Chemical Monitoring On Site (CM Onsite) organised by NORMAN Association and JRC in support of CIS WFD NORMAN Interlaboratory study (ILS) on passive sampling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
« HUMAN BIOMONITORING » Consultative Forum on Environment & Health 19th October 2005 in Luxembourg Update on developments.
Advertisements

Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Global POP An investigation of environmental pollutants in fish worldwide Version April 2007 International school campaign.
Chemicals in the context of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Bo N Jacobsen EEA Chemicals and Water workshop 6-7 December 2010, EEA, Copenhagen.
The chemical monitoring of organic pollutants using passive samplers within the framework of the PORTONOVO project (water quality in harbours of the Atlantic.
WP3.2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL MEASUREMENTS SINPHONIE Project kick-off meeting November, REC Conference Center, Szentendre Hungary Marianne Stranger,
TEMPUS project NETREL 2nd annual quality meeting Learning courses and hands-on trainings THE SECOND QUALITY CONTROL MEETING Masaryk University, Brno Czech.
Action plan for COST Action 636 WG 4: Analytical issues.
Presentation of Findings - Dissolved Methane Method Study Shale Network Workshop May 7-8, 2015 State College, PA Presented by Rock J. Vitale, CEAC Environmental.
Water.europa.eu Agenda item 7d Report on the quality assessment of the monitoring database Strategic Co-ordination Group November 2010 Madalina.
1 Module OVERVIEW OF EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT.
LIFE THIRD COUNTRIES Development and Implementation of an Integrated System for the Control and Monitoring of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Plants in.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
What is a Watershed? Goals for this module Discuss the goals and objectives of the project Discuss the goals and objectives of the project Learn who.
GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF STATISTICAL SYSTEM OF KAZAKHSTAN ZHASLAN OMAROV DEPUTY CHAIRMAN, STATISTICS AGENCY OF REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. 4.3.
New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of.
BMTA July 2005: 1 Valid Analytical Measurement Studies of Proficiency Testing scheme performance S Ellison LGC Limited, Teddington The work described in.
Why Participate in the WLA? Utility Perspective Preparation Emergency Response Plan Resources.
Challenges of developing national capacity for PRTR systems in Central and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program June 2004.
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest National Reference Laboratory for Air.
The NORMAN network Special view on biocides as emerging substances V. Dulio (1 V. Dulio (1), P.C. von der Ohe (2), F. Botta (1), I. Ipolyi (3), H. Ruedel.
Advisory Panel on Emerging Contaminants Unregulated Chemical Contaminants APEC Update – September 27, 2013.
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
Male’ Declaration Male’ Declaration Review of Progress in Phase III by Secretariat UNEP.
USGS Water Quality Programs and the Water Quality Monitoring Framework CONTACTS: Herb Buxton (609) Tim Miller
Third Regional Workshop on Production and Use of Vital Statistics May 2014, in Daejeon, Republic of Korea Presented by: Ashok Kumar Bhattarai, Director.
The Male’ Declaration Proposal for Phase III. Looking back to think ahead Policy Dialogue Background Materials Ministerial agreement Capacity building.
© 2015 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © 2015 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this presentation may be copied,
October 2008 CMA on-site 2 17./ Budapest, Hungary.
BUG SURVEYS : An Initiation of Transboundary Co- operation Małgorzata Landsberg-Uczciwek Voivodeship Inspectorate of Environmental Protection in Szczecin.
Water.europa.eu CMEP progress CMEP progress Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, WG E
Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Madalina David Bratislava 25 November 2010 First meeting of CMEP group.
Passive sampling of emerging pollutants: NORMAN Expert Group and Europe-wide harmonisation Branislav Vrana Water Research Institute,
Water.europa.eu CMEP progress CMEP progress Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Madalina David Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Madalina David WG E
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Quality Management & Operations Support Branch Quality Assurance Section Presented By: Webster Tasat.
Announcement SPECIAL ISSUE on Chemical Monitoring Activity (eds. P. Quevauvillier, S. Polesello, M. Carere) to be published in TRAC, Trends in Analytical.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Need for continuous exchanges on chemical monitoring issues, in the light of the on-going.
Global Terrestrial Observing System National and regional dimensions Linking scientists and policy makers to collaborate on global and regional environmental.
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
NORMAN-CMA Joint Meeting, Paris 21 Oct 2008 NORMAN support for validation of methods at the European level David Schwesig - IWW Water Centre, Germany -
Overview of the GEMS Food programme to support chemical risk assessment Dr Philippe Verger.
High Resolution Site Characterization Approach: Rapid Sample Collection with High Quality Analyses Targeting VOCs/SVOCs Presented by: Harry O’Neill, President.
Czech National Information Centre (Help-Desk) REACH Jan Kolář April 2009.
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Agenda Item 8(b): Progress with data collection template
Passive Sampling: From Research to an Innovation Transfer for the WFD CIS by B. Vrana, F. Smedes, V. Dulio presented by B. Gawlik.
SWIFT-WFD SSP1-CT SWIFT-WFD
SWIFT-WFD Screening methods for Water data InFormaTion in support of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive Contribution to the monitoring.
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
WFD conference Lille 2007: “Water Status Monitoring under the WFD”
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
Standardisation - What to expect from it?
1st CHEMICAL MONITORING AND EMERGING POLLUTANTS (CMEP) PLENARY MEETING 25th November 2010 Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Bratislava.
Report Of further work on Prioritization 5th meeting WG-E
CMA on-site 2 Announcement
Measuring priority substances in water today
Contribution from AQUILA to Air Policy Review
CMA Drafting group on sediment/biota monitoring
other ‘emerging tools’
Jasperien de Weert Foppe Smedes (Recetox, Brno)
Technical report on emerging substances
NORMAN 6th FP - Proposal n°: Priority
NORMAN Co-ordination Action
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
Scientific Support to Policies
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

