Preparing Science and Education National Impact Summaries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Reports and Proposals
Advertisements

EU CORIN Supporting Cross-border Cooperation BiH – Croatia/Serbia/Montenegro Europeaid/122730/C/SER/BA ________________________ Topical Training for JMC.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
June 4, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable. June 4, 2003 A Strategic Course for the Future Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable June 4, 2003.
Workshop on SPS Coordination 17 October 2011 Codex Alimentarius Commission Standard-setting Procedures Selma H. Doyran Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme.
CDCs 21 Goals. CDC Strategic Imperatives 1. Health impact focus: Align CDCs people, strategies, goals, investments & performance to maximize our impact.
ERASMUS STAFF PLACEMENTS First year experiences at UCY ERACON Conference 8 th -11 th, May 2008, Lisbon.
CRI- Common Review Initiative Reducing Lender Review Redundancy.
Open Access Dr Richard Masterman Director Research Innovation Services.
Social Sciences Collections & Research: a new content-based team Gillian Ridgley, Ian Cooke, Jerry Jenkins.
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
2007 – 2011 Plan of Work (POW) January 2006 Things We Will Cover Background Information –The 2000 – 2006 Plan of Work cycle –Plans for the next Plan.
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS
Enterprise Directorate General European Commission Supporting NCPs’ activities Irja Vounakis
How Your Research Administration Team Supports You From Start to Finish Michelle Melin-Rogovin, Manager of Research Administration Research Administration.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Valencia, November 2006.
1-1 PRESENTER The Role of the Framework 7 Advisor Your Name Your Websites Websites
Dr. John E. Niederhuber Director, National Cancer Institute Board of Scientific Advisors June 22, 2009 NCI Director’s Update.
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Proposal Writing Tips presented by Clarkson University Division of Research.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
SBOE Idaho Incubation Fund Workshop Office of Technology Transfer.
Development of WIPOSTAD Progress report by the International Bureau Committee on WIPO Standards Geneva May Anna Graschenkova Industrial Property.
Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements.
Introduction to Proposal Writing Proposal Development Team Office of Research & Sponsored Projects (ORSP) September 30, 2009.
Strategic Planning Staff Development Week
Office of Sponsored Programs November  Focus on What is Important  Proposal Structure  Proposal Development Process  Proposal Review.
Civil Air Patrol Office of the Chief Historian BUILDING CAP’S TEAM... FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW.
Special Evening Session: The Business of NASA Research August 22, 2006 Evening Session.
Preparing Grant Proposals: A Session for INASP Country Coordinators Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH AuthorAID Knowledge Community Editor Bangladesh May 2009.
1. Proposal deadline 2. Timeline  A grant opportunity announcement will include a sponsor deadline for receipt of the proposal.  The instructions will.
Identifying Priority Projects for Funding Joan LeBlanc GOMC Council Coordinator.
Research, Education & Extension Policy and CSREES Relations Gerald Miller Heartland Regional Water Quality Coordination Initiative and Iowa State University.
Documents posted at QRIS 2011 Program Quality Improvement Grant RFP Bidder’s Conferences February & March 2011 Wendy Valentine Director,
MRF Reporting Requirements Timing A Presentation for the New Directors’ Workshop Washington D.C. December 11, 2002 Adapted from a presentation by Tom Helms.
Introduction to National Program Directors Randy Wentsel Office of Research and Development January 24, 2006 Randy Wentsel Office of Research and Development.
Semester Conversion CPP Academic Senate March 12 th by F.A.Neto Semester Conversion Director 3/12/20141FAN.
Collaborative Proposals NCURA Region III Meeting Wild Dunes Resort Charleston, SC May 11, 2008.
Struktūrfondu vadošā iestāde – Finanšu ministrija 1 1 Communication Strategy of EU Funds Sanda Rieksta Head of Information Division, Deputy Head.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
PROPOSALS.
ESCOP Budget and Legislative Committee Darrell Nelson, Chair LeRoy Daugherty, Chair-Designate Daryl Lund, Executive Vice Chair.
Africa Regional Center (IIRR-ARC) The Writeshop Process Introducing…
Module V: Writing Your Sustainability Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 © 2011.
Proposal Development Resources at UNL Tisha Mullen Director of Proposal Development September 25, 2015.
1 SERD Project Director’s Conference CRIS OVERVIEW Education Component Current Research Information System March 30, 2005 Dr. Irma A. Lawrence National.
Midwest Big Data Hub Letters of Intent for NSF Edward Seidel Director, NCSA Founder Prof. of Physics, Prof of Astronomy On behalf of the Midwest.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
What is a wiki? Online Collaboration with Wikis. A wiki is an easy-to-use free web page that multiple people can edit.
Policy Lifecycle Policy Created Published & Communicated Periodic ReviewRevised or Retired 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
Office of Science Statement on Digital Data Management Laura Biven, PhD Senior Science and Technology Advisor Office of the Deputy Director for Science.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar Neil Naftzger and Samantha.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Communities of Practice & L ESSONS L EARNED Budget, Finance, and Award Management Large Facilities Office May 2016 Large Facilities Workshop 2016 S. Dillon.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
FISCO2 – Financial and Scientific Coordination Work Package dedicated to ENSAR2 management WP leader: Ketel Turzó WP deputy: Sandrine Dubromel ENSAR2 Management.
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
eIRB Training IRB Committee Members
Grant Search & Submission
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Office of Grant Resources
Office of Research Organization Chart
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Research Competition "Land, Transparency and Decision Making"
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
Presentation transcript:

