LARP Collaboration April 26 th 2006 The Commissioning of the Technical Systems of LHC 1.The final validation that all the collider components/systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Jimenez AT/VAC Room Temperature (LSS) Vacuum Systems M. Jimenez.
Advertisements

LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING REVIEW May 2005 CRYOGENIC VACUUM SYSTEM Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC.
Status of the LHC Project L.Evans - C.Wyss Riunione CSN1 INFN Napoli, 21 Settembre 2005.
TE-MPE –TM, 16/05/2013, Mateusz Bednarek, TE/MPE-EE ELQA testing during and beyond LS1.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
Chamonix Risks due to UPS malfunctioning Impact on the Superconducting Circuit Protection System Hugues Thiesen Acknowledgments:K. Dahlerup-Petersen,
Workshop 12/04/2006AT/MTM SM18 Test Facility A. Siemko "Workshop on Test Facilities and measurement equipment needed for the LHC exploitation"
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
Powering of the Superconducting Circuits: Procedures and Strategies for Circuit Validation Antonio Vergara on behalf of the Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
LHC Hardware Commissioning Review May 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 LHC Hardware Commissioning Review Contribution ID: 20 – Quality assurance and.
Roman Pot Engineering Design Review CERN, 14 February 2006 M.Oriunno, CERN PH-TOT Installation, Commissioning and Schedule.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Status & Plans – May 2011 MPE-TM – 12 May 2011 M. Koratzinos,
Review of Hardware Commissioning May 11-13, 2005 Hardware Commissioning Co-ordination Organisation Roberto Saban the logic day to day organization safety.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
For more info:
HC Review F. Rodriguez-Mateos Powering tests The outcome of the work conducted within HCWG and many discussions among colleagues.
Roberto Saban LEMIC Coordination of Hardware Commissioning  Sector 78 Cooldown Cooldown Powering Tests Powering Tests Test of software for the.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
Hardware Commissioning Tools Robin. AB-CO TC 8th February 2007Hardware Commissioning Tools - RJL2 Summary Hardware Commissioning View Slides from Antonio.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
SAFETY DURING HARDWARE COMMISSIONING, 18 October 2007, D. Bozzini, AT/MEL-EM 1 Safety during Hardware Commissioning Davide Bozzini on behalf of the ELQA.
Luigi Serio CRYOGENICS PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION L. Serio, on behalf of the LHC Cryogenics Operation and Cryogenics Performance Panel.
[R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] HWC Workshop ( ) Consolidation and major changes that have impact on the powering circuits.
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
16-17 January 2007 Post-Mortem Workshop Logging data in relation with Post-Mortem and archiving Ronny Billen AB-CO.
LHC Machine Status Report Mike Lamont for the LHC team Acknowledgements: Mirko Pojer, Matteo Solfaroli, Katy Foraz et al.
Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Outline  Interviews of all the Group Leaders loosely or tightly concerned by hardware commissioning proposing them.
MPP Meeting 07/03/2007 MPP Main Ring Magnet Performance Panel Meeting Wednesday 7th March 2007 Agenda: 1)Matters arising 2)Recommendations for the case.
An invitation to an open discussion We are team reviewing its performance globally We want to help each other to reach the objectives We know the other.
Closing session Issues and questions from the audience and some from me Rüdiger Schmidt.
Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner Software Tools for Commissioning Robin Lauckner 28 th March, 2007.
The prototype test String 2 May 13, 20082Roberto Saban – Academic Training Lecture 1 – Why LHC Hardware Commissioning?
HC Review Follow-up – June 22 nd – 23 rd 2006 What has been going on in the field: a status report F. Rodriguez-Mateos, TS-HDO on behalf of the HCC Team.
AB-CO Review September Session on circuit commissioning Session on circuit commissioning Post-Mortem requirements F. Rodríguez-Mateos on behalf.
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
Session 8: What we will do for beam preparation in 2009 G. Arduini, R. Giachino 1Session 8 – Summary - GA24/02/2009.
LHC experience with installation Katy Foraz March 6th 2008, Dubna GDE Meeting - ILC Conventional Facilities and Siting Workshop ***********************************
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
Technical Services: Unavailability Root Causes, Strategy and Limitations Data and presentation in collaboration with Ronan LEDRU and Luigi SERIO.
11T Magnet Test Plan Guram Chlachidze
Powering LHC magnets version 30/3/2007.
Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned
Powering the LHC Magnets
MPE main activities planned for LS2
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Re-Commissioning (IST) of Electrical Systems: QPS, EE & PIC
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is a U. S
Mike Lamont 4th HERA and the LHC workshop 26th May 2008
Machine Protection Xu Hongliang.
+ many slides from various colleagues (KH, Rudiger, Paul, …)
Machine Protection System Commissioning plans
Brief report of the hardware commissioning activities
PSS verification and validation
Commissioning of the LHC superconducting magnets systems: Why an LHC Hardware Commissioning? Specificity and complexity of this machine Roberto Saban.
Hardware Commissioning
Review of hardware commissioning
Presentation transcript:

LARP Collaboration April 26 th 2006 The Commissioning of the Technical Systems of LHC 1.The final validation that all the collider components/systems perform as specified. 2.All the tests are performed without beam. 3.The sectors under test are fully installed but installation is going on in other sectors. 4.Also, tests are going on in other sectors. Félix Rodríguez-Mateos, CERN-TS

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting the mandate individual system tests hardware commissioning  qualification for operation of the individual systems After the qualification for operation of the individual systems of a sector (vacuum, cryogenics, quench protection, interlocks, powering, etc.),  each sector will be commissioned as a whole each sector will be commissioned as a whole up to the powering to nominal current of all the circuits. Validation and specific studies Validation and specific studies will be carried-out on the first commissioned sector. commissioning coordination equipment groups infrastructure groups operation & controls groups cryogenics electricitymagnet collimators rf beam transfer instrumentation quench protection cooling & ventilation access control & safety interlocks

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting subsystems ready the logic all systems ready for machine check out individual system tests hardware commissioning Injection System RFCollimator System Superconducting Circuits Short Circuit Tests Hardware Commissioning Coordination with System Owners Hardware Commissioning Coordination with System Owners define and carry-out Sytem owners define and carry-out

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting preparation the scope all the accelerator systems in the LHC tunnel with particular emphasis to superconducting circuits documentation the program the schedule the manpower individual system tests commissioning failure scenarios x 65

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting preparation : software requirements prototypes procedures commissioning scenario x 15 sacec : software applications for the commissioning of the electrical circuits AB/CO AT/MELAT/ACRHCCAB/COAB/PO  QPS  Power Converters  Powering Interlock Documents on PMA tools requirements being prepared at present

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting the number of simultaneous work fronts FCR1FCR2UJ or RRCCC 1 SCT 2 PT2 PT1 SCT 2 PT1 SCT 2 PT 2 PT + 1 SCT 2 PT + 2 PT + 1 SCT August 2006 February PT = powering tests in two adjacent sectors1 SCT = short circuit tests of one powering area 9 fronts 5 fronts 1 front front = instance of the sequencer running

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting subsystems ready the as designed documentation all systems ready for machine check out defines the pre-requisites to start the tests in terms of conditions and availability of systems describes in what conditions the system should be delivered to the next step specifies the objective of the test and either describes each step or summarizes the test procedure EDMS

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting HCP in circulation for engineering check LHC-D-HCP-0004 The Commissioning of the Inner Triplet Region Esther Barbero Soto Davide Bozzini Paul Cruikshank Reiner Denz Bruno Puccio Félix Rodríguez Mateos Rüdiger Schmidt Luigi Serio Hugues Thiesen Markus Zerlauth This document describes the sequence of the steps which lead to the commissioning of the complete inner triplet. It gives the backbone of the general procedures and refers to more detailed documents associated to the different systems, which in turn describe the individual system tests and the hardware commissioning procedures.

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting subsystems ready the as tested documentation all systems ready for machine check out contains the sequence of the tests includes the data gathered during the tests describes the eventual non conformities MTF

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting the sequence

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting personnel underground Front 1Front 2Front 1Front 2 LeftRight 6.6 km in the field on call cryogenics operation cryogenics instrumentation quench protection machine interlocks power converters coordination controls operation ooperator xexpert eengineer ttechnician 22 present in the field Front 1 arc and the matching section on the even side Front 2 arc, the matching section on the odd side and the inner triplets on both sides two shifts = 15 hour days resources deployed for the powering tests

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting the sequence of tests around an even point Powering Tests

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting the field minor control centres field control room arc and even matching section inner triplets and odd matching section warm magnets ~210cold circuits 190 orbit corrector circuits ~10 warm circuits ~210cold circuits 190 orbit corrector circuits ~10 warm circuits

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting the field control room DFBs Field control room UA 83 – Left of Point 8 Power Converters Energy Extraction Systems + wi-fi coverage of the UA + printer + social corner + water fountain + desks + meeting table + lockable closets cryogenicspowering testsinterlockspost-mortem

