NADE 33 nd Annual Conference February 25– 28, 2009 Greensboro, North Carolina NADE 33 nd Annual Conference February 25– 28, 2009 Greensboro, North Carolina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modifications for All Learners
Advertisements

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
{ Child Development Christine Wolfe. Piaget's Four Stages of Intellectual Development.
Word Study – Word Sorts By: Laura Poland. Spelling is an important area of interest and concern, not only among literacy teachers, but also among numerous.
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
The Development of Mathematical Proficiency Presented by the Math Coaches of LAUSD, District K Based on: Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics,
Using Mathematical Practices to Promote Productive Disposition
1. Principles Learning Assessment Technology 3 Teaching Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality.
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Explicit Direct Instruction Critical Elements. Teaching Grade Level Content  The higher the grade the greater the disparity  Test Scores go up when.
Meaningful Learning in an Information Age
Teaching Thinking, Problem Solving, and Skill Acquisition
Learning Goals, Scales and Learning Activities
Mathematics for Students with Learning Disabilities Background Information Number Experiences Quantifying the World Math Anxiety and Myths about math The.
Welcome to Social Studies for the Elementary School! Make a name tent with first and last name. Draw an image of social studies from your past to share.
Common Core Mathematics. Learning Norms 2 Restrooms Parking Lot evaluation connections General comments.
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
GV Middle School Mathematics Mrs. Susan Iocco December 10, 2014.
The Cognitive Load Theory
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
Effective Teaching of Health Reporting: Lectures and More Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University Train the Trainer Workshop: Health Reporting for.
AFT 7/12/04 Marywood University Using Data for Decision Support and Planning.
Cognitive Development: Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s Theories
Building Community within the Mathematics Classroom Unit of Study 0 Global Concept Guide: 1 of 1.
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption May 29, Overview What Elementary Math Looks Like Historical Perspective District Philosophy Process and Criteria Why.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Engaging Students in Productive Challenge December 9, 2013 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Brandon Graham Putting The Practices Into Action March 20th.
Math Morning Third Grade 10/30/13. Welcome to Math Morning, the third grade edition!  Agenda  Provide a sense of how we teach math  Quick sample of.
SOL Changes and Preparation A parent presentation.
Common Core Mathematics. Learning Norms 2 Restrooms Parking Lot evaluation connections General comments.
Journal Write a paragraph about a decision you recently made. Describe the decision and circumstances surrounding it. How did it turn out? Looking back,
Ms.Mehwish Rafi The City School Darakhshan Campus Mathematics, Grade 3
Instructional Theory Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3230 Math and Science in Education 1.
Presenter’s Guide to Multiple Representations in the Teaching of Mathematics – Part 1 By Guillermo Mendieta Author of Pictorial Mathematics
LEARNING DISABILITIES IMPACTING MATHEMATICS Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
Algorithms for Addition and Subtraction. Children’s first methods are admittedly inefficient. However, if they are free to do their own thinking, they.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
PROBLEM AREAS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION By C.K. Chamasese.
Teaching Reading Comprehension
 For years, corporations have used computer-based simulations with employee-training programs, augmenting traditional on-the-job training with virtual.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Testing and Documentation Part II.
JOT2 – LEARNING THEORIES
Differentiating Instruction Dr. Laura McLaughlin Taddei.
Create a 5 Whys. Think about the purpose of maths and what type of mathematical learners you wish to create in the classroom.
EDUC 4454 – Class 20 P/J Methods
1 Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8 th edition Part 2: Working with Students Chapter 6: What Is Taught and How Is It Taught? Teaching Today,
Class 1, January 26, 2016 Lesson 5.1: Numbers, Numbers, Everywhere.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
Reflections on Practice Maths Counts Introduction to Linear Equations Laois Education Centre, Portlaoise.
Clinical Learning Dr Muhammad Ashraf Assistant Professor Medicine.
CHAPTER 2 Cognitive development Identify the four factors that, according to Piaget, influence children’s thinking from early childhood to adulthood.
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education. Vukelich, Helping Young Children Learn Language and Literacy: Birth Through Kindergarten 3/e Chapter 1 Foundations of.
Introduction to Math Methods Math Standards. Why can math be fun? Math can be fun because… it can have so much variety in topics. many different ways.
Planning for Instruction and Assessments. Matching Levels Ensure that your level of teaching matches your students’ levels of knowledge and thinking.
Vista Unified School District Meaningful Algebra.
MATH BY MEAGHAN, ROWEN, ELSIE. CONTENT LIST ▪ INTRODUCTION : Past vs Present ▪ SELECTING APPROPRIATE MATH : Math Standards ▪ RESEARCH ON MATH INSTRUCTION.
Welcome to Expressions Family Math Night Grades 3-5.
More fun with FRQ’s.
Master of Education Developmental Psychology. What is Developmental Psychology? the scientific study of age-related changes throughout the human life.
Natalija Budinski Primary and secondary school “Petro Kuzmjak” Serbia
Chapter 13 Instructing Students.
Chapter 9 Using Standardized Tests to Look at Cognitive Development
EDU704 – Assessment and Evaluation
Mathematics and Special Education Leadership Protocols
Mastery at Hillyfield.
Mathematics Teachers as Gatekeepers
Some thoughts from the conference
Presentation transcript:

