General Meeting Madison, August 4-6, 2004 Plans and Progress of Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plans for Magnetic Reconnection Research Masaaki Yamada Ellen Zweibel for Magnetic Reconnection Working group CMSO Planning Meeting at U. Chicago November.
Advertisements

NSF Site Visit Madison, May 1-2, 2006 Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport R. Kulsrud and H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic Self-organization.
NONLINEAR COMPUTATION OF LABORATORY DYNAMOS DALTON D. SCHNACK Center for Energy and Space Science Science Applications International Corp. San Diego, CA.
Dynamo Effects in Laboratory Plasmas S.C. Prager University of Wisconsin October, 2003.
Self-consistent mean field forces in two-fluid models of turbulent plasmas C. C. Hegna University of Wisconsin Madison, WI Hall Dynamo Get-together PPPL.
Magnetic Relaxation in MST S. Prager University of Wisconsin and CMSO.
Ion Heating Presented by Gennady Fiksel, UW-Madison for CMSO review panel May 1-2, 2006, Madison.
Control of Magnetic Chaos & Self-Organization John Sarff for MST Group CMSO General Meeting Madison, WI August 4-6, 2004.
Dissipation in Force-Free Astrophysical Plasmas Hui Li (Los Alamos National Lab) Radio lobe formation and relaxation Dynamical magnetic dissipation in.
Plans for Dynamo Research Presented by F. Cattaneo, S. Prager.
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.
Outline: I. Introduction and examples of momentum transport II. Momentum transport physics topics being addressed by CMSO III. Selected highlights and.
Madison 2006 Dynamo Fausto Cattaneo ANL - University of Chicago Stewart Prager University of Wisconsin.
Magnetic Turbulence in MRX (for discussions on a possible cross-cutting theme to relate turbulence, reconnection, and particle heating) PFC Planning Meeting.
Self-consistent mean field forces in two-fluid models of turbulent plasmas C. C. Hegna University of Wisconsin Madison, WI CMSO Meeting Madison, WI August.
The solar dynamo(s) Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas Chicago 2003.
Experimental Tests of Two-Fluid Relaxation D. Craig and MST Team University of Wisconsin – Madison General Meeting of the Center for Magnetic Self-Organization.
Introduction to CMSO Meeting Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas.
Dynamo and Magnetic Helicity Flux Hantao Ji CMSO & PPPL CMSO General Meeting Princeton, October 5-7, 2005 Contributors: Eric Blackman (Rochester) Stewart.
Comparing classical and lab plasma dynamos S. Prager University of Wisconsin useful discussions with D. Craig, H. Ji, J. Sarff, E. Zweibel.
Reconnection: Theory and Computation Programs and Plans C. C. Hegna Presented for E. Zweibel University of Wisconsin CMSO Meeting Madison, WI August 4,
Magnetic Chaos and Transport Paul Terry and Leonid Malyshkin, group leaders with active participation from MST group, Chicago group, MRX, Wisconsin astrophysics.
MHD Dynamos in the Lab and Dynamos Beyond MHD. The lab plasma dynamo does Generate current locally Increase toroidal magnetic flux Conserve magnetic helicity.
Global Simulations of Astrophysical Jets in Poynting Flux Dominated Regime Hui Li S. Colgate, J. Finn, G. Lapenta, S. Li Engine; Injection; Collimation;
Anomalous Ion Heating Status and Research Plan
Some New Data From FRC Experiment on Relaxation For discussions at Hall-Dynamo and Related Physics meeting CMSO June 10-11, 2004 at PPPL Guo et al, PRL.
Outline Dynamo: theoretical General considerations and plans Progress report Dynamo action associated with astrophysical jets Progress report Dynamo: experiment.
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO M. Yamada, C. Hegna, E. Zweibel For General meeting for CMSO August 4, Recent progress and.
Results from Magnetic Reconnection Experiment And Possible Application to Solar B program For Solar B Science meeting, Kyoto, Japan November 8-11, 2005.
The UW Plasma Physics Group Clint Sprott, Paul Terry, Ellen Zweibel, Stas Boldyrev, Dalton Schnack, Cary Forest, Stewart Prager Presented to Introductory.
Momentum Transport During Reconnection Events in the MST Reversed Field Pinch Alexey Kuritsyn In collaboration with A.F. Almagri, D.L. Brower, W.X. Ding,
The Solar Corona B. C. Low High Altitude Observatory National Center for Atmospheric Research The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated.
Episodic magnetic jets as the central engine of GRBs Feng Yuan With: Bing Zhang.
Sept. 12, 2006 Relationship Between Particle Acceleration and Magnetic Reconnection.
New England Space Science Meeting 3 Feb 1, 2006 Implications of Reconnection Nathan Schwadron Feb 1, 2006.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Summary of UCB MURI workshop on vector magnetograms Have picked 2 observed events for targeted study and modeling: AR8210 (May 1, 1998), and AR8038 (May.
Magnetic accelerations of relativistic jets. Serguei Komissarov University of Leeds UK TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you.
1 Hantao Ji Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Experimentalist Laboratory astrophysics –Reconnection, angular momentum transport, dynamo effect… –Center.
Kinematics and coronal field strength of an untwisting jet in a polar coronal hole observed by SDO/AIA H. Chen, J. Zhang, & S. Ma ILWS , Beijing.
1 Mei Zhang ( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences ) Helicity Transport from the convection zone to interplanetary space Collaborators:
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
Multiscale issues in modeling magnetic reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland IPAM Meeting on Multiscale Problems in Fusion Plasmas January 10,
Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
Experimental Study of Magnetic Reconnection and Dynamics of Plasma Flare Arc in MRX Masaaki Yamada August SHINE Meeting at Nova Scotia Center.
Overshoot at the base of the solar convection zone What can we learn from numerical simulations? Matthias Rempel HAO / NCAR.
Helicity Condensation: The Origin of Coronal/Heliospheric Structure S. K. Antiochos, C. R. DeVore, et al NASA/GSFC Key features of the corona and wind.
Practical Calculation of Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budgets in Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis Research Center for Astronomy.
3D Spherical Shell Simulations of Rising Flux Tubes in the Solar Convective Envelope Yuhong Fan (HAO/NCAR) High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
New England Space Science Meeting 3 Feb 1, 2006 Implications of Reconnection Nathan Schwadron Feb 1, 2006.
MHD and Kinetics Workshop February 2008 Magnetic reconnection in solar theory: MHD vs Kinetics Philippa Browning, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics,
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept Pascal Démoulin but there is no way to estimate it from observations.
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
Design of Coaxial Helicity Injection on SUNIST Li ZENG Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University Supervised by.
Solar Magnetism: Solar Cycle Solar Dynamo Coronal Magnetic Field CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 03, February 6 Spring 2007 References: NASA/MSFC Solar Physics.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept Pascal Démoulin but there is no way to estimate it from observations.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
Plasma outflow from dissipationless accretion disks
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
Dmitri Uzdensky (University of Colorado Boulder)
Introduction to Space Weather
An MHD Model for the Formation of Episodic Jets
Presentation transcript:

General Meeting Madison, August 4-6, 2004 Plans and Progress of Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic Self-organization

Outline Introduction –Magnetic helicity –Physics issues Goals, plans and progress –The basics –The role –The applicabilities Summary: relations to other topics

Introduction: Magnetic Helicity Magnetic helicity is a global topological quantity which measures linkage (knottedness and twistedness) of magnetic field lines. Gauge invariant when B is tangential to the surface of V, which is simply-connected. K is conserved in ideal MHD plasmas.

Physics Issues Ambiguities in gauge-invariant definitions and their physical interpretations still exist in realistic geometries. –Non-uniqueness of gauge-invariant definitions –Practical formulation Are they really conserved in reality? How does the helicity conservation regulate dynamo process? –The helicity conservation is a fundamental assumption in the theories of magnetic self-organization (relaxation).

Physics Issues (Contd) Can the concept for helicity and relaxation be extended to 2- fluid plasmas? –Other helicities and possible new relaxed states? How does the helicity related to solar dynamo, flares, and CMEs (coronal mass ejections)? –Reversed S tends to appear in the northern hemisphere while S tends to appear in the southern hemisphere.

Major Goals I.Study basic properties of magnetic helicity in realistic geometries and its extensions to 2-fluid plasmas. II.Determine role of conservation and transport of magnetic and kinetic helicities during magnetic self-organization processes. III.Assess applicabilities of physics understandings gained in achieving Goals I&II to astrophysical circumstances, such as solar dynamo activity and accretion disk dynamics.

