Department of Special Education Division of Special Programs in the Office of Academics 1111 W. 6 th Street Phone: (512) 414-1731 Austin, Texas 78703-5399.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

NCAAAI CHANGES Sheila Garner Brown North Carolina State University
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
USDE Decisions on 2006 Amendments to the Texas AYP Handbook.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Special Education. The purpose of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA 2004) is to assure that all children with disabilities are provided.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Rhode Island State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Stakeholder Input November 6, 2014.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Campus Improvement Plans (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Least Restrictive Environment Identification of High Percentage.
IDEA Recovery Funds for Services to Children and Youths with Disabilities | May 20, 2009.
austinisd.org/academics/specialeduc/index.phtml
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
Rider 70 Changes to Staging for Special Education.
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
THE OHIO LONGITUDINAL TRANSITION STUDY (OLTS) Lawrence Dennis, Office for Exceptional Children, Ohio Department of Education & Dr. Robert Baer, Center.
State Performance Plan: A Two-Way Street Ruth Ryder Larry Wexler Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Beyond Perkins Addressing the Needs of Students with Special Needs.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Technical Support for Special Education Inclusion Programs Systems III will work with you to plan, implement and support your inclusion programs Systems.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Understanding Levels of Determination—Part B (CFR and 604) Improving Performance to Increase Positive Results Eugene R. Thompson, Education Program.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees August 24, 2015.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Program Update For Compliance PBMAS (Performance Based Monitoring) –Moved from Stage 4 w/on-site TEA visit to Stage 1B ( 3 indicators caused.
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
Addressing Federal Program Stages in PBM OCTOBER 27, 2015.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN April 19, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
THE APR AND SPP--LINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION DATA TO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR EDUCATION RESULTS Building a Brighter Tomorrow through Positive and Progressive Leadership.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
April 29-30, Review information related to the RF monitoring system Ensure that the agency meets its ongoing obligation to have a monitoring system.
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
Edgewood ISD   School District Effectiveness  Statutory Requirements  Valid Indicators of Performance  Maximum Inclusion  Individual.
ARC Chairperson Training
What is “Annual Determination?”
Department of Exceptional Student Education
What Data? Where? Ann Jinkins June 5, 2014.
ARC Chairperson Training
SPR&I Regional Training
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Department of Special Education Division of Special Programs in the Office of Academics 1111 W. 6 th Street Phone: (512) Austin, Texas Fax: (512) AISD Special Education Webpage The Department of Special Programs exists to design and deliver quality supports to students, educators, families and the community for the success of students with disabilities Austin Independent School District

Department of Special Education Differentiated Special Education Support... for CAMPUSES! [it's not just for kids anymore] Ann Jinkins John Fuerst

Department of Special Education Purpose: Think about your Campus IEP data from Training & support will be differentiated based on your data. As a result of this training attendees will: 1)Know the 5 special education focus areas for )Understand how campuses will be divided into categories 1-4 3)Understand how supports will be differentiated

Department of Special Education Priority Areas  Increase graduation rate for SWD  Increase the # of SWD taking and passing the non modified STAAR  Decrease overall and African American representation in special education  Decrease the # of SWD in disciplinary placements  Increase compliance with state and federal regulations

Department of Special Education Data associated with each priority area:  Increase graduation rate for SWD - AISD graduation decreased from 61.3% in 2010 to 60.9% in An increase of at least 1% is prerequisite for use of Safe Harbor to meet AYP.

Department of Special Education Data associated with each priority area:  Increase the # of SWD taking and passing the non modified STAAR - Participation on non-modified assessments improved from 39% and 36% in reading and math, respectively, in 2011 to 46% in both areas in Goal is 62% in order to minimize federal cap penalties. - LRE data improved from 57.7% in 2011 to 58.8% in SPP standard is 66% [served in the general education environment for > 80% of the school day].

Department of Special Education Data associated with each priority area:  Decrease overall and African American representation in special education - Overall special education representation rose from 9.5% in 2011 to 11.2% in PBMAS target is 8.5% - Over-representation of African-American students improved from a 7.4% difference in 2011 to a 6.3% difference in PBMAS target is a 1% difference.

Department of Special Education Data associated with each priority area:  Decrease the # of SWD in disciplinary placements - Over-representation rate of discretionary OSS improved from 12% in 2011 to 11.6% in PBMAS target is 6%. - Over-representation rate of discretionary ISS will likely increase in 2013 due to use of campus ISS centers

Department of Special Education Data associated with each priority area:  Increase compliance with state and federal regulations - AISD was required to develop and implement an integrated PBMAS Continuous Improvement Plan based on a variety of compliance issues related to special education, bilingual/ESL, and NCLB - AISD is under a Corrective Action Plan for residential facility monitoring and non-compliance areas as identified through TEA parent complaints - SPP indicators for Transition and Early Childhood outcomes do not meet standard [100% compliance ]

Department of Special Education Determination of Category 1-4 [separately, for each of 5 priority areas] Category 4: Exceeded PBMAS/SPP standard Category 3: Met PBMAS/SPP standard Category 2: Almost met PBMAS/SPP standard Category 1: Significantly below PBMAS/SPP standard

Department of Special Education Example of Differentiated Support Category 3 and 4 campuses  Receive C-IEP (Campus IEP) each 6 weeks identifying campus status in critical instructional and compliance areas.  Receive written strategies to address critical instructional and compliance areas in C-IEP.  Receive student specific critical case supports and support student placements  Offered targeted PD course of study addressing area(s) in need of improvement (optional participation)

Department of Special Education Example of Differentiated Support Category 2 campuses  Receive C-IEP (Campus IEP) each 6 weeks identifying campus status in critical instructional and compliance areas.  Receive written strategies to address critical instructional and compliance areas in C-IEP.  Receive student specific critical case supports and support student placements  Provide targeted PD course of study addressing area(s) in need of improvement (required participation)  Provide targeted, desktop audit and improvement strategies addressing area(s) in need of improvement

Department of Special Education Example of Differentiated Support Category 1 campuses  Receive C-IEP (Campus IEP) each 6 weeks identifying campus status in critical instructional and compliance areas.  Receive written strategies to address critical instructional and compliance areas in C-IEP.  Receive student specific critical case supports and support student placements  Provide targeted PD course of study addressing area(s) in need of improvement (required participation)  Provide targeted, desktop audit and improvement strategies addressing area(s) in need of improvement  Provide on site technical assistance addressing area(s) in need of improvement

Department of Special Education Your input and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Department of Special Education Next steps for participant to implement Learning: look for final details regarding differentiated supports Comments and contact information: Ann Jinkins [ ] John Fuerst [ ]