Coordinating ARRA and EDFacts – An Update for PESC Ross Santy Director, EDFacts U. S. Department of Education October 20, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superintendents Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2009.
Advertisements

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
National Indian Education Association Advocating for educational excellence, opportunity, and equity for Native students.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP. This presentation is a product of the Maryland State Department of Education 03/03/10 American Recovery and Reinvestment.
STIMULUS AND STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING AUGUST 20, 2009 NANCY WAGNER, FNSBSD SUPERINTENDENT TRACI GATEWOOD, GRANTS AND SPECIAL.
Ross Santy Director, Performance Information Management Service U.S. Department of Education Incorporating new programs into EDFacts 25 th Annual MIS Conference.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act School Finance Officials April 16, 2009.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 April 13, 2010 State Board of Education.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SECRETARY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NOVEMBER 10, 2009 STRATEGIC PLANNING A MERICAN R ECOVERY AND R EINVESTMENT A CT.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
Escondido Union School District Budget Update The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
Ross Santy, U.S. Department of Education Beth Young, Quality Information Partners.
The Federal Stimulus: An Overview
1 Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 August 11, 2009 State Board of Education.
March 25, 2009 NHSTE Event at SERESC in Bedford, NH Dr. Cathy Higgins March 25, 2009 Spring Update from NH Department of Education Office of Educational.
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 0f 2009 A Year in Review February 17, 2010.
Update on ARRA Presentation for the National Network of State School Improvement Leaders Tom Corwin, Susan Wilhelm, and Carlas McCauley US Department of.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
ARRA Education Grants ~ Virginia Barry, Commissioner Kathleen Murphy, Director Judy Fillion, Director Paul Leather, Director.
Debra Tica Sanchez Vice President, Government Relations Association of Public Television Stations (APTS)
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda Webinar Presentation Monday, July 27 th 2009.
Closing Using Federal Stimulus Funds To Purchase the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program Sue Thomas, Manager, Business Development, Hazelden Publishing.
State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Update to Arizona Association of School Business Officials July 22, 2009 Arizona Office of Economic Recovery Janice K.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
5/13/10 National Expectations for Learning in Arts Education A brief look at what has come before and how educational context shapes the work ahead.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
Strategic ARRA Planning: Using Education Technology and Statewide Longitudinal Data System Grants to Support Title I and IDEA October 5 th 2009.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Recognition that Education is the key to a better economy.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Governor’s Education Summit April 28, 2009.
MEGS Applications and Reporting Requirements Restore and Reform: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational Management Kellogg Center, May.
Planning the Possible How Schools Can Use Stimulus Dollars for Lasting Impact.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
June 15th, 2010 U.S. Department of Education Strategic Use of Title I & IDEA: How to Maximize ARRA, FY09 & FY10 Funds.
U.S. Department of Education Safeguarding Student Privacy Melanie Muenzer U.S. Department of Education Chief of Staff Office of Planning, Evaluation, and.
K-12 Data Standards in Education  4 th Annual Conference on Technology and Standards 1 K-12 Data Standards and the U.S. Department of Education Accomplishments.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda Office of the Deputy Secretary September 2009.
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Primer on NCLB Reauthorization Implications from Federal Stimulus Programs September 20, 2010.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Title 1, Part A Recovery Funds for Grants to Local Education Agencies.
Common Education Data Standards (CEDS) and ED Facts …What’s Next Jack Buckley, Commissioner – NCES Ross Santy, Director – ED Fact s U.S. Department of.
The Statewide System of Support & Regional Roundtables.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
Focus Schools Grant Monitoring and Support Consolidated Planning and Monitoring September 2015.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
How can ARRA Funds Be Wisely Applied? How Researchers Can Help Lou Cicchinelli, Ph.D. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Fourth Annual IES.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION Shanker Institute: April 20, 2009 Marshall S. Smith The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act:
Restore and Reform: Implementing the ARRA Jackson County ISD June 4, 2009 STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION FUND (SFSF)
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
CEEDAR Center Cross-State Convening
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Statewide Systems of Support
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Presentation transcript:

Coordinating ARRA and EDFacts – An Update for PESC Ross Santy Director, EDFacts U. S. Department of Education October 20, 2009

Primary goal: Consolidate collection and storage of information on K-12 education programs. – Benefit: Reduced burden on states – Benefit: Improved data governance at ED – Benefit: Access to cross-program data – Challenge: Change in process for SEA reporting – Challenge: Cultural ED EDFacts Purpose

ED will monitor timeliness against usage dates (included in submission plans). Quarterly messages to Chiefs concerning EDFacts deadlines, expectations, and status of state reporting Partner Support resources will be focused on state assistance EDFacts data will be used to maximum extent to answer Consolidated State Performance Report questions Mandatory EDFacts Reporting: SY

EDFacts (Title I, Title III, IDEA, GFSA, etc) CSPR ARRA- 1512SFSF Phase II App.Race to the Top App. Federal K-12 Program Reporting in 2009

5 Stacking Up the New ARRA Grants

6 A Comprehensive Approach

7

8 Investing in Innovation $650 Million Status: The notice for public comment will be published this fall, applications will be available early next year. Title I School Improvement Grants $3.5 Billion Status:The public comment phase for the School Improvement Grants closed on September 25 th and those applications will be available this winter and due 30 days later. Teacher Incentive Fund $200 Million Status:The notice of proposed priorities will be published for comments this fall. The notice inviting applications will be published this winter and applications will be due 60 days after the notice publishes. Status:Notice Inviting Application has been published and applications are due October 6, 2009 Teacher Quality Partnership Program $100 Million

9 Status:The public comment phase for the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Phase Two closed on August 28 th – applications will be published this fall and due approximately 30 days later. State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Phase Two $11.5 Billion Race to the Top $4.35 Billion Status:The public comment phase for Race to the Top closed on August 28 th and ED received over 1100 comments. The Final Notice and application package are expected to be published late this fall and applications will be due 2 months later.

10 Action Steps to Ensure Strategic Planning and Implementation of all ARRA Grants Governor’s Office & SEA Engage LEAs in Development of Overall State Education Reform Plan Governor’s Office & SEA gather input from LEAs on their strengths and weakness in terms of the four reform priorities. Then together with LEAs, business leaders, parents, teachers, and community partners, SEA maps out overall plans that incorporate these reform priorities into a state-level framework for its ARRA applications and implementation of ARRA funds. OctoberNovember Dec. – Feb. LEAs Implement Title I and IDEA ARRA plans LEA planning and applying to SEA for Education Technology (Ed Tech) grants SEA applies for SFSF Phase Two grant (due early Nov) Partnerships submit TQP applications to ED (due 10/6) SEA applies to ED for SLDS grant (due Nov. 19 th ) SEA/Gov work on RTT application (due mid-winter) SEA works on SIG & i3 applications (due mid-winter) Action Steps:  State and local Title I and IDEA directors review ED Use of Funds Guidance for both programs and identify possible ways to complement each others’ spending plans around one or more of the ARRA reform areas.  SEA briefs state and local Title I and IDEA directors on status of other ARRA funding sources and status of upcoming applications.  SEA and state Title I and IDEA directors work with local Title I and IDEA directors to identify specific ways to contribute to the applications for new ARRA grants (i.e. supply data, ARRA spending plans and recommendations). This effort will improve the quality of ARRA applications for new grants and maximize the opportunities for cohesive and sustainable reform efforts. Action Steps:  State and local Title I and IDEA directors, LEA data managers, and state SLDS project directors meet to identify opportunities to use district data models at state level.  TQP applicants brief local Title I and IDEA directors on submissions – identify links to other ARRA grants.  Governor’s office and SEA briefs all LEAs on its SFSF Phase Two application which is the baseline for other ARRA grants.  ED Tech applicants (LEAs) meet with local Title I and IDEA directors, and other education officials, to identify possible uses of Ed Tech funding to complement overall district reform planning. Action Steps:  Governors, SEAs and LEAs meet to review RTT and SIG applications together to outline an approach that builds on other ARRA funding.  SLDS project directors, Ed Tech applicants, and state and local Title I and IDEA directors are briefed on RTT SIG and i3 applications – discuss connections and opportunities.  Governors and SEAs meet with counterparts from other states to exchange reform ideas, best practices, and opportunities to form consortia.  Governors and SEAs review Title I & IDEA use of ARRA funds and applications for TQP, SFSF Phase Two, SLDS, Ed Tech, and SIG to build upon for RTT and i3 applications.

