The SAON Networks Database Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, Sweden Jan René Larsen, AMAP Secretariat Simon Wilson, AMAP Secretariat SAON Board Meeting, 1-2 October.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ASSW Project Day, 16 March 2007 The Science Legacy of IPY – Antarctic and Arctic Research Partnership Opportunities Colin Summerhayes (Scientific Committee.

Advertisements

Sweden’s foreign trade March Källa: WTO; International Trade Statistics 2009.

Navigating Risk, Challenge and Opportunity Promise of the Arctic, Seattle, WA Drummond Fraser Transport Canada, Marine Safety & Security May 29, 2013.

IPY UPDATE: NSF OPP – Office Advisory Committee Robin E. Bell Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory - Columbia University ICSU/WMO IPY Joint Committee Chair.

The Camden Asset Recovery Inter-Agency Network (CARIN)

Sustainable Energy Systems Int’l H 2 Safety Conf, Pisa, Italy, 8-10 Sep IPHE projects focus on pre-competitive collaborative research, development.

IPY Dr Eduard Sarukhanian, Special Adviser to Secretary–General on IPY International Polar Year Status of preparation and the role.

FreshNor FreshNor The freshwater budget of the Nordic Seas A Nordic research network Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen Danish Meteorological Institute.

SERVICES TRADE RESTRICTIVENESS INDEX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARCHITECTURE Russell V. Keune Architect, USA.

Nikolaj Bock EEA and the Arctic. *5 are member countries in the Arctic Council (DEN, SWE, FIN, ICE, NOR) 6 are permanent observes in the Arctic Council.

Richard Lane, Chair Natural History Museum, London Scientific Collections International (SciColl) An international coordinating mechanism OECD GSF Vienna.

«The International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP)» Prof Basie von Solms Immediate Past President IFIP University of Johannesburg South Africa.

Arctic Spatial Data Infrastructure (Arctic SDI) Pan-Arctic Cooperation among Ten Mapping Agencies www. arctic-sdi.org Magnús Guðmundsson Director General.

OECD Review of Russian Statistics Peer Review Mission to Russia April 2012 Tim Davis Head, Global Relations, Statistics Directorate.

OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Organisation and Content Overview.

Expert Team on Sea Ice (ETSI)‏ Vasily Smolyanitsky Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI)‏ ETSI chair THE JOINT WMO/IOC COMMISSION FOR OCEANOGRAPHY.

Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks - SAON Data and Information Services for Arctic observational activities Jan René Larsen SAON Secretary Arctic Monitoring.

1 Arctic monitoring and research activities: As part of its ongoing work, AMAP will continue to coordinate, based largely on national programs, to provide.

January 2002 Géraud Servin 1 of 12 Terrestrial Ecosystem Monitoring Sites.

The International Federation for Information Processing.

MOBILITY update Ulan Ude Uarctic Council A cooperative network of over 170 universities, colleges, and other organizations.

AMAP - An international cooperation in far northern conditions Yuri Tsaturov - Roshydromet & Morten Sickel – Norwegian Radiation Protection.

Name Organisation or logo Arctic SDI basic presentations The standardized Arctic SDI slide show consists of 2 basic presentations of which one is technical.

Countries of Europe France Spain Italy Germany Which country is this?

Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Cold Region - Needs and Support Yubao Qiu GEO Secretariat Boarding Meeting,

Observational Platforms Vito Vitale, Lars-Otto Reiersen, Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 29 April 2013, Vancouver, Canada,

OECD WORK ON PENSION STATISTICS On-going data collection Working Party on Financial Statistics Paris, 6-7 October 2003 Organisation for Economic Co-operation.

The 3 rd Plenary Meeting Apr 2005, Tallinn Riga Initiative Informal Secretariat Implementation of Strategy Action Background Priorities Status Question.

Status of the Global Framework for Climate Services Filipe D. F. Lúcio

Cooperation Strategy in Polar Regions, ITALY – KOREA workshop, Incheon, 6-8 September, 2011 SAON Board meeting Potsdam, 1 st -2 nd October, 2012 INGV 1.

CIRCUMPOLAR BIODIVERSITY MONITORING PROGRAM CARMA, the Arctic Council and Beyond How CARMA fits into the Bigger Picture Mike Gill CBMP Chair Environment.

The CARMA Network: CARMA 7 – Nov. 30 – Dec. 2, 2010 Vancouver.

WMO Cliquez pour ajouter un texte GLOBAL CRYOSPHERE WATCH CryoNet Asia Workshop in Beijing, China - Report - CryoNet Team Meeting, Reykjavik, Iceland

The criteria and process for the approval of new tasks Draft proposal Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 1-2 October 2012, Potsdam,

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 SI O S Svalbard Integrated Arctic.

Introduction to GEO/GEOSS and GEO Cold Region Yubao Qiu GEO Secretariat 26 October 2012 Beijing, China.

The GRADE website and membership Yngve Falck-Ytter, M.D. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Barcelona, January 12&13, 2012 GRADE January.

