Yiming Cheng, Dario Ghersi, Claudia Calcagno, Roberto Puzone, Franco Celada Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Università degli Studi di Genova Claudia Calcagno - Dario Ghersi HOW THE IMMUNE SYSTEM WORKS A brief summary The immune system is a complex of organs--highly.
Advertisements

Humoral Immunity Ajith Sominanda Department of Anatomy.
1 Antibody Concentration – Primary and Secondary Response Primary Response 1.Infection (Ag) 2.Lag phase 3Antibodies produced 4Antibody level rises to combat.
Immune Responses to HIV
Lecture 4 Activation of Adaptive Immunity. Overview In order to initiate an immune response antigen must be recognized. In order to initiate an immune.
IMMUNITY.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSIS Department of Systems Biology Technical University of Denmark Immunological Bioinformatics Introduction to the.
TODAY B CELL DEVELOPMENT.
Schema What is an antigen?
Complexity and the Immune System. Why look at the immune system? -Intermediate level -One of the major information processing systems in the body (with.
Stochastic Stage-structured Modeling of the Adaptive Immune System Dennis L. Chao 1, Miles P. Davenport 2, Stephanie Forrest 1, and Alan S. Perelson 3.
The body’s defenses. Reading: Ch. 43; Keywords Lines of defense Lymphatic system Inflammation Features of immune system Memory B-cells Primary and secondary.
Immune Response Adaptive Immune Response. Adaptive Immune 2 Adaptive Immune Response Humoral Immunity B cells Cellular Immunity T cells.
The Lymphoid System and Immunity Overview
Specific immune system
Population-based metaheuristics Nature-inspired Initialize a population A new population of solutions is generated Integrate the new population into the.
Immunology Chapter 16, Lecture 2 Richard L. Myers, Ph.D. Department of Biology Southwest Missouri State Temple Hall 227 Telephone:
Specific Host Defenses: The Immune Response. The Immune Response Immunity: “Free from burden”. Ability of an organism to recognize and defend itself against.
The Immune System memory and specificity Chapter 43
Specific Resistance = Immunity
Automatic Test-Data Generation: An Immunological Approach Kostas Liaskos Marc Roper {Konstantinos.Liaskos, TAIC PART 2007.
Review: Cells of the Immune System Leukocytes – White blood cells Myelocytes –macrophage, neutrophil, eosinophil,basophil Leukocytes – B, T and NK cells.
Identification of Cancer-Specific Motifs in
Bellwork Discuss with your group what you think is happening in the following processes. Why does your body undergo an allergic reaction? Why do some.
Adaptive/Acquired Immunity
Review: Cells of the Immune System From Larsson and Karlsson (2005)
Cell Mediated Immunity (CMI)
Adaptive immunity – B cell
Jianwei Shuai ( 帅建伟 ), Hai Lin ( 林海 ) Physics Department Xiamen University A Stochastic HIV Dynamics.
Why are there so few key mutant clones? Why are there so few key mutant clones? The influence of stochastic selection and blocking on affinity maturation.
Artificial Immune System based Cooperative Strategies for Robot Soccer Competition International Forum on Strategic Technology, p.p , Oct
Dr. Taj IMMUNITY The Immune Response Immunity: “Free from burden”. Ability of an organism to recognize and defend itself against specific pathogens or.
Toward Quantitative Simulation of Germinal Center Dynamics Toward Quantitative Simulation of Germinal Center Dynamics Biological and Modeling Insights.
starter CELL comparison Cell Natural Killer Cell B Lymphocyte
T cells Abul K. Abbas: Basic Immunology page (fig3.7, 3.9, 3.11, 3.16 are not required) and (fig 5.11, 5.18 are not required)
Immunology B cells and Antibodies – humoral
Immune system Haixu Tang School of Informatics. Human lymphoid organs.
Simulating the Immune System Martin Weigert Department of Molecular Biology Steven Kleinstein, Erich Schmidt, Tim Hilton, J.P. Singh Department of Computer.
