FFAG Hardware development for EMMA Electron Model with Many Applications Electron Model with Muon Applications C. Johnstone, Fermilab NuFact05 INFN, Frascotti,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Advertisements

Electron Model Components and Costing C. Johnstone Summary talk, C. Johnstone FFAG04 Oct 12-16, 2004 KEK, Tsukuba, Japan.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation- Variation and 0ptimization David Neuffer, A. Poklonskiy Fermilab.
Resonance crossing and error tolerances Shinji Machida KEK FFAG05 at Fermilab, April 3-7, 2005.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
PAMELA Contact Author: CONFORM is an RCUK-funded Basic Technology Programme PAMELA: Concepts Particle Accelerator for MEdicaL Applications K.Peach(JAI,
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Poster reference: FR5PFP025 Extending the Energy Range of 50Hz Proton FFAGs S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Magnetic.
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field Nonscaling FFAG Lattice Design C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG07 April 12-17, 2007 LPSC, Grenoble,
NON-SCALING FFAGs: questions needing answers Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool Department of Physics. BASROC-CONFORM.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University *BNL, CERN, CI, FNAL, JAI, LPSC Grenoble, STFC, TRIUMF.
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
Longitudinal Dynamics in Linear Non- scaling FFAGs using High-frequency (≥100 MHz) RF Principal Cast of Characters in the U.S./Canada: C. Johnstone, S.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Novel Constant-Frequency Acceleration Technique for Nonscaling Muon FFAGs Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF, October 2004 Classical scaling FFAGs (MURA) have geometrically.
Bucketless Acceleration in nonscaling FFAG’s & Sketches of muon and electron machines Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada April 2004  Phase.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Extending FETS with a Ring Electron models are not sufficient for simulating the beam.
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field FFAG C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG06 Japan f Fermilab.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
JAI-Diamond Joint Seminar 07/06/20071 Development of Non-Scaling FFAG : EMMA & PAMELA Takeichiro Yokoi J. Adams Institute Oxford University.
Electron Model of Linear-Field FFAG for Muon Acceleration What does it look like? – much like the KEK ATF (36 F0D0 arc cells) but without its straight.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
Part I Optics. FFAG is “Fixed Field Alternating Gradient”. Ordinary synchrotron needs ramping magnets to keep the orbit radius constant. FFAG has Alternating.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
Non-scaling FFAGs in UK EMMA Requirement for (at least) one non-scaling FFAG clear: - multi-resonance crossings - huge/tiny momentum compaction - asynchronous.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Magnet design issues and discussion David Harding for Vladimir Kashikhin 3 April 2005.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
Beam dynamics and linac optics studies for medical proton accelerators
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
Investigation of Injection Schemes for SLS 2.0
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
Particle Physics Group Meeting January 4 th – 5 th 2010 Commissioning EMMA, the Worlds First Non Scaling Fixed Field – Alternating Gradient Accelerator.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Alex.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
Hardware development for EMMA
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Muon Acceleration in a Neutrino Factory
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

FFAG Hardware development for EMMA Electron Model with Many Applications Electron Model with Muon Applications C. Johnstone, Fermilab NuFact05 INFN, Frascotti, Italy June 21-26, 2005

FFAG Design Information Background –Scaling vs. nonscaling Ring components –Rf –magnets Diagnostics –BPMs –OTRs –Single Wire Scanners

FFAG Scaling vs.Linear Non-Scaling As a function of momentum  Parallel orbits  Constant optical properties  Orbit change,  r, linear As a function of momentum  Nonparallel orbits  Varying optics  resonance crossing  Orbit change ~quadratic  Smaller aperture requirements  Simple magnets   min

FFAG Optical layouts of FFAGs Scaling and nonscaling lattices can have identical optical structures –FODO –Doublet –Triplet Rf drifts The important difference is in the TOF vs. p, which is of particular importance for the linear non-scaling lattice: the FODO is 1.5 x (  T 1 +  T 2 ) as compared with the triplet (lower  T implies less phase slip, more turns for fixed, high frequency rf)