State District Who Spends SFSF Phase Two School Improvement Grants $3.5 billion $11.5 billion Ed Tech $650 million Both District State Who Applies $250 million 95% Explicitly Requires SEA – LEA Coordination Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Teacher Incentive Fund $200 million $650 million Race to the Top $4.35 billion 95% of ARRA Grants Explicitly Require SEA – LEA Coordination Teacher Quality Part. $100 million Investing in Innovation

K-12 Reform Priorities American Recovery & Reinvestment Act K - 12 State Fiscal Stabilization Fund $48.6 billion Race to the Top & Other New Grants ~$9.7 billion Title I, IDEA & Other Existing Formula Grants ~$26 billion Standards & Assessments Effective Teachers and Leaders Turning Around Struggling Schools Data Systems

13 Opportunities: Create Lasting Reforms Break Down Silos between SEAs and LEAs Break Down Silos between Title I & IDEA directors, budget managers and other program directors Establish models of Community Engagement & Transparency Improve Capacity for Grant Management in SEAs and LEAs Core Actions:  Develop overarching vision for school reform at the state and local levels  Convene state and local education officials and leaders throughout the grant planning, applying and implementation process to share information and collaborate on each ARRA grant  Examine Use of Funds Guidance from ED for each grant  Exchange best practices and create common reform models  Make use of the reports, studies, analysis, and ED materials and education associations  Collaborate with ED’s Comprehensive Centers, Equity Centers, Technical Assistance Network Centers, and Regional Education Laboratories and National Research and Development Centers ARRA Strategic Planning Goals

District Level Planning State Level Planning Classroom Reforms School Level Planning IDEA Students Title I Schoolwide Schools Title I Targeted Assistance Schools Non Title I Schools Persistently Low-Performing Schools State Fiscal Stabilization Fund II $11.5 billion Race to the Top & Other New Grants ~$9.7 billion Title I, IDEA & Other Existing Formula Grants ~$26 billion Identify Reform Needs & Funding Sources

K-12 – Higher ED Linkages

16 A comprehensive, local education, conceptual data model that provides a common structure with which schools can: Evaluate and improve software tools Enhance the movement of student information from one Local Educational Agency (LEA) to another and to the State Education Agency (SEA) Inform instruction and enhance data quality 16 National Education Data Model (NEDM)

SEA Board LEA Board SEA IEU LEA School Course/ Class Staff Student Facilities Finance LEA Staff Food Service TransportationAccountability Staff Qualifications Professional Development Instructional Programs/ Curriculum Programs Activities AssessmentAttendanceHealth Safety & Discipline Initial NEDM Framework 17

18 This phase has included the addition of federal report information (EDFacts, CCD, etc), linkages to Handbook information and transcript information between pK-12 and Higher Education. Official rollout fall 2009 Working site: NEDM: the Next Phase – Federal Reports and Higher Education

19 Efforts to better align data initiatives underway at USED – EDFacts – SLDS – Common Data Standards – National Education Data Model SFSF metrics seek to leverage and accelerate work of longitudinal data systems – Connections between teacher and student records – Alignment of K-12 and higher education data Concluding Remarks