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting the first commissioning

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting the phases CD:3 cool down from 4.5 to 1.9 K CD:2 cool down from 80 to 4.5 K W:ELQA electrical quality assurance at warm C:ELQA electrical quality assurance at cold W:SCT short circuit tests W:LT leak test W:ISTs all sorts of system tests at warm CD:1 cool down from 300 to 80 K C:ISTs system tests at cold C:PT powering tests W: PT pressure test

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting Interlock tests of a powering subsector prior and after connection of the power cables to the DFB leads Power Converters connected to Magnets Power Converters connected to Magnets Power Converters not connected to Magnets Power Converters not connected to Magnets 300 K 1.9 K 90 K Test of power converters connected to the DC cables in short circuit, including controls for powering, ramp, monitoring connexion of power cables to the current leads Electrical Quality Assurance superconducting magnet circuits Individual System Tests of the Quench Protection and Energy Extraction Systems Post-Mortem System tests Commissioning of the electrical circuits one by one or in groups at low, intermediate and nominal currents Commissioning of all the electrical circuits of the sector powered in unison to nominal current with nominal ramp rates Individual System Tests of Powering Interlock Control

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting powering of the superconducting magnet circuits HCA:PIC2Stand-by current  to commission the protection functionalities of the powering interlock controllers and all its connected systems with current through the circuits  to verify the compatibility of the switch-on and switch-off processes of the converters with the sensitivity of the protection systems (namely QPS) HCA:PLI1 HCA:PLI2 HCA:PLI3 HCA:PLI4 Injection level 20% of I nom 50% of I nom 80% of I nom  to set up the power converter current loops  to verify the cooling control of the current leads  to validate the protection mechanisms under real powering conditions and with limited amount of energy in the circuits  to validate quench-related procedures, e.g. cryogenic recovery procedures  to validate the sensitivity and compatibility during ramps of the systems susceptible to noise pick-up, couplings, etc  to perform a last check on the polarities of the circuits by verifying voltages across current leads (at low current using QPS signals) 1/2 

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting powering of the superconducting magnet circuits HCA:PNONominal current  to verify that the power converters work correctly during the ramp of the current  to verify the cooling control of the current leads  to calibrate the DCCTs for the main power converters and the Inner Triplet power converters and to verify that the calibration systems work correctly  to validate the protection mechanisms under real powering conditions and with nominal energy in the circuits  to verify the quench current level of each circuit  to validate quench-related procedures, e.g. cryogenic recovery procedures HCA:PACNominal current (all circuits of a sector)  to verify the tracking of the current  to verify thermal performance of the ventilation and water cooling systems in underground areas  to have a 24-h reliability run in order to detect premature failures due to wrong settings or possible assembly errors 2/2 

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting HCP in circulation for approval LHC-D-HCP-0003 Powering of the Superconducting Circuits of a Sector up to Nominal Current Amalia Ballarino, Davide Bozzini Knud Dahlerup-Petersen Reiner Denz, Robin Lauckner Bruno Puccio, Félix Rodríguez-Mateos Roberto Saban, Rüdiger Schmidt Luigi Serio, Hugues Thiesen Antonio Vergara, Markus Zerlauth This document describes the sequence of the steps which lead to the powering of the superconducting circuits of a powering sub-sector to nominal current. It covers the phases after the connection of the power cables to the current leads up to the powering in unison of all the circuits of a sector to nominal current.

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting failure scenarios  failure scenarios during the commissioning were studied  the objective was to define strategies for at least a few case studies per major system in order to gain in reactivity at the time of failures  evaluate the impact on the program and  define alternatives to carry-on  six sessions of the HCWG were devoted to this study:  Superconducting Electrical Circuits  Cooling and Ventilation System  Cryogenic System  Vacuum System & Leak Tests  Electrical Power Distribution  Power Interlock Controllers can it be circumvented do it according to defined procedures clear diagnostic apply diagnostic protocols decision crash programme failure yes decision apply diagnostic protocols

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting HCP in circulation for engineering check LHC-D-HCP-0006 Failure Scenarios for the Electrical Circuits Davide Bozzini Reiner Denz Knud Dahlerup-Petersen Hugues Thiesen Antonio Vergara Markus Zerlauth This document describes the failure scenarios for the Electrical Circuits which are relevant during the Hardware Commissioning. The objective is to identify show stoppers and define the strategies to repair, recover or do with them.

Felix Rodriguez-Mateos/CERN-LARP collaboration meeting Thanks for your attention…