NADE 33 nd Annual Conference February 25– 28, 2009 Greensboro, North Carolina NADE 33 nd Annual Conference February 25– 28, 2009 Greensboro, North Carolina Elena Litvinova, Bloomsburg University

 One-Unknown C-BIRD Method History  One-Unknown C-BIRD Method Effectiveness  Introduction of C-BIRD Method  One-Unknown C-BIRD Method Benefits  One-Unknown C-BIRD Method History  One-Unknown C-BIRD Method Effectiveness  Introduction of C-BIRD Method  One-Unknown C-BIRD Method Benefits

The method was born at Penn State Hazleton as part of the solution to the problem of remediation of elementary education major students in the area of problem solving.

Problem solving is one of the most important parts of early childhood development. Word problems convey mathematical meaning by using suitable concrete objects to represent abstract mathematical notions. They are allegories or mental manipulative, which paves a child’s way to abstractions. Let us remember that formal and abstract thinking, which is essential for success in the modern civilized technological society, does not come as a straightforward result of physiological maturation or social adjustment. The scientific experiments and observations showed that subjects who lived in remote villages and have not been influenced by school instruction were incapable of solving even the simplest word problems.

He proposed the Complete Box of Independent Raw Data (C-BIRD) method that he believes has the potential to provide education majors with the needed confidence in their ability to teach problem solving. Dr. Litvinov suggested that many Americans lack problem solving skills because their teachers were ineffective in explaining these crucial abilities.

The C-BIRD method is proven effective by analyzing the success rate of students in the PSMEM course offered at the Penn State - Hazleton campus. Originally, the majority of students who enroll in the course have deficient skills in problem solving and take it because the course is a requirement.

After completing the PSMEM course, and learning how to solve word problems through the use of C-BIRD, 80% of the students report feeling more confident in their ability to solve word problems. In the words of one PSMEM student, “The way [the course] is taught now allowed me to become good at problem solving, and I never thought I would be able to do that.” (The citation is taken from an anonymous essay)

Before I introduce the C-BIRD method for solving word problems I feel an obligation to explain why I think it might be extremely beneficial for all students. The traditional model of the problem –solving process, described by Mayer (1982), consists of a translation stage and solution stage. Students have more difficulty in the translation stage. Nevertheless, in the classroom more emphasis is given to the solution stage. The C-BIRD method is focused on the translation stage called problem modeling.

Traditionally, a student is required to break the problem into parts and hold a lot of information in the working memory. The C-BIRD method provides a tool for organizing and storing this data. As a result, the modeling part becomes more transparent.

Traditionally, word problems are divided into families, categories, and templates. Within this approach, teachers present concepts, procedures, routines and definitions piece by piece. A limitation of this model is that the problem has to fit one of those artificially developed structure types. The students would have to learn those structures, select the appropriate one and be able to take the information and place it in the matching structure. Unfortunately, standard methods can become mechanical and mysterious to the anxious students. They can also suggest that there is only one way to arrive to the solution and if one cannot recall it, the situation becomes hopeless.

In using this approach, teachers tend to forget that the delivery of knowledge is not the sole objective in teaching! It is more important to emphasize the development of a type of thinking that promotes solving problems than just giving the students a lot of tricks. The C-BIRD method stresses the use of common sense and encourages student suggestions by allowing multiple approaches during the modeling stage. It was proven by practice that in the course of one semester students developed confidence in their own ability in problem solving, and built an intuition for finding the most optimal solution.

Now I am ready to present a tool that helps to develop the student’s Intuitive Knowledge Base by allowing more flexibility and encouraging a heavy use of common sense.

Visual interpretation of data presented in the Complete Box of Independent Raw Data makes it easier to analyze data connections and make decisions about the variable choices.

Comparison of a number of unknowns to a number of equations in the Complete Box of Independent Raw Data helps to check if all the data in the problem was accounted for and if there is enough information to solve the problem.

Identification of the Master Equation and elimination of the modeling part helps to avoid common problems of the tautological equation.

Consistent use of the Complete Box of Independent Raw Data helps to develop an intuition for recognizing the best choice of the variable and simplest possible solution.

Thank you for being here today!