FFAG Momentum Compaction of Orbits Momentum Compaction,  –Measure of orbit similarity as a function of momentum (also isochronicity for relativistic beams) –Measure of the compactness of orbits -   0, aperture  0

FFAG Momentum compaction in scaling FFAGs Scaling FFAGs: Pathlength or TOF always increases with p

FFAG Momentum compaction in linear nonscaling FFAGs Linear non-scaling FFAGs:

FFAG Cont…. But, the transverse excursion cannot be ignored at low energy Eventually this transverse correction overtakes the net decrease with low momentum and  C turns around giving an approximate quadratic dependence of  C and TOF. l FF

FFAG What does this mean? Scaling FFAG can have only 1 fixed point, or orbit with is synchronous with the rf (fixed points are “turning” points in the phase slip relative to the rf waveform) –1 turning point implies the beam slips back and forth across the rf crest twice Linear nonscaling FFAG can have 2 fixed points (or 1) –Beam can optimally cross the rf crest 3 times By using two fixed points for maximal acceleration, the ratio of extraction energy can be ~3:2 for nonscaling vs. scaling FFAGs Fixed points

FFAG Electron Model - Non-scaling Demonstration of New Accelerator Physics Gutter Acceleration asynchronous acceleration within a rotation manifold outside the rf bucket. Momentum Compaction Unprecedented compaction of momentum into a small aperture. “Uncorrectable” Resonance Crossing Rapid crossing of many resonances including integer and ½ integer; multi- resonance crossings in a single turn Evolution of phase space Under resonance conditions and gutter acceleration Validate concept for muon acceleration Characterize and optimize the complex parameter space for rapid muon accelerators

FFAG Electron Model - Construction 6m – similar to the KEK ATF without straight sections (scaled down from 1.5 GeV to 20 MeV). Host: Daresbury Laboratory U.K. downstream of their 8-35 MeV Energy Recovery Linac Prototype (ERLP) of the 4th Generation Light Source (4GLS). 6m

FFAG Radiofrequency system Adopt TESLA-style linear RF distribution scheme to reduce number of waveguides R=1M , Q=1.4  10 4 Where possible adopt designs already existing at the host laboratory. 1.3 GHz preferred over 3 GHz: reducing RF while magnet length is fixed, implies magnets become a smaller number of RF wavelengths. This implies smaller phase slip and more turns. Adopt 1.3 GHz ELBE buncher cavity to be used at Daresbury 4GLS Frequency variation of few to investigate 1 or 2 fixed points operation. 20 cm straight for installation

FFAG Quadrupole Magnet Fermilab Linac quad The 5cm-long upgrade Fermilab linac quadrupole has peak pole-tip field near 3.5 kG, and the bore is 5cm. This is ideal for the 3 cm orbit swing envisioned for the ring. The gradient is stronger than required and will likely require a different coil. General requirements: Gradient: 7 T/m Slot length: 10 cm Aperture: 40 mm wide, 25 mm high Rep rate <1Hz

FFAG Combined function magnet Specifications  Dipole component of 0.15 – 0.2 T  Slot length: 10 cm  Magnetic length: 7cm  Quad component of ~4T/m  Magnet spacing: 5 cm  Aperture (good field): 50 mm wide, 25 mm high  Field uniformity  1% at pole tip  Space for internal BPM  1Hz operation or less  No cooling  No eddy current problems

FFAG Dipole plus quad field lines Dipole only field lines Power the dipole component with permanent magnets  Compact  No power issues  Thermally stable PM material Power the quadrupole component with a (modified) Panofsky coil  Compatible with rectangular aperture  Relatively short ends  Permanent quad + trim coil ±20% Magnet Concept (Vladimir Kashikhin, FNAL)