Chemical Monitoring On Site (CM Onsite) organised by NORMAN Association and JRC in support of CIS WFD NORMAN Interlaboratory study (ILS) on passive sampling of emerging pollutants Branislav Vrana Water Research Institute, Slovakia

Activities of NORMAN network in passive sampling  An expert group meeting in 2009  A position paper “Passive sampling of emerging pollutants in the aquatic environment: state of the art and perspectives” in 2010  An interlaboratory calibration study in

Interlaboratory calibration study in 2011 present variability in data by comparing results from various passive samplers sent by participating laboratories exposed to water at a single (reference) site Target substances: –polar pesticides - 19 participants –Pharmaceuticals – 17 participants –steroid hormones – 15 participants –Triclosan - 8 participants –bisphenol A - 11 participants –PFOA, PFOS - 8 participants –PBDE -16 participants 30 participants from commercial, academic and regulatory laboratories Silicone strips CONTACT:

Interlaboratory study DESIGN a sampler comparison exercise extended to cover individual aspects in the passive sampling process –analytical comparability –comparison with spot sampling

Study design 1. Passive samplers from participants Coordinator Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 Participant 4 Sampler 3 Sampler 2 Sampler 1 for selected analyte/analytes Sampling site - sampler exposure Sampler 1Sampler 2 Sampler 3Sampler 4 Quasimeme Report to database ng/sampler of compound A ng/cm 2 sampler of compound A ng/L water of compound A calculation procedure for compound A

Study design 2. Standard solution Coordinator Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 Participant 4 send to coordinator Central laboratory S Standard solution S SS S purchase standard prepare a QC solution prepare multiple vials (according to participant registration) check homogeneity send to coordinator S S S S distribute standards for selected analyte/analytes Quasimeme Report to database ng/ml of substance A

