doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 NGP SG May Agenda Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission IEEE Next Generation Positioning Study Group Vancouver, Canada May 10 th -15 th, 2015 Chair: Jonathan Segev ( Intel ) Secretary: James Wang ( MediaTek, standing-in ) Slide 2Jonathan Segev (Intel) May 2015

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 3 This presentation contains the IEEE NGP (Next Generation Positioning) Study Group agenda for the May session. Abstract May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 4 Attendance, Voting & Document Status Make sure your badges are correct Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area –see Jon Rosdahl – Cell Phones Silent or Off Jonathan Segev (Intel) May 2015

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 5 Logistics Attendance: – –You must register before logging attendance. –You must log attendance during each 2 hour session. Documentation – –Use “NGP” folder for documents relating to the NGP SG activity. Jonathan Segev (Intel) May 2015

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Guidelines for IEEE-SA Meetings l All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. l Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. l Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. l Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. l Technical considerations remain primary focus l Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. l Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. l Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. This slide set is available at March 2015 IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2]: “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged No duty to perform a patent search

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual Material about the patent policy is available at Slide #2 If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 11 Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual Material about the patent policy is available at If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at Jonathan Segev (Intel) May 2015

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Current IEEE-SA Rules The current version of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws is available at: (HTML version) (PDF version) The current version of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual is available at: (HTML version) (PDF version) The text of the changes made to these documents (approved by SASB/BOG in 2014) can be found at: Please read through these changes so that you are familiar with the current P&P. Slide 12Jonathan Segev (Intel) May 2015

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 13 Current IEEE 802 Procedures IEEE 802 Policies & Procedures –(link to AudCom, approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board Dec 2012) – IEEE 802 Operations Manual (effective 16 Nov 2012),IEEE 802 Operations Manual – IEEE 802 Working Group Policies and Procedures (effective 16 Nov 2012)IEEE 802 Working Group Policies and Procedures – IEEE WG OM : (Approved January 2015)IEEE WG OM – Policies and Procedures hierarchy – Jonathan Segev (Intel) May 2015

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 14 Link to IEEE Disclosure of Affiliation – Links to IEEE Antitrust Guidelines – Link to IEEE Code of Ethics – Link to IEEE Patent Policy – Resources – URLs May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Reminder of SG rules The Next Generation Positioning SG operates under the rules defined in the 802 LMSC Policy & Procedures subclause 5.3, 802 LMSC Operations Manual subclause 4.3, and Operations Manual clause 5 –Participation is open to all – voting rights is NOT required to attend, participate, motion and vote on NGP SG matters –All votes on motions require 75% approval to pass May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 15

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 16 NGP SG Schedule in a Glance MONTUEWEDTHUFRI AM1NGP AM2 PM1 PM2 May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 17 Agenda Items for the Week Patent policy Approve previous meeting minutes (11-15/474r0).11-15/474r0 Approve minutes from telecon (11-15/524r1)11-15/524r1 Presentations to inform the SG in its effort to develop PAR & CSD, such as: Continued development of the use case documents. Problems statements Scope and purpose Draft PAR and CSD submissions review. Approval of PAR and CSD for WG review and approval. Schedule teleconference times as needed. May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 18 Submission List for the week Document No.PresenterTitleTopic 11-15/0499Jonathan SegevNGP May 2015 AgendaAgenda Deck 11-15/030Brian HartWorking draft PAR modifications from telecon approval PAR 11-15/0262Brian HartWorking draft CSD modifications from telecon approval CSD 11-15/0561Thomas HandteSelected use cases for next generation positioningUse case 11-15/0629Igal KotzerAutomotive Use caseUse cases 11-15/0634Ganesh VenkatesanAdditions to use case documentUse case 11-15/0644Ganesh Venkatesanpreliminary simulation results on AoA accuracy in 2.4/5GHz band technical May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 19 Meeting Slot #1 May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 20 Meeting Slot # 1 Agenda Call Meeting to Order (1min) Patent Policy and Logistics (5min) Call for Submission (3min) Agenda Setting (5min) Approval of previous meeting minutes (2min) Approval of telecon meeting minutes (3min) Approval of PAR changes presented on telecon (15min) Approval of CSD changes presented on telecon (15min) Review of PAR and CSD proposed changes (45min) Recess May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 21 May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel) Submission order – Slot 1 Document No.PresenterTitleTopic 11-15/0499Jonathan SegevNGP May 2015 AgendaAgenda Deck 11-15/0030Brian HartNGP PAR draftPAR (20min) 11-15/0262Brian HartNGP CSD draftCSD (20min) 11-15/0561Thomas HandteAdditional use casesUse case (15min) 11-15/0629Igal KotzerAutomotive Use caseUse cases (10min) 11-15/0634Ganesh VenkatesanAdditions to use case documentUse case (30min) as time permits

