Group16: Assembly Fixture Design and Fabrication for 6 Pole Motor Magnets and their Retaining Parts Group Members: Jeffrey Morton John Pilgrim Marcus Rothberg November 12, 2009
Overview Introduction The Problem Product Specification The Design Concepts Design Choice and Walkthrough Experimental Calculations Cost Analysis Conclusion Future Work
Danfoss Turbocor Specializing in commercial HVACR applications Designer and manufacturer of world’s first oil-free refrigerant compressors The largest compressor, that is still in development, is the TT500
The Compressor – TT500 It is currently in its Beta phase of development Inside the TT500 is a shaft that powers it The shaft has a hexagonal center where six rows of magnets will be installed
The Shaft Will have six rows of magnets secured to it via wedges Each row of magnets will hold 9 magnets for a total of 54 magnets
The Problem Load and secure magnets and wedges onto the shaft. Magnets need to be aligned with the poles adjacent Pole orientation alternating from column to column Causes loading and alignment to be difficult
Magnets The difficulty in installing the magnets is that the poles of the magnets are aligned The repelling force of the magnets causes the installation to be difficult
Scope and Customer Needs A new method to install magnets and wedges onto the shaft Process must be Safe Ergonomic Accurate Time efficient Non-damaging to parts
Product Specification Budget of $1500 Load and align 9 magnets to each row Installs or allows wedges to be installed in between each row of magnets A total of 6 rows of magnets Repeatable Completion of assembly within 45 minutes
Design 1: Plunger Fixture Magnets placed all at once Holds magnets for wedges and the next column of magnets to go Initial plunger releases and moves to next column
Loads and installs magnets one at a time. Cylindrical Sleeve retains magnets on the shaft. Ferrous bit constrains each magnet as they are lowered onto the shaft. Wedges may be installed as each row of magnets is installed. Design 2: Cylinder Sleeve Aligning Rings Retaining Cylinder Ferrous Bit
Design 3: Bracket and Rail Magnets loaded one at a time. Magnets installed in rows of nine. Magnets are aligned in rail, then loaded into the bracket and steel fixture. Steel with magnets is lowered onto shaft and bracket locks into fixture. Brackets retain magnets on the shaft until wedges can be installed. Aligning Rail Magnet Clamp Removable Ferrous Bit
Design 4: Trap Door Magnets are loaded Bar clamps and places magnets onto shaft Magnets then secured by rods Bar is removed and process is repeated
Concept Matrix Specifications: Precision (40%) Ease of Use (30%) Safety (10%) Durability (10%) Time (10%)
From Start to Finish Bottom collar halves and aligning cylinder are placed
From Start to Finish Shaft is placed Top of the cylinder aligns shaft radially Edge of cylinder aligns shaft axially
From Start to Finish Top collar halves are placed
From Start to Finish Alignment cylinder is removed Collar tops are placed to retain collars
From Start to Finish Shaft is placed and located Magnets are to be loaded and placed
From Start to Finish Magnets are loaded one at a time (Part of the fixture base/frame is removed for visual purposes)
From Start to Finish Magnet row alignment issues Cam device and wall provides solution
From Start to Finish Cam device and wall
From Start to Finish Magnets loaded and aligned with cam Magnets picked up by clamp
From Start to Finish Trap door in loader opens Clamp moves down path to place magnets on shaft
From Start to Finish Retaining rods placed on magnet row
From Start to Finish Shaft is indexed and next row of magnets is to be loaded After all 6 magnet rows are loaded, shaft is removed from fixture
From Start to Finish Retaining wedges are installed Retaining rods and collars are no longer needed
Completion GREAT SUCCESS!!!
Fixture Exploded View
Analysis Force between two or more magnets Cam displacement polynomials Cam sva graphs Cam profile Time Analysis Material Selection Cost analysis
Magnet Testing The magnets need to be loaded together. As the magnets get closer together, the repelling force increases A force of 26lbs is needed to place magnets together Loader Scale Magnets
Cam Aligner Design ActionDisplacementVelocityAccelerationDisplacement Polynomial Rise(0- 90deg) 000 h00 Dwell( deg) h00 h00 Fall( deg) h00 000
Cam Aligner SVA Graphs No over shoot in displacement curve. Smooth velocity curve. No jumps in acceleration curve.
Cam Profile From displacement curve. Profile equations: Center of axle equations:
Time Analysis
Preliminary Material Selection Aluminum 6061 for most structural parts Easy to machine Relatively cheap Noncorrosive Yield strength of 8000psi (55MPa) Oil impregnated bronze or Teflon for loader lining Low friction Non abrasive Brass for inner collar Low friction
Cost Analysis PartDimensionMaterialQuantityPurchased?Price Loader H=1”; w=1”; Aluminum Square Tube1no$2.37 Sliding Door H=1”; w=1”; Aluminum Square Tube1no$2.37 Magnet Clamp T=1/2”; L=12”; w=2”Stainless Steel1no$38.90 Lever D=1”; L=36”Aluminum 60611no$13.33 Frame T=1/2”; W=4; L=12”Aluminum 60614no$52.36 Collar D=6”; L=6”Brass1no$ Hardware NA no$50.00 Cam D=1”; L=6”Aluminum 20241no$13.34 Cam Plate T=1/4”; L&W=8”Aluminum 20241no$16.38 Cam Aligner Side Plates T=1"; W=3"; L=12"Stainless Steel1yes$89.06 Base Plate T=1" ;W=8”; L=8”Aluminum 60613yes$ OtherDimensionsPrice per hourQuantityPurchased?Price Machine Work NA$50/hr10 hrsDonated$500 Total $776.30
Future Work Finalize design and do detailed drawings with tolerances. Analyze the four bar lever. Fem Analysis of the magnetic fields and their resulting forces. Order parts.
Acknowledgements Robert Parsons Turbocor Machine Shop Supervisor Clint Bencsik Turbocor Manufacturing Engineer Alain Pepin Turbocor Mechanical Engineer Design Manager Jean S. Cote Dr. Daudi R. Waryoba Davey Jones
Reference McMaster-Carr, Norton, Robert L. Design of Machinery 4 th edition, McGraw Hill. Softwares – ProEngineer Wildfire, SolidWorks, Mathcad, Microsoft Office
ANY QUESTIONS? Comments also welcome