T/B Collaboration Associative recognition/carrier effect Hapten cannot elicit an immune response without a carrier Hapten must be physically linked to.
Antigens Immunogen – a molecule that specifically interacts with an antibody or lymphocyte and elicits an immune response Antigenic determinants (epitopes)
Lecture 13 Immunology and disease: parasite antigenic diversity.
Immunity. Body Defenses First line - barriers Skin and mucous membranes Flushing action –Antimicrobial substances Lysozyme, acids, salts, normal microbiota.
Antibody-mediated Immunity Dr. Hend Alotaibi Assistant Professor & Consultant College of Medicine, King Saud University Dermatology Department /KKUH.
Presentation By SANJOG BHATTA Student ID : July 1’ 2009.
Microbiology MIC 201 Chapter 5- Immune response. Foreign Invaders Called Pathogens –Viruses, bacteria or other living thing that causes disease/immune.
Figure 43.1 An overview of the body's defenses
Immune Responses to HIV
Chapter 43 The Immune System.
Immune System Basics Immunity: The capacity to resist infectious pathogens. Pathogens: Disease-causing organisms Self vs. Non-self recognition Major Histocompatibility.
Kuby Immunology, 7e: Chapter 1
The Body’s Defense Against Pathogens -- Memory
CHAPTER 24 The Immune System
Immunology & Public Health
CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY RAHUL KUMAR LOHANA 2K16/MB/50 INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF SINDH, JAMSHORO.
Immune System Chapter 14.
Sustained Interactions between T Cell Receptors and Antigens Promote the Differentiation of CD4+ Memory T Cells  Chulwoo Kim, Theodore Wilson, Kael F.
Immunology & Public Health
The cellular immune response to cancer is complex and involves a diverse repertoire of immunoregulatory interactions principally involving antigen presenting.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Immune System Chapter 14.
Figure 43.0 Specialized lymphocytes attacking a cancer cell
Antibodies and B Cell Memory in Viral Immunity
LMU Department of Biology
Humoral and Cell Mediated Immunity
Immunopathology in RSV Infection Is Mediated by a Discrete Oligoclonal Subset of Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells  Steven M Varga, Xiaoting Wang, Raymond.
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Lec.10 Immune response كلية المأمون الجامعة\قسم تقنيات التحليلات المرضية مادةالمناعة-النظري/المرحلةالثالثة م.م.رشد اياد عبدالحميد.
T Cell Activation and proliferation
Attrition of T Cell Memory
Presentation transcript:

Yiming Cheng, Dario Ghersi, Claudia Calcagno, Roberto Puzone, Franco Celada Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Computer simulation of the immune system: study of cross-reactive Tc memory against heterologous viruses Yiming Cheng, Dario Ghersi, Claudia Calcagno, Roberto Puzone, Franco Celada Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Conclusions Abstract IMMSIM [1] was constructed to tackle the staggering complexity of the Immune System by comparing it with the responses of an agent-based computer model, where the agents are minimalistic portraits of lymphoid cell types, body’s target cells and typical invaders. Once launched, the response develops in virtual 3D (2 dimensions in space and 1 dimension in time) computer spaces, and all similarities with and differences from biological consensus serve to shape, confirm or discard ideas and hypotheses. In the present study we simulate the formation and the recall of anti-virus memory, and try to predict what will happen both to the responses and to the memory cells when the second infecting virus is partly different from the first one, and when the cross-reactivity of the two branches, humoral and cellular of the immune system is surprisingly asymmetrical, or split. The in machina simulations explore all epitope distances, and measure all changes in affinity, cellularity and efficiency in clearing the infection. Besides the obvious cooperation, they reveal powerful competitions between the two branches and between the cross-reacting memory and new responses when the latter suffer the competition by preformed cell-rich but inefficient clones. Memory, usually an asset, has become a liability. Model Setup Cross-reactivity IMMSIM model Homologous Responses Split cross-reactivity References Theoretical Total Repertoire of the species65536 Number of lymphocytes/individual mouse2500 Expected Individual total repertoire2453 Total Species Repertoire specific for one epitope697 Expected specificity overlap between two mice92 Expected Individual