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Approval of previous meeting minutes March meeting minutes 11-15/0474r0 dated Mar. 12 th.11-15/0474r0 Motion: We approve document 11-15/474r0 as our meeting minutes for the March meeting. Move: Praveen Dua 2 nd : Allan Zhu Y: Unanimous consent N: A: May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 22

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Approval of telecon meeting minutes Meeting minutes of NGP-SG telecon on Apr. 15 th /524r1 dated Apr. 15 th /524r1 Motion: We approve document 11-15/524r1 dated Apr. 15 th as our telecon meeting minutes. Move: Ganesh Vekatesan 2 nd : Chenchen Liu Y: Unanimous consent N: A: May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 23

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Presentations May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 24

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Approval of PAR working draft changes Motion: We agree to adopt doc r8 as our working draft for PAR development. Move: Ganesh Venkatesan 2 nd : Brian Hart Y: Unanimous consent N: A: May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 25

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Approval of CSD working draft changes Motion: We agree to adopt doc r4 as our working draft for CSD development. Move: Ganesh Venkatesan 2 nd : Brian Hart Y: Unanimous consent N: A: May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 26

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Strawpolls doc # 11-15/629 Strawpoll # 1 Do you agree on adding the “access and security” use case to the working draft use case document? Y: 18N: 0A: 16 May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 27

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Strawpolls doc # 11-15/629 Strawpoll # 2 Do you agree on adding the “comfort” use case to the working draft use case document? Y: 13N: 0A: 15 May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 28

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Strawpolls doc # 11-15/629 Strawpoll # 2 Do you agree on adding the “comfort” use case to the working draft use case document? Y: 13N: 0A: 15 May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 29

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Remainder to do attendance May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 30

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Recess May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 31

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 32 Meeting Slot #2 May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 33 Meeting Slot # 2 Agenda Call Meeting to Order (1min) Patent Policy and Logistics (5min) Approve CSD/PAR to WG approval (10min) Complete review on additions to use case document (30min) preliminary simulation results on AoA accuracy in 2.4/5GHz band (30min) Review SG timelines and current status (10min) Telcon schedule (10min) Adjourn May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 34 May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel) Presentations for slot # 2 Document No.PresenterTitleTopic 11-15/0499Jonathan SegevNGP May 2015 AgendaAgenda Deck 11-15/0030Brian HartNGP PAR draftPAR (10 min) 11-15/0262Brian HartNGP CSD draftCSD (10 min) 11-15/634Ganesh VenkatesanAdditions to use case document Use case

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Motion Believing that the PAR contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE-SA guidelines, Request that the PAR contained in 11-15/030r8 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom. Moved: 2 nd : Results: Y:N:A: May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 35

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Motion Believing that the CSD contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE 802 guidelines, Request that the CSD contained in 11-15/262r4 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval. Moved: 2 nd : Results: Y:N:A: May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 36

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Presentations May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 37

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 38 May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel) Study Group Timeline MonthMilestone / Plan of Action January (i)Formation meeting Initial discussion on PAR and CSD Presentations on use cases, usage models. March (p)Continue discussion on PAR and CSD Discussion supporting presentations. Study Group extension May (i)SG Final version of PAR and CSD Discussion on supporting presentations Working Group Approval on PAR and CSD PAR circulated amongst other WGs. July (p)Presentations. Resolve EC feedback on PAR and CSD. Executive Committee Approval on PAR and CSD Study Group extension July (i)NesCom Approval on PAR and CSD Sep. (targeted)Task Group formation meeting

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 39 Goals for July Technical and use case Presentations. Resolve EC and WG feedback on PAR and CSD. Executive Committee Approval on PAR and CSD Study Group extension May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 SubmissionSlide 40 Teleconference Schedule - TBD 1 st of July 10:00 ET for 1hr. Do we need anymore calls? Strawpoll: We agree to the conference call schedule depicted above. Y: N: A: May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Remainder to do attendance May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 41

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission AOB? May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 42

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Backup May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 43

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Some history May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 44

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Motion to release of PAR and CSD to WG approval Motion: TBD. Move: 2 nd : Y: N: A: May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 45

doc.: IEEE /0499r4 Submission Motions and strawpolls as needed Motion/strawpoll To instruct the use case document editor to add use cases depicted by slides x y z of submission abc to the use case working draft document. Move: 2 nd : Y: N: A: May 2015 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 46