The Global Cryosphere Watch 1 CRYONET ASIA FIRST WORKSHOP (Beijing, China, 2-5 December 2013) Barry Goodison, Vice-Chair, GCW Steering Group.

NIWA Water Resources Archive and Climate Database - An Overview David Wratt & Charles Pearson.

ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.

SAON Data Policy, activities, services, and deliveries Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 29 April 2013, Vancouver, Canada,

World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO WMO World Meteorological Organization Working.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division UNECE Databases David Boko UNECE Statistical Division.

State of art Paris, october, 10th 2006 PG Funding and management strategies.

International Polar Year : 2006 ARCUS Annual Meeting and Arctic Forum Washington, DC, May 24-25, 2006 By Igor Krupnik, Joint Committee for the.

SAON Operational Activities Draft proposal Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, January 2012, Tromsø,

Introduction to the OECD. 4 key questions Who are we? What do we do? How do we do it? What happens next?

IASC Mission IASC is a non-governmental organization whose aim is to encourage and facilitate cooperation in all aspects of Arctic research, in all countries.

Hannu Himanen 19 October International cooperation in the field of civil protection − what is in it for the Barents Region? Barents Rescue 2007.

Strengthening the Coordination of Arctic Research programmes and Infrastructures in support of Climate and Environmental Observations Dr Paul Egerton Executive.

Group on Earth Observations (GEO) Cold Regions Work Plan Item WA-01-C3 Barbara J. Ryan Secretariat Director Lanzhou, China 13 March 2013 EC Panel of Experts.

Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX)

Overview of the WISE SoE TCM data flow Data sources and handling

Ice sheets and their relation to sea level

Network Recognition Criteria

Global Terrestrial Observing System

Elmer Topp-Jørgensen, Aarhus University, Denmark

Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research

GEO Secretariat Geneva, Switzerland 3rd June 2013

Regional WIGOS Centres

2nd ARCTIC SCIENCE MINISTERIAL

GAWSIS is a web-based database system that

Selection of cities Anastasios Maroudas Eurogramme

SAON Board Meeting, 1-2 October 2012, Potsdam

Coordinating Operational Oceanography and Marine Meteorology

The GCW Website Jeff Key

Status and Plan of Regional WIGOS Center (West Asia) in

SAON Board Meeting, Potsdam 1-2 October 2012

CEOS SIT Technical Workshop Perspective on Arctic Initiatives

Presentation transcript:

The SAON Networks Database Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, Sweden Jan René Larsen, AMAP Secretariat Simon Wilson, AMAP Secretariat SAON Board Meeting, 1-2 October 2012, Potsdam,

The SAON Steering Group (SG) questionnaire The SAON Steering Group formulated a questionnaire that was presented, mainly to the countries Several countries used the reports to structuree their national reports: Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Poland, Russia, USA. Some reports were structured differently The reports have been digitized in a cooperation between Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil and the AMAP Secretariat. The work has been finanzed by AMAP and is a available at the the SAON web site and through the AMAP Project Directory

The questions - I Name/acronym/contact person/web site Main objective of network Member of or connected to a global network Type of activity/Theme: Atmosphere/Terrestrial ecosystem, including freshwater/Marine ecosystem/Coastal/Ocean/Cryosphere/Human & socio- economic/Space physics Type of activity/Location Type of activity/Community based Type of activity/Coordination

The questions - II Main variables When operational (year) Geographical coverage (countries) Data archive/centre, including Web site Data availability: Metadata only/All data/Charge or no charge for data

The sources Twenty national reports from 13 countries (Canada, Denmark, Greenland, Finland, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Norway, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and USA) for the period Three international organisation reports (Hausgarten, ICES, WMO)

The data base – the statistics Information from 20 countries and 127 organisations were processed A total of 267 activities/projects from 196 networks, covering 603 positions/sites/stations were identified and recorded 40 themes were involved: Aerosols, Air-sea interaction, Atmosphere, Climate, Coastal, Conservation, Cryosphere… The activities have been coded according to scales: Local, national, regional, arctic, global

The activities broken down on countries

The activities broken down on scales

The activities broken down on themes

The questions - III 1a: How can the SAON Steering Group best assist you? 1b: What do you see as the role of the SAON SG? 2: What are the critical issues facing your observing program or data and information management program?

How can the SAON Steering Group best assist you?

What do you see as the role of the SAON SG?

What are the critical issues facing your observing program or data and information management program?

The challenges – the data structure Some countries have submitted several reports, which contain internal contradictions. There have been problems updating old reporting with newer reporting Additional classification may cover: national monitoring networks, field stations, research plots Proposals for improvements: Introduce periodicity/frequency: annual/monthly/continous/seasonal etc. Sites’ are not always one postion, but may be plots (e.g. sampling plots) or study areas (e.g. a glacier).

The challenges – future maintenance Data are alreday outdated, have bugs, etc Future maintenance: Submission of national reports as updates (no) Web interface for maintanance Electronic submission of structured data records

More information -> Networks