Study design 3. Provided passive samplers Coordinator Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 Participant 4 for selected analyte/analytes Sampling site - sampler exposure Provided sampler Provided sampler Provided sampler Provided sampler Buy or prepare Provided sampler Provided sampler Provided sampler Provided sampler Provided sampler Provided sampler Provided sampler Provided sampler Central laboratory Provided sampler 3. Quasimeme Report to database ng/sampler of compound A ng/cm 2 sampler of compound A ng/L water of compound A calculation procedure Report to database ng/sampler of compound A ng/cm 2 sampler of compound A ng/L water of compound A calculation procedure

Study design 4. Water samples Coordinator for selected analyte/analytes Sampling site - sampler exposure Central laboratory W water sample W W W W W W analyse water samples collect water sample send to central laboratory Provided sampler Sampler 3 Sampler 2 Sampler 1 Sampler 4 Provided sampler Provided sampler Provided sampler Quasimeme Report to database ng/L water of compound A NOT APPLICABLE FOR HYDROPHOBIC COMPOUNDS PBDE…

Interlaboratory study Steering group RoleOrganisationActivity CoordinatorVUVH Slovakia coordination, sampling activities, logistics Central laboratory for pesticides Cemagref Bordeaux France Preparation of QC standards, analysis of provided samplers analysis of water samples Central laboratory for pharmaceuticals ISM-LPTC, University of Bordeaux, France Preparation of QC standards, analysis of provided samplers analysis of water samples Central laboratory for Steroid hormones Cemagref Lyon France Preparation of QC standards, analysis of provided samplers analysis of water samples Central laboratory for PFOSDG JRC IES Preparation of QC standards, analysis of provided samplers analysis of water samples Central laboratory for BDERECETOX + DELTARES Preparation of QC standards, analysis of provided samplers NO analysis of water

Interlaboratory study Steering group RoleOrganisationActivity Central laboratory for bisphenol A, triclosan UK Environment Agency Preparation of QC standards, analysis of provided samplers analysis of water samples Sampling supportInsitute of Public Health Ostrava, Czech Republic Support at the sampling site Sampling support Data interpretation RECETOX, Masaryk University, Czech rep. Support at the sampling site Participant registration Data interpretation, report preparation Participant interface for uploading results Data-assessment and Reporting results QUASIMEME Setup of the experiment into a database Setup of sharepointsites Instruction of laboratories how to get access to the sharepointsite Introduce the lab specific contact information into the database. Do the data-assessment Produce figures and excel sheets of the assessed data. Produce z-score lists for each individual laboratory. Help desk facility with respect to data- transfer

Target compounds Pesticides and their degradation products: Terbutylazine Desethylatrazine Desethylterbutylazine Atrazine Carbendazim S-metolachlor Diuron Pharmaceuticals: Carbamazepine Diclofenac Ibuprofen Naproxen Diazepam Alprazolam Ketoprofen Atenolol Steroid hormones: 17-alpha-Estradiol 17-alpha-Ethinylestradiol 17-beta-Estradiol Estriol Estrone Bisphenol A Triclosan Brominated flame retardants BDE 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 and 154 Fluorinated surfactants PFOA, PFOS

Campaign timing: passive sampler deployment Campaign number Class number Compound class Registration deadline Deadline for sending samplers + deployment equipment Sampler exposure Sampler deployment period 11Pesticides days Pharmaceutic als 23 Steroid hormones days PFOA PFOS 5 Bisfenol A, Triclosan 36PBDE days

Continuous water sampling

Sampler preparation for deployment

Sampler deployment

Sampler recovery

Onsite sampler cleaning and preparation

Laboratory preparation of provided samplers

Dissemination of results 3 rounds, May-August – a workshop will be organised to disseminate results.

Study results Statistics: 30 participating laboratories from Europe, North America and Australia 292 reference samplers for polar compounds distributed 80 reference samplers for PBDE 268 participant samplers for pesticides and pharmaceuticals 285 participant samplers for PFOS, steroids, bisphenol A and triclosan 132 participant samplers for PBDE Total: cca samplers were deployed at the reference site and distributed for analysis The reporting deadline for laboratories has been set to 15 th December A dissemination workshop will be organised in 2012 organised by NORMAN + DG JRC