large scale magnetic fields and Dynamo theory Roman Shcherbakov, Turbulence Discussion Group 14 Apr 2008.

Three-dimensional MHD Simulations of Jets from Accretion Disks Hiromitsu Kigure & Kazunari Shibata ApJ in press (astro-ph/ ) Magnetohydrodynamic.

Cosmic Magnetic Fields: Helicity Injection by Supermassive Black Holes, Galaxies and Laboratory Experiments Hui Li 李暉 Los Alamos National Laboratory and.

Dynamics of ITG driven turbulence in the presence of a large spatial scale vortex flow Zheng-Xiong Wang, 1 J. Q. Li, 1 J. Q. Dong, 2 and Y. Kishimoto 1.

Turbulent Dynamo Stanislav Boldyrev (Wisconsin-Madison) Fausto Cattaneo (Chicago) Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical.

Nonlinear interactions between micro-turbulence and macro-scale MHD A. Ishizawa, N. Nakajima, M. Okamoto, J. Ramos* National Institute for Fusion Science.

Turbulent Dynamos: How I learned to ignore kinematic dynamo theory MFUV 2015 With Amir Jafari and Ben Jackel.

Three-Dimensional MHD Simulation of Astrophysical Jet by CIP-MOCCT Method Hiromitsu Kigure (Kyoto U.), Kazunari Shibata (Kyoto U.), Seiichi Kato (Osaka.

The Magneto-Rotational Instability and turbulent angular momentum transport Fausto Cattaneo Paul Fischer Aleksandr Obabko.

1 Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive.

ITP 2008 MRI Driven turbulence and dynamo action Fausto Cattaneo University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory.

Initial Conditions As an initial condition, we assume that an equilibrium disk rotates in a central point-mass gravitational potential (e.g., Matsumoto.

ENS MHD induction & dynamo LYON Laboratoire de Physique

MHD and Kinetics Workshop February 2008 Magnetic reconnection in solar theory: MHD vs Kinetics Philippa Browning, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics,

Interaction between vortex flow and microturbulence Zheng-Xiong Wang （王正汹） Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China West Lake International Symposium.

Fast Reconnection in High-Lundquist- Number Plasmas Due to Secondary Tearing Instabilities A.Bhattacharjee, Y.-M. Huang, H. Yang, and B. Rogers Center.

INI 2004 Small-scale dynamos Fausto Cattaneo Department of Mathematics University of Chicago.

The Effects of Magnetic Prandtl Number On MHD Turbulence

Ahmed Ibrahim Kazunari Shibata Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University

Presentation transcript:

Madison 2006 Dynamo Fausto Cattaneo ANL - University of Chicago Stewart Prager University of Wisconsin

Madison 2006 Dynamos Sustained mechanism to convert kinetic energy into magnetic energy within the bulk of an electrically conducting fluid. Invoked to explain the origin of magnetic fields in the universe. Abstract dynamo theory –Conditions for dynamo action –Structure of resulting fields Laboratory dynamos –Dynamo events in RFP –Liquid metal experiments Astrophysical dynamos –Planets –Stars –Galaxies –ICM –Magnetars –Etc.

Madison 2006 Active research areas Role of turbulence in dynamo action Large scale field generation in laboratory and astrophysics Flux redistribution in accretion flows and jets

Madison 2006 Dynamos and turbulence Conditions for dynamo action in a turbulent fluid. Turbulence consists of velocity fluctuations on different spatial and temporal scales (self similar range) plus coherent structures (long lived). Pseudo-vorticityB field

Madison 2006 Turbulent dynamo action If < dynamo must operate in the inertial range of the turbulence. Reconnection is mediated by a strongly fluctuating (rough) velocity. Linear: Can dynamo operate for arbitrarily small ? Nonlinear: Does field amplitude decrease indefinitely with decreasing Pm= / ? Pm = 1/8 Rm =550, Re=550 Rm =550, Re=1100

Madison 2006 Large scale generation Equipartition mean fields are often observed in astrophysics. What are the mechanisms to generate strong, large-scale fields? Traditionally discussed within framework of Mean Field Theory (introduce averaging). MFT correct for kinematic fields and small Rm. MHD filter MFT solve Exact sol. filter ??? Does this diagram commute? What happens to (mean induction) in the nonlinear regime? If turbulent induction is suppressed, how are large scale fields generated? Neither satisfied in astrophysical situations.

Madison 2006 At high Rm fluctuations dominate. Either -effect is collisional. Or -effect is turbulent but strongly nonlinearly suppressed. Large scale generation Unstable localized modes x Finite helicity Unstable extended modes MFT Under suitable conditions it is possible to transform dynamo problem into QM System has both extended modes (MFT) and bound states (fastest growing) Kinematic Non rotatingRotating Nonlinear

Madison 2006 Non MF dynamos What generates strong, large-scale fields? Turbulent -effect is rescued by –Boundary effect (magnetic helicity injection) –Strong spatial inhomogeneities Non MF effect –Large scale motions –Magnetically induced instabilities (essentially nonlinear). B y - B y +

Madison 2006 Dynamo action in the laboratory Dynamo event MST Toroidal flux (Wb) Time (ms) Energy source instability dynamo Tearing mode instabilities generate velocity and magnetic field fluctuations. Fluctuation-fluctuation interactions ( - effect) regenerate toroidal field.

Madison 2006 Dynamo action in the laboratory Evidence for strong mean induction effects Evidence for non MHD effects at some locations Time (ms) Volts/m What non MHD physics is important? –Hall effect –Diamagnetic Incorporate two fluid effects in simulation codes (Nimrod). Why is the -effect strong in the RFP and weak in numerical simulations? Turbulence not strong in RFP. Similarities to buoyancy driven dynamo.

Madison 2006 Accretion flows-jets Radio galaxies show coherent magnetic structures with Kpc scales. Magnetic field (probably) generated by dynamo action in accretion disk around compact central object. Evidence for moderately strong fields in the ICM. Both super Alfvénic injection and magnetic pinch help to collimate. Finite external pressure (possibly ram pressure as well) can lead to containment of magnetic structure. Similarities between spheromaks and disk arcades; kink instability (flux conversion) in jets and reversed field pinch experiments. What is the role of magnetic fields in jet dynamics ? What is the role of rotation and external pressure in the formation of coherent magnetic structures ? Are there analogies between laboratory and astrophysical magnetic structures? ToroidalPoloidal

Madison 2006 Future directions Abstract dynamo theory –Mechanisms for large scale generation Shear Flux pumping Essentially nonlinear Laboratory dynamos –Introduce PIC and two-fluid codes to study dynamo processes Astrophysical dynamos –Magnetized/relativistic jets (Pluto) –Accretion flows Jet launching Accretion disk dynamos –Stellar dynamo models Sim. By N. Brummell

Madison 2006 THE END