FFAG Advantage of variable quad and dipole fields? Variable quad was felt to be most important for phase advance and resonance crossing controol Variable dipole allows exploration of acceleration with 1 fixed point (1/2 synchrotron oscillation around “bucket”) or 2 (gutter acceleration –Measure phase space and emittance dilution Both: different  C /TOF parabolas –Asymmetric vs. symmetric –Correct for errors/end field Potential Fixed points

FFAG FFAG Combined Function Magnet V.S.Kashikhin, June 21, 2005 The proposed combined function magnet has C-type iron yoke and separate dipole and quadrupole windings. Each winding powered from individual power supply. They can be connected in series in accelerator ring. Dipole component of magnetic field formed by parallel surfaces of iron poles. Quadrupole field component formed by sectional quadrupole winding placed into the pole slots. Such configuration provides independent regulation both field components. Magnet parameters Magnet configuration C- type Dipole field 0.15 T Adjustable quadrupole gradient 0 – 6.8 T/m Dipole winding ampere-turns 7600 A Quadrupole pole winding ampere-turns A Magnet body length 50 mm CF magnet with independently variable dipole and quad fields

FFAG 2D modeling of new CF magnet Flux lines at maximum dipole and quadrupole currents. Dipole coil (blue), Quadrupole (red).

FFAG Diagnostics Diagnostic designs described here –BPMs bunch train/single bunch operation Turn by turn data –OTRs (Optical Transition Radiation) Foils + detection 10 8 /bunch or lower for a bunch train 10 9 /bunch for single bunch operation – will require closer examination for 108/bunch, single bunch operation Other diagnostics –Single Wire Scanners orbits are non-overlapping, step increment microns –Pepperpot phase space measurements in extraction line

FFAG 1.3GHz button-type BPMs (FNAL Main Injector) 1 set per magnet 3 to 5 cm aperture 20 micron resolution Internal mounting Turn by turn for ~10 turns 10 9 electrons/bunch ~66 nsec rotation period BPM Specification - General  Digital receiver  210 MHz adc sample rate  12 bit resolution  Single-bunch excitation of a filter as shown  105 MHz center frequency  10 MHz bandwidth  Filters must be stable and matched  adc must be synched to beam BPM (Jim Crisp, FNAL) FNAL MI BPM Hardware and Single Bunch Operation

FFAG

EXAMPLE: Profiles from an OTR foil in the 120 GeV AP-1 proton line at Fermilab

FFAG

Beam Profile Diagnostics for the Fermilab Medium Energy Electron Cooler Abstract—The Fermilab Recycler ring will employ an electron cooler to store and cool 8.9-GeV antiprotons. The cooler will be based on a Pelletron electrostatic accelerator working in an energy-recovery regime. Several techniques for determining the characteristics of the beam dynamics are being investigated. Beam profiles have been measured as a function of the beam line optics at the energy of 3.5- MeV in the current range of A, with a pulse duration of 2µs. The profiles were measured using optical transition radiation produced at the interface of a 250µm aluminum foil and also from YAG crystal luminescence.. 3-D image of the electron beam obtained with OTR monitor Variation of the beam X-profile versus SPA05 lens current

FFAG Electron Model - Demonstrates: Asynchronous 2-fixed pt. gutter Acceleration Unprecedented compaction of momentum Resonance Crossing Evolution of phase space and comparison with simulation Validate concept for muon acceleration

FFAG Electron Model - Hardware and Measurements: Full Complement of Diagnostics designed or available including - Large aperture BPMs, OTR foils and detectors - Single Wire Scanners, Pepperpots Magnetic components designed or under design; short: 5-6 cm and strengths appear technically reasonable Measure: -orbits, orbit stability, injection stability - probe injection phase space with a pencil beam - tolerances : field, injection, contributions of end fields -Evolution of phase space and comparison with simulation under different conditions of acceleration and resonance crossing - optimization and operational stability of accelerator conditions