Tasks for Goal I - The Basics Revisit the concept of relative helicity (short) Consider helicity concept in 2-fluid plasmas (short-mid) Evaluate conservation of magnetic and kinetic helicities during 2-fluid dynamo simulations (short-mid) Evaluate conservation (and transport) of magnetic and kinetic helicities during self-organization events in MST (short-mid) Evaluate conservation of magnetic and kinetic helicities during merging processes in MRX and SSX (short-mid)

Gauge-invariant Definition Gauge-invariant definition when magnetic field intercepts with boundary and/or the volume is doubly-connected –Concept of relative helicity which subtracts off unknown linkage outside of V (Berger & Field 84, Finn & Anderson 84) –Non-uniqueness of gauge-invariant definitions identified (Blackman & Ji, 03). Practical formulation exist for spherical shell or slab geometry (Berger 85), but not for toroidal/cylinderical shell –Important for a sub-volume of a torus, accretion disks

Helicities in 2-fluid Plasmas Self-helicities (e.g. Steinhauer & Ishida 98): Electron-helicity reduces to magnetic helicity when size is larger than electron skin depth (c/w pe ). Ion-helicity is equivalent to helicity of the generalized vorticity (e.g. Mahajan & Yoshida 98): Discussions by C. Hegna (98) canonical momentum: =e,i:

Helicity change: Energy change: Ratio of changes: In reality, is small in large systems a: plasma size Magnetic Helicity Change Relative to Energy: an Estimate due to Reconnection

Test Helicity Conservation in Simulation (Horiuchi & Sato, 88) MHD simulation: –Tested for magnetic helicity in some cases 2-fluid simulations : –NIMROD ready in a few months –DEBS later

Test Helicity Conservation in MST External info only (MST 95) Internal + external info (MST 03) Magnetic helicity: Progress in measuring velocity profiles (CHERS) Neutral beam injection to drive flow

Test Helicity Conservation during Merging Data from TS-3 (Ono et al., 96)

Test Helicity Conservation in SSX and MRX SSX: –Data available for evaluation of magnetic helicity –New velocity measurements in progress MRX: –Machine upgraded for merging –Plan to drive flow by biasing and/or neutral beam injection

Tasks for Goal II - The Role Investigate role of helicity flux for large -effect in RFP and compare with computations (short-mid) Evaluate 2-fluid relaxation theories and explore new relaxation phenomena experimentally (mid-long) Evaluate role of helicity conservation in cascades where wave anisotropy supercedes invariant constraints on cascades (mid) –P. Terrys talk –E. Blackmans talk

Quenching of the Dynamo Effect The -effect is a key ingredient of dynamo action. Recent theories and simulations using periodic or closed boundaries predict the quenching of -effect due to large R m or B 0. (Cattaneo & Hughes 96)

Large -effect accompanies an large outward helicity flux. Importance of open boundaries? smalllarge The Dynamo Effect is Large in the Lab largesmall

Magnetic field generated in the convection zone –Polarity reverses every 11 years Has open boundaries, with helicity flux outward to corona –S and reversed S loops Anything common between lab and sun? The Dynamo Effect is Also Large in the Sun

Flow of magnetic energy –Generated in the convection zone –Transported to the corona, reversing polarity every 11 years –Effectively dissipated by flares Flow of magnetic helicity –Generated in the convection zone, with opposite signs each hemisphere –Transported to the corona, with no polarity reversal –Almost no dissipation by flares –Removed effectively only by CME ==> Inevitability of CME Magnetic Helicity and CME (Flux Rope) (Zhang & Low 04)

2-fluid Self-organization or Relaxation New relaxed states can be readily found using additional conserved quantities in 2-fluid. An example is given below. Energy Magnetic helicity Generalized (or ion) helicity Minimizing W while keeping K and G constant: (Mahajan & Yoshida 98)

2-fluid Relaxation (Contd) When 2 0, then V 0 and When 1 0 and 2 large, then V is large: Taylor solution; paramagnetic Scale arbitrary, decided by 1 Scale on order of c/ pi diamagnetic Shock front, diamagnetic cavity, small s FRC, etc

Preliminary Indications From TS-3 Plan to drive large flows by biasing and/or NBI to explore new relaxation phenomena in MRX/MST

Tasks for Goal III - Application to Astrophysics Investigate solar dynamo using a comprehensive computational model (long) –F. Cattaneos dynamo talk Relate above helicity concepts to solar dynamo and to computation (long) –E. Blackmans talk Understand helicity/poynting flux injection in disk- jet system –Related to coronal MRI

Summary: Relations to Other Topics Dynamo: –Conservation and transport of helicity may regulate dynamo Reconnection: –Helicity is dissipated at the reconnection region Magnetic turbulence: –Conservation of helicity is linked to the inverse cascade Angular momentum transport: –Properties of kinetic helicity and cross helicity could be related to (angular) momentum transport?

Links with Astrophysical Plasmas Physics of fast solar/disk dynamo: –Role of helicity conservation and transport Magnetic turbulence: –Inverse cascade due to helicity constraint High-beta magnetic structures (cavity, hole) –A relaxed state of 2-fluid plasma with significant flow