specific repertoire for one epitope26 Expected number of clones specific for one epitope in common between two individuals < 1 Each virtual mouse (VM) in the present setup is endowed with 2500 cells of each type: B, Th (Th1+Th2), Tc, APC. The random generation of 16-bit strings assures a total repertoire of different specificities for B and T receptors. Each of the specific cell types (B and T) is endowed with the clonal repertoires shown in the table. The agents of IMMSIM behave like cellular automata (a), but they represent all types of cells of the immune system with their specific receptors and paratopes, the antigens and the invading viruses. T cell helps B cell upon antigen binding of the B receptor, leading to the initiation of the humoral response (b). The maturation of the antibody response is governed by the scarcity of T help in the primary response and the antigen competition in the secondary response (c). (d) illustrates all simulated steps of the viral infection and the combined cellular and humoral response leading to the cure of infection. Repeated infections by the same viruse generate primary, secondary and tertiary responses by the humoral and cellular branches of the immune system. At each successive infection, the number of virus particles decreases Responses are decreasing in clone repertoire. The experiments have been conducted in a MATRIX scheme to ensure at least 25 repetitions of each experiment for every one bit at a time increased distance between the primary infectant and the challenging virus. Since only 0, 1, 2 and 3 mismatches between paratope and epitope are effective, 2 viruses are potentially related when they carry up to 6 bit differences between their respective peptides, as shown in Cartoon (A). (B) maps all distances between 5 viruses; (C) shows the combinations between primary and secondary challenge used in the matrix. Recall efficiency, in terms of clones and of cell numbers, declines in parallel in the humoral response, but the decline is biphasic in the cellular, with no decrease up to bit distance 3. The strength (weighted affinity) of the secondary response relative to the primary response toward the primary infectant and against the secondary infectant. In the humoral response, the latter curve descends harmoniously from 1.3 to 1 as expected. In the cellular response, there is an initial dip and the level of the primary response is reached only at distance 5 and higher. Comparing the clonal engagement in the secondary response relative to the primary for humoral and cellular responses show trimming at bit distance 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and then expansion at distance 5-8. The significance of this observation is under study. How can memory be a burden instead of an asset? It can, if the affinity of memory is low on account of the distance of the cross-reactants: the sheer member of the memory cells may outcompete the naïve cells and offer a lower quality defense. Like all model results, these conclusions are provisional. They await the conformation by wet-lab researches (of the UMASS team) before being used in the discussion about – e.g. – the influenza vaccine. This work is supported by NIH Grant R01-AI Celada F, Seiden PE. A computer model of cellular interactions in the immune system. Immunol Today 1992;13(2): Selin LK, Lin MY, Kraemer KA, Pardoll DM, Schneck JP, Varga SM, et al. Attrition of T cell memory: selective loss of LCMV epitope-specific memory CD8 T cells following infections with heterologous viruses. Immunity 1999;11(6): Celada F, 2005, Personal Communication. Selin et al. [2] discovered that many serologically heterologous viruses are cross-reactive at the level of cellular responses. This is defined as Split cross-reactivity [3]. Running side-by-side H+C and C (Split) responses allowed us to dissect two zones of contrast affecting the cellular response. (a) The Tc strength recall at bit distance 0-3 suffers a competitive thwarting caused by the presence of the humoral response. The probable effector is antibody, as indicated by what-if experiments introducing virtual Ab half lifetime. (b) The Tc strength at bit distance 2-4 is thwarted and this is caused by the presence of cellular cross-reactive memory. (a) (b) (c) (d) Responses are increasing in clone average affinity (strength). The overlap of specificity in two randomly generated VM is illustrated in the figure below and is compatible with the consensus on private specificity. C C V C (A) (B)(C) C H C H H H H (a) (b)