Preparing Science and Education National Impact Summaries

The Process Begins The National impact process begins with submission of impact statements to the Science & Education Database

Drafting Impact Statements Individual State/Institution impact statements are prepared at their respective locations and submitted to the national database by the local writers SAES CES AP

Multi-States Impact Statements Prepared at Multi-State annual meetings Submitted by administrative advisors to regional office Executive directors review and submit to National Database

Quality Impact Statements Economic Environmental Social Impact on Disciplines

State/Institutions Priorities Each State/Institution has the opportunity to identify priority impact statements for their organization

Impact Writing Process Annually, CSREES (T. Meisenback) calls for impacts, generally around November - March Impact submission identifies the I SSUE (who cares and why) W HAT H AS B EEN D ONE I MPACT National Goal, Primary Area(s) of Impact and Funding Source(s)

Preparing National Impact Summaries The database is generally closed to state/institution impact submissions in March A national writing team is formed and brought to a hosting facility Ag writers, editors and desktop publisher ESCOP (R. Pardini) ECOP (J. Venette) ACOP (L. Cole) CSREES (T. Meisenback)

Preparing National Impact Summaries National writing team meets to review innovations from previous year (Pre-meeting dinner) Based upon national priorities, the team selects priority/hot topic areas for the Science & Education Impact Summaries ( 1 to 1½ pages in length )

Preparing National Impact Summaries Writers choose/assigned priority/hot topic areas Writers research their priority/hot topic using the Science & Education Impact Database Quality impacts: Well written Quantifiable impacts or potential impact State/Institution Priorities –provide guidance for inclusion into national summary

Preparing National Impact Summaries Writers prepare draft on selected priority/hot topic area Each draft is reviewed by COPS, CSREES, editors and revised by writers COPS & CSREES monitor hits in drafts to insure that every state/institution that submitted quality impacts is mentioned Another round of editing by CSREES & land grant institute editor

Preparing National Impact Summaries Final Editor revises & formats national summaries (External to CSREES) Summaries are prepared for distribution: Print Web CDRom (Production is coordinated by CSREES) ** Web & CDRom versions will include linked cross references to the original State/Institution's impact statement

The Science & Education Database The Database is open to the public ( Public can search using multiple criteria –Simple Terms –States and Institutions –National Goals –Hot Topics –Funding Sources –Program Priorities Decision makers have access to each State/Institutions impact submission

State/Institution's Responsibilities Quality impact statements Identify priority/focus areas for your organization Review your impact submissions QUALITY not QUANTITY! Administrative Advisors work with committees to prepare and report impacts Document scientific impact of CSREES supported research on respective disciplines

Proposed Plan for ESS/ESCOP Identify hot topic areas for impact 2005 Define Administrative Advisor/Executive Directors responsibility in obtaining multi- state project impacts and providing quality control Impact training for ESS/ESCOP/Region Improve interface of impact process with ESCOP communications & marketing committee activities & Blue Ribbon Team.

Preparing Science and Education National Impact Summaries